Wednesday, March 04, 2026

17392: Regarding Repositioning, Reframing, And Rejiggering At BBDO.

 

Digiday interviewed the BBDO Global Chief Client Experience Officer, a newly created role at the White advertising agency.

 

According to Digiday, “BBDO is repositioning itself to court clients more proactively.”

 

Is the repositioning intentional—or is it the result of radical restructuring, revamping, redundancies, and RIFs at Omnicom?

 

As hold cos restructure, BBDO reframes client relationships

 

By Kimeko McCoy

 

Holding companies are having an identity crisis. Between mergers and acquisitions, whistleblowers and generative AI, clients are largely overwhelmed and confidence is shaken. 

 

In the midst of scale and promises of AI-enabled tech efficiencies, BBDO is repositioning itself to court clients more proactively. The Omnicom-backed creative agency this month revamped what traditional account leadership looks like, hiring Daale Carter, formerly president of Energy BBDO, into the newly created global chief client experience officer role at BBDO.

 

“There are a lot of capability stories out there. There aren’t a lot of stories or pictures about the client’s experience,” Carter told Digiday. “We’re really trying to look at how we use client experiences as a true differentiator that we showcase.”

 

As the hold co model changes, and competition gets stiffer, clients are reassessing how they want to work with agency partners. It’s not that the client experience has been forgotten, Carter said, but in the push to scale, clients are getting lost in the shuffle. 

 

Digiday caught up with Carter about her new role, AI expectations and post-merger plans.

 

This interview has been lightly edited for clarity.

 

What’s the purpose of your role — the newly created role of global chief experience officer? 

 

I’m sure there’s no surprise, there has been a lot of change and transition across the ad world — and more specifically, within Omnicom. Part of that change comes a lot of scale, a lot of access to really great tools and technology. But for BBDO specifically — and actually, Omnicom has introduced this role at the holding company level as well — was just a realization that, as you’re scaling, there’s sometimes such a strong focus on that scale and the tools and tech that the client and their experience maybe gets lost in the narrative. 

 

What exactly does that look like in practice?

 

One of the things that we did as an example is account management is seen as the gateway or the owner of the client relationship when actually it’s the responsibility of every single person that touches client business. We also got rid of the term account management, and shifted it to business leadership, and I think the crux of what was missing lies there, because clients want to be led. Clients don’t want to reach out to their agencies and have agencies just be responsive. They want agencies to truly lead them.

 

The other thing that has been a real shift for BBDO is a real relentless focus on clients’ business challenges. Because when you’re a creative agency, sometimes the expectation is superficial. It doesn’t matter how you get there, you get a brief. If you land on a really amazing, creative exercise, all the work is done. But if you think about the scale of issues that clients are facing today, they can’t all just be solved in a really beautiful creative campaign. They’ve got real numerical, socioeconomic pressure. 

 

How does the agency shift from “traditional agency” to “enterprise partner” (especially with AI) change BBDO’s client pitch?

 

Relationships become ever more critical because in our conversations, clients are looking for us to guide them. They’ve got AI overload. They’ve got tech overload, and they’re looking for guidance from a real human being that says, “This makes sense for my business, and this is how we should utilize it or we shouldn’t.” I had a client who had come to us and essentially had said, “I’ve written scripts. I’ve put some stuff into AI and it’s come out with scripts.” And then they admitted that the scripts were devoid of any level of humanity or relativity and what they really were saying was, “I want you to show me how you’re using AI to be forward-facing or to be future fit as you think about the creative process.” They didn’t necessarily want to write their own scripts using AI.They were looking to see us guide them in terms of how they should be thinking about AI.

 

Post-IPG Omnicom merger, what’s been the sentiment from clients?

 

They just wanted to be kept abreast of what the changes are and how we’re building. That’s what they’ve cared the most about, and that’s what we have been committed to. We use the term the Year of Distraction. It’s been a distraction for the industry, for the agency, for our clients, and the way that we’ve been able to manage that is not to be distracted in how we work with our clients and just to focus. That being said, the media tells me that there are lots of clients who have concerns. That’s just not our real experience on the ground. In general, if you have strong relationships with your clients, to the point why relationships are so important, it’s not impacted by that.

 

Considering the headlines around conflict of interest, mergers, layoffs, principal media buying, etc. what’s BBDO’s pitch to win new business?

 

Despite all of this, you cannot get lost because we are committed to the plan experience at the core.

Tuesday, March 03, 2026

17391: WPP & McKinsey & Company & WTF & BS.

 

As widely reported, the Roserrection of WPP—Elevate 28—was hatched in consultative collaboration with McKinsey & Company.

 

The partnership represents a fundamental failing for WPP: that is, a White holding company boasting capabilities for delivering world-class strategies, concepts, and executions to enhance brands’ businesses is incapable of providing such services to itself.

 

It’s a classic “Physician, heal thyself” scenario.

 

What makes this mess extra disturbing is highlighted in a recent Harvard Business Review interview with McKinsey & Company Global Managing Partner Bob Sternfels.

 

Sternfels’ statements from the HBR interview include:

 

·      “We’re coming around to the conviction that we’re migrating away from pure advisory work, away from a fee-for-service model. We’re moving to more of an outcomes-based model, where we identify a joint business case with our clients, and we underwrite the outcome by tying our fees to the impact our work delivers for them.”

 

·      “Beyond that, I hope we complete the journey from being an adviser to being an impact partner.”

 

Regarding the outcomes-based pay scheme being explored by the White holding company, WPP CEO Cindy Rose said, “By shifting our revenue profile from being unpredictable and episodic to being much higher quality, recurring revenue that can be linked directly to the outcomes we deliver for our clients. … A commercial model that is more closely linked to client outcomes will enable us, over time, to move away from time and materials.”

 

Declaring WPP is no longer a White holding company, Rose said, “We’re a single operating company, and our mission is changing. We want to be a trusted growth partner for our clients in the era of AI.”

 

In short, it looks like McKinsey & Company took its own PowerPoint vision template and replaced M&C with WPP. Plus, the consultancy supplemented the half-assed effort by instructing Rose to copy other global holding companies’ tactics.

 

Hopefully, McKinsey & Company does not have an outcomes-based pay arrangement in this case. Otherwise, they might have to give WPP a significant refund.

Monday, March 02, 2026

17390: WPPress Coverage.

 

Advertising Age, Adweek, and other trade publications reported on the Roserrection of WPP—a three-year Hail Mary game plan dubbed Elevate 28, designed to be a turnaround maneuver for the White holding company.

 

WPP CEO Cindy Rose declared the enterprise was “no longer a [White] holding company.”

 

“We’re a single [White] operating company, and our mission is changing,” Rose explained. “We want to be a trusted growth partner for our clients in the era of AI.”

 

Okay, except Rose’s grand vision sounds exactly like the mad dreams of every holding company: simplified restructuring, AI reinvesting, asset rejecting, real estate razing, and workforce reducing.

 

The Elevate 28 unveiling was accompanied by the official introduction of WPP Creative—a global banner over all White advertising agencies in the network. As previously noted, WPP Creative offers nothing original, copying what other holding companies have executed in recent years.

 

In summation: Elevate 28 should be renamed Eviscerate 28 and WPP Creative is an oxymoron.

 

Oh, and the voluminous press coverage for WPP makes zero mention of DEIBA+ initiatives.

 

WPP targets £500 million in annual savings—CEO on job cuts, potential agency sales and a big bet on principal media

 

By Brian Bonilla

 

WPP is targeting £500 million ($678 million) in annual cost savings by 2028 as part of a sweeping restructuring aimed at returning the struggling British agency holding company to growth. The overhaul was announced alongside a forecast of a steeper-than-expected revenue decline for this year.

 

Cindy Rose, who joined WPP as CEO less than six months ago, is working to reignite its growth at WPP after it was hit by declining sales and a string of client losses.

 

Rose said she plans to reinvest in growth areas such as AI and a new enterprise solutions unit that will combine data platforms and customer management tools for WPP’s clients. Savings will come from eliminating overlapping support functions in finance and human resources, cutting spending on real estate and disposing of assets.

 

The company announced that it’s planning a portfolio review this year to unlock value, without providing further details. Rose admitted there will be job cuts, but didn’t clarify how many.

 

“There’s duplication that we’re going to eliminate,” Rose told Ad Age. “There’s simplification within the organizational structure that we’re going to address. There are shared services and real estate. I’m amazed at how many buildings we own around the world. There’s a lot of opportunity—a lot of opportunity—for us to achieve that target.”

 

While Rose declined to comment on specific job cut numbers, she said the company would reinvest in roles in growth areas. WPP had about 98,655 employees as of December, down from 108,044 at the end of 2024.

 

High-growth areas include media, enterprise solutions and global client lead positions, including the formation of a new team called “client solution architects,” Rose said. In particular, the company will be looking for “AI-native” employees, she added.

 

The restructuring will divide the company into four main units—creative, production, media and enterprise solutions. Today, it announced that its creative agencies are being placed under a structure called WPP Creative. WPP consolidated its production capabilities as WPP Production last month, retiring the Hogarth name. WPP’s media buying unit, GroupM, was renamed WPP Media last May.

 

Rose also clarified that WPP is looking at potential sale opportunities for various assets.

 

“I can’t name specific assets, for obvious reasons, it would impact our sale process,” Rose said. We’ve done a strategic review of the entire group … looked at every single asset we own and partly own, and asked: ‘Is this part of the core integrated proposition, and are we the best owners?’ We’ve come up with our list and started a formal process to explore all the options available to us. Some of that might be outright disposals; some of that might be partial disposals and strategic partnerships.”

 

WPP also made it clear that principal-based media buying—when media agencies buy media and resell it to clients—is a big part of its turnaround plan.

 

Principal-based media buying “is very important … because clients are asking for it. There’s increasing demand for it. There’s a specific need for it, and we hope to shift our business mix within the media team more in that direction in the future,” Rose said in her interview with Ad Age.

 

This week, it was revealed that WPP had generated roughly $1 billion in net sales from “non-product related income,” including rebates and principal-based media buying, with annual growth targets of 15%, through a 2024 report shared in legal documents by a former WPP executive who is in the midst of a legal dispute with the holding company.

 

How WPP’s performance stacks up to rivals

 

WPP is coming off a difficult year. Like-for-like revenue less pass-through costs fell 6.9% in the fourth quarter and 5.5% in 2025, broadly in line with its latest guidance for a 5.5% to 6% decline. WPP had cut that outlook in October, after a previous forecast called for a 3% to 5% annual decline.

 

The company projected that like-for-like revenue less pass-through costs would fall by “mid to high-single digits” in the first half of 2026, followed by an “improving trajectory” in the second half. Analysts expected a 3.2% drop, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

 

In comparison, Publicis Groupe’s organic revenue rose 5.6% last year, and earlier this month it forecast 4% to 5% growth for 2026. Omnicom, the industry’s new largest player by revenue after acquiring Interpublic Group of Cos., did not provide a 2026 forecast when it released its fourth-quarter results last week.

 

WPP’s 2025 operating profit dropped 23% to £1.32 billion, and the company announced it is slashing its dividend for the year by 62% to 15 pence.

 

“Our recent underperformance has been driven by excessive organizational complexity, a lack of an integrated operating model and inconsistent strategic execution,” Rose said in a statement, adding that these issues are “all within our power to fix.”

 

WPP shares fell 5.6% to 257.2 pence at 08:33 a.m. in London on Thursday. They were down 67% over the past year.

 

—With reporting by Bloomberg

Sunday, March 01, 2026

17389: Mr. Clean Makes Clean Break…?

 

E! News reported—or published corporate public relations hype—on the apparent retirement of Mr. Clean.

 

It’s likely a lame campaign stunt. After all, retiring a beloved White critter has received public backlash in recent years, as evidenced by the unretirement of the Cracker Barrel Old Timer.

 

No way will Mr. Clean be allowed to fade away, especially once news of his erasure reaches the brand’s significant White supremacist—er, supermarket—constituents.

 

Expect Old White Guys and Old White Gals to cry Mr. Clean is the victim of ageism too.

 

Mr. Clean Announces His Retirement After 68 Years on the Job

 

The Mr. Clean brand shared that its mascot, also named Mr. Clean, would be retiring after nearly 70 years. But it seems the bald icon has some exciting plans for the future.

 

By Brahmjot Kaur

 

Mr. Veritably Clean is putting down the magic eraser. 

 

After all, the Mr. Clean brand confirmed that its bald-headed mascot has stepped down from his role after nearly seven decades.

 

“It’s true, Mr. Clean has announced his retirement,” the company announced in a Feb. 18 TikTok video. “After a career with zero stains on the record, he’s ready for new adventures. But don’t worry, his products will continue to be available to support all your cleaning needs.”

 

And he’s already on island time. While Mr. Clean—who was introduced by the company in 1957—opted for a blue Hawaiian button-down at the press conference, his iconic white shirt was displayed in a frame alongside the podium. He concluded the meeting with a mic drop, although he was sure to wipe down the equipment before exiting.

 

The faux press conference was depicted as a live stream, with one user in the video commenting, “End of an era!” Meanwhile, another teased, “He looks too young to retire.”

 

Alongside the announcement, the company shared insight into the future of its cleaning supplies.

 

“While our products will continue to battle your dirt and grime, Mr. Clean, well, first name Veritably, (yes, really), is off to new adventures,” the caption read. “We know his journey will be fulfilling, and we support his decision.”

 

Mr. Clean was also sure to give his own statement after the news.

 

“I’m saying goodbye to the world of cleaning in pursuit of new hobbies,” he wrote in a Notes app screenshot posted on the company’s social media accounts Feb. 19. “Stay Clean.”

 

“I’ve seen it all, cleaned it all,” he added in the caption. “I think it’s finally time to hang up my white shirt.”

 

As for what Mr. Clean has been up to since his retirement? The company shared snaps of their former mascot DJing at a nightclub, hitting the slopes, running a marathon, experimenting in the kitchen and going on hikes.

 

“New hobby, who dis?” the Feb. 24 TikTok caption quipped. “Who said retirement had to be boring… #NewBeginnings #Reset.”

 

And he’s officially going by his first name, Veritably. As the company teased in their Feb. 23 TikTok post, “The name’s Veritably — Mr. Very if you’re clean.”

 

Saturday, February 28, 2026

17388: BHM 2026—An Adland Recap.

 

During Black History Month 2026, Adland embraced lots of new and old events that totally trumped BHM interest:

 

Holding Company Restructurings, Redundancies, and RIFs

Super Bowl

Grammys

Winter Olympics

Groundhog Day

Presidents’ Day

Abraham Lincoln’s Birthday

George Washington’s Birthday

Susan B. Anthony’s Birthday

Valentine’s Day

Lunar New Year

Fat Tuesday

Mardi Gras

Ash Wednesday

National Freedom Day

Random Acts of Kindness Day

American Heart Month

National Children’s Dental Month

National Carrot Cake Day

National Pizza Day

National Golden Retriever Day

World Nutella Day

Galentine’s Day

National Love Your Pet Day

Tu Bishvat

Imbolc

Maha Shivaratri

Ramadan

Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month

 

For Adland, Black history is, well, history. Fade to black.

17387: WPP = Wrong Payment Plans.

Digiday reported WPP is exploring outcome-based pay schemes, charging escalating fees for measurable results.

 

This is hardly a new idea, as White advertising agencies have unsuccessfully attempted such deals for decades.

 

Although in an industry where White holding companies have created commoditization—catering and capitulating to client whims—it would be difficult to discern who is responsible for improved performance.

 

Given WPP’s desperation for billable business—paired with its growing AI fascination—perhaps a low-cost strategy is more realistic.

 

WPP is not suited to propose outcome-based pay; but rather, outhouse-based pay.

 

WPP is betting its future on getting paid for outcomes

 

By Seb Joseph

 

For decades, the agency business has run on a simple, if imperfect logic: clients pay for time and the people who fill it. Hours logged, heads counted, invoices sent. Nobody particularly loved it but it was predictable enough that nobody moved to change it.

 

That may finally be shifting. At the presentation for its new strategy in London on Thursday (Feb. 26), WPP made the most explicitly public case that the future of agency compensation look less like a staffing invoice and more like a performance contract — one where fees are tied directly to business results, not inputs.

 

“Those outcomes aren’t ‘do you like the agency you work with’,” said Johnny Hornby, CEO, WPP specialist communications agency division. “Those outcomes are ‘are we selling more product and will we get paid on being able to sell more product?’”

 

That’s a notable thing for a senior ad exec to say in public. It’s even more notable that there’s a real client sitting behind it.

 

Not a concept, a contract

 

Jaguar Land Rover is the clearest proof point WPP has right now. The group is currently in an exclusive negotiation with the automaker to become its global creative and marketing partner, with full contracting expected by March. The commercial structure Hornby described — fees tied to measurable sales and brand performance rather than hours worked — is the model WPP is actively pushing in pitches. CEO Cindy Rose was direct about what she thinks it signals: “I believe this is the beginning of a more widespread commercial model evolution.”

 

Whether that’s CEO optimism or genuine market shift, it’s worth taking seriously. The conditions that have made outcome-based pay feel impossible for so long are changing.  AI is compressing the cost of content production dramatically. A thousand ad variants now cost easily what five used to. That blows up the logic of charging by the unit. At the same time, measurement technology has advanced to the point where agencies can, with increasing credibility, draw a line between their work and actual sales.

 

“By shifting our revenue profile from being unpredictable and episodic to being much higher quality, recurring revenue that can be linked directly to the outcomes we deliver for our clients,” Rose said. “A commercial model that is more closely linked to client outcomes will enable us, over time, to move away from time and materials.”

 

WPP’s data platform, built partly around InfoSum’s federated technology, is central to the pitch. The company claims it can now connect first-party data, media signals and sales outcomes in a single closed loop, without data leaving a client’s environment.

 

For Heineken, that meant linking shopper data with TV broadcaster ITV’s viewing audiences and supermarket Tesco’s sales figures to measure real in-store uplift. For a U.S. retailer, rebalancing marketing investment through WPP’s platform reportedly generated £300 million in incremental sales. Results like these are ones the group is trying to wrap a performance fee around.

 

Three models, not one

 

The transition isn’t a clean flip. CFO Joannne Wilson laid out three commercial tracks WPP is running simultaneously: output-based pricing, which is growing but still a minority of work; and technology licensing fees including subscriptions and platform bundles. As Wilson explained: “With many of our clients, we’re working to understand what works best.”

 

Outcome-based elements have always existed in agency contracts as small bonus kickers. What WPP is describing is more structure — making performance the organizing principle of the relationship, not an addendum to it. Get it right, and the commercial benefits cut both ways. Clients get a partner whose fees are tied to actual business results, not hours spent. WPP, in theory, gets paid for the value it creates rather than the cost of creating it — a distinction that matters more as AI drives production costs down.

 

“We’re looking at this to be ultimately over time margin enhancing for us,” said Wilson, though she framed it as a consequence of delivering more value, versus cutting corners on delivery. 

 

The internal bet

 

The holdco is wiring its own organization the same way. Global client leaders — the senior execs responsible for the biggest accounts — will now be paid on client growth, full stop. Not agency P&L, not holdco EBIDTA. Client growth.

 

“If you’re a GCL, you’re paid on your client growth. It’s that simple,” Rose said. “And it’s dramatically from where we are today, where if you’re an agency you’re paid on your agency results.”

 

The logic is that when WPP’s own people are on a version of performance pay they become better at making the case for it with clients.

 

The questions that remain

 

There are obvious gaps. What happens when targets are missed? How are outcomes independently verified? What share of WPP’s revenue currently sits under any outcome-linked structure? None of those numbers were shared during the update, and analysts repeatedly pushed on the lack of specifics.

 

Which is why the JLR contract, should it get ratified, will be so important. If WPP can demonstrate over the next year that the model works it will have something genuinely new to sell. If, on the other hand, it turns out to be a one-off, the outcome-based narrative risks becoming another piece of holdco lore.

 

Why that’s less likely to happen this time is due to the underlying infrastructure being more credible. The measurement tools exist while AI has already broke the per-unit pricing logic. And clients, under their own pressure to prove marketing returns, increasingly want a partner whose incentives match theirs.

 

The old model is running out of road. Whether WPP has found the new one is still an open question.

17386: BHM 2026—AbelsonTaylor Group.

For 2026, it’s been disturbing how most White holding companies and White advertising agencies ignored Black History Month.

 

Equally disturbing is seeing campaigns from the few firms acknowledging the annual event.

 

AbelsonTaylor Group—a pharmaceutical marketing firm—proudly recognized Black pioneering figures in health and wellness.

 

Side effects include eye rolls, head shaking, and vomiting.

Friday, February 27, 2026

17385: On WPP Culture & Cultural Cluelessness.

More About Advertising opined on the Roserrection of WPP, including WPP CEO Cindy Rose’s grand vision for cultivating a culture for the White holding company.

 

It’s a safe bet the culture will lack cultural competence, as Rose has not addressed the historic exclusivity at WPP.

 

The Elevate 28 three-year scheme can’t reverse over 35 years of systemic racism.

 

Can Cindy Rose unearth a winning culture for WPP?

 

By Stephen Foster

 

WPP’s Cindy Rose succeeded in calming some first night investor nerves with a well-received presentation yesterday, outlining her Elevate 28 three-year plan to return what it is still one of the world’s biggest ad holding companies to profitable health.

 

Key to this, though, is that it’s not going to be a holding company anymore. Such entities, Rose says, have no ‘culture’ and she wants the new integrated WPP to have one, a bit like a new PE teacher coming in and calling for more team spirit.

 

Culture is one of those words that forever catches out adland, used for all sorts of purposes it was never intended. In Sir Martin Sorrell’s day WPP had a very pronounced culture: it was going to be the biggest because big attracted big (advertisers that is.) Just as such outfits do in law, accountancy or consultancy. But most high growth, high pressure businesses hit the buffers at some stage and WPP duly did.

 

Rose’s more measured approach may work in today’s market; it should at least stabilise things which is the driving idea for year one of Elevate 28.

 

Will WPP staffers buy into it, in particular those from the creative side of the organisation who are now, Rose says — although not overtly — to be led by media. Historically creative types have rather looked down on their media colleagues, including at WPP. Key to Rose’s fortunes is the relationship between her and WPP Media boss Brian Lesser. He’s over there and she’s here, which may be a problem.

 

Fear, of course, is a great motivator and with AI stalking the corridors of the world’s people-led businesses WPP staff will be grateful to be still employed, albeit in a much-changed organisation. But that won’t last forever.

 

Rose still has to reveal the detail of what she’s planning and some of it, particularly cost cuts, will be painful. She will need to announce the regional bosses in creative, media and elsewhere and those choices may not be popular.

 

But this AI fan still manages to come across as human and that’s a start.