Showing posts with label donald trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label donald trump. Show all posts

Monday, July 27, 2026

17549: On The Political Fallout Of Bad-Boy Behavior, Blatant Bias, And Bashing Bud Light.

 

At the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, President Donald J. Trump delivered a disturbing monologue that included comparing CNN News Anchor Kaitlan Collins to transgender actor and influencer Dylan Mulvaney, making repeated references to the latter’s infamous Bud Light promotion.

Trump later shared the social media post depicted above, extending the crass comedy routine.

Now, Trump and his sycophantic supporters continue to position the Commander-in-Chief as a famously successful businessman. Yet would any executive—even in a White advertising agency—be allowed to present such words, visuals, and actions without consequence today? Behavior like this typically results in immediate reprimand, rejection, and termination.

Sorry, Trump is a thoroughly outdated businessman, representing cartoonish characteristics of the Mad Men era.

POTUS proudly declared, “We ended DEI in America!” Despite the vehement denials, it appears the man also resurrected, reinvigorated, and reinvented racism.

What’s more, will Trump’s latest antics reignite the political protesting, bashing, and boycotting for Bud Light?

The entire spectacle catapults Trump to probably repeat his White Man Of The Year honor.

Thursday, May 28, 2026

17490: US Navy RFP WTF BS.

 

MediaPost reported the US Navy issued an RFP, launching a mission to identify its next White advertising agency.

 

Given President Donald J. Trump’s administration opposes DEIBA+—and Trump declared, “We ended DEI in America!”—will non-White advertising agencies play any role in the account review?

 

At least non-White advertising agencies might be relieved of facing the indignities associated with Prime Redlining and crumbs.

 

Expect competing White advertising agencies to be MIA on DEIBA+ too.

 

Incumbent VML spent many years churning out performative PR, erecting heat shields, and even gaining certification for DEIBA+ political propaganda. Time to admit it was all White lies.

 

In this scenario, RFP stands for Racism Fortification Proposal.

 

Navy Issues RFP For New Ad Contract

 

By Steve McClellan

 

The US Navy has issued a request for proposal for a new advertising recruitment contract.   

 

The initial contract period is for one year and would start in January of 2027. If all extensions are executed, the contract would expire in July of 2032, according to the RFP.  

 

WPP’s VML is the current incumbent, having won the last contract in 2021 (when the agency was known as VMLY&R). It also won the previous contract in 2015.   

 

The total value of the current contract is estimated at $460 million.   

 

The remit includes creative, media, strategy, research, field marketing and more.   

 

The Navy RFP follows word in March that the US Army is in the early stages of picking an agency for its new recruitment contract. It has issued a request for information in advance of a formal competitive bidding process that could kick off in the spring of 2027 and take effect in 2028.   

 

The army values the current 10-year contract, won by DDB in 2018, at $4 billion. DDB was folded into TBWA as part of the reorganization related to Omnicom’s acquisition of Interpublic. 

 

The Navy RFP was reported on earlier this week by the Ratti Report, an industry newsletter focused on new business leads.

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

17489: On Late Night Television And Byron Allen.

 

NBC News revealed how Byron Allen persuaded CBS to award him the time slot formerly held by The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.

 

Allen delivered a unique pitch, as detailed via the article below.

 

The image directly below unintentionally underscores Allen brings diversity to late night television—which will likely get the critical attention of President Donald J. Trump, who recently boasted, “We ended DEI in America!”

 

 

Byron Allen on how CBS handed him Stephen Colbert’s ‘Late Show’ time slot

 

The comedian-turned-media mogul spoke to NBC News this week about how “Comics Unleashed,” as well as his majority stake in Buzzfeed, will help him grow his media empire.

 

By Chloe Melas

 

As CBS sunsets “The Late Show,” media executive Byron Allen is gearing up to take over one of television’s most coveted evening time slots.

 

Starting Friday, Allen’s long-running syndicated comedy series, “Comics Unleashed,” will air at 11:35 p.m. ET.

 

Allen, who rose to fame as a stand-up comic, described the move as a “business opportunity” that he believes could help further expand his media empire. Last week, he bought a controlling stake in Buzzfeed, the digital media company co-founded by Jonah Peretti that helped define virality online.

 

His CBS pitch formed much earlier, however. Allen said that when news broke in July that the Paramount-owned CBS would be booting Stephen Colbert and the late-night staple off the air, he approached the network with a simple question.

 

“I said, ‘OK, do you like money?’” he said in an interview this week. “They said, ‘Yes!’”

Allen is friends with Colbert — the two go way back. He urged CBS to “not put on another show” if it went through with canceling the cancellation. He said he told the network, “I’ll buy the time period, and you can save over $110 million.”

 

Under the arrangement, Allen leases the hour and sells the advertising inventory himself. Although he wouldn’t reveal exactly how much he’s spending on the deal, he did say he’s “putting a lot of money in their cash register.”

 

“I am a gift from the money gods and the comedy gods,” he said.

 

Allen’s dream of appearing on late-night television dates back decades. When he was a child, his mother — an NBC employee who couldn’t afford childcare — took him to the lot in Burbank, California, where he got to watch late-night legend Johnny Carson in action.

 

“You know, my mom ended up convincing NBC to start an intern program with her, so she could work here for free,” he said. “While I was there, waiting for her to get off work, I’m watching Johnny Carson, and I’m like, wow, Johnny Carson is amazing, and he’s having the time of his life, lots of laughs, lots of fun.”

 

It all came full circle in 1979, when Allen got to do stand-up comedy on “The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson.”

 

“I was thinking to myself, in the next five minutes I’m going to change my life and my mother’s life forever, so I’m going to go out there and have a great time, and after I make these people laugh, we’re never going to worry about a bowl of cereal again,” he said.

 

Eventually, he jumped into the media business and founded Allen Media Group (Entertainment Studios) in 1993. He owns television channels such as Pets.TV and Cars.TV. And in 2018, Entertainment Studios bought the Weather Channel’s parent company.

 

He sees a bright future for Buzzfeed, a brand that he said has “a great following.”

 

“Everything Jonah [Peretti] has built in the last 20 years, we are not touching that,” he said. “That is the foundation we are building on that, and we’re making it additive.”

 

But the media company, which was among the first digital-media startups to be valued at over $1 billion, has struggled to maintain a sustainable business model, as Axios reported this week.

 

Allen’s plan for the site involves having user-generated content that won’t live behind a paywall and will instead be available on his ad-supported streaming platform, Local Now.

 

“‘Free’ is the world’s favorite word,” he said. “The two best words in media: ‘free’ and ‘streaming’ ... bring it together and, poof, you’ve got something magical.”

 

Allen’s ambitions stretch even further. He said he eventually wants to control the premium cable network Starz, where he is the second-largest stockholder.

 

“I want to own it. I plan to own it, and somehow one day I’m going to own it and control it,” Allen said. “What I’ve said to them is, what I would like for you to do is, I would like to keep it publicly traded, and I would like for you to let me put more capital in Starz and become the controlling shareholder.”

 

That may be difficult, however.

 

Allen previously explored deals that didn’t materialize, including deals with TV station operator Tegna and the NFL’s Washington Commanders. In 2024, he also tried to make a play for Paramount, CNBC reported.

 

Last year, Starz separated from the studio, Lionsgate, to become its own standalone public company. In March, “the Starz board unanimously voted to adopt a limited-duration shareholder protection rights agreement, also known as a ‘poison pill,’” according to Deadline, which described the move as a “defensive strategy used by companies against activist investors and hostile takeovers.”

 

A representative for Starz didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

That hurdle doesn’t appear to deter Allen, however. At 65, he continues to pursue his dreams, with his mother remaining one of his biggest motivations in life.

 

“It makes me feel great, because at the end of the day, all I want to do is make my mama proud, no matter how rich I get,” he said. “I’m just still a little scared little boy hanging on to my mother’s leg.”

Thursday, April 02, 2026

17424: Delayed WTF 67—Holding Company Of The Year Award Is Totally BS.

 

MultiCultClassics is often occupied with real work. As a result, a handful of events occur without the expected blog commentary. This limited series—Delayed WTF—seeks to make belated amends for the absence of malice.

 

A previous post noted WPP was named White Holding Company of the Year at Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity in 2025, receiving the title for the second consecutive year.

 

As noted in another previous post, winning the award is based on a point system adding up the number of trophies and shortlisted entries nabbed by corporations—meaning the top White holding companies dominate an exclusive competitive field by virtue of sheer volume.

 

The honor poses questions in 2026, underscoring the absolute stupidity of the trophy.

 

If WPP scores a threepeat, will the White holding company decline to accept? After all, WPP CEO Cindy Rose declared the enterprise is no longer a holding company, but rather, a single operating company.

 

If IPG wins, will it be disqualified since the company no longer exists?

 

If Omnicom wins, will it be asterisked if the victory is a result of acquiring IPG?

 

If Dentsu wins, will Jerry Della Femina and President Donald J. Trump make racist jokes?

Thursday, March 26, 2026

17416: ICYMI US Army RFI BS.

 

Advertising Age reported the US Army launched an RFI, moving in advance of an official account review process projected to start in spring 2027.

 

Given the anti-DEIBA+ positions of the White House and White advertising agencies, will multicrumbtual shops be denied the opportunity to participate and experience Prime Redlining?

 

US Army launches RFI for its $4 billion account, which is currently with Omnicom

 

By Brian Bonilla

 

The U.S. Army has begun laying the groundwork for a review of its multibillion-dollar marketing and advertising business, signaling a potential shake-up for one of the industry’s largest government accounts.

 

The government launched a “sources sought” and RFI on March 12, which is the first step leading up to an official review process slated to begin in late spring 2027.

 

The account was originally with DDB Chicago since 2018, before the agency was folded into TBWA after Omnicom’s acquisition of IPG.

 

The current contract is valued at up to $4 billion, which would seem to make the Army one of the agency’s largest accounts. The current contract is worth about $40 million annually in agency revenue for Omnicom, according to a person familiar with the contract, which is similar to what was reported when DDB initially won the business.

 

DDB’s contract included a five-year base period and “two award-term option periods,” for a total potential 10-year ordering period. It’s not known whether Omnicom is planning to defend the account. The contract is expected to conclude in 2028.

 

TBWA and the U.S. Army weren’t immediately available for comment.

 

The winning agency or agencies will be tasked with driving enlistment and retention across a broad set of audiences at a time when military recruitment has faced sustained challenges.

 

However, there have been recent signs of a turnaround. In January 2025, the U.S. Army had its best recruiting numbers in 15 years, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated last year. After missing its recruitment goals in 2022 and 2023 by 15,000 troops a year, the government entity revised downward its goals and has since reached or exceeded them. In 2025, the U.S. Army surpassed its 60,000 recruit target by more than 1,000 recruits.

 

The RFI details wanting help to target high school and college students, working professionals under 35, specialized talent such as medical and legal professionals, as well as “influencers” such as parents, family members, high school counselors and coaches. It also includes a need for messaging aimed at veterans and recruits to fill civilian workforce positions.

 

The RFI implies that the U.S. Army is open to a one-agency solution or multiple agency partners, which is significant, according to Mike Kapetanovic, a business development consultant at GrowthLab, that is focused on supporting advertising and marketing agencies that work in the public sector.

 

Kapetanovic said there have been growing conversations around government entities pushing for a multiple-agency approach, which could be beneficial for mid-size and independent agencies and less so for holding companies such as Omnicom.

 

“Just the notion that the Army has gone on public record through this RFI exercise, it is contemplating a decentralization of this contract, has massive implications for both the incumbent as well as the future competitive set,” he said. “[If that’s done] there’s a very good chance that that $4 billion contract quickly becomes $50 million to $1 billion contracts in which Omnicom will not retain all of it. Right there, Omnicom gets an immediate hit.”

 

The selected partner or partners will be expected to handle a full suite of services, including creative development, media planning and buying, production, CRM, digital and website management, public relations, events, sponsorships and advanced analytics.

 

The value in winning a contract like this is not only its massive size, but its stability in an increasingly project-based and roster-first industry.

 

MullenLowe, which has been folded into TBWA as well, continues to do work for the government’s Joint Advertising, Market Research & Studies program (JAMRS), which is focused on recruiting volunteers for all branches of the military. MullenLowe retained the account in 2023 and launched a campaign last year called “You Have a Calling, We have an Answer.”

 

In 2024, WPP retained its Marine Corps account, which was previously with Wunderman Thompson before it was merged into VML.

 

Contributing: Ewan Larkin

Friday, March 20, 2026

17408: On The White House & White Advertising Agencies, Part 10.

President Donald J. Trump’s return to supremacy continues to mirror Adland.

 

The Independent reported Trump clumsily delivered a culturally clueless Pearl Harbor joke to a Japanese reporter and Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.

 

Was Trump inspired by iconic Adman Jerry Della Femina?

 

Incidentally, the president’s comedy routine, well, bombed.

 

Trump cracks Pearl Harbor joke when pressed by Japanese reporter on lack of warning over Iran attack

 

Oval Office crowd left briefly silent after Trump makes light of 83-year-old attack

 

By Andrew Feinberg in Washington, D.C.

 

Just over 83 years ago, President Franklin Roosevelt called the Imperial Japanese Navy’s December 7, 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor “a date that will live in infamy” as he urged Congress to declare war.

 

On Thursday, President Donald Trump turned it into a punchline.

 

Trump was finishing up a question-and-answer session with reporters during a bilateral meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi when a Japanese journalist asked why he did not inform key American allies — such as Japan — before the start of the joint U.S.-Israeli air campaign against Iran on February 28.

 

The president initially replied that the U.S. “went in very hard” and “didn’t tell anybody about it because we wanted surprise.”

 

But Trump’s response took an awkward turn moments later when he said: “Who knows better about surprise than Japan?”

 

After some muted laughter from the U.S. officials who’d joined him for the meeting, he turned to Sanae — who was born two decades after the attack — to ask her another question.

 

“Why didn’t you tell me about Pearl Harbor, OK?”

 

At that point, laughter turned to audible groans. The room went silent.

 

Takaichi, who spent two years in Washington working on Capitol Hill during the Reagan administration and has a strong command of English, was clearly taken aback by the president’s attempt at humor.

 

The smile she’d had on her face disappeared and her eyes widened as she realized what Trump had just said.

 

After an awkward pause, Trump returned to the topic he’d been asked about, telling reporters, “He’s asking me about surprise, and we did.”

 

“And because of that surprise, we knocked out ... we probably knocked out 50 percent ... and much more than we anticipated doing. So if I go and tell everybody about it, there’s no longer a surprise,” he said.

 

The surprise Pearl Harbor airstrike against the U.S. Pacific Fleet on Dec. 7, 1941 left more than 2,400 American service members dead and nearly 1,200 injured from bombs and shells that sunk four American battleships and left four more severely damaged. It was the deadliest attack on American soil until the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks on New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.

 

Seven of those ships were salvaged and returned to service, while the seventh — the U.S.S. Arizona — was left where it had settled just below the harbor’s surface after a Japanese bomb detonated inside a explosive powder magazine.

 

The attack took place after months of failed negotiations between Tokyo and Washington over economic sanctions imposed by the U.S., the U.K., China and The Netherlands in an attempt to deny Japan’s military the raw materials it needed to prosecute wars in China and what is now Vietnam.

 

Japan declared war on the U.S. on the day of the strikes, but the official declaration did not arrive in Washington until afterwards.

 

The Pearl Harbor attack gave Roosevelt the leverage he needed to push for the U.S. to formally enter World War II — allowing him to join ally Great Britain in fighting Adolf Hitler’s march through Europe — with the House and Senate approving declarations of war against Japan by margins of 388-1 and 82-0, respectively.

 

Less than four years later, Japan would accept America’s demand for “unconditional surrender” after the U.S. dropped the first two — and thus far the only two — nuclear weapons to be used in combat in separate strikes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

 

The Japanese government has never formally apologized for the infamous sneak attack, though one of Takaichi’s predecessors — the late Shinzo Abe — delivered a speech expressing "sincere and everlasting condolences" to the American and Japanese personnel killed in the fighting that day during a 2016 visit to the Pearl Harbor memorial above the wreck of Arizona.

 

Abe, who was assassinated in July 2022, said at the time that the U.S. and Japan “must never repeat the horrors of war again.”

Wednesday, March 11, 2026

17399: FYI COPPA 2.0 ICYMI.

 

MediaPost reported the US Senate unanimously passed a bill designed to further restrict online enterprises’ ability to collect and harness data from youth under 17.

 

If the bill becomes law, expect quite a bit of collateral damage in Adland, adversely affecting DEIBA+ progress.

 

First, digital ads targeting youth tend to be low-budget projects typically handled by entry- and junior-level staff. Indeed, such staffers are arguably best qualified to produce messaging that connects with youth audiences.

 

So, erasing digital ads targeting youth results in reducing the need for entry- and junior-level staff, an industry segment already experiencing declining job opportunities.

 

Second, entry- and junior-level positions have historically been the main gateway for non-Whites to access Adland; hence, there will be fewer racial and ethnic minorities—an already underrepresented group.

 

Should President Donald J. Trump ultimately sign the bill, he’ll greatly improve his chances to repeat as White Man Of The Year.

 

Senate Passes Bill Prohibiting Ads Targeting Minors Under 17

 

By Wendy Davis

 

The Senate on Thursday unanimously passed a bill that would impose new restrictions on online companies’ ability to collect and harness data from teens under 17.

 

The Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA 2.0) introduced by Senators Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts) and Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana), would expand the current children’s privacy law by prohibiting website and app operators from knowingly serving targeted ads to users under 17 — including ads based on those teens’ online activity.

 

The measure, if enacted, would continue to allow companies to serve teens and young children with contextual ads — meaning ads based on the content of the websites or apps where the ads are displayed.

 

The bill also would prohibit websites and apps from knowingly collecting personal data from users between the ages of 13 and 16 without their consent.

 

Currently, federal law prohibits online companies from knowingly collecting personal information from users under 13 without their parents’ consent.

 

The bill’s definition of personal information includes names, email addresses, biometrics, location information and pseudonymous identifiers like IP addresses and cookies.

 

The proposed law’s restrictions would apply if companies have “actual knowledge” of users’ ages, or “knowledge fairly implied on the basis of objective circumstances.”

Markey called the Senate’s move “a major step forward for protecting children and teens online.”

 

“Kids, families, and parents have waited far too long for Congress to pass legislation and stop Big Tech’s relentless tracking and targeting of children and teens online,” he stated Thursday afternoon.

 

The House Energy and Commerce committee on Thursday had been slated to consider a version of the bill, but Chair Brett Guthrie (R-Kentucky) withdrew the measure from the agenda in the afternoon, after learning of the bill’s passage in the Senate.

 

“Since we’ve been here today, our staffs have continued to work towards a bipartisan agreement, and both sides feel there’s been substantial progress towards a path forward,” Guthrie said. “To that end, I’ve decided that we will not consider COPPA today.”

Friday, March 06, 2026

17394: TGIFired Day.

MediaPost reported President Donald J. Trump fired Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, declaring she lied to Congress about receiving his approval for a $220 million advertising campaign.

 

In short, the Gaslighter-in-Chief axed a White woman for producing advertisements without permission and replaced her with a White man—plus, he announced the moves on social media.

 

Now Trump can boast, “We ended DEI in America—and Adland too!”

 

Yep, President Donald J. Trump is angling to repeat as White Man Of The Year in 2026.

 

Trump Said Noem Lied About $220M Ad Campaign

 

By Tanya Gazdik

 

President Donald Trump has fired Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem after stating that she lied to Congress about getting his approval for a $220 million ad campaign.

 

“I never knew anything about it,” Trump told Reuters in a phone interview.

 

Two sources close to the White House told the New York Post that Trump is furious that Noem testified that he approved of the ads — and set in motion his later move to fire her, the first cabinet shakeup of his second term. 

 

Trump fired Noem on Truth Social and announced Sen. Markwayne Mullen (R-Okla.) as her replacement.

 

Noem faced bipartisan criticism over the commercials during U.S. congressional hearings this week.

 

“The ad features Noem, donning a cowboy hat on horseback, moving out of a wooded clearing in the Black Hills of South Dakota, the state where she was formerly the governor,” according to The Hill. 

 

“Why do I love these wide open spaces?” Noem asks. “They remind me of why our forefathers came here. Not just for its beauty, but for the freedom only America provides.”

 

Lauren Bis, Department of Homeland Security deputy assistant secretary, said the international ad campaign prompted more than 2.2 million illegal immigrants to self-deport and saved taxpayers more than $39 billion, according to Fox News. 

 

Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin tore into Noem with a blistering series of criticisms to her face on Wednesday.

 

The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee accused Noem of using billions of dollars given to DHS as a “personal slush fund” for her glitzy ad campaign and luxury jet travel, according to The Daily Beast.

 

“You budgeted an astonishing $220 million for media consultant contracts so you can star in self-promoting photo shoots and lavish ad campaigns featuring the Lifestyles of Rich and Famous Cabinet Secretaries, like this one of you on horseback at Mount Rushmore, which was shot during last year’s government shutdown,” Raskin said.

Thursday, February 26, 2026

17382: BHM 2026—Advertising Age On Diminishing DEIBA+ In Adland.

For Black History Month, Advertising Age is publishing content from Blacks in Adland, covering a variety of topics.

 

The content below features Black agency leaders discussing how DEIBA+ initiatives have diminished in Adland.

 

The opening question reads, “Why did DEI conversations go quiet?”

 

Um, because President Donald J. Trump made like Don Draper and obliterated the conversation.

 

Black agency leaders on DEI’s quiet phase—and why courage still matters

 

By Brian Bonilla

 

It’s no secret that the conversation around diversity, equity and inclusion in the industry has diminished from where it was only a few years ago. Investments in DEI initiatives have declined and representation in Super Bowl advertising, both in front of and behind the camera, continues to be an issue.

 

To understand what this shift means for the industry’s future, I convened five prominent Black agency leaders for a candid discussion about why the push on DEI went quiet—and what brands risk by staying silent. The following is a lightly edited and condensed version of my talk with Asmirh Davis, co-founder and president of Majority; Walter T. Geer III, chief creative officer of innovation, North America at VML; Keith Cartwright, founder and chief creative officer of Cartwright; Taj Reid, global chief creative officer of Burson; and Kaleeta McDade, global chief experience design officer at VML.

 

Why did DEI conversations go quiet?

 

Keith:​ You could even tell last year in Cannes: those conversations aren’t apparent in the work.

 

It’s a great conversation to have because the first question you ask is why. Is it fear? Is it burnout? Is it both? Is there no desire because there wasn’t a financial impact attached to it?

 

Kaleeta:​ I think it’s fear of retribution … When you’re looking at brands, there’s an immense fear of retribution from the government that is financial.

 

You have to look at the fact that people who are in power are also billionaires. So I think people have a healthy fear of litigation, a healthy fear of just anything that the government might do regarding that. But at the same time, I think there’s a groundswell of citizens and Americans who want to see who’s brave.

 

I’ll say Costco has really stepped up, and those who have stepped up have felt the dividends of that. You’ve seen their stock go up, you’ve seen more people sign up. So people have to balance their fear with progress, because right now, if you’re not choosing a side—because there’s no in between—I think you’re going to be stuck in the messy middle.

 

Consumers are watching which brands step up

 

Walter:​ I understand why brands have backed off and ripped everything apart, because it’s a massive financial risk to them. Yet we are in a moment where people are waiting and watching to see what brands do.

 

And we’re also in a moment where people are using their platforms, their voices on social media and their dollars to represent and stand behind the brands that are doing things that benefit them and other communities. There is a line being drawn.

 

I guarantee you, three or four years from now, when this starts to turn around—because the pendulum always swings the other direction—you are going to have a multitude of brands coming back out. Because again, we are seeing the browning of America, and by 2040 the “minority” will be the majority, and brands are going to be going after them. Multicultural is mainstream media. They’re going to want to hop back on that other side, and I think people are going to remember.

 

Keith: As an industry though, we’re stuck, right? Because we’re at the power of these brands making a decision on how they want to move and operate. We can try to convince them, but at the end of the day … they’re saying, “We took that risk four years ago, we took that risk eight years ago, and look where it got us.”

 

That’s fair. But at the same time, we have to have a conversation about what progress looks like in this moment and how we, as an advertising industry, can quantify that progress and demonstrate how it can create commerce if you stay with it, and Costco is a great example.

 

Walter: Costco also has the money to stand up and say it. There are a lot of smaller brands that wish they could do that but can’t play in that space. It would cripple the entire company. So again, to some degree, I get it.

 

Overcoming a fear of backlash

 

Asmirh:​ But do you have an example of where a smaller brand has done that and it’s been detrimental to them?

 

Walter: I don’t. That’s the thing.

 

Asmirh: Right. That’s what I was just thinking about. Where is this imaginary monster that we’re all—

 

Kaleeta:​ I think Bud Light. That was the one time—it wasn’t a small brand—where I remember a transgender woman was featured and they lost billions of dollars. I remember that stream was the moment when I started hearing the fear of being diverse, the fear of showing up differently.

 

When in actuality, what we know that what that was, is you didn’t understand your base … you’re sitting in this very bright spot and going way over here. What is your base? I feel like that’s when it started.

 

Taj: The lazy performative is now really, really in jeopardy. But with the work that we do every day—all of us, just in this conversation—I’m super inspired by the work that we’re designing that speaks to marginalized communities in a way that makes the commerce or the business grow.

 

I feel like it’s more important than ever to have diverse lived experiences in the room, to develop those experiences that lead to conversion in a way that’s long-lasting. Because, like you said, people will remember.

 

Asmirh: Last year was hard for everybody. For us, it was even more of an anomaly because, since the inception of our agency, we were on such a rocket trajectory. So it was more stabilizing for us—a stabilizing year—than anything in terms of serious headwinds.

 

But it was good because it helped us double down on what we were about and what we were building.

 

I’ve seen the impact more so in the industry initiatives that we are a part of … I’m on the board of BLAC [an internship program focused on getting diverse talent onto the industry], and it was a really hard year for us and continues to be as we go into 2026, because our model relied so heavily on brands and agencies getting behind the cause of Black talent and underrepresented talent.

 

No one wants to invest and put their money and resources behind bringing in diverse experiences into their doors and nurturing it. That is where we’re feeling it.

 

Keith:​ The economy froze because there was instability. Obviously, advertising and marketing get hit first.

 

The common way of thinking is when you don’t know what to do, you just stand still. I think now they’ve sort of figured out how they can grow from this administration and what’s going on in the economy, and they’re starting to open back up.

 

I don’t know if it’s going to be as good as it was five years ago, but I think it’s going to get better.

 

Our pipeline’s healthy, but the thing that’s interesting is: healthy pipeline, lower margins. And I think that’s industrywide. There are tons of opportunities. Businesses are up for pitch. But when you look at what the fee is, you start to scratch your head and say, “Wow, it’s starting to become less and less worth it if you can’t figure out a way to make margin on it.”

 

Do we change the conversation, or keep pushing it?

 

Taj:​ I don’t know if it’s changing the conversation as much as keeping that conversation going.

 

It is incredibly fatiguing and frustrating. But at the same time, I think that persistence—and not letting it be muffled out—is so important. Maybe more important than ever now. Because I actually do see people retreating from the conversation and saying, “It’s not safe to even talk about it, so why are we even going there?” I think we need to, if anything, lean into it more, but also start building onto that in ways that can really be impactful.

 

Asmirh: It’s not changing the conversation, but it is changing the narrative of how we enter the conversation. Appealing to people’s morality and their empathy and their hearts to do the right thing—in history has shown that has never worked.

 

Walter: Every brand wants to hit mainstream media, right? Well mainstream media is multicultural. It’s Black and brown people, so if you want to make money you have to think about that.

 

Asmirh: But we traditionally, industrywide, have not led with that piece of it. And that’s why I believe that our business has not been hugely impactful.

 

What needs to change this year

 

Walter: I’m sick of this exhausting shift. It’s really tiring, feeling like you have to come in and beat your head against the same wall every single day. Ideas that are brilliant, that could make a massive impact, are just pushed aside due to fear.

 

I think brands need to be a little bold and step out and do the work. And again, it’s not DEI work; it’s going after your market, going after your audience, expanding on it to some degree.

 

Kaleeta:​ The only thing different I would tell my Black leaders who are running these businesses is: survive the encounter. Whatever you need to do to keep your doors open, survive the encounter. I know it’s an onslaught of things that are happening. The reason they’re not doing extra things is that there’s probably not enough time to do it, because you’re still trying to survive the encounter. Thriving will happen later.

 

I don’t think every year will be a win, but I think this year is about surviving. And I know that’s not as sexy as us saying it’s a year of Black joy or a post-George Floyd glow-up. But it is a year of reconciliation and us understanding who we are. So that’s what I would say to my Black leaders.