Age reported the 4As is officially protesting a new
executive order from President Donald Trump that prevents federal contractors—including
White advertising agencies—from implementing
heat shields diversity
training programs. Now, historically, such an order would have posed little
concern, as most firms in adland only paid lip service to diversity.
Technically, firms are still only paying lip service, except now they’re also paying
money—likely tax-deductible investments—for such programs.
The order states that any contract with a White ad agency could be “canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts” if it is found that the agency implements training in violation of the stipulated guidelines. In short, violating shops could lose lucrative contracts with entities like U.S. Army, U.S. Census and more—perhaps even Ad Council too.
There is serious irony and karma at play here. After all, White ad agencies have traditionally won governmental assignments by creating the illusion of diversity via “partnerships” with minority firms, covertly establishing separate and unequal unions. Trump’s order is inadvertently exposing the hypocrisy and deception—and slamming the brakes on the biased bullshit.
Plus, it’s no secret that Trump strikes back at people he perceives to be enemies. So maybe the order is delayed retaliation for White ad agencies openly expressing disdain for the president. Although MDC Partners won’t have to worry about this possibility…
The truth is, White ad agencies are probably quietly applauding Trump’s move, as it provides them with an excuse to continue ignoring diversity.
4A’s Pushes Back On Trump’s Move To Suppress Diversity Training At Agencies
By Lindsay Rittenhouse
The American Association of Advertising Agencies (4A’s) is pushing back on U.S. President Donald Trump’s new that prevents federal contractors, including ad agencies, from implementing diversity training that would seem to cover such issues as unconscious bias.
Alison Pepper, executive VP of government relations for the 4A’s, tells Ad Age that the trade body for advertising agencies is joining “several leading trade associations and companies that represent a broad array of industries to push back on this Executive Order.”
“We are reaching out to the appropriate parties at the Office of Management and Budget and Department of Labor to outline the many logistical problems associated with this [order],” Pepper says, “not to mention the significant expense faced by thousands of companies.”
Pepper says it is too early for the 4A’s to provide guidance to member agencies until it has a “better understanding of what the final [Department of Labor] regulations may look like. There will hopefully be some clarity on these important procedural matters soon so that agencies and other industries can understand what is expected of them,” she says.
Marla Kaplowitz, 4A’s president and CEO, added that the order, signed by Trump on Sept. 22, would upend the programs that agencies have “heavily invested in to hire, recruit and retain diverse and inclusive workforces and boards.” All of the holding companies and many agencies have made even further investments in diversity training in the wake of the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and Ahmaud Arbery. For example, WPP and Publicis Groupe committed $30 million and $50 million, respectively, to diversity, equity and inclusion efforts that would include employee training.
“As this Executive Order prohibits employee training on topics such as ‘stereotyping’ and ‘scapegoating’ based on race or sex—ambiguous terms that even courts of law have trouble parsing and applying—it complicates how agencies can evaluate their employee training programs for compliance,” Kaplowitz says. “At large, this Executive Order undermines important investments agencies are trying to make at a time when many Americans are asking what they, and the industry, can do to create a more diverse and equitable workplace.”
The executive order, titled “Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping,” states that a contract with an agency or other federal contractor can be “canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts” if it is found that the organization in question implements training that goes against its guidelines.
Banned topics in diversity training, per the order, include “any form of race or sex scapegoating, including the concepts that (a) one race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex; (b) an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously; (c) an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of his or her race or sex; (d) members of one race or sex cannot and should not attempt to treat others without respect to race or sex; (e) an individual’s moral character is necessarily determined by his or her race or sex; (f) an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex; (g) any individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on account of his or her race or sex; or (h) meritocracy or traits such as a hard work ethic are racist or sexist, or were created by a particular race to oppress another race.”
As defined by the order, “divisive” training includes “concepts that (1) one race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex; (2) the United States is fundamentally racist or sexist; (3) an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously.”
The Department of Labor has been ordered to set up a hotline and investigate complaints of a federal contractor reported to be participating in such training.
Psychologists and other experts have long studied the adverse effects unconscious bias has on society, specifically in perpetuating systemic racism, and it is an issue that many agencies tackle through their diversity training.
Confusion and concern
According to several holding company executives, many with government contracts, the executive order has caused a lot of confusion and concern. They maintain though that diversity remains a focus.
Martin Sorrell, S4 Capital founder and executive chairman, commented on the order on an Advertising Week panel today, saying it’s “thrown a lot of confusion into the ring” for agencies and consultancies currently holding and pitching government contracts.
Two executives at different holding companies, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told Ad Age that they are holding out hope that the executive order will be deemed unconstitutional before it becomes law. Also, they say the order seems to only pertain to new government contracts, not existing ones.
The order states: “This order is effective immediately, except that the requirements of section 4 of this order shall apply to contracts entered into 60 days after the date of this order.” (Section 4 of the order pertains to the requirements for government contractors.)
One of the holding company executives said the “hope is we never really have to worry about this.”
“Until it becomes law and incorporated in our client contracts, we will continue our current training program and requirements,” the other holding company executive said.
If it does become law, however, the order could undoubtedly stymie the progress agencies have made in the past few months to create a more equitable industry.