Showing posts with label whites. Show all posts
Showing posts with label whites. Show all posts

Sunday, December 12, 2021

15637: Beauty Standards Create A Substandard Concept.

 

This campaign from Armenia is explained as follows:

 

Beauty standards dictate that asymmetric features, big noses, facial hair, stretch marks, body folds, uneven skin, and essentially anything out of the standard, are ugly. But in reality, it’s the beauty standards that are ugly—they are ugly because they artificially create ugliness. Everything we consider ugly in our appearance is only ugly because the beauty standards say so.

 

Why weren’t any people of color integrated into the campaign? Never mind—the exclusion reflects yet another ugly standard.

 









Thursday, October 30, 2014

12174: Wondering About Whiteness.

In his recent USA TODAY interview, Silicon Valley Pioneer Ken Coleman wondered, “The real question is, what might I have done or been if I had been White?” Madison Avenue Pioneer Roy Eaton was told at his first interview, “If you were White, I’d hire you immediately.”

Another question to consider: “What if all of Coleman’s and/or Eaton’s White peers had been Black (or held to the standards placed upon Blacks)?” Imagine how some of the Whites might have fared if they had been restricted, scrutinized and judged—and expected to perform at the same ultra-extraordinary levels as Black executives of the times.

Stereotypical gripes surrounding diversity include the concern that hiring minorities would lessen the quality of the overall workforce. This belief is pure bullshit. Eaton, for example, was far more than a jingle writer—he was a renowned, classically trained composer and musician. His mother inspired him with the notion of doing 200% to get credit for 100%. If White candidates had been required to match Eaton’s credentials and qualifications—and consistently deliver 200% for 100% credit—just think of how high the quality of the overall workforce would have risen.

Perhaps the question should simply be, “What might I have done or been if I had not faced institutionalized discrimination and racism from Whites?”

Friday, August 23, 2013

11380: Equality In Black & White.

From The Los Angeles Times…

Have we achieved racial equality? Whites say yes, blacks say no

Studies show vast racial gap in how Americans gauge unfair treatment of blacks on the job, by police, in school and in other everyday situations.

By Emily Alpert

Half a century after Martin Luther King Jr. declared his famous dream, white Americans think his vision is much closer to reality than blacks do, a new survey from the Pew Research Center shows.

The findings underscore an enduring chasm between how white and black Americans perceive racism and its continued effects, as glaring gaps persist between whites and blacks in wealth, education and imprisonment.

Black Americans were nearly twice as likely as white ones — 79% versus 44% — to say that the U.S. had a long way to go before reaching racial equality, Pew found in a survey released Thursday. Nearly half of whites said the country had made a lot of progress toward that dream, while less than a third of blacks agreed.

And as blacks lament ongoing mistreatment, whites were much less likely to believe that blacks continue to be treated unfairly in courtrooms, classrooms or other common situations.

Whites may believe racism is gone because “the hideous things that have happened in our history” — such as lynchings or cross burnings — “have tended to disappear,” said Jerome Rabow, professor emeritus of sociology at UCLA. But “when blacks talk about how they’re doing, it’s more about their daily lives.”

Whites often miss those everyday frustrations, such as frequently being pulled over by police, Rabow said. Seventy percent of blacks surveyed said that in their community, police treated blacks less fairly than whites. Only 37% of whites agreed.

More than half of blacks surveyed said blacks were treated unfairly at work, compared to only 16% of whites who thought so. Hispanics fell somewhere in between whites and blacks on those and similar questions.

Other studies also show vast differences in how blacks and whites gauge racism: Earlier this summer, 74% of whites told Gallup that blacks in their community had an equal shot at jobs, while only 40% of blacks agreed. Whites also held much sunnier views about blacks’ chances at housing and a good education.

In the new millennium, “whites became more convinced that racism wasn’t a problem,” University of Chicago political science professor Michael Dawson said. “And blacks became more convinced that racial problems are not being solved.”

National polls recently revealed whites and blacks starkly split over whether the George Zimmerman case was tied to race. And last year, Loyola Marymount University researchers found that whites in Los Angeles were more upbeat than blacks about how Angelenos of different races were getting along.

Whites may see blacks alongside them at a Lakers game, but “you’re not around when the African American person goes to get a job and is offered thousands of dollars less,” said Marqueece Harris-Dawson, president of the Community Coalition in South Los Angeles.

Some scholars argue whites have grown increasingly blind to the disadvantages faced by blacks. One year after President Barack Obama was elected to his first term, a Harvard University study found 61% of whites said blacks had achieved racial equality, compared to 43% of whites who answered another survey nine years earlier.

More than half of whites thought blacks, on average, were doing as well or better than whites financially, Pew found in the new poll. Yet two years ago, the median white household had an income of $67,175, compared to $39,670 for black households. Wealth in white households, or assets minus liabilities, dwarfed that of black ones even more — $91,405 versus $6,446.

High school completion rates have drawn closer between black and white Americans, but blacks are still less likely than whites to have college degrees. And as of three years ago, black men were more than six times as likely as white men to be incarcerated, a gap that has widened since 1960.

Many experts argue that “structural racism” — advantages and disadvantages that perpetuate themselves even without people choosing to discriminate — plays a big part in continued inequality. For instance, even if companies don’t try to avoid hiring blacks, blacks may be less likely to get the best jobs because many get filled through word-of-mouth. That gives an edge to those who live and socialize with people already working lucrative jobs, who remain disproportionately white.

But whites have pulled away from such ideas: Over recent decades, fewer agreed on national surveys that slavery and discrimination had created conditions that made it hard for blacks to advance, University of Illinois at Chicago sociology professor Maria Krysan found. Instead, more chalk up inequalities to differences in culture, blaming those who aren’t succeeding, she said.

Pew found young whites were more likely than older ones to say blacks were treated unfairly. Yet in another study, based on the national Monitoring the Future survey, Emory University sociologist Tyrone Forman found young whites were increasingly likely to say they were indifferent to racial matters. Between 1976 and 2011, the percentage of young whites who said they never worried about race relations nearly tripled.

The problem is that “a lot of these biases have gone underground but have not disappeared,” Forman said. “And that’s what is powerful and dangerous about racial apathy. We are all still looking for the smoking gun,” such as Paula Deen using racial slurs — instead of more subtle discrimination, he said.

Whites have steered away from plainly bigoted ideas, such as whites being more intelligent than blacks, on national surveys over time. Pew found blacks and whites largely agree that they get along well. However, newer “implicit” tests show Americans tend to have more trouble matching positive words to black faces, suggesting that unspoken bias persists.

Monday, September 03, 2012

10477: Reuniting With Segregation.

From The New York Daily News…

La. high school alumni send out reunion invite with ‘white graduates only’ party

Party organizers insist homecoming after-party was meant to break tradition and include everyone. Graduates of school say there’s been an ongoing issue with segregation.

By Erik Ortiz / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Louisiana high school grads wanted to break from tradition this year and hold a homecoming after-party for members of the Class of 1973 that wasn’t segregated based on race.

But instead of coming together at St. Martinville Senior High School in St. Martinville, the invitation inadvertently mentioned the event was for “white graduates only” — a shocking display of 21st century divide.

“This year, 2012, was going to be the first year that we were going to integrate it,” Liza Chance, one of the organizers, told ABC affiliate KATC in Lafayette.

“I don’t understand why this went the way it did,” she added.

According to ABC News, someone sent out the invite based on last year’s wording without changing it to include everyone.

The letter runs down the events for Sept. 21: A 5:30 p.m. reception; the 7 p.m. homecoming football game; and an “after game get together: (white graduates only).”

“Bring your own refreshments and food dish (to share),” the invite adds.

The letter also mentions a party the next evening for “all graduates” of the Class of ‘73.

Michael Kreamer, principal of St. Martinville Senior High School, said he began receiving calls about the letter Friday, but told KATC the school was not involved with the invite.

“I’m just a little disappointed that something like this comes up,” he said. “I don’t think that it looks good for the school but … it has nothing to do with St. Martinville Senior High. So I hope people don’t take that the wrong way.”

Facebook users described how the high school has had segregated activities in the past, but younger generations have been trying to change that.

“If you are not from this area, most people do not understand the segregation that took place and is still taking place,” wrote a Facebook user saying she graduated in 2001, “however we have to look at the positive in this reunion, they want to come together as one.”

Saturday, June 23, 2012

10238: Talking Shit About Mitt.

The New York Daily News reported Politico White House correspondent Joe Williams was suspended for suggesting Mitt Romney is only comfortable around White people. Actually, it appears Romney is only comfortable around non-humans and automatons.

Politico suspends reporter, Joe Williams, for saying Mitt Romney is ‘comfortable’ with ‘white folks’

White House reporter related Republican presidential candidate to hosts of ‘Fox and Friends,’ whom he characterized as ‘white folks who are very much relaxed in their own company.’

By Brian Browdie / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

A political news website has suspended its White House reporter after he made comments suggesting Mitt Romney is only comfortable around white people.

Editors at Politico are reviewing remarks by Joseph Williams on Thursday they say call into question the veteran correspondent’s obligation to cover politics fairly.

“Romney is very, very comfortable, it seems, with people who are like him,” Williams told MSNBC’s Martin Bashir, in an appearance later flagged by The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website. “That’s one of the reasons why he seems so stiff and awkward in some town hall settings, why he can’t relate to people other than that.”

“But when he comes on ‘Fox and Friends,’ they’re like him, they’re white folks who are very much relaxed in their own company,” Williams added.

Williams also has zinged the presumptive GOP presidential nominee for his wealth and more in a series of tweets compiled by Breitbart.com.

“Either Ann Romney meant Mitt is flaccid or that when we ‘unzip him’ we’ll find he’s a d—k,” Williams tweeted after Romney’s wife told an interviewer in April her husband’s campaign “better unzip him and let the real Mitt Romney out” if people thought he lacked a sense of humor.

“Politico journalists have a clear and inflexible responsibility to cover politics fairly and free of partisan bias,” editors John Harris and Jim VandeHei reportedly wrote in a memo to the website’s staff. “Regrettably, an unacceptable number of Joe Williams’ public statements on cable and Twitter have called into question his commitment to this responsibility.”

Before joining Politico, Williams was deputy chief of The Boston Globe’s Washington bureau, where he covered the 2008 presidential campaign and 2009 inauguration.

“I regret that this happened,” Williams wrote in an email to Politico on Friday. Though Williams charged a “small group with Internet access and an ambitious agenda” with distorting analysis of political news, “it’s quite unfortunate and incredibly frustrating, however, that I landed in the crosshairs this time, calling Politico’s integrity into question and jeopardizing a job and a career that I love.”

Thursday, August 25, 2011

9218: The Future Role Of White Admen.


At The Big Tent, marketing expert David Burgos wrote a column titled, “What Will the Role of Whites Be in a Multicultural America?” Dunno what the correct answer might be on that question. But based on the advertising industry’s historic failure with diversity, the role of Whites on Madison Avenue in a multicultural America will remain completely unchanged.

Friday, December 10, 2010

8247: The Low Cost Of Blackness.


From The Ohio State University Research News…

WHITES UNDERESTIMATE THE COSTS OF BEING BLACK, STUDY FINDS

COLUMBUS, Ohio – How much do white Americans think it “costs” to be black in our society, given the problems associated with racial bias and prejudice?

The answer, it appears, is not much.

When white Americans were asked to imagine how much they would have to be paid to live the rest of their lives as a black person, most requested relatively low amounts, generally less than $10,000.

In contrast, study participants said they would have to be paid about $1 million to give up television for the rest of their lives.

The results suggest most white Americans don't truly comprehend the persisting racial disparities in our country, said Philip Mazzocco, co-author of the study and assistant professor of psychology at Ohio State University's Mansfield campus.

“The costs of being black in our society are very well documented,” Mazzocco said. “Blacks have significantly lower income and wealth, higher levels of poverty, and even shorter life spans, among many other disparities, compared to whites.”

For example, white households average about $150,000 more wealth than the typical black family. Overall, total wealth for white families is about five times greater than that of black families, a gap that has persisted for years.

“When whites say they would need $1 million to give up TV, but less than $10,000 to become black, that suggests they don't really understand the extent to which African Americans, as a group, are disadvantaged,” Mazzocco said.

These results also offer insight as to why more than 9 out of 10 white Americans reject proposals to give reparations to the descendants of slaves, said study co-author Mahzarin Banaji, the Cabot Professor of Social Ethics at Harvard University.

“Our data suggest that such resistance is not because white Americans are mean and uncaring, morally bankrupt, or ethically flawed,” Banaji said.

“White Americans suffer from a glaring ignorance about what it means to live as a black American.”

Read the full story here.