Showing posts with label jena 6. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jena 6. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Essay 4899


From The Chicago Tribune…

------------------------

3 TOWNS: THE PAST, THE PRESENT, THE FUTURE

No black-and-white answers

Several months after racial injustices were exposed, some wounds have begun to heal. And some have festered.

By Howard Witt, Tribune senior correspondent

Plotted on a map, the towns of Paris, Linden and Jena line up neatly along a 300-mile diagonal that falls across the Texas-Louisiana border.

But to many African-Americans, that line looks more like a gash across the beneficent face that the New South tries to present to the rest of the nation.

In each of those three mostly white towns, local incidents of perceived discrimination against blacks drew national outrage and civil rights protests after the Tribune wrote stories about them, thrusting their long-obscured racial tensions into the open during a tumultuous year.

Now, Tribune senior correspondent Howard Witt has returned to discover whether the fundamental racial dynamics of Linden, Paris and Jena were altered in any meaningful way after the TV cameras departed and the headlines faded away.

The answer in Linden appears to be yes. In Paris, not much. And in Jena, it’s too soon to tell.

As spotlight dims, shadows remain

The stories read to many like harrowing echoes from the worst days of the Jim Crow South.

[To read the full story, click here.]

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Essay 4590


From The Chicago Tribune…

------------------------------

The history of rope

By Leonard Pitts, a syndicated columnist based in Washington: Tribune Media Services

This will be a history of rope.

It strikes me that such a history is desperately needed just now. It seems the travesty in Jena, La., has spawned a ghastly trend. Remember how white students at Jena High placed nooses in a tree last year to communicate antipathy toward their African-American classmates? Now it’s happening all over.

A noose is left for a black workman at a construction site in South Elgin. In Queens, N.Y., a woman brandishes a noose to threaten her black neighbors. A noose is left on the door of a black professor at Columbia University. And that’s just last week. Go back a little further and you have similar incidents at the University of Maryland in College Park, at a police department on Long Island, on a Coast Guard cutter, in a bus maintenance garage in Pittsburgh.

Mark Potok, director of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center, told USA Today, “For a dozen incidents to come to the public’s attention is a lot. I don’t generally see noose incidents in a typical month. We might hear about a handful in a year.”

The superintendent of schools in Jena famously dismissed the original incident as a “prank.” It was an astonishing response, speaking volumes about the blithe historical ignorance of people who have found it convenient not to peer too closely at the atrocities of the past lest they be accidentally … moved.

But watching this trend unfold, it occurs to me that maybe what we need here is the opposite of ignorance. Maybe what we need is information. Maybe what we need is a history of rope.

A history of rope would have to include, in 1904, Luther Holbert and his wife, who had their fingers chopped off and handed out as souvenirs. Holbert was beaten so badly one of his eyes came out. It hung by a thread. A large corkscrew was used to bore into the couple’s flesh. It tore out big chunks of them each time it was withdrawn. A rope was used to tie them to a tree.

A history of rope would have to include, in 1917, Rufus Moncrief, who was beaten senseless by a mob. They used a saw to cut off his arms and otherwise mutilated him. The mob hanged Moncrief. Then, for good measure, they hanged his dog. Ropes were used for both.

A history of rope would have to include, in 1918, Mary Turner, burned alive in Valdosta, Ga. A man used a hog-splitting knife to slash her swollen stomach. The baby she had carried nearly to term tumbled out and managed two cries before the man crushed its head beneath his heel. A rope was used to tie Turner upside down in a tree.

A history of rope would include thousands of Turners, Moncriefs and Holberts. It would range widely across the geography of this nation and the years of the last two centuries. A history of rope would travel from Cairo, Ill., in 1909 to Ft. Lauderdale in 1935 to Urbana, Ohio, in 1897 to Wrightsville, Ga., in 1903 to Leitchfield, Ky., in 1913 to Newbern, Tenn., in 1902. And beyond.

You might say the country has changed since then, and it has. The problem is, it’s changing again.

It feels as if in recent years we the people have abandoned even the pretense of believing our loftiest ideals. It has become fashionable to decry excessive “political correctness,” deride “diversity,” sneer at the “protected classes.” Code words sanding down hatred’s rough edge. “States’ rights” for the new millennium. And now, out come the nooses. Just a prank, the man says.

Mary Turner would argue otherwise. I find it useful to remember her, useful to be reminded of things we would rather forget. To remember her is to understand that there is no prank here.

A history of rope would drown your conscience in blood.

[Leonard Pitts is a syndicated columnist based in Washington.]

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Essay 4569


Merging stupidity and ignorance in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Coors and Miller have merged their breweries in to better compete with Budweiser. Hmmm. The two brands with the most contrived and corny advertising hope to knock down the King of Beers. Wonder what these folks have been drinking.

• An arbitrator ruled NFL quarterback Michael Vick must give back $20 million in bonus loot to the Atlanta Falcons. The Falcons argued the disgraced athlete violated his contract by his involvement in illegal dogfighting; plus, he used money from his contract to finance the illegal activities. Heaven forbid the team should also investigate all the money fans pour into fantasy football pools and gambling.

• A student in Nashville, Tennessee, is suing her high school after she was banned from wearing a t-shirt supporting the Jena 6. An assistant principal had stopped the student from entering the school wearing the shirt because it could “cause a problem.” Guess the assistant principal was right about that.

Saturday, October 06, 2007

Essay 4549


Weekend Upchuck in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Olympic medalist Marion Jones officially told the public that she had taken steroids, opening the door to losing her awards and facing prison time (see Essay 4547). “In September 2000, before the Sydney Olympics, (former coach Trevor) Graham began providing me with a substance he told me was flaxseed oil,” said Jones. “I continued to use this substance until July 2001. … By November 2003, I realized that what Graham had given to me was a performance enhancing drug.” Three years to figure things out? Perhaps the drugs were accelerating her physical performance while slowing her mental abilities.

• The Rev. Al Sharpton is threatening to boycott the New York Knicks unless Isiah Thomas apologizes for remarks about referring to Black women as bitches. “We are calling on him to apologize because of what came out during the deposition … when he said it was all right for Black men to call Black women ‘bitches,’” said Sharpton. “It is inexcusable for any man of any race to call Black women or any women ‘bitch.’” As a symbolic gesture, Thomas should be forced to apologize during a WNBA New York Liberty game.

• In Jena, Louisiana, the town’s mayor is taking issue with a song by John Mellencamp whose lyrics include, “Jena, take your nooses down.” The mayor wrote, “The town of Jena has for months been mischaracterized in the media and portrayed as the epicenter of hatred, racism and a place where justice is denied. … the Mellencamp video is so inflammatory, so defamatory, that a line has been crossed and enough is enough.” Mellencamp posted a note on his web site stating, “The song is not written as an indictment of the people of Jena but, rather, as a condemnation of racism.” It’ll probably make a terrific jingle for a Chevy truck commercial too.

• As expected, three players from the Duke lacrosse team filed a lawsuit against former prosecutor Mike Nifong, the city of Durham, North Carolina, and police detectives involved on the case. The suit declares the case to be “one of the most chilling episodes of premeditated police, prosecutorial and scientific misconduct in modern American history.” Don’t hold your breath waiting for a Mellencamp song.

• Mickey D’s must pay a whopper of an amount—$6.1 million—to an ex-employee who was forced to strip and sexually abused on the job after the restaurant received a crank call from someone posing as a cop. The fiendish caller told the assistant manager that a young woman had stolen from a customer and should be strip searched. The assistant manager’s ex-boyfriend performed the search and abused the victim, all of which was recorded by a surveillance camera. The lawsuit charged that Mickey D’s failed to warn employees about the caller, whose pranks had occurred at other fast food restaurants across the country. Of course, the fast feeder plans to appeal. A spokesman for McDonald’s said, “While we are disappointed with the verdict, we remain vigilant in our efforts to protect our employees and provide them with a safe and respectful workplace.” Yeah, can’t think of a more respectful job than toiling at Mickey D’s.

• O.J. Simpson is getting back his Rolex watch seized by the family of murder victim Ron Goldman (see Essay 4540). The watch was originally valued at $12,000 to $22,000, but turned out to be a fake worth about $125. It’s just one more lie surrounding the former NFL star.

• Sidley Austin, one of the country’s biggest law firms, agreed to pay a $27.5 million settlement to former partners who accused the firm of age discrimination. The law firm sought to argue that as partners, the accusers were technically not employees entitled to protections of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. But the firm lost key preliminary court fights, paving the way for the settlement. Perhaps this is an example of the benefits of being a seasoned and savvy veteran.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Essay 4496


Killjoys in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• As if we needed more news about O.J. Simpson, the New York Post reports of potentially violent episodes involving Simpson and part-time girlfriend Christie Prody (dubbed by the newspaper as a “Nicole look-alike”). About six weeks ago, Simpson confronted a man for allegedly sleeping with Prody and threatened, “Come over here. I’m going to fucking kill you.” You’d think at this point, O.J. might consider erasing the word “kill” from his vocabulary.

• To counter all the positive stories detailing how the Internet has helped spread the news and organize protests to support the Jena 6 families, there’s a nasty incident involving a White supremacist website. The website apparently listed the names and addresses of the Jena 6 teens and “essentially called for their lynching,” said an investigating FBI spokesperson. O.J. Simpson probably could have saved a lot of time and energy by posting his threats online too.

Essay 4493


From The Chicago Sun-Times…

--------------------------------

E-mail and blogs rally support for accused La. teens

Without this computer savvy, the fate of six black Jena High School students might never have become a national cause celebre. As much as younger generations are criticized for being socially awkward -- spending too much time text-messaging and IMing -- they were inspired to make a road trip to Jena to march for a cause instead of passively clicking on an electronic petition. In this technically advanced era, even bigotry in small towns, like Jena, can’t hide from a community wired and without boundaries.

The youths’ online commentary kept alive details about the teens arrested and charged with attempted second-degree murder for beating up a white classmate at Jena High School in 2006. (That student, Justin Barker, was treated for a concussion and bruises, then attended a school function later that night.)

People wanted to know why a schoolyard fight had been elevated to criminal charges. They questioned why white students -- who incited the racially charged atmosphere months earlier by hanging nooses from a landmark shade tree traditionally used by whites -- were ultimately let off because school officials said the ropes were simply a joke.

“It should never have gotten to the point of going to court for second-degree murder,” said Tamikka Jackson, a Chicago State University student who made the 20-hour trek to Jena last week as part of a bus convoy.

Like many others who took the long trip, this was Jackson’s first foray into protesting. The case of the Jena 6 has aroused the passions of many who previously hadn’t exercised their support for civil rights.

As generations before them were energized by the fight for civil rights, women’s rights and anti-apartheid, these youths found their cause. It was a collective oh-no-they-didn’t moment.

So bus loads of regular folks -- the middle-aged, retired and the young -- rolled into Jena on Thursday to demand fair treatment for the black students. They came from as far as New York, Chicago, St. Louis, Miami, even Alaska. They packed their own food and toiletries so they wouldn’t contribute to the local economy.

“I just don’t feel comfortable standing up for something and not giving all I could,” said Charles Harrington, 23, of Chatham. “I didn’t have all the money in the world. I couldn’t go to court. But I could give my body, soul and spirit to show I’m behind it.”

The protest invites comparisons to the civil rights movement, but there are key differences. Jena protesters didn’t face water hoses and vicious dogs. And a court system that once perpetuated a racist bias now seems more inclined toward meting out justice.

The original charges have been reduced for four of the teens. A fifth was booked on sealed juvenile charges. The conviction of Mychal Bell, 17, was tossed out by a state appeals court. He was denied bail in juvenile court on Friday.

Chicagoans who made the drive to Louisiana say what happened in Jena could happen anywhere. The difference in an age of cell phone cameras, e-mail and the Internet is that, to paraphrase King, injustice anywhere really is injustice everywhere.

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Essay 4483


From The Chicago Tribune…

----------------------------

Racism in a small town

At the start of the 2006 school year, an African-American freshman at Jena High School in Louisiana asked if black students could sit under a large shade tree that was a gathering place for white students.

The school principal said yes. Three white kids, members of the school’s rodeo team, had other ideas. They expressed their displeasure by hanging three nooses from the tree, a potent reminder of lynchings in the South.

The principal recommended that the three white students be expelled. The superintendent, Roy Breithaupt, objected. “Adolescents play pranks,” he said. “I don’t think it was a threat against anybody.”

The students were handed three-day, in-school suspensions -- what you might expect for toilet-papering the school grounds.

It’s hard to believe anyone would consider what those kids did a “prank,” much less a school superintendent in the South. But Jena, La., is showing the nation that racism is alive and well.

African-American residents say that in Jena -- a former mill town of 3,000 people that’s 12 percent black and 85 percent white -- black people are always punished more severely than whites. Events in the last year seem to back up that claim. In November, when a young white man pulled a shotgun on three black students outside a convenience store, he got off scot-free, while the young black man who wrestled the gun away was charged with theft. After a schoolyard fight in December injured a white student -- he was well enough to attend a party later that evening -- six black students were charged with attempted murder.

“I think it’s safe to say some punishment has not been passed out fairly and evenly,” school board member Billy Wayne Fowler told National Public Radio in July. “I think probably blacks may have gotten a little tougher discipline through the years.” But, Fowler said, Jena “is not a bunch of bigots.” People there “wouldn’t mistreat anybody.”

Now the nation is paying attention to Jena, and look what has happened: The attempted murder charges have been reduced. A state appeals court vacated a conviction for second-degree battery against one of the black students involved in the incident.

Thousands of people are expected in Jena on Thursday for a massive protest against the treatment of the students, who have come to be known as the “Jena 6.”

It’s hard to say from Chicago just what, if anything, is appropriate punishment for the students, who could still face jail time.

But it’s easy, even from afar, to see why they and many other people in Jena and around the world think there was a slim chance they would have been treated fairly before the rest of the country started paying attention.