Showing posts with label negro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label negro. Show all posts

Thursday, November 06, 2014

12196: Army Red-Faced Over Negro.

From The New York Times…

‘Negro’ is an acceptable term for black soldiers, U.S. Army says

Color it a confusing command update. One military official says using the word to describe ‘a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa’ might be for people who prefer to refer to themselves this way. But another calls it ‘the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.’

By Ginger Adams Otis | NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

What year is it again?

Army regulations still allow for black soldiers to be labeled Negro — a term that faded in the late 1960s.

The archaic policy was spelled out as recently as Oct. 22, when the Army issued an update to some of its command procedures. But the review failed to strike the term from its books.

Negro is an acceptable classification for “a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa,” according to section 6-2 of the Army’s AR 600–20 regulations.

The same clause — part of the Army’s equal opportunity policy — also gives the OK to use “Haitian” in addition to the more common black or African-American.

The Army said it didn’t know how long the paragraph had been in its directives. It could stretch back decades.

A spokesman said Wednesday that a change was already in the works.

“The racial definitions in AR600-20 … are outdated, currently under review, and will be updated shortly,” Lt. Col. Alayne Conway said.

“The Army takes pride in sustaining a culture where all personnel are treated with dignity and respect and not discriminated against based on race, color, religion, gender and national origin,” Conway added.

The Army regulation sparked outrage on Twitter.

“Sigh … Because what could go wrong?” asked a user identified as Matthew Evanisko, in response to a headline that said the Army was “OK” calling black soldiers Negroes.

“Say what!? One GIANT step backwards for mankind,” tweeted an outraged Fee Khan.

“We said turn clocks back an hr. Not a century,” added Kay Dogon.

South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, a black Republican, said Wednesday he plans to ask the Army about the policy.

An official familiar with the AR600-20 told CNN that “Negro” might still be included for blacks who wished to identify themselves that way. But a second military officer said acknowledging the term was “the dumbest thing I have ever heard,” according to CNN.

Negro was not a classification used in any of the data collected by Pentagon officials for military and personnel purposes, the initial source said.

One ex-soldier who served for 21 years and saw combat in Vietnam said he was classified as a “Negro” when he joined the Army as a teen in 1954.

“Didn’t bother me then, doesn’t bother me now. I wasn’t always treated with respect, but you got to look forward, not back, and you can’t pay ignorance any mind,” Bishop Leon McClain, a member of the National Association for Black Veterans, told the Daily News.

“If Martin Luther King associated himself with the Negro race, it’s all right with me,” he added. “But we’re not going back to working in any cotton fields, I can tell you that.”

While Martin Luther King Jr. used the term in his famous “I Have a Dream” speech in 1963, the term was generally phased out of everyday language and most official documents during the 1960s and the civil rights movement.

Still, the U.S. Census Bureau keeps the word “Negro” on its forms, alongside black and African-American. Census officials said some older black Americans still self-identify with the term.

About 21% of active-duty members of the Army are black, according to Defense Power Research.

Wednesday, August 08, 2012

10399: Adios, Negro…?

From The Los Angeles Times…

Census Bureau considers changes to race, ethnicity questions

The U.S. Census Bureau is considering changes in questions it asks Americans about race, in an effort to keep up with evolving perceptions about race and identity.

The bureau released recommendations Wednesday in which it suggested dropping use of the term “Negro” on its questionnaires and counting Hispanics as a single category, regardless of race. The census now defines Hispanic as an ethnicity, not a race, and respondents who say they are of Hispanic origin are also asked to identify their race.

The recommendations were based on research conducted through experimental questions asked of 500,000 households during the 2010 census. The findings showed that many Americans believe the current categories don’t always jibe with their own views of their identity and have led to confusion.

For example, asked to state their race on the 2010 census, more than 19 million people, including millions of Hispanics, chose “some other race,” rather than select from the five offered categories: white, black, Asian, American Indian or Hawaiian/Pacific Islander.

One change proposed by the Census Bureau would simply ask respondents to choose their race or origin and allow them to check a single box next to categories that would include white, black or Hispanic. Another would end the bureau’s use of the controversial term “Negro” as an alternative for black or African American. And a third would add write-in categories to allow those of Middle Eastern or Arab origin to specifically identify themselves, officials said.

Nicholas Jones, chief of the Census Bureau’s racial statistics branch, said the research findings were the first step in a process leading to possible changes for the 2020 census.

Changes to census questions must be approved by Congress.