Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts

Monday, July 27, 2026

17549: On The Political Fallout Of Bad-Boy Behavior, Blatant Bias, And Bashing Bud Light.

 

At the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, President Donald J. Trump delivered a disturbing monologue that included comparing CNN News Anchor Kaitlan Collins to transgender actor and influencer Dylan Mulvaney, making repeated references to the latter’s infamous Bud Light promotion.

Trump later shared the social media post depicted above, extending the crass comedy routine.

Now, Trump and his sycophantic supporters continue to position the Commander-in-Chief as a famously successful businessman. Yet would any executive—even in a White advertising agency—be allowed to present such words, visuals, and actions without consequence today? Behavior like this typically results in immediate reprimand, rejection, and termination.

Sorry, Trump is a thoroughly outdated businessman, representing cartoonish characteristics of the Mad Men era.

POTUS proudly declared, “We ended DEI in America!” Despite the vehement denials, it appears the man also resurrected, reinvigorated, and reinvented racism.

What’s more, will Trump’s latest antics reignite the political protesting, bashing, and boycotting for Bud Light?

The entire spectacle catapults Trump to probably repeat his White Man Of The Year honor.

Sunday, June 14, 2026

17507: On Elephants In The Room At BP.

This BP employee training video empowers people to speak up against disrespectful and/or abusive behavior in the workplace.

 

Okay, but based on historical accusations, maybe the visual metaphor should’ve been a White elephant in the room.




Friday, June 05, 2026

17498: Can’t Beat The Real Exclusivity.

Advertising Age reported The Coca-Cola Company is launching a global review for media, data, and technology, staging a France vs UK battle royale between Publicis Groupe and WPP.

 

The scenario underscores how serving global brands are closed affairs, exclusive privileges available only to a handful of White holding companies and a single White operating company.

 

In the US, Coca-Cola has a history of intentionally excluding Blacks from its marketing efforts.

 

Looks like the colorless campaign continues. Let them eat—and drink—crumbs.

 

Coca-Cola media, data and tech agency review pits WPP against Publicis

 

By E.J. Schultz, Brian Bonilla, and Ewan Larkin

 

Coca-Cola Co. will conduct a global agency review for media, data and technology needs, setting up a shootout between Publicis Groupe and WPP, the beverage giant confirmed.

 

The rival holding companies will compete for the business in Coca-Cola’s top global markets, excluding North America, where Publicis is the incumbent, and Japan and Korea, where it works with Dentsu, Coca-Cola confirmed to Ad Age. Mediasense will handle the review, which will begin in July with a decision expected in the fall.

 

The review is driven by Coca-Cola’s desire to evolve “its digital-first marketing operating system for future growth. This includes a shift in mindset from traditional media planning to the emerging ways we need to reach consumers through technology, including agentic tools,” the company stated.

 

Coca-Cola Co. reported $5.4 billion in ad expenses in 2025, up from $5.1 billion in 2024. Coca-Cola was the 19th-largest advertiser in the world and the 27th-largest advertiser in the U.S. based on 2024 spending, according to Ad Age Datacenter.

 

The review comes nearly five years after Coca-Cola hired WPP for creative, media, data and marketing technology across its 200 or so brands, setting up a bespoke unit called Open X. WPP in early 2025 lost its grip on a significant chunk of that business when Coca-Cola Co. hired Publicis Groupe for its North America media account. Now Publicis has an opportunity to significantly expand its remit with Coca-Cola, potentially at WPP’s expense. Publicis finished a close second during the 2021 review, but at that time, Manolo Arroyo, Coca-Cola’s global chief marketing officer, said WPP’s global reach tipped the scales in its favor.

 

The new review “coincides with a contract renewal cycle following the start of our five-year partnership with WPP Open X, which has helped to modernize our marketing approach and deliver significant business value,” Coke stated, adding that “global creative and PR disciplines are not in scope of this review and will remain with WPP Open X.”

 

“We are proud to serve as The Coca-Cola Company’s global network partner,” WPP shared in a statement. “The upcoming five-year contract renewal process coincides with Coca-Cola’s Next Chapter initiative, and we will continue to transform our capabilities in lockstep with them. We welcome the opportunity to showcase how our integrated media, data science, and agentic technology platform and solutions will continue to drive future growth across their key global markets.”

 

Publicis didn’t return requests for comment.

 

WPP has been building some much-needed momentum in the pitch room, with WPP Media raking in $1.5 billion in new client billings during the first quarter, according to COMvergence. There is, however, a lot riding on the Coca-Cola account. Marketing consultants previously told Ad Age that any further losses or missteps with the beverage giant could signal deeper systemic issues within WPP.

 

It is the latest test for Cindy Rose on the eve of her first time at the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity as WPP’s CEO.

 

Open X has seen leadership changes since losing the North America media account. When Laurent Ezekiel moved from Open X CEO to take the top post at Ogilvy in September, WPP handed the reins of the bespoke team to Floriane Tripolino, previously WPP’s client lead for NestlĂ© and a former Publicis executive, with Ezekiel staying on as executive sponsor.

 

In September, Ezekiel told Ad Age the Open X model was going “very well.” At the same time, Devika Bulchandani, WPP’s chief operating officer, made clear that WPP intended to reclaim Coca-Cola’s North America media account.

 

In April, Coca-Cola reported a 12% jump in first-quarter net revenue, to $12.5 billion. The company in part credited efforts to execute “locally relevant marketing at scale to drive enduring brand value,” citing programs such as an AI‑enabled campaign in China inspired by traditional Chinese paper art. WPP’s EssenceMediacom cited the effort on its website, suggesting it led to 8% year-over-year sales growth.

 

Coca-Cola, in recent years, has shifted much of its advertising to targeted digital channels and stepped back from big tentpole events such as the Super Bowl. However, it still spends big on the World Cup and Olympics.

Sunday, May 10, 2026

17470: On Deep-Seated Racism.

 

This campaign for Brazilian Men’s Football Team Corinthians—titled “Racists Have No Seat Here”—was produced by End to End and AREA 23 in Brazil. The concept is explained as follows:

 

After Palmeiras goalkeeper Carlos Miguel was racially abused during a match at Corinthians’ Neo QuĂ­mica Arena—and the individual responsible could not be identified—the club made an indefinite, visible intervention: it removed the seat from the section where the incident took place. In its place is a message reading, “Here, racism has no place. And never will,” along with a QR code that directs fans to educational resources on how to identify, document and report racist behavior during matches. The idea is simple, but hard to ignore: if racism cannot be allowed a place in the stadium, then the seat itself had to go. The empty space becomes the message.

 

The campaign, created with Corinthians and End to End, was developed with AREA 23’s creative leadership and is designed as both a symbolic act and a practical reporting tool turning an unidentified act of hate into a reminder of collective responsibility.

 

To call the tactic “a practical reporting tool” is ludicrous. After all, how many stadium visitors or sports fans might even be aware of the campaign, let alone see the missing seat message?

 

And why would a healthcare agency be involved in such an endeavor, except with the self-absorbed intention to submit the work for awards?

 

If the true objective is communicating people have a responsibility to report acts of hate against racial and ethnic minorities, start by calling out the systemic racism prevalent at AREA 23 and its new parent Omnicom.



Saturday, February 07, 2026

17344: BHM 2026—President Donald J. Trump.

USA TODAY reported on an unintended Black History Month promotion from President Donald J. Trump, who continues to angle for a repeat White Man Of The Year honor.

 

‘I didn’t make a mistake’ Trump says of post depicting Obamas as apes

 

“I look at a lot of, thousands, of things,” Trump said of the video. “And I looked at the beginning of it, it was fine.”

 

By Zac Anderson, USA TODAY

 

President Donald Trump declined to apologize for sharing a video depicting former President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama as apes, telling reporters “I didn’t make a mistake.”

 

Trump told reporters while traveling on Air Force One to Florida on Feb. 6 that he only looked at the beginning of the roughly one-minute long video, which starts off talking about unsubstantiated voter fraud claims regarding the 2020 election, and didn’t see the portion with the Obamas that has been widely condemned as racist.

 

“I just looked at the first part... I didn’t see the whole thing,” Trump said, indicating he gave it to someone else to post and “somebody slipped and missed a very small part.”

 

“I guess probably nobody reviewed the end of it,” Trump said.

 

Asked about calls from GOP lawmakers for him to apologize, Trump said he didn’t plan to. He later said “of course I do” when asked if he condemned the racist part of the video.

 

The brief portion of the video with the Obamas appears to have been created by artificial intelligence. It depicts the bodies of two apes with the faces of the former president and first lady. Apes are flying around in the background of what appears to be a jungle.

 

The video was among dozens of posts on Trump’s Truth Social account in the late hours of Feb. 5 and early hours of Feb. 6. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt initially defended the Obama post, saying it was “from an internet meme video depicting President Trump as the King of the Jungle and Democrats as characters from the Lion King.”

 

“Please stop the fake outrage,” Leavitt added.

 

The White House later distanced the president from the video amid growing criticism, including from many top Republicans. A White House official said the video had been shared erroneously by an unnamed member of Trump’s staff. It was removed from Trump’s Truth Social account after being up for about 12 hours.

 

The video drew a strong response from Republican lawmakers, who often are reluctant to criticize the leader of their party.

 

Sen. Tim Scott, a close Trump ally and prominent Black Republican from South Carolina who is leading the Senate’s campaign efforts this year, wrote he was “praying it was fake because it’s the most racist thing I’ve seen out of this White House.”

 

Sen. John Curtis, R-Utah, called the post “blatantly racist and inexcusable.” Sen. Pete Ricketts, R-Nebraska, said a “reasonable person” would deem the video “racist” and called for Trump to apologize. Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Mississippi, called the video “totally unacceptable” and also said an apology is in order.

 

Trump said he is the “least racist president you’ve had in a long time” and that “I’ve been great” for Black voters, pointing to criminal justice reform and other policies.

 

The president earlier this year was accused of racism by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries for sharing a controversial deepfake video of the lawmaker wearing a sombrero hat with mariachi music playing.

 

Jeffries again slammed Trump as a racist after the video post depicting the Obamas as apes.

 

“This guy is an unhinged bottom feeder,” Jeffries said in a video posted on social media

 

Contributing: Joey Garrison, Melina Khan 

Saturday, January 10, 2026

17310: Roll Out The Cracker Barrel Again.

The Sun reported Cracker Barrel returned two popular menu items after customer backlash.

 

Wonder if the restaurant chain will bring back discrimination and racism too.

 

GOING CRACKERS Cracker Barrel makes menu U-turn after loathed update & bosses make admission after backlash

 

The company has faced mounting criticism in recent weeks over proposed changes

 

By Will Miller

 

CRACKER Barrel has announced the return of two longtime menu favourites after fierce customer backlash.

 

The returning dishes are the Hamburger Steak and Eggs in the Basket.

 

These much-loved items are described as classics that embody the kind of hearty, familiar fare Cracker Barrel has served for generations.

 

“Winter calls for comfort and connection, and nothing delivers that better than the classics,” said Thomas Yun, Cracker Barrel’s vice president of menu strategy and innovation.

 

He added the decision to revive the dishes was a no-brainer.

 

“Not only are they timeless favourites with deep roots on our menu, but they’re also among the most requested dishes from our guests.”

 

Hamburger Steak has been a staple at Cracker Barrel since the chain first opened its doors in 1969.

 

The dish features seasoned beef topped with a rich, buttery garlic sauce and is served with a choice of two or three traditional sides.

 

Eggs in the Basket, meanwhile, is billed as a nostalgic breakfast favourite.

 

The meal consists of two slices of golden-grilled sourdough bread with an egg cooked in the centre, served alongside bacon or sausage and one classic side.

 

The renewed emphasis on tradition marks a shift in tone for the Tennessee-based chain, which has faced criticism in recent months for appearing to move away from the very heritage it is known for.

 

In August, Cracker Barrel sparked backlash after unveiling a new logo design that replaced its iconic “Old Timer” image with a simplified, modern look.

 

The change came as part of broader plans to modernise the chain’s restaurants with brighter, more contemporary decor and an updated menu.

 

After more than a week of mounting controversy, the company changed its mind – restoring the old logo and putting its modernisation efforts and menu changes on ice.

 

Still, some customers say Cracker Barrel has continued to drift from tradition.

 

On New Year’s Day, the chain broke its tradition of offering of offering black-eyed peas to mark the holiday.

 

For generations, the food has been a traditional New Year’s day dish.

 

The company has also faced internal changes.

 

In December, CEO Julie Felss Masino confirmed that members of its corporate staff would be laid off.

 

“While this will be understandably difficult for some of our corporate team members, it is necessary to successfully navigate the current headwinds,” Masino said.

 

Cracker Barrel said the layoffs will be implemented in two phases, including some recent restructurings, as part of an effort to streamline kitchen operations and reduce costs.

 

Against that backdrop, the return of familiar comfort dishes may signal an attempt to reconnect with the identity that made Cracker Barrel a household name in the first place.

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

17299: We Heart WeLoveUs.shop

Digiday published a report on Essence launching WeLoveUs.shop, an online marketplace dedicated to Black women-led brands.

 

The content is definitely worth reading, as it underscores how everything from Target to Trump Tariffs have contributed and conspired to accelerate the employment challenges impacting US Black women.

 

Media giant Essence launches a marketplace for Black women-led brands

 

By Allison Smith

 

The story was first published by Digiday sibling ModernRetail

 

When LaToya Stirrup’s brand Kazmaleje first landed on Target’s shelves in 2022, it felt like a dream come true. The Miami-based founder had spent years building her hair-tool brand — which she launched in 2019 — and securing placement at a national big-box retailer gave her scale and visibility that would’ve been harder to achieve on her own.

 

At the time, Target touted its wholesale partnership with Kazmeleje, along with 20 other Black-owned or founded beauty brands, as part of a broader commitment to spend more than $2 billion with Black-led businesses by 2025. Target said the initiative “will help us create more equitable experiences for our Black guests, and use our company’s size, scale and resources to create economic opportunity for Black-owned businesses that extends outside of Target.”

 

But earlier this year, Stirrup noticed “a complete sales slowdown” at TargetShe attributed it to consumers who had stopped shopping at the retailer because of the company’s DEI rollbackAfter Target announced it would scale back some of its diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in January, calls to stop shopping at the retailer spread. Modern Retail reported in August that many once-loyal Target shoppers were still boycotting the retailer because of its DEI rollback.

 

As a result of declining sales — Stirrup declined to share exact figures — Target decided to remove Kazmaleje’s products from its physical stores, she said. Beginning in 2026, she said the brand will be sold online-only at Target, via Target.com. Target declined to comment.

 

Stirrup is one of dozens of Black women founders navigating a particularly challenging moment for small businesses. Corporate rollbacks of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, including at major retailers like Target, have created new uncertainty around distribution, visibility and consumer demand for Black-owned brands. At the same time, President Donald Trump’s trade war has driven up costs through steep tariffs on top trading partners, squeezing margins for founders who rely on overseas manufacturing.

 

Against that backdrop, Essence has launched WeLoveUs.shop, a new online marketplace dedicated to Black women-led brands. The platform, which officially launched earlier this month, aims to give founders an alternative sales channel at a moment when the larger retail industry has become more volatile. WeLoveUs.shop currently features about 100 brands and 1,000 products across categories like beauty, wellness, fashion and home, with more than 400 additional brands expressing interest in joining future cohorts, according to Essence.

 

The idea for WeLoveUs.shop crystallized earlier this year as the toll on Black women in business became increasingly clear, Michele Ghee, Essence’s chief content officer, told Modern Retail. Since February, nearly 600,000 Black women have been sidelined by job losses and unemployment, according to Fortune. That reality, combined with rising costs from tariffs and shrinking opportunities tied to DEI rollbacks, made the launch of WeLoveUs.shop feel urgent. It was “all hands on deck” to get the marketplace up and running as quickly as possible, with key executives and stakeholders even working over Thanksgiving. The site quietly launched in beta just after Thanksgiving, before a wider public rollout around Cyber Monday.

 

“We know so many businesses are hurting right now,” said Ghee. “Nobody is immune to what is happening in the world today, especially for marginalized communities.”

 

For Stirrup, the consumer backlash against Target made it harder for her to promote Kazmaleje’s products at the retailer. “There was a lot of pushback, especially on social media, and you couldn’t really talk about being in [Target],” she said. “That limits you from being able to advertise, because we were getting the response of, ‘We’re not shopping there.’”

 

On an earnings call in May, Target CEO Brian Cornell said the company’s first-quarter performance was dented by several factors, including “the reaction to the updates we shared on belonging in January.” He also flagged tariff uncertainty and declining consumer confidence as other headwinds. He added, “While we believe each of these factors played a role in our first quarter performance, we can’t reliably estimate the impact of each one separately.”

 

The boycott against Target underscored the risk of relying too heavily on any one channel, making WeLoveUs.shop an attractive opportunity. “You really have to have a diverse revenue stream because you never know how the market will impact you,” she said.

 

This year has also been tough for small business owners because of tariffs, which have raised costs for founders importing materials or finished goods. For Brittny Horne, founder of RVL Wellness Co., tariffs have significantly constrained growth. RVL makes therapeutic jigsaw puzzles, and the brand’s products are entirely manufactured in China, one of the most heavily tariffed countries.

 

Tariffs “definitely slowed down our production of new products,” Horne said. “It’s just one of those things — another issue we have to try to navigate and figure out a solution.”

 

Horne said she explored moving production to the U.S., but quickly ran into cost barriers. “It’s way more expensive to manufacture in the U.S., especially unless you are ordering at least 5,000 units per SKU,” she said. With 11 SKUs in her lineup, she said, “There’s no way we could afford that much at this time.”

 

The uncertainty has forced her to rethink where and how RVL can grow. “It just kind of makes you now have to rethink, ‘OK, well, what do we look forward to next?’” she said. “‘Where’s a safe space for us to go?’”

 

That led to Horne’s decision to join WeLoveUs.shop, which has led to a “really big boost” in sales since the marketplace launched at the beginning of the month. Even though it’s only been a couple of weeks since the partnership began, the majority of RVL’s orders are now coming from WeLoveUs.shop, Horne said.

 

WeLoveUs.shop takes a 35% commission per transaction. That’s higher than what other marketplaces charge. Amazon, for example, takes a cut ranging from 8-15% per transaction, depending on the product category. But Amazon also charges sellers for other services, including advertising and fulfillment. In exchange for WeLoveUs.shop’s 35% commission rate, brands gain access not just to Essence’s audience but also to its full media ecosystem, including editorial coverage, social promotion, newsletters and PR support. Other brands that spoke to Modern Retail for this story said WeLoveUs.shop’s bi-weekly payouts were also more appealing than the 90- to 120-day payment cycles common in wholesale and consignment arrangements.

 

WeLoveUs.shop is gaining traction on social media, according to Essence’s Ghee, who said Essence has leaned heavily on its existing audience and distribution muscle to promote the marketplace. Essence reaches about 75 million touchpoints each month across its digital platforms, she said, and has been using a mix of curated gift guides, newsletters and social posts to drive attention to the new shop. One recent gift guide featuring products priced under $50 generated about 10,000 impressions within the first few days, Ghee said. In another example, a social post encouraging followers to “tag a Black business” was shared roughly 5,000 times in a similarly short period.

 

“For [Essence] to be able to put their media power behind more Black-owned brands at a time of great need, when small incomes are struggling, can really support them,” said Sky Canaves, a principal retail analyst at eMarketer.

 

Melissa Mitchell, a self-taught designer who sells accessories, apparel and home decor and more through her brand Abeille Creations, echoed that sentiment. “This year has been very up and down,” she said. “With this kind of partnership, this allows me to reach people that I probably would never have on my own.”

Friday, November 28, 2025

17265: Black Women Friday.

 

The Associated Press reported on the disproportionate unemployment challenges experienced by US Black women.

 

Can’t help but wonder how worse things are for all the Dawn Chambers in Adland, who have historically been underutilized, underpaid, and underrepresented—a situation compounded by the anti-DEIBA+ vibe impacting the industry and society at large.

 

 

As Black women face unemployment challenges, a roundtable of policymakers searches for solutions

 

By Matt Brown

 

In a packed room at library in a downtown Boston, Rep. Ayanna Pressley posed a blunt question: Why are Black women, who have some of the highest labor force participation rates in the country, now seeing their unemployment rise faster than most other groups?

The replies Monday from policymakers, academics, business owners and community organizers laid out how economic headwinds facing Black women may indicate a troubling shift for the economy at large.

 

The unemployment rate for Black women increased from 6.7% to 7.5% between August and September this year, the most recent month for available data because of the federal government shutdown.

 

That compares with a 3.2% to 3.4% increase for white women over the same period. And it extended a year-long trend of the Black women’s unemployment rate increasing at a time of broad economic uncertainty.

 

Many roundtable attendees view those numbers as both an affront and a warning about the uneven pressures on Black women.

 

“Everyone is missing out when we’re pushed out of the workforce,” said Pressley, a progressive Democrat. “That is something that I worry about now, that you have all these women with specific expertise and specializations that we’re being deprived of.”

 

And when Black women do have work, she said they tend to be “woefully underemployed.”

 

Black women had the highest labor force participation rate of any female demographic in 2024, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, yet their unemployment rate remains higher than other demographics of women.

 

Historically, their unemployment rate has trended slightly above the national average, widening during periods of slowed economic growth or recession. Black Americans are overrepresented in industries like retail, health and social services, and government administration, according to a 2024 Bureau of Labor Statistics Survey.

 

“Black women are at the center of the Venn diagram that is our society,” said Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman, a PhD candidate in public policy and economics at the Harvard Kennedy School.

 

She pointed to April as the month when Black women’s unemployment began to diverge more sharply from other groups. A policy agenda that ignores the causes, she said, could harm the broader economy.

 

Roundtable participants cited many long-standing structural inequities but attributed most of the latest divergence to recent federal actions. They blamed the Trump administration’s downsizing of the Minority Business Development Agency and the cancellation of some federal contracts with non-profits and small businesses, saying those actions disproportionately impacted Black women. Others said tariff policies and mass federal layoffs also contributed to the strain.

 

The administration’s opposition to diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives was repeatedly mentioned by participants as a cause for a more hostile environment for Black women to find employment, customers or government contracting.

 

There is no concrete data on how many Black federal workers were laid off, fired or otherwise dismissed as part of President Donald Trump’s sweeping cuts through the federal government.

 

The attendees discussed a wide range of potential solutions to the unemployment rate for Black women, including using state budgets to bolster business development for Black women, expanding microloans to different communities, increasing government resources for contracting, requiring greater transparency on corporate hiring practices and encouraging state and federal officials to enforce anti-discrimination policies.

 

“I feel like I was just at church,” said Ruthzee Louijeune, the Boston City Council president, as the meeting wrapped up. She encouraged attendees to keep up their efforts, and she defended DEI policies as essential to a healthy workforce and political system. Without broad-based efforts, the Democrat said, the country’s business and political leadership would be “abnormal” and weakened.

 

“Any space that does not look like our country and like our cities is not normal,” she said, “and not the city or country we are trying to build.”

Thursday, March 27, 2025

17015: Cannes Lions, Cannes Liars.

 

MediaPost reported Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity awarded the first ‘Creative Country Of The Year’ trophy to Brazil—a place notorious for scam ads, cultural cluelessness, and countrywide racism. It feels like Time ‘Person Of The Year’ going to Donald Trump.

 

Brazil Is Named Cannes Lions First ‘Creative Country Of The Year’

 

By Steve McClellan

 

The Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity has unveiled a new award — Creative Country Of The Year — and the first recipient is Brazil, which will be honored at the festival in June. 

 

The organization said that the annual accolade recognizes a country’s consistent success at the Festival as well as “a country’s exceptional and enduring commitment to creativity that drives progress and growth.”

 

As part of that recognition this year, the 2025 Festival will feature Brazilian creative showcases, celebratory events, dedicated stage talks and Brazilian-led activations across the City of Cannes, including the return of FilmBrazil, which will host a networking event.

 

Sponsoring this year’s award is Brazilian daily newspaper EstadĂŁo, a long-time supporter of the Festival and which celebrates its 150th anniversary this year.  

 

Brazil won its first Lions at the 1971 Festival, collecting two Bronze Lions for Cinema and a Silver Lion for Television. In 1975 it brought home its first Gold Lions, and in 1993 it was awarded its first Grand Prix for ‘The Guarana Diet Campaign’ by Dm9 Publicidade for Guarana Antarctica. Since then, it has gone on to win 1911 Lions, 20 of which have been Grands Prix. 
 
In 1972, Alex Perissinoto served as the first Brazilian Juror, and Christina Carvalho Pinto, the first woman to lead a multinational communication corporation in Latin America — the Young & Rubicam Group — served as the first female Juror from Brazil in 1990. To date, more than 400 Brazilians have served on Cannes Lions Juries. Brazil’s Marcello Serpa brought home Latin America’s first Grand Prix and was honored with the prestigious Lion of St Mark in 2016. 
 
Washington Olivetto, who died last year, was known as the ‘Godfather of Brazilian Advertising’ and winner of Brazil’s first Gold Lion and more than 50 Lions across his career. A special tribute will be made to him at the Festival.