Sunday, November 26, 2006

Essay 1367


Slurs merit ire, not laws

By Clarence Page

Until his racist rant at a Los Angeles comedy club threw his faltering stand-up comedy career onto a bonfire of insanity, Michael Richards was best known to millions as The Guy Who Used to Play Cosmo Kramer on “Seinfeld,” one of the most popular shows in TV history. Now he’s known as the mixed-up weirdo who gave us something besides sports and the midterm elections to talk about over Thanksgiving dinners.

By now you know the story: A raging Richards was caught on video camera spewing the N-word and making obscene lynching references at some black hecklers in the audience.

When the remorseful Richards later apologized (“I’m very, very sorry”) on CBS’ “The Late Show With David Letterman,” even he seemed to disbelieve his own denials of racism. “I’m not a racist, that’s what [is] so insane about this,” he said in a rambling satellite interview. “And yet it is said. It comes through, it fires out of me and even now in the passion that’s here as I confront myself.” His passive voice (“… It is said …”) sounded as unconvincing as President Ronald Reagan’s saying “mistakes were made” to disassociate himself from the Iran-contra fiasco. Richards sounded like a man trying desperately to disconnect himself from something that he, and only he, stands accountable for.

His apology to “Afro-Americans,” a term I have not heard much since the 1960s, revealed a man oddly out of touch with cultural currents, especially for an aspiring stand-up comedian. Yet, if being out of touch on race were a crime, the world would not have enough jails to hold all of the offenders.

With that in mind, one hopes that Richards will not be alone in using this incident as a learning experience, although I am not expecting miracles. The progress we have made from the era of lynchings to the era of racial bridge-builders, like Bill Cosby, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and Oprah Winfrey, fools too many people into thinking our racial divide has been closed--until an ugly surprise like Richards’ toxic tirade erupts.

Instead of helping us to learn, celebrities caught in such eruptions tend to do what Richards has done: They hire a spin doctor.

Richards hired Howard Rubinstein, a big-time crisis manager aptly described by The Washington Post’s Lisa de Moraes as “The go-to guy for celebrities who have really stepped in it.” Rubinstein, in turn, helped arrange apologetic phone calls by Richards to the go-to guys for big-time black rage, the Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.

Jackson has been talking to members of Congress about prohibiting the use of hate language in mass media, according to a WBBM-Ch. 2 news report. If so, let us hope those talks don’t get far. It is easy to agree with Jackson that hate speech divides society and can lead to violence, but if we let Congress decide which speech is and isn’t hateful, a lot of comedy clubs would be out of business.

And that’s not all. Everything offends somebody. Imagine the repercussions for TV shows like BET’s “Comic View” or HBO’s “Def Comedy Jam” that feature black stand-up comedians. I’ve heard from readers, for example, who are offended when black comics on TV poke fun at whites, Hispanics or Asians in their audiences. From the black cultural point of view, such a good-natured call-out can defuse racial tensions. But, to some white folks and others viewing at home, it’s hate speech.

The same caution should greet the looming legal actions that the two black male targets of Richards’ wrath might take. They’ve hired celebrity attorney Gloria Allred, the go-to woman for newsmakers with an actionable gripe. In a CNN appearance with her clients, Allred said they deserve compensation for the emotional pain they suffered. If so, I shudder to think where that could end. Current hate-crime laws add penalties to assault and other serious crimes if the offender’s speech indicates it was motivated by hate. But, if abusive speech without physical damage is grounds for a lawsuit, the biggest laughs will be coming from lawyers.

Richards is living with his own punishment, properly condemned by the court of public opinion. Even his hip and edgy comrades in comedy are acknowledging that there still are lines of decency that none of us should cross.

Among the offended is the real Kenny Kramer, on whom Richard’s character was based. “Use some of that ‘Seinfeld’ money to buy yourself an act!” he advised.

Right. Try some anger-management therapy too.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Richards is living with his own punishment, properly condemned by the court of public opinion. Even his hip and edgy comrades in comedy are acknowledging that there still are lines of decency that none of us should cross."

I'm curious as to whether this includes Chris Rock. Has he made any public comment on this issue?

HighJive said...

anonymous,

is it possible to discuss this topic without referencing chris rock? if you’re seriously seeking answers, consider picking up a copy of “nigger: the strange career of a troublesome word” by randall kennedy. all the best.

David Wen said...

I like your comment about Black comedians on BET. I have never thought of it from that perspective before.

Anonymous said...

Why shouldn't we talk about Chris Rock? Isn't he subject to the same rules as everyone else?

You have written that "...there still are lines of decency that none of us should cross." Does this apply to everyone or not? Does this apply to Chris Rock?

HighJive said...

FYI, this is an essay written by Clarence Page, a syndicated columnist. It appeared in nationwide newspapers.

We didn’t mean to imply Chris Rock should not be discussed; rather, Rock is always referenced in discussions on this topic — that is, “Why is it ok for some people to use the n-word, but it’s forbidden for others?”

Some would argue it’s never ok for anyone to use it.

But others would recognize Rock’s routine is significantly different than Richards’ usage.