Thursday, December 06, 2012

10819: U.K. = K.K.K.…?

Campaign reported the latest IPA Agency Census figures showed U.K. advertising agencies are hiring more than ever, bringing staffing numbers to the highest level in over 50 years. Gee, considering the recent Jonathan Akwue essay spotlighting the industry’s exclusivity—as well as the 2011 IPA Survey showing 90 percent of workers at member agencies are White—the dearth of diversity must be exploding at a record-breaking clip. Thank God, Queen and Country that equality champion Sir John Hegarty is there to promote change. Then again, he might not be there at all.

Why are adland staff levels booming?

The IPA has found that, despite the economic climate, agency numbers have spiked.

By John Tylee

If the latest IPA Agency Census figures are a true guide to the advertising industry’s future fortunes, it is a wonder that a few choruses of Happy Days Are Here Again are not ringing out from boardrooms across the country.

In a finding that seems to defy all logic, the census suggests that the figure of 20,491 people working in almost 300 IPA member agencies as of 1 September 2012 is not only above pre-recession levels but the highest in more than half a century.

Taken at face value, the finding runs counter to all the anecdotal evidence suggesting agency bosses are not letting staffing costs run ahead of revenue.

And it was little more than a month ago that the IPA’s Bellwether Report revealed that marketing spend has been revised downwards for a second successive quarter amid declining client confidence.

Perhaps the source of the apparent disconnect is to be found in adland’s age profile. The IPA survey reports that 45.1 per cent of those working in agencies are 30 or under and that the average age of a media agency staffer is 31. Just 5.5 per cent of agency employees are over 50.

Some suggest this may reflect the growing influence of digital, a discipline dominated by twentysomethings. “Digital agencies need a lot of very young people,” Mary Budd, a former IPA employment affairs advisor, says. “Not many of them are highly paid.”

Another theory is that agencies are taking on high numbers of young people because they are relatively low-maintenance. A typical graduate trainee at a top-20 agency is paid around £20,000 a year, rising to between £25,000 and £37,000 after training.

A number of other factors may also be fuelling numbers. They include high numbers of agency start-ups and new agency categories.

Roger Ingham is the IPA’s research consultant who collated the figures. He suggests much may be down to agency groups ending their recruitment freezes, resulting in more graduate trainees being hired, mainstream agencies staffing up for digital and more jobs emerging as media agencies start hiring creatives.

At the same time, numbers are being boosted by more part-time roles as agencies do more to accommodate working mothers and agency freelancers seek greater financial security by opting for full-time roles.

However, the overriding reason for the rise may be that the industry has to adapt to match the demands being made on it. Agency chiefs are said to be stripping out layers of middle management because clients are refusing to pay for it.

“Agencies don’t invest in middle-level people as they once did,” Belinda Kent-Lemon, an outplacement and talent management specialist who works with many of the leading UK agencies, observes. “It’s either at the top or bottom.”

Nigel Jones, the Publicis Groupe UK chief executive, says: “Agencies used to be structured like pyramids. Now they are more like hourglasses. Clients don’t like deep layers of middle management, so that’s where the cuts are being made.”

But Nick Grime, a partner at the headhunter LIZH, fears this is short-term expediency that may lead to long-term problems if there is no middle management through which succession management can evolve.

“We saw what happened as a result of the last recession when few planners were trained,” he says.

“Now it’s creatives and account handlers who could get lost in the middle.”

No comments: