Saturday, September 30, 2006

Essay 1159


Idea in Spanish is still spelled idea

By José Reyes

[José Reyes is partner and creative director at Turbulence, an award-winning creative shop in Miami focused on revitalizing brands by building culture, not just advertising. Prior to joining Turbulence, José was Group Creative Director of Zubi Advertising in Miami.]

So, a Puertorican, a Cuban, a Colombian, and an Argentine walk into a bar.

Nope, this isn’t some cheap, tasteless joke about our newfound multiculturalism. It’s every day at one of the top Hispanic agencies in the US.

Once we get to the bar, the scene’s pretty familiar. We all have high expectations, and we’re pretty hard on each other. After all, we’re all still looking for the best “idea.” Most of the creatives have been trained in other Spanish speaking countries, where production budgets aren’t great, so more emphasis is placed on creating something breakthrough. In those countries, advertising messages tend to be sophisticated with an emphasis on the creative solution without underestimating the consumer.

Unless you’ve been living in Kuala Lumpur, you know the Hispanic market has enjoyed a boom over the past few years. Clients are familiar with the research and charts all showing the growth in purchase power over the next few years coming from the Hispanic market, so most are interested in buying into this “new trend” which has been happening for the past 20+ years. Crisp, new marketing plans are minted daily focusing on the “Spanish dominant” Hispanic: the consumer which apparently survives in this country while only managing to consume Spanish-language messages. A traditional, family-oriented, lower-income, conservative adult with a basic level of education, and an over-developed sense of accomplishment that manifests itself in the need for emotional comfort provided by the countless products he comes in contact with.

Really?

Well, I’m sure in some cases this might be true, but definitely not in all cases. Some agencies have clients convinced there is some unique “Hispanic language” they can use that will make all Spanish-dominant consumers loyal to their product. They’ve been successfully built on answering the question: What’s Hispanic about it? The music. The family. The soccer. I argue, just like any other market in the world, what we need is FRESH IDEAS.

(That’s the sound of all the multi-cultural agencies collectively screaming blasphemy.)

Truth is, this market is changing, and just like any other marketing environment, fresh thinking is what separates one product from another. If we aren’t willing to accept this, maybe we’re in the wrong business. Maybe we should be translating. Maybe we should simply buy Spanish media. Maybe we shouldn’t be calling ourselves agencies. We are in the business of selling ideas that sell. Just in Spanish. Of course, I’m idealistic enough to believe we, as a market, are as sophisticated as the Anglo market, and we certainly need to understand the importance of communicating a fresh breakthrough idea to consumers. As the market becomes more inundated with advertisers, the advantage of a fresh idea will be more and more important. Simply producing Spanish language advertising won’t be enough — we need to produce great ideas. Just like everyone else.

Essay 1158


A not-so-thrilling MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Michael Jackson and ex-wife Deborah Rowe have reached a settlement in their child-custody battle. Lawyers for both parties declined to comment, so no one knows any details of the agreement. Which is fine, as most folks stopped caring after Thriller.

• Elvira Arellano will remain holed up in a church for now, after a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit that sought to halt the woman’s government-ordered deportation to Mexico. The illegal immigrant and her U.S.-born son took refuge in the Chicago church in August. Arellano and her lawyer declined to comment. Which is fine, as most folks stopped caring in August.

• In case anyone still cares, here’s one more response to the AdAge story presented in Essay 1136…

> Touchy subject, but considering the hugely great influence advertising has on our economy and the aggregate US dollars spent toward the companies that peddle the influence, it should be of equally great importance that these groups that represent the brands’ revenues be forced to reflect upon their actions. I do not agree with quotas for the sake of social compliance. However, the advertising industry has gone unchecked in its portrayal of Black people in the many media brands purchase by proxy. I can say from firsthand experience, even when faster, better and cheaper are the hot buttons, media groups that choose to represent the “true” reflective culture of Black America are shunned as not reaching the masses. Seemingly (and this is only from my experience as a Black media company owner), if we are not dedicated to reaching White audiences directly or by crossing over, Big Brand dollars are not for us. The brands won’t say it, but the actions of agencies are clear — Latinos and Asians are today considered target consumer markets, while Blacks are merely an annual $600 Billion given. “Throw them a bone during Black History Month, MLK day, Back to School, and the standard esoteric Cigarette promos.” Like all non-mainstream markets, the nascent Black market may be relatively small, but the major difference and “need” for municipal oversight is that advertising to this market is not represented by nor is it representative of its culture — and it would be nice both socially and economically if it were. — Chicago, IL

Essay 1157


You won’t stay swole if you eat this shit regularly. But you might swell.

Essay 1156


From The Los Angeles Times…

--------------------------------------------

‘Girlfriends’ feels left out of the clique

The long-running show has a new time slot and a new network. But its creator wishes the CW would tout it more.

By Greg Braxton, Times Staff Writer

When it comes to on- and off-screen drama, it’s hard to beat the comedy “Girlfriends.”

As “Girlfriends” launches its seventh season at 8 p.m. on Sunday, its creator is biting the hand that programs the show — the new CW network — saying she’s not feeling the love. The network denies the charge, saying it has much love. One of its core stars dropped out unexpectedly at the end of last season and has turned down pleas to make a farewell appearance. And the first episode of the season begins not with a joke but with one of the girlfriends jogging through the ruin and recovery of Hurricane Katrina-torn New Orleans.

The furor helps mark a milestone season for “Girlfriends,” whose producers include Kelsey Grammer. The comedy is one of the longest-running series featuring a predominantly black cast since “The Cosby Show,” surpassing the runs of ABC’s “My Wife and Kids,” Fox’s “The Bernie Mac Show,” and even NBC’s “The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air.” “Girlfriends” is also the most veteran UPN series to survive the WB and UPN merger that led to the CW.

Moving from the 9 p.m. Monday time slot it previously occupied, “Girlfriends” is the anchor of the CW’s Sunday lineup of African American shows that includes “Everybody Hates Chris” and “All of Us,” while also serving as the springboard lead-in for its spinoff, “The Game,” which premieres Sunday.

On the eve of the new era, Mara Brock Akil, the key creative force behind “Girlfriends” and “The Game,” calls this season “an exciting challenge.”

But she is troubled that “Girlfriends” was not included in the CW’s “Free to Be …” billboard and bus-placard campaign hyping its programming. The push focused on “America’s Next Top Model,” “Gilmore Girls” and “Veronica Mars,” while also giving a boost to “Smallville,” “Everybody Hates Chris” and “Supernatural,” which have not been on the air as long as “Girlfriends.”

Akil said she was concerned when she first heard that the show “was moving from the Monday night slot where we’ve worked so hard to build an audience. … I know [CW Entertainment President Dawn Ostroff’s] financial purse is tight, but to move us without a billboard around town when we’re going into our seventh season doesn’t make me happy. Will our fans know we’re on, or when?”

She said that “Girlfriends” “has never had a billboard, even though more times than not we’ve been the No. 1 show in black households.” She continued: “That’s not right. If I meet this challenge, even though our numbers may be small, I will consider them double what they are, because we would have done it without marketing support. I know it’s the reality of the business, but I don’t like it.”

Responding to Akil’s comments, a network spokesman said, “When you’re launching a new network, there are countless marketing priorities, including an overall branding campaign, which featured every show on the CW. ‘Girlfriends’ is one of those shows, and we are very proud that it’s anchoring our new Sunday night as the most-watched program on television by African Americans since it premiered in 2000.”

And in an interview earlier this week, Ostroff called the series an integral part of the CW’s strategy to attract female viewers. “When ‘Girlfriends’ was on UPN, it was still going strong,” she said. “It’s very important for us — it helps to bring in women. The show is so smart, and shows women in a realistic vein.”

Making the transition even tougher for Akil is the unexpected departure of one of the series’ main cast members, Jill Marie Jones, which caught Akil and the rest of the cast off-guard.

Jones’ character, real estate agent Toni, was embroiled in several heavy-duty story arcs last season, which included a bitter divorce and custody battle, and a falling out with her best friend, restaurant owner Joan (Tracee Ellis Ross).

The departure of Jones and her refusal to make a farewell appearance still has Akil shaken. She said: “I would love for her to come back, but Jill doesn’t want to return. I don’t know 100% why she made this decision. She didn’t tell me. All she said when we talked was that she felt it was time for her to move on. The door is not closed. We’ve asked her to come back and have offered different ways for her to return. But I completely wish her well. There’s no drama involved.”

Jones declined to comment. “There really is nothing to say,” said the actress’ publicist, Nicole Nassar.

“Girlfriends” will now deal with Toni’s loss through Joan’s struggles, said Akil. “We’re going to show what it’s like to lose a best friend and not have that last conversation to say goodbye.”

That loss will be linked thematically to Joan’s visit to New Orleans, where she went after her falling out with Toni and her other friends. The season opens with Joan jogging from the French Quarter to the 9th Ward, and was filmed guerrilla-style with a local crew.

Ross said: “The scene really opens the devastation that has been in Joan’s life. We’ve always straddled the line between comedy and drama, and showing real life is what keeps our show fresh.”

Akil said she knew it was risky to start the new beginning of “Girlfriends” with the sequence: “It’s a little out of character with the show — it’s not the conventional thing to do, especially when the story is not about New Orleans. This was our way to reach outside the box, and pay tribute to New Orleans at the same time. It’s our way of saying we don’t want people to forget what happened there. We can’t delve into it like an hour drama. But I’m proud of the way we did it.”

Essay 1155



For Blacks, Ford presented a man discussing his fade and barbershop (see Essay 1146). For Hispanics, it’s a face-painting soccer fan. Clearly, Bold Moves does not refer to the automaker’s multicultural messages.

Essay 1154


From The Los Angeles Times…

--------------------------------------

For 20 years, gay men have vigorously fought the contention that HIV is a disease of homosexuals.

But now, one of Southern California’s most influential gay institutions has embarked on a controversial ad campaign with this stark declaration: “HIV is a gay disease.”

With that message and the tag line “Own It. End It” on billboards and in magazines, the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center says it is trying to reach legions of gay men who have become complacent about HIV and AIDS.

The campaign is an abrupt departure from the years of hard politicking against the idea of AIDS as a gay plague, a characterization that many — including the Gay & Lesbian Center — had argued marginalized victims and made it hard to reach others who were at risk, including thousands of minority women who have become infected in recent years.

The ads have stunned some in the gay community and the AIDS services world, who recall the early years of the epidemic, when anti-gay clergy railed against the condition and little money was available for research or prevention.

(Click on the essay title above to read the full story.)

Essay 1153


Is Terry McMillan moonlighting as a copywriter? What’s next — How Stella Got Her Fixed Car Back?

Essay 1152


Just in time for Yom Kippur, this editorial appeared in newspapers nationwide…

-------------------------------------------------------

The new anti-Semitism

Victor Davis Hanson, a senior fellow and historian at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University: Tribune Media Services

Hating Jews, on racial as well as religious grounds, is as old as the Roman destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem. Later in Europe, pogroms and the Holocaust were the natural devolution of that venom.

Anti-Semitism after World War II often avoided the burning crosses and Nazi ranting. It often appeared as a more subtle animosity, fueled by envy of successful Jews in the West. “The good people, the nice people” often were the culprits, according to a character in the 1947 film “Gentleman’s Agreement,” which dealt with the American aristocracy’s social shunning of Jews.

A recent third type of anti-Jewish odium is something different. It is a strange mixture of violent hatred by radical Islamists and the more or less indifference to it by Westerners.

Those who randomly shoot Jews for being Jews--whether at a Jewish center in Seattle or at synagogues in Istanbul--are for the large part Muslim zealots. Most in the West explain away the violence. They chalk it up to anger over the endless tit-for-tat in the Middle East. Yet privately they know that we do not see violent Jews shooting Muslims in the United States or Europe.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad promises to wipe Israel “off the map.” He seems eager for the requisite nuclear weapons to finish off what an Iranian mullah has called a “one-bomb state”--meaning Israel’s destruction would only require one nuclear weapon. Iran’s theocracy intends to turn the idea of a Jewish state on its head. Instead of Israel being a safe haven for Jews in their historical birthplace, the Iranians apparently find that concentration only too convenient for their own final nuclear solution.

In response, here at home the Council on Foreign Relations rewards the Iranian president with an invitation to speak to its membership. At the podium of that hallowed chamber, Ahmadinejad, who questions whether the Holocaust ever took place, basically dismissed a firsthand witness of Dachau by asking whether he really could be that old.

The state-run, and thus government-authorized, newspapers of the Middle East slander Jews in barbaric fashion. “Mein Kampf” (translated, of course, as “Jihadi”) sells briskly in the region. Hamas and Hezbollah militias on parade emulate the style of brownshirts. In response, much of the Western public snoozes. In the last two decades, Islamic terrorists have bombed and murdered thousands inside Europe and the United States. Their state supporters in the Middle East have raked in billions in petro-windfall profits from energy-hungry Western economies. For many in Europe and the U.S., supporting Israel--the Middle East’s only stable democracy--or even its allies in the West has become viewed as dangerous and costly.

In addition, Israel is no longer weak but proud and ready to defend itself. So when its terrorist enemies like Hezbollah and Hamas brilliantly married their own fascist creed with popular left-wing multiculturalism in the West, there was an eerie union: yet another supposed Third World victim of a Western oppressor thinking it could earn a pass for its murderous agenda.

We’re accustomed to associating hatred of Jews with the ridiculed Neanderthal right of those in sheets and jackboots. But this new venom, at least in its Western form, is mostly a left-wing, and often an academic, enterprise. It’s also far more insidious, given the left’s moral pretensions and its influence in the prestigious media and universities. The renewed hatred of Jews in the Middle East--and the indifference to it in the West--is a sort of “post anti-Semitism.” Islamic zealots supply the old venomous hatred, while affluent and timid Westerners provide the new necessary indifference--if punctuated by the occasional off-the-cuff “Amen” in the manner of a Louis Farrakhan or Mel Gibson outburst.

The dangers of this post anti-Semitism is not just that Jews are shot in Europe and America--or that a drunken celebrity or demagogue mouths off. Instead, ever so insidiously, radical Islam’s hatred of Jews is becoming normalized.

The result is that the world’s politicians and media are talking seriously with those who not merely want back the West Bank, but rather want an end to Israel altogether and everyone inside it.

Friday, September 29, 2006

Essay 1151


Is it the shoes? Who cares, mamacita.

Essay 1150


Surviving and stayin’ alive with a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• CBS reality TV series “Survivor” decided to integrate its tribes. No explanation was offered for the multicultural merging. “We’re back to America. We’re a melting pot,” said contestant Parvati. “I love it.” Now will someone with broader appeal replace host Jeff Probst please?

• Environmentalists and authorities believe the proposed U.S.-Mexico border fence will upset migration routes for animals, including rare birds and jaguars. Although the animals will probably wind up using the same alternative paths as illegal immigrants. In the meantime, prepare for face-offs between The Minuteman Project and PETA.

• Senator George Allen is now taking heat from a Confederate group that feels he dissed them by distancing himself from Confederate symbols. Hey, as much as he’d like to, Allen can’t be expected to support every racist platform.

Essay 1149


“People, I just want to say, you know, can we all get along?”

That’s a tough question to answer, based on the last few weeks in the advertising industry.

Anheuser-Busch pulled the plug on its Bud Light campaign starring Zagar and Steve. Native American groups complained Zagar — who bears an uncanny resemblance to a Yanomamo tribesman — displayed stereotypical and racist characteristics.

An Ohio auto dealership sparked outrage by trying to air a radio commercial with blatantly anti-Muslim messaging. The announcer copy proclaimed the car seller was “declaring jihad on the automotive market.”

The Chicago Creative Awards sunk to new lows with Master of Ceremonies Tony Little, accompanied by two scantily-clad, large-breasted bimbos. The lecherous Little literally groped female award recipients when they stepped onto the stage. Next year, maybe the Chicago Creative Club will book Neil French to host.

CBS reality TV series “Survivor” segregated contestants by ethnicity, ultimately polarizing advertisers as well. After two episodes, the producers switched to a multicultural merging with no explanation.

Plus, a contender in Advertising Week’s annual icon contest is none other than Aunt Jemima.

The continuing diversity soap opera inspired plenty of ugliness too.

Advertising Age conducted a poll that showed 93 percent of respondents did not think the agreements signed by New York shops would solve the exclusivity problems.

Advertising Age followed through with a cynical editorial that stirred controversy when the iconic publication declared The Human Rights Commission is “asking the industry to lower its standards” by hiring minorities. Subsequent “clarifications” by AdAge were delivered with a bumbling incompetence reminiscent of the infamous Al Campanis perspective on Blacks in sports.

Emails and letters to the editor unleashed the biased, bigoted responses that, for all intents and purposes, clearly established there are serious race-based dilemmas plaguing Madison Avenue.

New York City Councilman Larry Seabrook provided terse commentary regarding the no-shows at a diversity forum scheduled during Advertising Week. According to Seabrook, advertising executives “ran like chickens with their asses plucked clean.” The councilman warned he might be issuing subpoenas soon.

Activist and radio talk-show host Sanford Moore also publicly skewered the industry with references to economic colonialism and slavery. He’ll probably ask O. Burtch Drake to cough up 40 acres and a mule.

To top it all off, blogger Copyranter posted this attempt at humor:

Advertising Week — Thursday Morning Diversity Seminar.

In response to widespread media criticism, The 4As this morning held an impromptu Diversity Seminar/Breakfast at a secret swanky Manhattan restaurant. However, an anon copyranter operative was able to snap some pics. On hand were Juan Valdez (pictured), Aunt Jemima, and the Travelocity Gnome, who were all seated at a VIP table and served by an all-white staff of top ad industry honchos. Said Phil Dusenberry, former BBDO Chairman, with a laugh, “Wow, that was enlightening. Now I know what it feels like to be a spic slave-mama midget.”

Nothing like completing the circle with a racial slur.

Can’t imagine any of this will help future recruitment efforts. In fact, potential minority candidates may view these sad activities as evidence to stay away.

It’s no wonder the 4A’s hired a PR firm to rejigger its image. At this point, an extreme makeover is in order. Somebody call Queer Eye pronto.

Thank God — or whatever deity you worship — it’s Friday.

------------------------------------------------

(Visitors are cordially invited to click on the essay title above to reread the MultiCultClassics inaugural rant.)

Essay 1148


Hard to believe this ad was produced in the 21st century. And it looks like the dude is only eyeing the woman’s Bud Light.

Thursday, September 28, 2006

Essay 1147


Two more comments in response to the AdAge story presented in Essay 1136. Initial comments were listed in Essay 1140…

> I’m shocked. Shouldn’t employment be about finding the best people for the job? The problem lies with educating and developing minorities, to enable them to make a valuable contribution in advertising. — London

> I totally concur with “hometown’s” comments. Perhaps someone should explain to Mr. Seabrook that the New York Times reaches more African Americans on a daily basis than the Amsterdam News. And is more efficient. I nominate Butch Graves to be the teacher. — New York, NY

Essay 1146


Here’s a minority version of Ford’s latest campaign. The man discusses his fade and trips to the barbershop. The copy even features an obligatory “Keep it tight.” It’s a wonder Ford didn’t play off “Bold Moves” by depicting the man breakdancing.

Essay 1145


AdAge.com calls radio talk-show host Sanford Moore “The Man Who Triggered The Diversity Probe.” The Man talks via video — click on the essay title above to check it out.

Essay 1144


(The latest issue of Advertising Age presented more propaganda from 4A’s President-CEO O. Burtch Drake.)

Essay 1143


(Letters To The Editor from the latest issue of Advertising Age, including a spanking from New York City Commission on Human Rights Commissioner Patricia L. Gatling.)

Essay 1142


Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Essay 1141


Be the first on your block to own a KOAB. Provided you can handle the $100,000 price tag. Click on the essay title above or call 949 859 KOAB.

Essay 1140


Check out these comments responding to the AdAge story presented in Essay 1136. Click on the essay title above for the full story, including video of the proceedings…

> To give business to a firm solely because it is owned by a black man is no better than to give business to a firm solely because it is owned by a white man. Advertising media placement is a game of numbers. If any media company, minority- or Caucasian-owned, wants to gain market share, they need only provide an audience of greater number and value to marketers. Forcing advertisers to spend money in any market which does not provide the greatest return will diminish their ability to compete. Their business will not grow as fast as others in their category and, in turn, their advertising budgets will reduce. The best thing minority-owned media companies could do to get a greater share of the advertising pie is to provide a greater share of valuable market audience. — Hometown, DC

> The best rationale for the need for this dialogue comes not from the article but from the previous comments. How can the industry of “Big Ideas” be filled with such small minds? The arrogance displayed in these comments is a glaring reflection of the problems that face this industry. You copy the style, language, fashion and music of the African American community, and then question African Americans the availability of qualified people to hire? At least be creative in your denial. Dallas, Texas — Grand Prairie, TX

> No one likes to have decisions forced upon them. No company or its principals are ever welcoming to the notion that government can step in and say that they are doing things in an unethical or unfair manner. However, businesses felt that same way in the 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, etc. At some point, regardless of your race or ethnic origin, you must notice the huge disparities that exist between “white” companies and everyone else’s. It’s more a matter of fair and honest competition than making sure that black businesses get a cut. Monopolies are broken up. Anti-trust suits are filed. Barriers must be broken in a civil and judicious manner, similar to the 1960s. What is the other recourse? It’s not as simple as saying: “Don’t they have anything better to do?” or “Focus on your community.” It’s a fight for proportionality. The percentages of blacks working in ad agencies are not low due to lack of skills, experience, or desire. The question becomes what is actually lacking in the process that can be fixed. — Philadelphia, PA

> This is ridiculous. Diversity hearings are for losers. You don’t see Asians out there beating their chest for an equal opportunity. They do a fantastic job, and they get hired. Anyone who is hired to fill a quota, and not on their own skills, is lazy, or untalented. Maybe diversity needs to be forced onto corporations that are traditionally white/male only, like big oil manufacturers. When I worked in oil&gas, there were no black people… unless they were working on the rigs. THEY need to be forced to be diverse. The advertising industry is probably one of the more diverse industries there is. Give me a break! — Burlington, ON

> I think the agencies were wrong not to attend. I think they could have used the opportunity to show which minority media they do buy and which media they don’t. There are several reasons why I didn’t buy specific media in the past, especially community newspapers: poor circulation figures (if audited at all), poor production standards, and canned editorial content straight from corporate PR departments. When given the choice between legitimate media reaching minorities, especially magazines, such as Black Enterprise, radio such as KMEL, and cable TV versus these local publications, I didn’t hesitate. And naturally, it was the publishers who were the loudest critics. — Novato, CA

> In over 30 years in the agency business I have only worked with two African Americans. This issue should have been addressed years ago. Kudos to the NYC City Council. — Irvine, CA

> Don’t those people have anything better to do? Instead of demanding that agencies hire minorities to fill some arbitrary quotas perhaps they should focus on the minority communities and what they should be doing to improve their saleability to the agencies that hire. I’d also like to see the data that supports their claim. — Alamosa, CO

> I will admit that I may not be totally informed about the purpose of the public hearing. However, once again, it appears that the government is forcing its way into the private sector’s decision-making process. If the ad community decides to skip the meeting, let the marketplace determine how to handle it. Why does the government feel compelled to threaten them, or at the very least use their public forum to bash them. This issue is larger than this hearing; it is just another example of how the government will throw their weight around whenever they don’t get their way. Let’s face it, we all can’t get our way but the rest of us have to deal with it. As for the minority-owned businesses, I do see a need to help them get started and have a solid foundation. But once they are up and running, why is it the role of the government to continue to support them? If they have a good idea that the market has a need for, combined with a strong business plan, shouldn’t they be able to stand on their own? This all reminds me of something I was once told, “We become experts on external conditions when we fail to look at ourselves.” — NORFOLK, VA

> I think there are few companies out there in general that support diversity. Many corporations have “diversity programs” whether that is for hiring internally or externally with suppliers. However, I bet if you investigated the issue further you would find that many of these “programs” are fronts. Corporations and Ad Agencies will still continue to do what they want unless someone actually holds them accountable and they are required to disclose NOT just “numbers” but names of individuals or contractors that can be verified. Then and only then will they start to take it seriously! — Chicago, IL

> Obviously the New York City Council practices the much-practiced Jesse Jackson-inspired shakedown techniques that are cloaked in the phoniness of “diversity.” Can we also ban the word “disrespected?” — Plainfield, IL

Essay 1139


New Yorkers have counted on HIP’s health plans for almost 60 years. The ad image — with Gramps and the kid dancing in front of a brownstone stoop — looks like it’s almost 60 years old.

Essay 1138


New media opportunities in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• The Los Angeles Times reported on a new wave of hype in rap music: creating viral marketing with folks in jail. One record label sends promotional material to incarcerated pals, realizing these felons are tastemakers. “Prisons are great because you have an incredibly captive audience that has a lot of entertainment time on its hands,” said a record label executive. “These people are definitely influential, and not just in the prisons. … A lot of these guys are still calling shots in the outside world. You look in some of these urban communities and you see some of these pimps and gangsters as the governors of the ghetto.” Yeah, but most folks on Madison Avenue are still a lot more evil than the typical convict. Click on the essay title above to read the full story.

• The Health Department in New York is waging war against trans fat, proposing a ban on its use in restaurants. Officials are comparing the health dangers of trans fat to lead paint. The New York City Health Commissioner proclaimed, “Trans fat causes heart disease. Like lead in paint, artificial trans fat in food is invisible and dangerous, and it can be replaced.” Hey, lead paint tastes much better than the standard McGriddles® sandwich.

• Chicago’s first Wal-Mart is tailored to appeal to Blacks and Latinos with bilingual signage, urban clothing labels and more. There’s even Latino-themed soft drinks and food. Additionally, local residents are benefiting from jobs provided by the megastore. However, they can look forward to remaining low-paid employees, thanks to Mayor Richard Daley’s veto of a proposal to boost the wages at big retailers.

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Essay 1137


Ever smelled anything that made you feel like steppin’? This ad smells — and it makes you feel like steppin’ to the toilet.

Essay 1136


From AdAge.com…

------------------------------------------------------

NYC Official Slams Agency Execs for Skipping Diversity Hearing

Mad Ave. Also Criticized for Lack of Spending in Minority-Owned Media

By Matthew Creamer

New York (AdAge.com) -- New York City Councilman Larry Seabrook blasted ad agencies who failed to show today for a public hearing on minority-owned media, saying they “ran like chickens with their asses plucked clean,” and suggested a subpoena might compel them to do so in the future.

‘Relegated to leftovers’
Madison Avenue, under fire for its failure to build diverse workplaces, was also slapped today for not buying enough ads in media outlets owned by African-Americans, Latinos and other minorities. In hearings at New York City Hall, media owners and City Council members blasted the industry for what one described as an environment where these outlets are “devalued and relegated to leftovers.” But it wasn’t just media plans that got the goat of the council. What raised the council’s ire and brought out some of the loudest verbal fireworks was the decision by agency executives not to show up and testify, a move that could ultimately lead to more hearings.

Left holding the bag was the agency business’ trade group, the Association of American Advertising Agencies. 4A’s Senior VP Adonis Hoffman said the agencies’ decision not to appear followed a series of agreements with the New York City Human Rights Commission that had the effect of canceling a separate set of hearings into diversity hiring matters also scheduled for this week. Both sets of hearings were scheduled to coincide with Advertising Week, the industry’s annual celebration.

With those agreements, he said, the agencies “would be free to proceed with their diversity plans without hearings on the issues that were resolved as a result of many months of negotiations. Thus, following the advice of their individual legal counsel, the agencies, as you can understand, opted not to appear today.”

‘It’s disrespectful’
Councilwoman Letitia James said the decision was “an affront to the City Council. We’re pretty offended by this. It’s disrespectful.”

For his part, Mr. Hoffman acknowledged the challenges facing the media outlets, in an era of media consolidation, and he offered a set of recommendations for how the city can help. He said the city should use tax incentives and other economic-development tactics as part of a program to promote minority-ownership of media.

But that did little to ease the concerns of the media owners. Following a presentation by a Verizon government-affairs executive touting the company’s diversity record, Elinor Tatum, editor-publisher of the New York Amsterdam News, questioned Verizon’s commitment to minority-owned media. She said that in her paper’s case Verizon bought a couple ads every January and February to coincide with Black History Month and Martin Luther King's birthday.

“It seems like black newspapers exist only in January and February,” Ms. Tatum said.

List of grievances
Overall, a long list of grievances was aired, ranging from the fact that multicultural agencies are often subcontractors and thus control a small slice of ad budgets to the fact that those budgets often are relatively tiny set-asides and don’t come out of general-marketing budgets. Said Ms. Tatum: “Agencies blame clients. Clients blame agencies. That way all the doors stay closed.”

Mr. Seabrook, who brokered an agreement with Omnicom Group, the largest ad-agency holding company, to provide more than $2 million toward a diversity program, has been trying to broaden the debate beyond workplace issues to include matters such as media spending. Last week, four Omnicom-owned agencies followed shops from WPP Group, Interpublic Group of Cos. and Publicis Groupe in settling with the Human Rights Commission, agreeing to set and report minority-hiring and promotion goals.

Essay 1135


For an ad whose headline reads, “Where Style Meets Substance,” there’s little style or substance.

Essay 1134


4A’s President-CEO O. Burtch Drake — seeking to kick off diversity initiatives during Advertising Week — stares at a Black woman’s booty.

(Photo credit: AdFreak.com)

Essay 1133



Sunday’s issue of The New York Times Magazine featured a 37-page special advertising supplement comprised of diversity messages from a host of companies.

These types of ads, many of which have been presented on this blog before, usually appear in minority business publications for recruitment purposes — plus, the insertions help satisfy corporate goals to support minority-owned media.

It’s unclear what inspired this collection. Not surprisingly, there were no messages from New York advertising agencies.




Essay 1132


The Apocalypse is officially scheduled to take place on Wednesday, October 11 at 10pm/9c.

Essay 1131


From The Associated Press…

--------------------------------------------------------

Spotlight shined on lack of racial diversity in New York ad agencies

NEW YORK — Why, city officials demanded, were there virtually no black staffers at New York’s elite advertising agencies? The year was 1968. Agencies’ executives vowed to fix the problem.

They did not.

Now, under steady pressure from advocates and the threat of public embarrassment by city officials, they have renewed those promises. Sixteen of the city's top ad agencies have agreed to recruit more minorities, especially blacks. They will also diversify senior management and let city officials monitor them for three years.

As Advertising Week 2006 festivities begin, the agreements signed with the city’s Human Rights Commission offer a rare glimpse inside one of New York's core industries — and reveal that its work force does not look much like the nation.

“This is a big deal — that advertising agencies actually signed written agreements to make these changes,” said Burtch Drake, president of the American Association of Advertising Agencies. “Will you see an overnight sea change? No. But over time you’ll see other cultures integrated into advertising.”

About 3 percent of advertising staffers nationally were black in 2005, according to U.S. Bureau of Labor data, with 1.6 percent Asian and 7.5 percent Latino. In upper management, the diversity is virtually nonexistent, data show.

Under the agreements, big agencies including WPP Group PLC’s Ogilvy & Mather, Publicis Groupe SA’s Saatchi & Saatchi and Draft New York, part of Interpublic Group of Cos. Inc., will devote staffing and resources to finding and keeping more minority staff members. They will set up in-house diversity councils, and executives who meet the new hiring goals will be rewarded accordingly.

“This strategy is deliberate — we really wanted to change things across the board,” said Patricia L. Gatling, head of the human rights commission.

Spokesmen for advertising agencies have mostly declined to comment on the issue. Young & Rubicam, a unit of WPP, issued a statement saying the agency “believes that diversity is a business imperative and we are pleased to have come to an agreement with the Human Rights Commission that reinforces our diversity initiatives.” Omnicom Group Inc., parent of DDB Worldwide and BBDO Worldwide, has pledged $1.25 million to diversity initiatives within the company and will help establish a new advertising curriculum at Medgar Evers College in Brooklyn.

Why did the city focus on advertising? It is hardly the only big industry that lacks racial diversity. City officials said it was time to revisit an issue first raised at their hearings in 1968. And Gatling, a former prosecuting attorney, took a tough approach.

And then there is Sanford Moore.

The veteran black advertising guru, 65, for decades wrote letters, staged protests and pushed public officials to highlight the lack of diversity in advertising. Off and on for 13 years, he has also discussed it on his Sunday night talk show, “Open Lines,” on the radio station WRKS-FM. His on-air name is Charles W. Etheridge III.

The agreements are a result of Moore’s determination, said Eugene Morris, president and CEO of E. Morris Communications, a Chicago-based agency specializing in the African-American market.

“He has been a bulldog,” said Morris.

Moore conceded: “I’m obstinate. I’ve kept records on this since 1968.” He added, “I call advertising the last bastion of Jim Crow.”

The relationships he built through his lobbying with city public officials, including Gatling and City Councilman Larry Seabrook, prompted the Human Rights Commission to begin subpoenaing advertising agencies’ staff records in 2004.

Potentially embarrassing public hearings, at which agency executives would likely have faced tough questions during the industry’s annual Advertising Week, had been scheduled for Monday. They were canceled after the diversity agreements were announced earlier this month.

Seabrook will hold hearings Tuesday on a related issue: the struggles that black media have getting big clients to advertise with them.

“The advertising issue isn’t just about hiring, it’s about doing business,” Seabrook said, referring to the vast but mostly white industry of artists, writers and smaller ad agencies that subcontract with big agencies. “African Americans participate as consumers — we spend $350 billion a year in this country. But we are not getting our just due.”

Earl G. “Butch” Graves Jr., CEO of Black Enterprise Magazine said that some big corporations refuse to court minority consumers, but much of the blame lies with advertising. “They must hire people from top to bottom that look like society. How can an ad agency be charged with having a worldwide assignment for marketing and have all the people in the room be white men?”

Advertising experts say it is tough to find and keep minority ad professionals. Entry-level salaries are around $30,000 a year, likely unappealing to some potential recruits, said Mary Hilton, vice president of public affairs for the American Advertising Federation.

Black students often must be recruited into college advertising programs, said Jerome Williams, an advertising professor at the University of Texas at Austin. Many have never considered it because they know of no blacks in the industry.

Alicia Evans, a black advertising professional, said when she worked at a large, mainstream agency she won raves from clients. But she was never embraced by her mostly white co-workers and supervisors.

“I needed to be mentored,” said Evans, president of Total Image Communications a public relations agency in Westbury, New York. When you’re black, “you’re out there on your own.”

Seabrook said that, since the advertising agreements have been made public, he’s received calls from around the country.

“People say, ‘You think advertising is bad, you should come see where I work,’” he said. “The next journey is going to be Wall Street.”

Essay 1130


Ever wonder where Serena Williams, Usher, 50 Cent, Maurice White and more go to buy pit bulls? Of course not. But now you can click on the essay title above and find out.

Essay 1129


Keeping abreast of old news with a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Janet Jackson revealed she hasn’t spoken to Justin Timberlake since the 2004 Super Bowl “wardrobe malfunction” incident. “We haven’t spoken. But I consider him a friend, and I’m very loyal, and friendship is very important to me,” said Jackson. “He has reached out to speak with me.” And probably cop another feel. Plus, could someone tell Jackson that most of us stopped caring about this topic around two minutes into the 3rd quarter of the 2004 Super Bowl? Jackson also expressed surprise over all the hoopla. “So much more important things were going on in the world. And the focus was on my breast? That didn’t make any sense to me.” Jackson is currently baring her enhanced breasts on about a dozen magazine covers.

• A federal judge approved a class-action lawsuit charging Big Tobacco with allegedly lying to the public about “light” cigarettes for the past 30 years. A lawyer for Reynolds American Inc.’s R.J. Reynolds Tobacco division said, “We obviously disagree with the ruling — strongly.” Well, yeah, liars do tend to dispute being called liars.

• Senator George Allen continues to face accusations of racial insensitivity, as two former acquaintances said Allen used racial slurs in the 1970s and 1980s. According to the two folks, Allen regularly used the N-word. “I don’t remember ever using that word,” said Allen. “And it is absolutely false that that was ever part of my vocabulary.” This guy sounds like a lawyer for Big Tobacco.

Monday, September 25, 2006

Essay 1128


The new standard in luxury: rims called Vomit. Don’t want to know what the old standard was.

Essay 1127


Adjusting the contrast with a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Mickey D’s will contribute $2 million to the La Jolla, California-based Scripps Institute for funding research and programs targeting child obesity. “Everything that we keep on seeing is the whole issue of childhood obesity and the early onset of Type 2 diabetes has grown exponentially,” said President and Chief Operating Officer Ralph Alvarez. “We felt we needed to get greater education in this area.” Alvarez is aware of the irony of the company’s donation. “Ironic or not we’re going to make a difference. … You won’t see those benefits short-term, in one to three years, because habits change over time. But as a major restaurant company, we need to be on the cutting edge of what’s happening.” So for now, keep feeding your kiddies Happy Meals to give the researchers plenty of scientific data to work with. And the Scripps Institute can probably expect to receive the $2 million in the form of McDonald’s Gift Certificates.

• Oprah is launching her own XM Satellite Radio channel called Oprah and Friends. The station will broadcast 24/7, featuring personalities from her TV show. Let’s see, Oprah’s got TV, radio, Internet and magazines covered. Look for the woman to fund inventing a new media outlet to dominate soon. And to contrast Oprah’s XM Satellite Radio offerings, Snoop is hitting the scene in November.

Essay 1126


Don’t play with razor bumps. Don’t play with asthma. Note to creatives: Don’t play with clichés.

Essay 1125


From The New York Times…

------------------------------------------------

Focusing on an Attitude Rather Than a Language

By MIREYA NAVARRO

LOS ANGELES — In “Pimpeando,” a new show about cars, the talk is of lowriders and paint jobs with images of Aztecs and the Virgin of Guadalupe.

The target audience may also watch “Pimp My Ride,” the MTV car customizing series on which “Pimpeando” is based. But the sought-after viewers for this show are primarily young Latinos, a fast-growing demographic whose taste in entertainment runs from English to Spanish, from American to Latin, and back. And MTV is giving chase.

Today it is starting MTV Tr3s as a replacement for the all-Spanish language “MTV en Español,” a 15-year-old video jukebox that MTV executives now say was a placeholder while they tried to figure out more fitting programming for the Latino youth audience.

The new MTV Tr3s, or MTV Three, doesn’t shun Spanish — it will broadcast, for example, “Quiero Mis Quinces,” a Latin American show about the coming-of-age parties for 15-year-old girls, with English subtitles — but it will mostly reflect the fusion of American and Latin music, cultures and languages, MTV executives said.

That means V.J.’s who speckle their English with Spanish words, a playlist that puts Daddy Yankee next to Justin Timberlake, and original programming like “Pimpeando,” which pairs the popular host-customizer Michael Martin, or “Mad Mike,” star of “Pimp My Ride,” with Luis Lopez, a custom painter from the San Fernando Valley.

MTV Tr3s, pronounced “MTV tres,” is concentrating on Latinos between the ages of 12 and 34 and expects to reach at least 15 million households through cable, satellite and broadcast channels, said Lucia Ballas-Traynor, general manager of the network’s new channel.

Market research has consistently shown that while the American-born generations increasingly speak only English, they preserve a pride and sense of uniqueness based on their Hispanic heritage. Christina Norman, the president of MTV, declined to estimate the dollar investment the network made in Tr3s, but she said that from its name — “Three,” following MTV and MTV2, MTV’s video-intensive offshoot — to its sharing of MTV’s marketing, research and even personnel, the new network is beaming a message in and outside the company that “it’s not that Latin channel over there.”

“In people, in money and in time, MTV Tr3s is part of the MTV brand in the biggest way that we can think of,” she said.

The potential audience is huge. About one in five Americans aged 34 and younger is of Hispanic descent, and MTV executives cite Census Bureau estimates that say by 2020 the Latino teenage population is expected to have grown 62 percent, compared to 10 percent for teenagers over all.

Television networks are not the only ones trying to figure out how to reach this audience. Carl Kravetz, chairman of the Association of Hispanic Advertising Agencies, said his group is grappling with a shift away from equating Latin with Spanish. He said that instead of emphasizing language — “Should we do the ad in English or Spanish?” — the thinking is shifting to first considering whether the message touches on the common values and attitudes that set Latinos apart from the general market.

These attitudes, he said, include a less individualistic approach to life, a less rebellious view of parents and a less rigid sense of privacy.

“It is obvious that whatever it is at the core of feeling Latino is not just about language,” Mr. Kravetz said. “It really is about identity.”

Already cable channels like SiTV and Mun2, a Telemundo channel that underwent a makeover last year, offer Latin-theme hybrid programming. Robert Rose, chief executive of the AIM Tell-A-Vision Group, which produces two syndicated shows for American-born Latinos, said that the advent of MTV Tr3s is significant because it should help get the attention of advertisers, the majority of which, he noted, still try to reach Latinos through Spanish-language media only.

“I view them as an ally because they’re further validating the market that we’re all targeting,” Mr. Rose said of MTV.

Executives at Mun2 say their shows are striking a cord with their target audiences. A musical countdown show of both Spanish and English hits, “18 & Over,” beats MTV, VH1 and BET among Hispanic viewers aged 12 to 34, with about 66,000 watching.

The numbers may seem small, but Alex Pels, general manager of Mun2, said the network’s ratings have tripled since it was revised last year with different programs and a more balanced offering of shows — from the hip-hop oriented “One Nation” to the Mexican regional music-based “Reventón” — which appeal to Latino tastes that vary from the East Coast to the West Coast. (Mun2 also relocated its headquarters to Los Angeles from Miami.)

But Mr. Kravetz said, “We’re still not in a place of ratings wars.” The efforts to reach young Latinos, he said, is “at a point where people are still tweaking and fine-tuning and trying to figure things out, including MTV Tr3s.”

Their smaller size and niche status allow cable channels to experiment in ways broadcast networks often don’t. MTV, for instance, has also been courting young Americans of Korean, Indian and Chinese descent with their own music channels.

Cheskin, a research firm that this year released a report based on videotaped interviews with bilingual Latinos ages 13 to 19, found that these teens often include their extended family in their social network, that they want to be part of the mainstream but maintain their ethnic identity and that they will respond to either English or Spanish content as long as “it recognizes the role that Hispanic culture plays in their lives.”

Jose Tillán, a senior vice president at MTV Tr3s, said the channel would serve as a platform to develop new Latino musical talent and will put Latin superstars like Alejandro Sanz and Juanes on an equal footing as English-language counterparts such as Beyoncé and U2.

Programming includes adaptations of MTV shows like “Total Request Live” and “Sucker Free.” “MiTRL” on MTV Tr3s showcases talent from both cultures, relying on rock, urban and pop music, and “Sucker Free Latino” features hip-hop and reggaeton.

“For us it’s extremely exciting,” said Gus Lopez, president of Machete Music, Universal Music Group’s Latino urban label, whose artists include reggaeton stars like Don Omar. “I’m hoping the right videos for new music and unique talent could open up the door to a new listener and maybe even radio.”

And to take into account differences among Latino groups, the channel offers music blocks and “destination” shows to appeal to that diversity. “Pimpeando,” for example, is geared to the Mexican-American market, which helped establish the low-riding car culture.

“It’s something people ask, why hasn’t it happened before,” said Abel Izaguirre, an artist who appeared on “Pimpeando” to talk about his murals and automotive airbrush work.

At 35 Mr. Izaguirre is on the fringes of the MTV Tr3s target audience, but he said that his 16-year-old daughter and 12-year-old son will likely be viewers because they already watch MTV, Mun2 and LATV, a hybrid local channel here.

Even with MTV Tr3s this population is still underserved, Mr. Kravetz said.

“What happens to the children who are now watching ‘Dora the Explorer?’” he asked, referring to the Nickelodeon cartoon. “What happens when they become tweens and teenagers? There’s still not a lot for them to turn to where they find themselves represented.”

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Essay 1124


The character depicted here claims he’s not a starving artist. The art director responsible for this ad should be.

Essay 1123


The article below appeared on AdAge.com. A MultiCultClassics commentary immediately follows…

---------------------------------------

Just Make It Stop: 4A’s Hires PR Help

Fed Up With Bad Press for Advertising Industry, O. Burtch Drake (pictured above) Taps GolinHarris

By Matthew Creamer

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Advertising Week, the industry’s annual pat on the back that kicks off this week, won’t be the end of Madison Avenue’s collective publicity efforts. Despite the fact it got badly burned last time it tried the tactic, the industry’s largest trade group has hired one of the country’s largest PR firms to conduct a public-image campaign on behalf of the business.

‘Negative headlines’
The American Association of Advertising Agencies has tapped GolinHarris, a global firm that represents corporate heavyweights such as McDonald’s and SC Johnson, to stave off “negative headlines” and burnish the industry’s reputation with reporters and other influencers.

It’s unclear exactly what tactics will be employed, but executives familiar with the situation said part of the outreach could target reporters who don’t cover the ad business on a regular basis with the hope of scoring positive stories in mainstream business magazines and in the consumer press.

‘Reputation problem’
“Our industry has had a reputation problem the past few years, though that’s been turning a bit with the excitement around new media,” said Julie Thompson, co-chair of 4A’s PR committee and communications chief at Leo Burnett. “I was surprised and pleased that an industry association many would call old school would take this step. It’s a refusal to keep taking lumps.”

The program, one executive said, is a reaction to “negative headlines about the business.” And, to be sure, the industry has picked up its share in recent years as consumer behavior and technological change call into question the relevance of ad agencies, especially the largest ones, and their best-known commodity, the 30-second TV spot. More recently, the agency world is getting bad press for its lack of success hiring minority staff.

‘Journalists aren’t idiots’
But even some agency PR people familiar with 4A’s programs aren’t confident Golin can pull off glowing headlines in any credible media outlet, given the issues facing the business. “Journalists aren’t idiots,” one PR executive said. “Why would any journalist, let alone one at a mainstream business publication, want to paint a Pollyannaish picture of the ad industry?”

At a hush-hush meeting Sept. 6, Golin pitched its plans to the 4A’s PR committee, composed of top communicators from some of the biggest agencies. A team from GolinHarris, brought in by 4A’s President-CEO O. Burtch Drake, laid out a few tactics, including one where agencies would feed news to the Golin team, which would aggregate the information and pitch it as trend stories to reporters.

Those present said it sparked more than a little grousing from agency PR folks, confused about why they’d want to cooperate with their competitors in achieving their communication goals. “The majority of the room was skeptical,” said an executive who was there.

Big stakes
Such a program may seem like inside baseball, but it does lay bare the insecurity that plagues the ad-agency industry in a time of immense flux. Just how the industry is perceived in corporate boardrooms, on Wall Street and in major business media has consequences for both how marketing budgets are spent and for the financial fortunes of the publicly traded companies that own most of the major shops.

This isn’t the first time the 4A’s has tried to counter skeptical reporting on the ad business. In 2004, it hired Dan Klores Communications to publicize the first Advertising Week.

It ended up landing a Fortune story titled “Nightmare on Madison Avenue.” Oh, it mentioned Advertising Week, but not before it spent a few thousand words trashing BBDO and giving Shelly Lazarus and Donny Deutsch room to criticize the industry’s shortcomings. It also quoted executives whining about procurement and, of course, the passing of the easy-like-Sunday-morning business culture that dominated for so long.

“Any time you pitch a story, you run the risk of being glorified or crucified,” Ms. Thompson said. “No risk, no reward.”

---------------------------------------

Damn. Have things ever been worse for the 4A’s and the advertising industry?

Even Advertising Age appears incapable of recording the events without injecting a critical and sarcastic tone.

One must wonder if the 4A’s leaders are actually working advertising professionals. What would compel them to believe hiring a PR firm is the solution? As most adfolks realize, it’s tough to generate positive hype when you’ve got a fucked-up product.

4A’s PR committee co-chair Julie Thompson admitted, “I was surprised and pleased that an industry association many would call old school would take this step. It’s a refusal to keep taking lumps.” First of all, the 4A’s does not deserve to be called old school. The 4A’s is old. Period. The step being taken here is completely typical of a decrepit and desperate dinosaur. Plus, AdAge’s story clearly demonstrates that the 4A’s and the industry can expect to continue taking lumps until they get their shit together.

The 4A’s inability to agree on a course of action — or to simply come to a consensus on GolinHarris’ bad ideas — does not bode well for the industry’s chances of making progress on any initiative, especially the diversity efforts. In standard old style, the bigwigs of our business don’t trust each other, despite being trapped on the same sinking ship.

If the 4A’s and the industry honestly hope to stop the negative press, they need to stop the negative stupidity. Then start doing something positive. Accomplish anything. It’s just that easy.

Or at least stop talking to AdAge reporters.

Essay 1122


The latest American Girl catalog features 35 photographs of Caucasian girls and 3 photos of Black girls — and one Black girl is depicted twice with the same product, while the other is out of focus in the background. Guess the doll company isn’t interested in accurately reflecting American girls. Plus, the girl shown below is kinda creepy — she looks less life-like than the doll.

Essay 1121


Meet Justin Merrick. The next great symphony conductor. Um, somebody forgot to tell Justin it was a black-tie affair.

Essay 1120


Affirmative action ban provokes uncivil response

BY GEORGE WILL

DETROIT -- A feisty 29-year-old white woman and a pugnacious 67-year-old black man are performing two services this autumn for Michigan and the nation. Their Michigan Civil Rights Initiative is promoting color-blind government. And they are provoking remnants of the civil rights movement, which now is just a defender of a racial spoils system, to demonstrate its decadence, even thuggishness.

In November, Michiganders will vote on this ballot initiative: “A proposal to amend the state constitution to ban affirmative action programs that give preferential treatment to groups or individuals based on their race, gender, color, ethnicity or national origin for public employment, education or contracting purposes.”

At age 19, Jennifer Gratz, denied admission to the University of Michigan, fought the university all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. It endorsed her argument that it was an unconstitutional denial of equal protection of the law for the university to add 20 points to the scores of black, Hispanic and Native American applicants. (The maximum score was 150; a perfect 1,600 SAT earned 12 points.)

Ward Connerly is a California businessman and former member of the University of California Board of Regents. He propelled to victory the measures mandating colorblind government in California and Washington.

With Gratz as its executive director, and Connerly lending hard-earned expertise, the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative collected 508,000 signatures. In response, some opponents have adopted four tactics, none of which involve arguing the merits of racial preferences, and all of which attempt to prevent Michiganders from being allowed to vote on the initiative. The tactics have included:

•Pressuring signers of petitions to say they did not understand what they were signing. Some talk radio stations have broadcast the names of signers, and opponents of the initiative have gone to signers saying, “Did you know you signed a petition against equal opportunity?” Two who recanted their signatures, saying they had signed without reading the measure, are federal judges.

•Violently intimidating the state Board of Canvassers, which certifies that initiatives have qualified for the ballot. The Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action By Any Means Necessary disrupted the board’s deliberations, shouting and overturning a table. Video of this can been seen at www.michigancivilrights.org.

•Asking a court to rule that the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative committed fraud because many who signed the petition supposedly were confused. A federal judge -- Arthur Tarnow, a Clinton appointee -- sadly said he could not rule that way because, although he thinks the initiative is a fraud, whites as well as blacks were confused about it, and even if all signatures gathered in majority black cities were invalidated, there still were enough signatures to qualify it for the ballot. So Tarnow contented himself with an extrajudicial smear of Gratz, charging that her “deception” had confused all Michigan voters, regardless of race.

•Michigan ballots are printed by counties, so the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action says it is asking local officials to assert an extralegal “moral authority” to leave the initiative off the ballot. Because the plain language of initiative is appealing, some opponents argue that it would have terrible “unintended consequences.” It might, they say, eliminate single-sex public schools (Michigan has none; eight schools have a few voluntary single-sex classes) and breast-cancer screening, or might stop a Department of Natural Resources program aimed at helping Michigan women become hunters.

Given the caliber of opposition arguments, it is no wonder a Detroit News poll published Sept. 15 shows the initiative with an 11-point lead.

Anti-initiative demonstrators chant, “They say Jim Crow, we say hell no.” So, the rancid residue of what once was the civil rights movement equates Jim Crow -- the system of enforced legal inferiority for blacks -- with opposition to treating blacks as wards of government, in need of infantilizing preferences, forever. To such Orwellian thinking, Gratz and Connerly -- and soon, perhaps, Michigan say: Hell no.

Essay 1119


A moving MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• A New York City Councilman is pissed off over an ad from Public Storage (depicted above), claiming the message is “offensive and insulting” to outer boroughs residents. “Implying, as your company does, that there is no reason, other than your storage facilities, to visit four of the five boroughs is simply wrong,” the councilman wrote to the storage company CEO. The incident demonstrates New Yorkers never need a good reason to bitch.

• California filed a lawsuit against the U.S. operations of General Motors Corporation, Ford Motor Company, the Chrysler division of DaimlerChrysler AG, Toyota Motor Company, Honda Motor Company and Nissan Motor Company, alleging the automakers cause global warming. Sounds like an inconvenient lawsuit.

• A new energy drink has sparked controversy with its name — Cocaine Energy Drink. The president of the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University said, “Kids get hopped up on drinks called Cocaine and Xtazy and then what happens when someone offers them a line of real cocaine or an Ecstasy pill?” And what about kids who drink Nelly’s Pimp Juice and then are introduced to a real pimp?

• A new Internet game pits a tequila-packing Mel Gibson against rabbis and state troopers. The game features Gibson cruising in his silver Lexus with rabbis hurling Stars of David at the actor-director. So far, over 700,000 folks have played, making it the passion of the gamers.

• Bill Cosby now wants every American to contribute $8 to fund a national slavery museum to be built on former Civil War battlefields. “The incentive is that they would join in with the rest of the United States of America in saying yes … I gave $8 to help build something that tells the story,” said Cosby. The star then probably went on a tirade against the poor descendants of slaves.

Essay 1118


Surely there must be a better way to execute this strategy. It would have been preferable to let Tyler Perry’s Madea or Martin Lawrence’s Big Momma deliver the message.

Saturday, September 23, 2006

Essay 1117


Advertising Age reporter Matthew Creamer previews the upcoming Advertising Week in New York (click on the essay title above to read it all).

Creamer does a great job of poking fun at the events. But what does it say about Advertising Week when the leading trade magazine has trouble taking things seriously?

Sadly, event organizers will be hard-pressed to outdo Creamer in terms of entertainment value.

Essay 1116


Taking a coffee break with a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Starbucks is upping the prices of its products, blaming the increase on rising fuel costs. “I think their prices are pretty expensive,” said a customer in Manhattan. “It’s too extravagant for a basic cup of coffee.” A typical Starbucks coffee in New York will set you back about two bucks — while the same amount of joe at a deli costs around 65 cents. And to think Mrs. Olson used to insist Folger’s coffee was “The Richest Kind.”

• A Pensacola pizza deliveryman has launched a union for fellow drivers — the only such organization in the country. He currently represents 11 workers as president of the American Union of Pizza Delivery Drivers. If the union pushes for mandatory coffee breaks at Starbucks, look for the price of pizzas to skyrocket.

• Exxon Mobil is facing an age discrimination lawsuit filed by pilots who claim they’re forced out of work at age 60. “The Age Discrimination in Employment Act protects these experienced, safe, competent pilots from being grounded just because they reach their 60th birthday,” said an EEOC attorney. “We contend the way to determine if someone should continue to do the job is to use our modern-day avenues: physical and mental fitness, not a calendar.” Hey, the pilots could probably make more money delivering pizzas in Pensacola.

• A Columbus, Ohio car dealership sparked controversy for plans to run a radio ad proclaiming “a jihad on the automotive market.” The spot also says sales folks wearing “burqas” — traditional dress for Islamic women — will hawk vehicles that “comfortably seat 12 jihadists in the back.” Despite protests, the car dealership is adamant in its intentions to air the alleged tongue-in-cheek message. Um, maybe Pope Benedict XVI needs to call these morons.

Essay 1115


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

If this financial company really wanted to connect with the target, it would change its name to Ameripride.

Friday, September 22, 2006

Essay 1114


AdAge.com reports on the Hispanic Creative Advertising Awards (click on the essay title above for more, including links to view spots)…

-----------------------------------------

Best of Show: Energizer’s ‘Beard’

But Grupo Galleagos Had to Fight to Make It

By Laurel Wentz

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) – “Beard,” the Grupo Gallegos-produced TV spot for energizer that won the Hispanic Creative Advertising Award for Best of Show, almost didn’t get made.

Back burnered
Energizer liked it, but the idea went on the back burner while the company promoted lithium batteries instead. Grupo Gallegos stubbornly went out and shot the spot anyway, Energizer loved it and, thanks to the agency’s perseverance in bringing a good idea back to life, “Beard” ended up a winner.

The commercial chronicles the life of a clean-shaven man whose beard grows in the blink of an eye, forcing him to shave constantly with his Energizer-powered razor. The commercial is cleverly shot so that he grows a heavy beard in the instant it takes him to sneeze at the office, do a sit-up at the gym and have the photo on his driver’s license examined by a cop, all during his deadpan narration of why this is such a problem and the importance of appearance.

Hispanic insight?
“Beard” highlights a point debated during the contest judging: Must winning work contain a Hispanic insight, or is it enough to have a good idea that works well with Hispanics but would likely appeal to others as well?

“We don’t force Hispanic insights where they’re not necessary,” principal John Gallegos says. “Hispanics want batteries to last longer [too]. They don’t do anything different with batteries.”

Essay 1113


A magically delicious MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• The New York Post reported Michael Jackson wants to build an amusement park in Ireland with a possible leprechaun theme. “Michael is deadly serious about this idea,” said an anonymous source. “He loves the whole idea of leprechauns and the magic and myths of Ireland.” Jacko probably intends to have the leprechaun characters played by young boys.

• A group of Black Republicans has sparked controversy by airing a radio spot that claims Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican. So how come many Republicans opposed making Dr. King’s birthday a national holiday?

• The High Court in the Indian state of Kerala overturned a ban on Coca-Cola and Pepsi that stemmed from accusations the sodas contained high levels of pesticides. However, Kerala’s Chief Minister is seeking to reverse the decision and stated, “The court’s verdict quashing the Kerala government’s order is unfortunate and the government is exploring legal steps to take corrective measures to reinforce the ban.” In the meantime, Coke is exploring introducing Coke Black Flag and PoweRaid Sports Drink.

Essay 1112


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

Mercedes-Benz offers a nice sentiment. But whose group is represented by the loner behind the car?

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Essay 1111


The Letter to the Editor below was published in the latest issue of Advertising Age (Essay 1057 presented an abridged version that originally appeared on Adage.com). A MultiCultClassics rebuttal immediately follows…

---------------------------------------------------------

This whole so-called issue is simply ridiculous! Any agency, no matter how big or small, as a private company operating in a free market, should have the solemn right to select and hire its employees based on talent, skills and qualification and not on skin color!

Actually, what the commission requests is much more racist in its core—as it will mean that, for example, a white copywriter or creative director with a better portfolio or more appropriate experience should be neglected in favor of a black candidate just because of a “minority quota.” Such a quota would be understandable for government and city jobs, but for the private sector? How about Wall Street then? How about Silicon Valley?

And how about the percentage of black students in Ivy League colleges? Or how about a “white-player quota” on NBA basketball teams?

I, for example, am Bulgarian—or, to put it another way, an “East-European American.” English is not even my native language. Despite my background, portfolio and references, I found it extremely difficult to land a job in the American advertising industry until a small Chicago agency came out brave and decided to give me a try.

But according to the approved labeling system, I must be labeled “white/Caucasian” and not a minority “Bulgarian-American.” Now is that fair?

By the way, do you ever wonder how many white vs. black candidates apply for each top agency position? Of course, when 90% or more are white, the end result would be quite obvious. And nobody should complain about it.

Milko Stoyanov
Creative Director
Graziano, Krafft and Zale
Chicago

---------------------------------------------------------

It’s always disturbing to see such stereotypical and clichéd thinking coming from someone claiming to be a creative director.

The letter is thoroughly unoriginal, littered with the standard reasoning that routinely surfaces during diversity debates. To complete the tired discussion, here are the standard counterpoints:

• Yes, most agencies have the “solemn right” to hire anyone for any reason. But this simply ridiculous so-called issue is actually focused on doing the right thing.

Additionally, it is illegal for bosses to discriminate based on such things as skin color. Like it or not, our industry’s ethnic percentages seem to indicate biased behavior is taking place. That is, it appears people have been hiring based on skin color — with a strong preference for White skin. That’s a no-no.

Finally, most big agencies service accounts with non-private components (e.g., Lottery, Tourism, Anti-Drug PSAs, etc.). So it could be argued these companies have responsibilities similar to governmental institutions.

• The commission is definitely not pushing racist requests. In fact, the commission is determined to battle racism. At no time has the commission recommended hiring less qualified minorities over White folks. The belief that White folks will suddenly face discrimination is just too stupid to consider. Then again, it’s said that turnaround is fair play.

Keep in mind that the commission is ultimately demanding that Madison Avenue keep its promises. Advertising agencies pledged to change back in 1978. The old Chinese proverb says, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.” The commission is probably tired of being played for fools.

• Ivy League schools have shown concern about the percentages of Black students on their campuses, and many are executing initiatives to address the matter. Maybe it’s time for Madison Avenue to follow suit.

• Why do so many folks point to the NBA as The Great Equalizer? It wasn’t long ago that Blacks faced tremendous difficulty being allowed on the hardcourts. Ditto for breaking into the coaching ranks. If anything, the NBA demonstrates that once minorities receive opportunities, they succeed and thrive. Perhaps some folks are afraid a similar result would take place in the advertising industry.

• For a minority “Bulgarian-American” to be labeled “White/Caucasian” is possibly an amazing benefit with a host of advantages. Milk it for all it’s worth, Milko.

• Hey, lots of folks wonder why over 90 percent of top agency candidates are White. That’s one major point inspiring the commission’s actions. And everyone should complain about it.

HighJive
Creative Blogger
MultiCultClassics.blogspot.com
Blogosphere

Essay 1110


Adweek asked Adfolks about Survivor.

Essay 1109


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

For concept and execution, this Las Vegas ad hits the jackpot.

Essay 1108


Breakfast is served with a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Mickey D’s is planning to make its breakfast products available 24/7. It’s all part of an updated kitchen layout that will also give customers a better view of the food being prepared. Not sure any of this is good news. Would you like fries with that McGriddles®?

• The Fire Department of New York launched a million-dollar recruitment program to entice minorities and women, but only a few applications have been turned in. Maybe the FDNY is taking advice from New York advertising agencies.

• Anheuser-Busch announced it will terminate the Bud Light campaign starring “Zagar and Steve” following complaints from Native American groups (see Essay 1040). “Based on discussions with the program director at the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility about these concerns, we have decided to conclude the campaign at the end of the month,” said an Anheuser-Busch spokesperson. Which means Zagar is now available to join the FDNY.

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Essay 1107


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

Looks like the Hyatt Touch® is getting more and more diverse.

Essay 1106


One more comment responding to the AdAge editorial presented in Essay 1094…

> It is very sad that in 2006 the advertising industry and Ad Age, for that matter, feel that they have to “lower their standards” to gain more diversity within the advertising industry. You can call it a clarification all you like, but the fact that a clarification had to be made to the editorial in the first place is quite telling... In any event, the recent “deals” made by the NY ad agencies are a further insult. While it is unfortunate that people have to be embarrassed or threatened by litigation to do the right thing is shameful; however, I guess we can look to the commission every 30 years or so to expose the dirty laundry in the industry. The facts are that if minorities can excel in every other aspect of business and industry, they can certainly excel within the advertising agency if given the exposure and opportunity. If the agencies were really out to increase the diversity and were looking for ways to do so, they should only look as far as old-fashioned tactics such as networking with current ethnically diverse employees or clients (assuming there are more diversity employees than just in administrative positions). These people would be more than happy to reach within their ranks, specifically those who attended HBCUs (Historically Black Colleges & Universities) to help start recruitment programs on their campuses. Instead, they took the easy way out. While the Omnicom/Medgar Evers College arrangement is a step in the right direction, it should be noted that one campus may not be able to produce the numbers needed to achieve real change within the industry. Finally, let me say I am tired of all these people talking about handouts, whining and complaining, etc. As an African American advertising executive, equipped with an MBA and many years of experience managing large budgets for major corporations, I am NOT looking for a handout, nor do I need one. My qualifications, along with many others, speak for themselves. What we would like to see is an industry that is paid for creativity embrace some of the most creative, trend-setting people on the planet within their industry. If you consider examples, like Shonda Rhimes, creator of Grey's Anatomy, Usher Raymond, top-selling R&B artist (whose music is embraced by the general market teenagers) and is currently starring on Broadway and many others, it shows that the marketplace is ready to embrace diversity even if the ad industry (who consider themselves in the forefront of setting trends) is not. — Atlanta, GA

Essay 1105


Three more comments responding to the AdAge editorial presented in Essay 1094…

> As a Libertarian, I abhor government intervention of any kind. As someone who has run an agency, I also know how difficult it is to find minority candidates of any kind. The word “grandstanding” couldn’t be more appropriate, especially in a critical election year. Can the industry do more to become more ethnically diverse? Yes. But it must police itself. — c, O

> This whole thing is sickening. Another example of giving people something before they earn it. I don’t care what color you are or where you come from. Work for what you want, study for it, become qualified and luckily you will get it. And don’t lose sight of the fact that there are plenty of others out there who try and try and get turned down who are all colors. When are the “hand-outs” to ever end? It seems everyone has their hand out and everyone is owed something for nothing. Quit whining and complaining. From Detroit, Michigan — Southfield, MI

> Your editorial may be well-intentioned, but you obviously didn’t consult any people of color before you wrote it. The editorial, while trying to appear balanced, lacks real understanding of the issue as seen by those on the short end of the stick. Very few gains for “minorities” have been achieved without significant action and established goals. Business runs on setting goals and objectives. The only way to shake the advertising industry out of its inertia and disinterest in hiring and promoting qualified “minorities” is for those who have some authority to call the industry to task. The Commission’s action is necessary and long overdue. It now must back up the words and agreements with action. I find your attempt to spin your comment about lowering standards a bit distasteful. Why would you even utter the thought that an agency would lower its standard in order to hire minorities? The mere fact that you mention it indicates that it is your thinking. There are plenty of qualified candidates available, the one qualification they seem to lack is one they can never have: white skin. Put that aside and the pool widens dramatically. There is no single qualification for a career in advertising. Many luminaries in the industry gained entry through a myriad of channels. The same opportunity should be made available to “minorities.” — Stamford, CT

Essay 1104


Two sides to every border story in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• The Homeland Security Department selected Boeing to provide high-tech solutions for securing the border. The estimated $80 million contract will pay for Boeing to install cameras, sensors, fences, unmanned aerial vehicles and more. Additionally, Boeing becomes the unofficial sponsor of The Minuteman Project.

• The proposed 700-mile-long fence to be built along the Mexican border may have a 75-mile gap. The area in Arizona is home to the Toohono O’odham Indian tribe, who oppose the fence concept on environmental and cultural grounds. “Animals and our people need to cross freely,” said a member of the tribal council. “In our tradition we are taught to be concerned about every living thing as if they were people. We don’t want that wall.” This should significantly reduce the amount of loot Boeing hoped to collect.

Essay 1103


From AdAge.com…

-------------------------------------------------------------

Omnicom Settles With NYC Human Rights Commission

Deal May Halt Hearings on Diversity Hiring Set for Next Week

By Matthew Creamer

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Four Omnicom Group-owned agencies have reached a settlement with the New York City Commission on Human Rights, bringing the largest ad-agency holding company in line with rivals that earlier this month struck deals to publicly set goals for hiring minority staff and then report on their progress.

Agency chiefs subpoenaed
The agreement will likely head off the threat of potentially embarrassing hearings set for next week, when the industry celebrates its third annual Advertising Week. The commission subpoenaed a number of New York agency chiefs as part of an investigation into the industry’s historical struggles in building diverse workforces. Among them were executives from Omnicom-owned agencies BBDO, DDB, Merkley & Partners and PHD.

The commission has said previously that hearings would go on only for agencies that haven’t signed agreements with the commission. Commission spokeswoman Betsy Herzog declined to comment.

Omnicom, the No. 1 ad-agency holding company, had been alone in balking at the commission’s demands. Earlier this month 11 agencies from Interpublic Group of Cos., WPP Group and Publicis Groupe signed memoranda of understanding with the commission in which they agreed to create goals for diversity hiring that will be reported publicly to the commission.

Deal with city councilman
Instead of striking a deal with the commission, Omnicom brokered one with New York City Councilman Larry Seabrook. It pledged more than $1 million for a program that includes the creation of advertising, marketing and media curriculum at the historically black Medgar Evers College. That program is still in the works, despite today’s news.

“Our agreements with both the City Council and City Commission assure a long-term commitment that we believe will be tangible and effective in generating long-term solutions,” said Omnicom President-CEO John Wren in a release.

Mr. Seabrook is inviting industry executives to hearings on Sept. 26 on the diversity issue and ad-spending in minority-owned media.

Al Sharpton statement
Today’s press release from Omnicom featured a glowing quote from Al Sharpton, president-founder of the National Action Network: “This is an historic day in advancing our efforts to increase diversity in the advertising industry. I applaud John Wren and his companies for their continued efforts and for now setting the highest standard in the industry. Omnicom’s commitment of people and financial support show why it is the market leader in the advertising world, they think and act big.”

Essay 1102


From The Chicago Sun-Times…

--------------------------------------------

Race study pays off in genius grant

BY ERIC HERMAN, Staff Reporter

Genius has its rewards. Just ask Jennifer Richeson.

The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation awarded Richeson a $500,000 “genius grant” Monday. The coveted grant comes in recognition of her work in the psychology of racial bias.

“It’s not quite real. I’m totally in the land of the surreal,” said Richeson, an associate professor of psychology at Northwestern University.

Richeson’s work is firmly grounded in reality. With techniques including surveys and MRI brain imaging, she studies interactions between races, shattering traditional views of how people think and feel about race.

The Chicago-based MacArthur Foundation created the grants in 1981. Officially, the program is called the MacArthur Fellowship. But foundation officials concede the “genius grant” label, created by the media, has stuck.

Money comes over 5 years

Each year, the foundation selects 20 to 25 “really creative individuals” in fields from science to music, said Daniel Socolow, director of the MacArthur Fellows Program. Past recipients include author Susan Sontag, geneticist Eric Lander, civil rights lawyer Marian Wright Edelman and filmmaker John Sayles.

Though the amounts have changed over time, grantees now receive $500,000 over a five-year period, coming in $25,000 payments four times a year. The money is taxable, Socolow said.

What makes the grants unusual is that recipients do not have to do anything for the money. They do not have to finish specific projects, report how they spend the funds, or explain what they worked on during the five years. The purpose is to give talented people “the gift of time and an unfettered opportunity to reflect, explore and create,” MacArthur president Jonathan Fanton said.

Not planning to splurge

Richeson will “spend a little bit of time thinking” about the issue that has captivated her since her college days: The complexity of racial feelings.

“This stuff isn’t straightforward. … It isn’t just a question of who and who is not a bigot,” she said.

For example, Richeson’s work has shown that well-meaning whites work to repress bigoted feelings when dealing with people of other races. Brain scans show “heightened activity in areas of the brain associated with regulating our thoughts and emotions,” she said.

That effort leads to “awkwardness” and “exhaustion” in social interactions, she said, and could lead to depleted ability to perform other tasks.

Richeson grew up in Baltimore and attended public schools. She became interested in race relations while in college at Brown University, which was “a sea of whiteness” filled with wealthy kids, she said.

After getting a doctorate at Harvard University, Richeson taught at Dartmouth College in Hanover, N.H., before coming to Northwestern last year.

As for the money, Richeson has no plans to take a sabbatical from Northwestern, she said. She said she will devote her efforts to “the mission of improving intergroup interaction.”

“I want to do something purposeful with it. I’m not going to go buy a Porsche,” she said.

Contributing: Jim Ritter

Essay 1101


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

These audiences are also targeted with diversity messages, including all the typical recruitment ad clichés.

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

Essay 1100


One more comment responding to the AdAge editorial presented in Essay 1094…

> I wouldn’t recommend either side holding its breath on having a diverse industry. It’s clear that the ad industry — as well as many others — doesn’t feel the need to show diversity in its hiring practices outside of having black receptionists since this doesn’t seemingly contribute to the bottom line. — Baltimore, MD

Essay 1099


CLARIFICATION: Our editorial “The Ad Industry Diversity Hiring Controversy” was intended to convey that the laudable -- and indeed necessary -- goal of increasing agency diversity cannot be accomplished by agencies inking agreements that have unrealistic or unachievable hiring goals forced by political grandstanding. The line that the Human Rights Commission is “asking the industry to lower its standards” has been misread by some to have an alternative meaning. In actuality, it was meant to indicate that if agencies -- to satisfy the HRC or any other governmental body -- hire candidates based on ethnicity alone rather than suitability for the post at hand, it does a disservice to all parties. (AdAge attached this clarification to the editorial presented in Essay 1094.)

CLARIFICATION REBUTTAL: AdAge deserves some credit for attempting to record and comment on Madison Avenue’s diversity dilemmas. At the same time, the iconic magazine ultimately exposes a root cause of the global problem: Cultural Cluelessness.

This leading publication reporting on the advertising industry also reflects the ignorance, arrogance and biased behavior so prevalent in our ranks. Are AdAge’s writers and editors racists? Probably not. Are they insensitive and unfamiliar with non-White cultures? Based on the recent work — including the clumsy columns by Bob Garfield — the answer is a resounding yes.

AdAge believes its words have been misread. But folks in the know absolutely understand the meanings behind the copy.

AdAge revealed our industry has ignored the investigations and recommendations of the Human Rights Commission since at least 1978. Talk about political grandstanding.

AdAge proclaims the agreements have “unrealistic or unachievable hiring goals.” Says who? Advertising agencies routinely deal with complex contracts for everything from production budgets to celebrity endorsements to legal disclaimers. Have the top shops in New York knowingly signed pacts with impossible requirements? Of course not. The company lawyers would never have allowed it.

“…Asking the industry to lower its standards” is nothing short of insulting. For starters, the industry doesn’t have standards. Agency managers with hiring authority regularly hand jobs to kin, close pals, neighbors, client relatives and more. People land positions in our business by lying, cheating and even performing sex acts. The only mandate that’s been consistently upheld is the refusal to employ minorities.

If AdAge needs proof that the initiatives can succeed, simply consider professional sports. When minorities are provided opportunities to participate and lead as managers, they inevitably match and exceed the abilities of White counterparts. The same scenario has played out in every other professional field. There’s no reason to think the outcome will be different in the advertising industry.

AdAge would be hard-pressed to prove anyone has been instructed to “hire candidates based on ethnicity alone rather than suitability for the post at hand.” Patricia Gatling and the commission members have been quite clear in demanding agencies hire qualified minority candidates. Anything less is unacceptable.

In the end, AdAge’s stupid writing does a disservice to all parties.

Essay 1098


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

Ever wonder if the Travelocity garden gnome is gay? Maybe his longtime companion is a lawn jockey.

Monday, September 18, 2006

Essay 1097


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

This hotel message is not stellar, but any ad that uses the term “Gaydar” in its headline deserves kudos.

Essay 1096


Responses to the AdAge editorial presented in Essay 1094…

> Yes. Open up. Do something about it. Seek more comprehensive solutions. Keep up the threats. Diversity is good business. Sadly, it feels like agency thinking patterns require extraordinary pressures for any response — like compensation, holistic/multi-media thinking, staffing, training… Why does the agency business need threats and kicks in the ___ to do something about critical problems? Two major thoughts on this particular critical problem: 1. Winners. Whoever gets it right will win big time in all respects — strategy, creativity, solutions, service, initiatives… — especially in profitability! 2. Clients. Why are clients such chickenshit on this? It’s your business. You are way ahead of agencies in realizing the business benefits. Your lack of direction, conviction, and action in demanding attention to this matter is just plain stupid, bad business. “This (inaction)” is a long-term trend in creative service businesses that get big and “complicated.” We can call it “agency myopia” or “extreme marketing fear.” We’ve been living through decades of myopia and fear. Thank you, AdAge, for raising the curtain, rubbing sticks, and giving more effort to help in this area. (P.S. What’s your own staffing record like?) — NEW YORK, NY

> “Lower our standards”?? This mindset is so tired, so outdated. It’s as if we regressed 40 to 50 years. As a black woman, I heard this when I was applying for positions years ago. And I brought solid skills and a good education to the table. That didn’t stop the interviewers from being rude and condescending. I made the decision to work in radio and TV instead, a decision I don’t regret. Hopefully, one day the ad industry will realize that it will not RAISE its standards until the playing field is level. — St. Louis — Saint Louis, MO

> Well said!! No surprise that the words from a 1978 Human Rights Agency document is basically the same document that would be applied today in 2006. And personally I feel that it will be applicable 30 years from now--which is very sad! As a Jamaican Black Advertising/Marketing professional that’s been in the biz for the past 8 years in Account Management, I can certainly attest to my own personal trials as well as those of my colleagues who are Black, Hispanic & Asian. I tried to get into the ad biz in 1993 after graduation with a Marketing degree from Temple University. But I was only offered Admin Assistant positions rather than being considered for the Account Management training programs that were prevalent back then. I have worked General Market agencies (small & medium) and am now at a well-known Multicultural Agency. I have brand strategy/media planning & buying/account planning/etc. with integrated marketing programs (traditional & non-traditional media) and have worked on brands such as Informix Software, NAUTICA, Durex Condoms, McDonald’s, State Farm, GSK, Coca-Cola, etc. And I was a partner for 6 yrs in an event planning/marketing entrepreneurial venture. However, I’m still slightly considered for Account Management opps when it comes to the bigger well-known General Market agencies (that’s when I’ve managed to get an interview). I’ve asked & was basically told by recruiters that if I was White with my background, there would be more offers. The opportunities I got and worked in General Market were because those individuals saw that I brought quite a bit of skill, talent, willingness to learn and desire to work with clients in advancing their business objectives. The ad industry really needs to wake up! There’s plenty of talent out there (besides poaching from Multicultural Agencies). Students would consider this career path if it were made more inviting & inclusive. A homogenous environment does not make for creative content that addresses the marketplace, particularly when the makeup is changing faces & color. — JAMAICA ESTATES, NY

> Darn good thing the entertainment biz doesn’t need to come up with such self flagellation. Can anyone imagine not experiencing Pryor, Murphy, Foxx, Washington? John McCullough, white guy — Easton, PA

> The discussion about diversity in the ad industry seems as if it were being conducted in an alternate reality. I say that because the excuses/rationalizations being given by many of the major ad agencies are detached from this reality. To posit the notion that there are not enough minorities coming out of the top advertising or design programs misses the point. Individuals who think this should first ask themselves how many individuals from their agency came from the “top” advertising and design programs. The minority talent is there. They are coming out of a wide variety of colleges and universities with degrees in marketing and other areas. Just like the majority of individuals in advertising. There are not a lot of minorities in advertising, if you only look at the big “general market” agencies. The picture you see is quite different when you also look at the growing number of multicultural agencies. A number of minorities at those multicultural agencies got their start in advertising at the bigger “general market” agencies. Because of the stifling nature of those agencies, these individuals had to find other places where individuality and diversity are encouraged. The pressure multicultural agencies are applying to the bigger “general market” agencies with Clients for budget and fees, is a testament to the talent that is out there. Further, the idea that a lowering of standards would be required to recruit the necessary number of minorities is laughable. If standards were so high, would so much of the final creative product look and feel so pedestrian? Would we all feel so conflicted at the sight of a truly great idea because great ideas should be more commonplace? Would account management training take place at McDonald’s drive through window (order-takers)? These “high standards” that must be met by every minority candidate do not seem all that high. The post-rationalization being done by the ad industry for the current sad state of affairs have nothing to do with reality. It has more to do with a biased, conformist mentality within the ad industry. A mentality so pervasive that it filters all the way to the mailroom. Until that mentality is ripped apart, no amount of discussion will be productive. — Southfield, MI

> WELL-SAID. Your stance is brave and realistic. There are many problems with hiring and staffing in advertising -- probably in all industries, though I’m most familiar with this one. For policymakers and whistleblowers to point fingers at the industry, and the industry to beg off on supply-and-demand economics is a circle that goes nowhere. Looking at things more linearly, there IS a middle ground. Thanks for sparking these thoughts. — Howell, NJ

> As an African American who also happens to be a 30-year vet of the industry, I was always struck with how hypocritical things always were. The industry would gleefully coop everything of African American origin for creative fodder-trends, styles, language, music, personalities, attitudes — but African Americans as a group could never deemed to quite “fit in” to mainstream Agency culture. Except there’s always been the occasional African American “lab rat,” kept around the creative dept. to seem hip, glean from, and ask, “Hey, man. Is this ‘down’ enough?...” — Chicago, IL

> After nearly 15 years as an in-demand senior level creative at both GM and ethnic shops, I’ve virtually seen it all and done it all. However, the most insulting part of this editorial is the notion that the only way to get additional minorities into the industry is to “lower our standards.” Furthermore, that’s the primary problem as it relates to race in this industry. We have hiring issues, retainment issues, AOR issues (i.e., Why can’t Black/Hispanic/Asian agencies ever compete for AOR contracts?). Why are only White agencies allowed to be AORs, hence, have high growth opps? No. This is about looking in the mirror and ending the pervasive white liberal condescending attitudes that are rife in the industry. Attitudes that have been too often supported by clients who are so concerned with quarterly projections that they lose sight on the bigger picture; a picture that we as supposed brand stewards are too myopic and too biased to see. Sooner or later, this will all come back and hurt the industry one way or the other. Eventually the work will get so whitebread, so off-target, so homogenized that GM shops will have no choice but to change. — Chicago, IL

> Hi, I think the cure to the diversity problem is for those who are in the industry who are white having more friends who are black. This way, if there’s a job opening and the person’s looking for someone who’s African American, they can tell them and perhaps that person knows someone. The other solution is mentoring and outreach. Also, as I think about it, and given the emergence of digital media, why can’t ad agencies form better minority staff sizes via recruiting songwriters and musicians. It’s not a hard problem to solve. You just have to flip that change switch, and do it. Thanks. — Oakland, CA

Essay 1095


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

Canada legalized same-sex marriage, making the country a popular destination. This ad’s body copy boasts, “It’s hard to imagine a more gay and lesbian-friendly place than Ontario, Canada.” Um, how about any WNBA game…

Essay 1094


An editorial from AdAge.com — and check out the “CLARIFICATION” later added…

----------------------------------------------------------

Editorial: The Ad Industry Diversity Hiring Controversy

Will We Be Reading This Same Story Again in 2036?

“Despite expressed intentions to reform, the [ad] industry’s past record cast doubt upon its willingness and ability to police itself. Spokesmen testified that … the industry and individual companies might be trusted to make the necessary changes without governmental intervention. But critics contended that the industry has forfeited the confidence of the minority communities, and that government agencies must step in.”

So wrote the New York City Commission on Human Rights in 1978.

Poll results
Why do we -- along with 93% of those responding to our poll -- get the feeling we’ll be reading something similar in another 30 years? There is something surreally Orwellian about this affair. A government agency loudly demands that an entire industry reform. The industry, on the other hand, makes public promises to meet the demands (partly in the hope it all blows over), while ignoring the realistic goals it could conceivably achieve.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

Both sides need to get real. The commission needs to cease grandstanding attempts to embarrass the industry into action. It also needs to acknowledge the fact that in a supply-demand market, qualified and interested minority applicants can get a lot more out of their degrees in other sectors. And it should realize that asking the industry to lower its standards -- something only a government agency would suggest -- is downright insulting to all parties.

More proactive
For its part, the industry should be a little less defensive and a great deal more proactive. Poaching qualified minority applicants already in the system doesn’t boost numbers. And time spent whining that there aren’t enough black kids at VCU Adcenter or the University of Texas would be better spent looking for undergraduates in other programs. Training and mentoring would help. As would breaking up the good ol’ boy vibe prevalent in many agencies.

Time for action
Action, as always, speaks louder than words. This isn’t an issue that will go away by decree. But maybe expecting common sense at the intersection of Madison and Town Hall is a bit naive on our part.

CLARIFICATION: Our editorial “The Ad Industry Diversity Hiring Controversy” was intended to convey that the laudable -- and indeed necessary -- goal of increasing agency diversity cannot be accomplished by agencies inking agreements that have unrealistic or unachievable hiring goals forced by political grandstanding. The line that the Human Rights Commission is “asking the industry to lower its standards” has been misread by some to have an alternative meaning. In actuality, it was meant to indicate that if agencies -- to satisfy the HRC or any other governmental body -- hire candidates based on ethnicity alone rather than suitability for the post at hand, it does a disservice to all parties.

Essay 1093


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

Gay pharmaceutical ads — like all pharmaceutical messages — may cause depression and nausea.

Essay 1092


More money, more problems — with a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Hip-hop mogul Russell Simmons joined Jermaine Dupri, Ludacris and others to school folks on financial management at Atlanta’s Morris Brown College. “They don’t need to just pay attention to the bling,” said Simmons. “Rappers spending countless money are on television. But in real life, these artists are very responsible with their money.” Although a few rappers admit reforming, like twice-bankrupt Kurupt. “If you hang around bums, then you are going to be one,” said the rapper. “But if you get positive people who are looking to be millionaires, then you will someday make millions. Those are key ingredients in being successful.” Hey, who needs Charles Schwab when you’ve got Kurupt?

• Automotive News reported that Ford Motor Company and General Motors have talked about merging or teaming up. However, no discussions are currently happening, as both automakers are individually scrambling to get their acts together. Sounds like the companies could benefit from talking to Kurupt.

Essay 1091


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

The Levi’s model doesn’t have a shirt. The Justus Boyz dude doesn’t have any pants. Maybe these guys should hook up.

Essay 1090


From AdAge.com…

------------------------------------

Poll: 93% Think New Agency Agreements Won’t Solve Diversity Problem

Repondents Cite Need for Pressure From Marketing Clients

By Meredith Deliso

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Nintey-three percent of respondents to Ad Age’s poll about the new diversity hiring agreement signed by 11 ad agencies with the New York Commission on Human Rights say the agreements will not bridge Madison Avenue’s diversity divide. Only 7% of respondents thought it was a solution or at least a beginning.

Negative view
Respondents comments expressed a negative view of the round of agreements that may enable top agency executives to avoid testifying at public hearings on the issue originally scheduled for later this month.

“Lasting, meaningful change will only come about when agency management leads that change voluntarily, and that doesn’t seem to be on the immediate horizon,” said Mark Robinson, managing partner at S/R Communications.

Chris Lyons, a freelance illustrator, thinks more needs to be done about diversity in schools: “Let’s get more minorities enrolled in good design and advertising schools and take advantage of diverse experiences and influences.”

Client demands
Others feel the demand needs to come from clients. “Agencies respond to client needs and demands,” said Stacey Manley, management supervisor at Carol H. Williams Advertising. “Clients, then, must be clear about the need for their advertising to reflect the dynamics of a changing consumer market.”

There were respondents that did see the agreements as a first step. “This needed to happen, and as diverse as our consumers are, it plays well for creative issues with all products,” said Shari Greer, account executive for Total Traffic Network.

Essay 1089


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

Washington Mutual presents a relevant message in a classy, understated style. The creative team earned their paychecks with these ads.

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Essay 1088


This ad commemorated an Apollo Theater event last June. Ironically, BBDO’s performance for showcasing and promoting Blacks would earn the advertising agency a quick hook from the late Howard “Sandman” Sims.

Essay 1087


The editorial below appeared in The Chicago Sun-Times. A MultiCultClassics rebuttal immediately follows…

----------------------------------------------------

Latest ‘Survivor’ has potential to cook up friction

In addressing the controversy over “Survivor: Cook Islands,” which in the name of diversity initially segregates whites, blacks, Asians and Hispanics in separate “tribes,” host Jeff Probst effectively framed this TV moment: “People are very touchy about even saying the word race or even bringing up the notion of different ethnic groups working together or maybe not working so well together. What if they don’t get along? What if it’s a disaster? What if we set back the whole notion of integration?”

Well, as popular as “Survivor” has been – “Cook Islands,” launched Thursday, is its 13th installment -- Probst may have overestimated its cultural reach. He definitely overestimated the number of viewers who take it seriously. But at a time when Americans are deeply divided over racial profiling and immigration politics, African Americans feel disenfranchised by the electoral process, relations between Jews and blacks have bogged down and white supremacy cults still occasionally rear their ugly heads, it’s possible that in playing up ethnic differences, “Cook Islands” will strike some nerves.

As innocent and affirmative as rooting along racial lines may be in the beginning, how will viewers feel if all the whites or blacks get voted off the show? What if ethnic stereotypes like Asians being smart but physically overmatched and blacks not being great swimmers are played up? As unlikely as it is on a show this carefully stage-managed -- the opening episode couldn’t have been more innocuous in giving participants a chance to say things they’re expected to say -- what if “Survivor” creator Mark Burnett’s specious claim that “we’re smart enough to have gotten rid of every racist person in casting” blows up in his face?

But if “Cook Islands” has the potential to create friction by dividing audience members as well as contestants along ethnic lines, it also has the potential to impart positive values in giving tribe members the opportunity to quash stereotypes, bond across ethnic lines (even as they scheme to betray each other in pursuit of the $1 million prize) and stand on common ground. Television shows that consciously try to be uplifting usually drown in their own sensitive juices, but maybe this one is different enough to transcend formula. But probably not.

The producers insist they came up with this hot button idea not merely to bounce back from their worst-rated entry, “Survivor: Panama-Exile Island,” but to appease critics who said the show has been too white. In the past, 80 percent of those who applied to get on it were white. This time, ethnically diverse men and women were aggressively recruited. Judging by an African-American tribesman’s declaration that “Black people don’t like to be told what to do” and a hippie-inspired Vietnamese American’s lament that he’s an outcast in his own group, “Cook Islands” will have no shortage of minority spokesmen creating their own stereotypes and caricatures. Whether or not the show promotes a dialog on race or bogs down in “Survival” tactics as usual remains to be seen. But the last thing anyone should expect from the entertainment division of CBS is “a social experiment like you’ve never seen before.”

----------------------------------------------------

The latest installment of “Survivor” only continues to demonstrate “reality TV” is an oxymoron.

And host Jeff Probst is just a moron.

For starters, Probst is not qualified to oversee this “social experiment,” as he dubbed it. He has exhibited stereotypical, ignorant White Man behavior, as revealed in the following excerpts from The Washington Post:

“Until ‘Survivor’ host Jeff Probst sat in on casting sessions for the CBS reality series’s new edition, in which competitors were picked and put into ‘tribes’ based on their ethnic background, he had not realized that ‘Asian’ includes Japanese, Koreans and Chinese and that they do not necessarily like each other as a matter of ethnic solidarity.

Whites, on the other hand, are ‘mutts’ and ‘don’t have any ethnicity to hang on to,’ he told reporters on a phone conference call…

‘When you start talking to a person from Asia, you realize — Wow! They have all different backgrounds!’ gushed Probst, who described himself repeatedly as a 44-year-old white guy from Wichita…”

Probst wondered, “What if we set back the whole notion of integration?” It’s more likely he’ll set back the whole notion of civilization.

Producer Mark Burnett claimed, “[We’re] smart enough to have gotten rid of every racist person in casting.” Why? The truth is, the format would probably benefit from having a few bona fide bigots on the islands. At least the White Supremacists suddenly interested in the program would have relatable characters to support and cheer.

The creators insist that the big idea was hatched in response to the show’s traditional lack of color. This may be true, but the ultimate solution’s shock value seems pretty calculated and cynical.

If avoiding Whiteness was a goal, why not fully mix the teams to watch diversity in action? Or better yet, why not eliminate all Caucasians from the equation? The term “Survivor” is more relevant and applicable to non-Whites anyway.

There’s a disturbing parallel to draw between “Survivor” and the exclusivity in the advertising industry. Simply flooding minorities into the system is not a viable answer unless everyone knows how to properly integrate the cultures.

This attempt to invent a multicultural reality show sharply contrasts reality. Minorities may team up to compete in the real world, but the playing field is never level. Plus, they’re usually outnumbered at least 10 to 1. In short, it’s no day at the beach.

The only “real” thing here is that the entire affair has been orchestrated by White Men.

Essay 1086


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

Here’s Bud Light’s appeal to the Gay market. Wonder if the beer maker will produce a campaign starring “Gaygar and Steve.”

Essay 1085


From The Chicago Tribune…

---------------------------------------------------------

PERSON OF INTEREST: DAWN-ELISSA FISCHER

The potential of hip-hop

By Johnathon E. Briggs, a Tribune staff reporter

Dawn-Elissa Fischer has crisscrossed the globe, exploring how young people around the world use hip-hop as a tool for political empowerment.

A founder of the National Hip-Hop Political Convention, which held its second biennial gathering in Chicago this summer, Fischer has studied the role of hip-hop in political organizing throughout the U.S. as well as Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Senegal, South Africa, Sweden and Tanzania.

Fischer, 29, also is the youth and education coordinator for the Hiphop Archive at Stanford University and teaches courses at Laney College in Oakland, including “The Politics of Protest: Is Hip-Hop a Social Movement?”

Q: How did hip-hop influence your own youth?

A: When I began to find my own voice as a youth, it wasn’t necessarily The Last Poets or even Bob Dylan, but it was hip-hop that vocalized my [sense of] social injustice. I was born in 1977. So hip-hop became the soundtrack for my political organizing, beginning in the ‘80s.

At that time, it was very in-your-face, black-nationalist and cultural-nationalist rhetoric in much of the music that was out: X-Clan, Public Enemy, even works from N.W.A., MC Lyte and Queen Latifah. Then there would also be these sorts of “don’t give up” messages. That sort of mantra inspired me as a young person.

Q: Is hip-hop a social movement?

A: I continue to ride the fence, sad to admit.

Q: What would it take to convince you that it is?

A: If you would have asked me this in 2004, I probably would have been very fixed in saying that hip-hop was a social movement. That was following what [social movement theorist] Charles Tilly puts forward as the W.U.N.C. theory. Basically, if something is a social movement, it has a cause that’s worthy—that’s the W--people are united, there’s a large number of people and they’re committed to the cause.

Q: What has changed your opinion since 2004?

A: After traveling around the United States helping to set up local organizing committees in preparation for the 2004 National Hip-Hop Political Convention, I felt that I definitely saw large numbers of people who were united around what seemed to be a worthy cause, and they seemed to be committed. However, now that it’s 2006, I’ve reassessed the worthiness parameter. I definitely see hip-hop being a salient force in regards to raising the level of race and class analysis. However, until we begin to seriously engage gender and sexuality into that equation, we are not realizing its full potential.

Q: Is there any progressive hip-hop out there?

A: There is a hip-hop cultural movement that is feminist, anti-heterosexist, such as the Deep Dickollective here in the Bay Area. But as far as the national movement as a whole, for example, when you look at our 2004 National Hip Hop Political Agenda [education, economic justice, criminal justice, health and wellness, human rights], gender and sexuality were taken off the original document.

Q: How do youth in other parts of the world use hip-hop as a tool for political empowerment?

A: Many scholars have this sort of “grass is greener on the other side” view of hip-hop in other countries. Like there’s more “real” hip-hop in other countries; it’s more political. I think that hip-hop is pretty much the same in this country as it is in other countries. If you go to the right communities, you’ll definitely see people who are doing very progressive work, particularly using hip-hop to resist race and class [divisions] in their countries. However, I don’t necessarily see sustained work in the field of gender and sexuality anywhere in the world.

Q: What is the most common misconception about hip-hop today?

A: Hip-hop is blamed for being particularly misogynist. A valid argument that people give is, “How much more misogynist is it than mainstream rock music or a beer commercial?” That’s actually an argument that I used to give. But now that I’m a little bit older and I’m a parent of a young male, I actually feel a stronger sense of urgency that we have to do better.

Essay 1084


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

The Out Club boasts being “the first record club for our community.” An advanced search of the site found no matching results for Buju Banton (see Essay 1060).

Essay 1083


Sunday sermonizing in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• The pope said he was “deeply sorry” for the responses to his remarks about Islam, insisting he was quoting text that he didn’t necessarily agree with (see Essay 1081). “These [words] were in fact a quotation from a Medieval text which do not in any way express my personal thought," said the pope. “At this time I wish also to add that I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a few passages of my address at the University of Regensburg, which were considered offensive to the sensibility of Muslims.” Guess future pontiff pontifications will carry a disclaimer: All comments expressed by the pope do not reflect the opinions of the Vatican and its assorted deities.

• New York Post columnist Tim Arango reported that agencies are unhappy over the alleged disorganization for Advertising Week, slated to launch September 25. Arnago wrote, “Several agency sources said they felt that poor planning led to a last-minute letter dated Aug. 28 from the organizers asking large agencies to ‘contribute’ $10,000 and small agencies $5,000 to a minority scholarship fund. … The request felt more like a stick-up, sources said, since agencies that couldn’t come up with the cash wouldn’t get access to the opening night bash with hot hip-hop act Gnarls Barkley or a closing party in TriBeCa with DJs Mark Ronson and DJ Logic.” Arango quoted an agency leader who said, “If it were better orchestrated from the get-go, then we would buy into it and support it from the start. … But the whole thing has been ad-hoc.” Hey, maybe it’s all part of the signed agreements designed to instill diversity on Madison Avenue.

Essay 1082


MultiCultClassics looks straight at Gay & Lesbian ads…

Hated the Black and Hispanic versions of this Bridgestone campaign (see Essay 1025). These extensions should have stayed in the closet.

Saturday, September 16, 2006

Essay 1081


Heading into conflicts with a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• A Connecticut man filed a $15,000+ lawsuit against a wig shop, claiming he suffered a heart attack after arguing over his poorly designed toupee. The man had refused to pay for the rug, insisting it didn’t fit and was the wrong color. The shop originally filed a small claims action to get $1,200 for the hairpiece. A telephone argument followed, ultimately leading to the heart attack. Somebody call Sy Sperling pronto.

• You know the Apocalypse is upon us when the pope inspires religious rage. Muslim leaders are demanding an apology for the pope’s remarks about Islam and jihad, although Vatican officials insist Pope Benedict XVI was just trying to make a point about the incompatibility between faith and war. A Turkish official remarked, “[The pope] is going down in history in the same category as leaders such as Hitler and Mussolini.” Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, Lebanon’s most senior Shiite cleric, said, “We do not accept the apology through Vatican channels … and ask [the pope] to offer a personal apology — not through his officials.” Calling out the pope should lead to quite a rap battle.

Essay 1080


Does anyone doubt that the ladies depicted above could come up with better turnaround plans for the automaker than the initiatives hatched by Chairman Bill Ford?

Essay 1079


From The Chicago Tribune…

----------------------------------------------------

... and a verdict on tobacco

Speaking of killing yourself ...

There once was a time when cigarettes were advertised as good for your health. “Not a cough in a carload,” Chesterfield promised. “Not a single case of throat irritation,” boasted Camels. “Why risk sore throats?” asked Old Gold.

That was a half century ago. It seems the tobacco companies have become more sophisticated, and more misleading, in their sales pitches. U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler of Washington, D.C., ruled recently that tobacco companies have systematically lied to the public with their use of such healthy-sounding labels as “light,” “ultra-light,” “mild” and “low-tar.”

Tobacco companies argue innocently that such labeling refers only to flavor and lack of harshness. But with words like “light” or “lite” branded on almost everything from beer to butter, most consumers think “light” cigarettes are somehow better for you.

“Light” or not, they’re just as addictive, Kessler wrote in her 1,653-page opinion. Most damning: The major tobacco companies, she wrote, deliberately adjusted nicotine levels to encourage addiction even after the federal government and some anti-smoking organizations filed the federal suit in 1999. All “defendants continue to market ‘low-tar’ cigarettes to consumers seeking to reduce their health risks or quit,” she wrote. “All defendants continue to fraudulently deny that they manipulate the nicotine delivery of their cigarettes in order to create and sustain addiction.”

A six-year study by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health agrees with her verdict. It found the average amount of nicotine inhaled by smokers increased by 10 percent between 1998 and 2004. Some brands boosted their nicotine output by more than 20 percent.

But Big Tobacco sounds anything but contrite. Tobacco lawyers are appealing Kessler’s ruling. They’ve asked her for a legal clarification so they can, in effect, have her permission to continue to advertise “light” cigarettes overseas.

Congress needs to bring nicotine under the oversight of the Food and Drug Administration. The Supreme Court ruled in 2000 that Congress had not given the FDA a mandate to regulate tobacco as a drug. Since that ruling, Congress has avoided the obvious: nicotine is a drug--a deadly drug--and should be treated as such.

“Why risk death?” You’re not likely to see that on a cigarette ad in this country. But it’s the real calculation smokers have to make.

Essay 1078


Looking for a Few Good Minorities with MultiCultClassics…

For a retailer that redefined the category with its breakthrough advertising, this Target recruitment message lacks style.

Essay 1077


From The New York Times…

------------------------------------------------------------

Jackson Mayor Is Indicted Over Crime-Fighting Tactics

By SHAILA DEWAN

ATLANTA — The mayor of Jackson, Miss., was indicted on six felony charges Friday after months of criticism and warnings that his unorthodox crime-fighting tactics might put him on the wrong side of the law.

Among the counts now faced by the mayor, Frank Melton, are burglary, malicious mischief, illegally carrying a gun and causing a minor to commit a felony. The most serious of the charges against him carry sentences of up to 25 years, said the local district attorney, Faye Peterson.

The mayor’s supporters called the charges politically motivated and said he would not resign.

Some of the charges stem from a sheriff’s investigation of the night of Aug. 26, when the home of Evans Welch, a man with a history of mental illness and petty crimes, was attacked by a sledgehammer-wielding group of young men without warning or permit.

Witnesses said Mr. Melton, who often patrols the city at night with the police and a group of teenage followers, had directed the demolition of the house, which he said was known as a place to buy illegal drugs. His two police bodyguards are also charged in connection with that event.

Dale Danks, Mr. Melton’s lawyer, issued a statement acknowledging that damage had been done to “the drug house” and that “maybe better judgment could have been used.”

“But,” the statement said, “the charges that have been made against Mayor Melton are an extreme and excessive reaction.”

Mr. Melton was also charged with carrying a gun on the campus of the Mississippi College School of Law, in a public park and in a church. The first is a felony; the two others are misdemeanors. All three of these cases had been referred to the local authorities by the state attorney general, Jim Hood, who had earlier written Mr. Melton a letter warning that he could not legally carry a gun in such places.

Mr. Melton, a former television executive, took office in July 2005, promising to lower the crime rate in Jackson, the state capital. He personally oversaw those efforts, drawing attention for going on nighttime raids, using the Police Department’s only mobile command unit and wearing a police jacket and badge.

After The Clarion-Ledger, Jackson’s daily newspaper, reported that he made a habit of traveling with guns, the federal Transportation Security Administration, the paper said, requested that he no longer carry guns aboard commercial airplanes, as he had under a waiver granted to law enforcement personnel.

In April, Mr. Melton used a police car to pull over four school buses on a highway so that, he said, he could talk to the children and hug them.

After a grand jury returned the indictments Friday, the mayor surrendered, posted a $50,000 bond and was released on condition that he refrain from using law enforcement vehicles, carrying firearms or supervising minors.

Friday, September 15, 2006

Essay 1076


Looking for a Few Good Minorities with MultiCultClassics…

Verizon boasts an army of powerful minority women. Wonder if the ladies are powerful enough to encourage the company’s advertising agencies to seek similar diversity.

Essay 1075


The MTV degeneration needs saviors

By Stanley Crouch

It is important to recognize that while those such as Bill Cosby and Juan Williams continue to point out the importance of changing self-destructive attitudes and habits in the black lower class, there are others like Lisa Fager and Callie Herd.

Fager is a black woman and one of the founders of Industry Ears (industryears.com), a think tank that focuses on media. Fager might seem an enemy of hip hop, but she is actually a fan. Her complaint has to do with the idiom’s demonization of young black men and women who are depicted as “real” only when they appear as thugs and hedonists.

The women are spared the burden of memorizing the rhymes that insult and demean them; their only job is to dress as scantily as possible, roll their rear ends and act like proverbial female dogs in heat.

Fager is presently incensed. Last night, the Walter Kaitz Foundation honored MTV with the Diversity Champion Award during its annual dinner in Manhattan. A press release from the foundation describes MTV Networks as providing “culturally relevant programs that are the most outward demonstration of their dedication to diversity.”

It would seem that the Kaitz Foundation either knows nothing about MTV Networks or is another example of how confused some of our diversity campaigns are.

After all, MTV Networks probably considers “Where My Dogs At?” a show so diverse it makes canines feel included, with black women depicted with leashes around their necks and walking into a pet shop on all fours. Then there’s “Yo Momma,” with teenagers spewing racist epithets, and “Flavor of Love,” a largely vulgar minstrel show.

Industry Ears is protesting this diversity charade with a petition that can be signed at www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/526905262.

While Lisa Fager battles with the goliaths of irresponsible media firms, Callie Herd is another black woman working at providing college scholarship information for black and Latin kids.

“What I’m doing is trying to educate them. It’s not that blacks and Latinos don’t want to go to college or need scholarship money; they just don’t know what is going on. At the advice of my son, I started a blog to get past writing individual letters. That just about wore me out. But the blog reaches so many.

“It is located at www.ctherd.blogspot.com. There are millions of dollars available, just waiting for those who know how to ask for them.” Herd has become aware of much assistance that goes untapped because kids move too late. “It’s all about knowing, and that’s all I’m trying to provide. Well-used knowledge is part of the solution.”

In women like Fager and Herd, we see the tradition of social responsibility taking two forms of the sort this nation can use in every possible direction.

Essay 1074


Looking for a Few Good Minorities with MultiCultClassics…

New York Life presents another editorial-style recruitment ad. There must be better ways to inspire without so much drama.

Essay 1073


Old moves in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Ford Motor Company plans to cut 10,000 more salaried jobs, offer buyouts to 75,000 hourly workers and close two plants. “These actions have painful consequences for communities and many of our loyal employees,” said Executive Chairman Bill Ford. “But rapid shifts in consumer demand that affect our product mix and continued high prices for commodities mean we must continue working quickly and decisively to fix our business.” The Ford terminator can go from 0 to 85,000 in under a year.

• The Government Accountability Office (which sounds like an oxymoron) reported the number of illegal immigrants who died trying to cross the border more than doubled over the last decade. Hopefully, these folks aren’t heading north in the hopes of landing a job at Ford.

• The controversial season of CBS’ Survivor kicked off on Thursday, with host Jeff Probst calling it, “A social experiment like never before.” Still wondering why Probst wasn’t replaced with Carlos Mencia or Dave Chappelle.

Essay 1072


Looking for a Few Good Minorities with MultiCultClassics…

Firestone forgoes the typical badly designed recruitment ad by making the message look like badly designed editorial.

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Essay 1071


Knock Knock!

Who’s there?

Knock The Hustle author Hadji Williams (pictured here), talking via podcast with Talent Zoo’s Danny G.

(Knock on the essay title above and listen up.)

Essay 1070


Riding high with a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• A lawsuit was filed in Miami for thousands of young boys claiming they were slaves of rich rulers from the United Arab Emirates and forced to work as camel jockeys. The suit shows more than 30,000 boys may have been victimized. “Boys as young as 2 years old were stolen from their parents, trafficked to foreign lands, and put under the watch of brutal overseers in camel camps throughout the region,” the suit said. “These claims are brought to punish the perpetrators and compensate the victims of child slavery and an international slave trade in small children that seems unimaginable in the 21st century.” And folks thought Joe Camel was outrageous.

• A new study shows Spanish disappears and English becomes the dominant language among immigrants after a few generations. “Even in the nation’s largest Spanish-speaking enclave, within a border region that historically belonged to Mexico, Spanish appears to be well on the way to a natural death by the third generation of U.S. residence,” said the study. So “Hasta la vista, baby” becomes “Whaddup, dawg.”

• Hanesbrands announced plans to cut 2,200 jobs and shut down three North American plants. Talk about a major wedgie.

• Chicago Mayor Richard Daley successfully vetoed a proposal to raise the minimum wage and require benefits for employees at big-box retailers like Wal-Mart and Target. So for Wal-Mart employees, it’s “Low Wages — Always.” And for Target employees, it’s “Expect More. Get Paid Less.”

• Claudia Mitchell is being named the first “bionic woman,” with a robotic arm that responds to her thoughts. The battery-operated arm has six motors to perform a variety of functions with the hand, wrist and elbow. Meanwhile, the original bionic woman is hawking Sleep Number Beds.

Essay 1069


Looking for a Few Good Minorities with MultiCultClassics…

The LAPD advertises starting salaries range from $52,638 to $70,679. That kind of loot will get you a lot of donuts. And it doesn’t even include kickbacks, bribes and extortion money.

Essay 1068


From Adweek…

-------------------------------------------

Viewers Stand By ‘Survivor,’ Survey Says

By Steve McClellan

NEW YORK Despite the controversy surrounding CBS’ decision to air an upcoming edition of Survivor in which teams are divided by race, a survey conducted by Interpublic Group's Universal McCann found that only 17 percent of those claiming to be avid Survivor watchers were “personally offended” by the new format.

That said, nearly one-third of non-viewers said they found the format personally offensive.

Results of the survey, conducted earlier this month, were released just two days before the premiere of the new installment of the show, Survivor: Cook Islands, which will feature four competing teams divided by race (African American, Asian American, Hispanic and white).

The show has prompted cries of protest from some groups, including the New York City Council’s Black, Latino and Asian Caucus, which has called on CBS to dump the format.

In the wake of the controversy, several longtime Survivor advertisers, including Procter & Gamble, General Motors, Coca-Cola and Home Depot, pulled their advertising from the program.

A CBS representative said the network has replaced the defectors with other advertisers. “We have a full roster of advertisers for Survivor,” she said. But she said that the network would not disclose that roster prior before the show airs. “They will be apparent come the show’s premiere,” she said.

According to the UM survey, conducted online, about 75 percent of all respondents claimed their attitude toward the show’s advertisers would not change. About 80 percent of those saying they view the show regularly also said they would probably watch the Cook Islands installment, while an additional 10 percent of those who said they don’t watch regularly said they were interested in tuning in.

Of those respondents who said they weren’t interested in watching, less than 15 percent said it was because they were offended by the new format.

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Essay 1067


Advertising Age is conducting an online poll that asks:

Will the agreements that agencies signed with the NYC Human Rights Commission solve the industry’s diversity problem?

The early results show the “No” votes leading at 92 percent.

Essay 1066


From DiversityInc.com…

-------------------------------------------

‘Survivor’ Racial Clash Overrated, Says NAACP Head

By Jennifer Millman

NAACP President Bruce Gordon took his time before commenting on the new “Survivor” series, but the statement he issued Tuesday has stirred up some controversy of its own.

Aside from calling the show “a bad idea,” Gordon was unimpressed. He said the new series, which will divide contestants into four groups along racial/ethnic lines, is not nearly as disconcerting as the broader issues facing people of color in the entertainment industry, according to the Los Angeles Times.

“There are countless race abuses that exist in the entertainment community every day,” Gordon told the L.A. Times. “For the media to give airtime to the format of a TV show when it is silent on the absence of African Americans on Sunday morning news shows is shameful.”

Critics of the new show argue that Gordon’s position on the CBS board, one he did not disclose in the NAACP’s original statement on “Survivor,” may have shaped his opinion. According to National Urban League Policy Institute data, however, Gordon’s got a valid point.

In its August 2005 diversity study of five Sunday-morning political talk shows, which analyzed all programs broadcast from the five major networks—ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX and NBC—from January 2004 through June 2005, the Institute found:

• Fewer than 8 percent of program guests were black.

• Of the more than 2,100 guest appearances, only 176 guests were black, and 122 of these 176 appearances were by three guests: Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell and Juan Williams.

• U.S. senators and representatives were featured more than 500 times on these broadcasts, but black representatives accounted for a mere nine times.

CBS’s “Face the Nation” aired fewer interviews with black guests than any other network. Only 12 percent of broadcasts featured these interviewees, compared with “CNN Late Edition” at 38 percent, the highest of all the networks.

“Survivor: Cook Islands” will debut at 8 p.m. Thursday. Host Jeff Probst said the idea came out of preseason discussions in which the show’s staff decided they needed to make the show more diverse.

This season, producers will pit blacks, Latinos, Asians and whites against each other to stimulate viewing through “ethnic pride.” Long-time advertisers such as General Motors and Campbell Soup have pulled their support, but they denied that the race-based programming had anything to do with their respective decisions.

This is not CBS’s first attempt to diversify its programming, albeit the most controversial. Its “The Amazing Race,” which won an Emmy Award for best reality program, takes a more in-depth approach to diversity, featuring participants who differ by race, gender, disability, orientation and marital status, among other issues. Last year, 11 teams of two raced for $1 million in a global competition that took them to Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Senegal, Germany, Hungary, Corsica, Ethiopia, Sri Lanka, China and Hawaii. The seventh season of “The Amazing Race” will begin Sunday, Sept. 18.

Essay 1065


When ‘diversity’ trumps equality

By Clarence Page

WASHINGTON -- A lot of people have their shorts bunched in a knot over a decision by the CBS reality game show “Survivor: Cook Islands” to divide its competing “tribes” by race and ethnicity.

No surprise there. We have enough wars to worry about these days without having one put forth as prime-time entertainment, even if it’s all in good fun.

Hispanics Across America founder Fernando Mateo called the “Survivor” move an “offensive and cheap trick” to boost ratings, which is undoubtedly true, but hardly the first time networks have done that. Does anybody remember Fox’s “Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Millionaire?”

In fact, Carlos Mencia, that mogul of politically incorrect (but often on-target) humor on cable’s Comedy Central, already parodied the “Survivor” race idea this season, playing on every racial stereotype he could dredge up. (The brainy Asian guy, the fast black guy, the buoyant white guy, etc. In the end, the Hispanic guy won, leading to suspicions that Mencia had tilted the playing field.)

Interestingly, no big headlines of controversy followed Mencia’s move. After all, he’s only on cable and he’s only kidding. “Survivor” is prime-time and it’s serious, inasmuch as any goofy reality show can be serious.

Adjectives like “insulting,” “irresponsible,” “reprehensible” and that conversation-stopper “racist” have been thrown at the idea of separate black, white, Asian and Latino teams scheming and competing against each other. Sponsors fell away like autumn leaves in a Category 5 media storm.

Yet when you think about it, the protests illustrate how double-minded Americans are about race. Since the 1960s, it has become chic, particularly among liberals, to decry color-consciousness and, at the same time, embrace it.

Americans have “a love affair with race,” writes Walter Benn Michaels, a literature professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago. In his new book, “The Trouble with Diversity: How We Learned to Love Identity and Ignore Inequality,” he describes in eloquent detail how the liberal pursuit of social and economic equality was sidetracked by the pursuit of “diversity.”

Ironically, the more we have pursued diversity by repudiating racism and the notion that our racial biology is our destiny, the more we have perpetuated those very concepts, he writes. Liberals “celebrate diversity,” while conservatives ask, “Why can’t we all just be American?” Liberals shy away from being “judgmental” about various groups. Liberals grant people from all manner of subcultures their “agency,” which is their right to make their own choices about their moral behavior. Liberals quantify “equal rights” in terms of affirmative-action “goals” and “timetables,” which critics call “racial quotas,” which are supposed to be illegal but aren’t because, so far, the U.S. Supreme Court says they aren’t.

Others have complained that liberals talk too much about race.

Michaels is a liberal and proud of it. He wants to re-energize the left by persuading it to build new coalitions against the growing problem of economic inequality.

Of the 37 million poor Americans in the 2004 census head count, he points out, almost 17 million (45.6 percent) were white. Poor whites are not touched by left-right disputes over whether discrimination is a thing of the past or stronger than ever. They are touched by statistics that show the American dream to be increasingly elusive for those on the bottom of the nation’s economic ladder.

While poor whites numerically outnumber poor blacks, poverty has taken on a black face in the public mind, from the race riots of the 1960s to the coverage of Hurricane Katrina. “The truth is there weren’t too many rich black people left behind when everybody who could get out of New Orleans did so,” says Michaels. True enough.

Unlike racism, poverty cannot be pinned as easily on a particular set of villains. The poor do share some responsibility in improving their own condition. But the most compelling part of Michaels’ book are his descriptions of the vanishing American dream. Increasingly, one’s chances in life are defined by the parents to whom one is born, regardless of race or religion, and whether one is lucky enough to get into the right schools--from kindergarten on up. That wasn’t Martin Luther King’s dream for America, but that’s the direction in which we are moving.

That’s not just a reality show. It’s reality.

Essay 1064


Looking for a Few Good Minorities with MultiCultClassics…

Measure this ad however you wish. The concept comes up short.

Essay 1063


Reviewing report cards in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• The New York Post reported more details on the trendy bar accused of keeping track of female employees’ weight (see Essay 1059). The joint allegedly also rated the ladies in three categories: personality, sales and body. “It was a rating system between 1 and 10,” said one waitress. Upon viewing her name next to an average score of only 7.3, “I was mad.” A heavyset worker earning a 3 for body was reportedly fired shortly after being graded. The establishment’s lawyer said, “This is the first time I’m hearing these allegations, and, again, my understanding is that the allegations are fictitious.” Bet this guy rates a 0 for honesty.

• The Wall Street Journal reported Ford Motor Company will announce sweeping corporate restructuring designed to lower white-collar costs by up to 30 percent. The automaker deserves average ratings for personality and body — but a big, fat 0 for sales.

• USA Today reported nutrition experts are primarily blaming parents for the growing number of fat kids in America — especially parents who are fat themselves. One dietician remarked, “Parents are, hands down, the biggest influence on their kids. They need to be good role models. I heard a quote that said, ‘What you say will speak to your kids. What you do will scream to them.’” Guess too many parents scream for ice cream.

Essay 1062


Looking for a Few Good Minorities with MultiCultClassics…

Memo to creative team: You got no game.

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Essay 1061


Word on the Web regarding recent AdAge reports:

Two more comments for the AdAge article presented in Essay 1036…

> Pushing off the diversity hearings is a disappointment to say the least. The unfortunate truth is that unless companies are publicly embarrassed about their diversity efforts -- or rather, lack therefore of them--very little will change. Most agencies will do the bare minimum to comply which amounts to little more than window dressing. So once again, agencies get to “dodge a bullet.” Call me psychic, but based on this “agreement” I think the industry is going to be having the exact same discussion in 10, 15, 20 years. — NY, NY

> I’m not sure where our colleague from Windham is coming from, but I’ll add my 2¢. I don’t think anyone is saying that unqualified minority applicants should be hired ahead of qualified white candidates, yet you wouldn’t guess that from the usual comments. I know coming from the media side, it’s rare you see minorities in higher positions. I’ve worked at a number of agencies and I can say that in most instances, the bulk of minorities are in support positions (admin assistant) or clerical positions (billing, traffic etc). Look around your agencies, how many Directors/Supervisors are minorities? I’m all for the hearings, let’s hear what the agencies have to say. — New York, NY

One more comment for the AdAge article presented in Essay 1056…

> On the one hand, Omnicom has pledged money for education to an African-American populated college… That’s good. Does it mean that Omnicom will have its agencies pursue an active recruitment policy from this very school? I seriously doubt it! On the other hand, when did poor diversity/minority hiring practices in the advertising workforce suddenly become “African-American” only? Did I miss something? It was my understanding that these conglomerates were being scrutinized for having failed (once again) to improve their minority/diversity hiring & promotion practices. My understanding of the definitions of “Minority” and “Diversity” transcends “African-American” … or maybe I’m just daft. I’ve been working in the advertising industry for over 20 years — never once have I had to bring my ethnicity (Hispanic) to the table in order to get hired or promoted — that would actually be an insult to me. I’ve worked hard and have earned every bit of my success. Did I meet bigots along the way? Of course! Merely obtuse individuals that should be pitied for their lack of intellectual responsibility. It is disturbing and yes, sad, to see that the more things seem to change the more they seem to stay the same. M. Rocafort-Mercado Principal Hispanic DM Solutions San Antonio, TX — San Antonio, TX

Essay 1060


From The Chicago Tribune…

--------------------------------------

Anti-gay lyrics in reggae targeted
Buju Banton, others drawing protesters at concert appearances

By Althea Legaspi

For more than a decade, several reggae artists have been sparking controversy with songs that contain anti-gay lyrics. Beenie Man, Capleton and Buju Banton are among those accused of writing violent, homophobic lyrics, and several gay-rights groups have successfully pressured promoters, leading to concert cancellations.

Banton is perhaps the most controversial, having been accused and later exonerated earlier this year, in a case in Jamaica that involved an attack on a group of gay men. But it's the performer’s 1992 song, “Boom Bye Bye,” notorious for its lyrics about murdering gay men, that continues to draw fire.

Banton is scheduled to perform Wednesday at House of Blues, and two gay-rights organizations, Gay Liberation Network and Black LGBT & Allies for Equality, have planned to protest the show.

“This is the fourth performer in four years that House of Blues has scheduled that’s from this new reggae genre called Dancehall,” said GLN’s Bob Schwartz. “These are Jamaican singers who have published songs that in very explicit ways call for the killing of lesbian and gay people.”

In July the same organizations protested rapper DMX’s performance at House of Blues. Two years prior, GLN protested the House of Blues Chicago performance of another rapper, Capleton,leading to the cancellation of subsequent performances at House of Blues outlets in Los Angeles and New Orleans. That same year, the group’s efforts led to R.J. Reynolds’ pulling tour sponsorship for Beenie Man, spurring the cancellation of several tour dates nationwide, including one at Chicago’s House of Blues.

“Two years ago we made numerous efforts to contact [House of Blues.] … We were rebuffed; they absolutely refused to meet with us, to talk about the issues,” Schwartz said.

‘Not what we stand for’

However, House of Blues senior vice president of marketing Jack Gannon said he has met with several concerned organizations at the company’s L.A. corporate headquarters. “We’re not in a place where we support discrimination or violence of any kind -- and it’s not what we stand for,” Gannon said.

“Our mission statement is really committed to peace and harmony and so forth. But at the same time we have a business responsibility to provide environments for artists to demonstrate and perform their trade. … We can’t be in the business of censoring their content. If the organization has challenges or concern with the content, they really should speak directly to the artist and talk to them about the content that they’re performing.”

In August, GLN contacted Live Nation, which is acquiring House of Blues, requesting that it intervene with current management to cancel Banton’s performance. In a statement, a Live Nation representative said, “Although Live Nation has entered into an agreement to acquire House of Blues, we do not currently own House of Blues and the deal is still subject to a number of closing conditions, including regulatory approval. As such, we are not currently in a position to exert any type of control or influence over any aspect of House of Blues.”

Banton converted to the Rastafarian religion in the mid-‘90s, and since then his lyrics have been primarily socially conscious. He has not recorded another homophobic track but has reportedly performed “Boom Bye Bye” since his conversion.

Banton also remains unrepentant. In 2003, when the U.K.’s Guardian asked if his opinion had changed, he responded, “If I’d changed my opinion, would it change the song? So why should you go back there? That’s the past. I’ve been down that road a thousand times and I refuse to go there again with anyone.”

Not likely to recant

It’s unlikely Banton would recant the views expressed in the song because Rastafarianism is generally intolerant of homosexuality. More recently he was adamant that people not tell him what he can and can't express, likening it to slavery and saying, “If you don’t like it, don’t listen to it” during an interview with BBC Radio this summer.

Banton was not available for comment. Banton’s publicist, Tracii McGregor, said Banton was 15 when he wrote the song and that it was taken out of context.

“In Jamaica you regularly, in the newspaper, you hear reports of … older men raping young boys, or taking advantage of young boys, or … trying to … bribe young boys who live in the streets … so they can take advantage of them sexually,” McGregor said. “This is not anything new. So Buju actually wrote that song in response to an article that was on the cover of a paper in Jamaica, and that’s where that came from.”

The song was 4 years old by the time it was released in the United States. In July his concert in Brighton, England, was canceled because of protests, and a subsequent protest in Copenhagen led to the venue owners’ requesting that Banton not express any homophobic views during the show. The singer reportedly complied.

GLN plans to protest until anti-gay music becomes a thing of the past. “What we would want is for these artists [to] issue an apology for harm that may have resulted from their lyrics,” Schwartz said. “[And] a commitment to, one, not perform those [homophobic] songs anymore and, two, to not release any recordings going forward that contain those [types of] songs.”

Essay 1059


Hot topics in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Two ex-waitresses in New York (one pictured above) filed a $15 million sexual-harassment suit against a former employer who insisted on keeping track of the female workers’ weight. Managers at the trendy bar forced the women to regularly get on a scale, with results recorded and tracked on a Web site. “I told them I’m not going to be part of your sick game,” said one waitress, who claims a manager attempted to pick her up to get her on the scale. “I just felt so violated.” California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger probably called the women to show support and tell them they’re hot.

• Cigarette maker Philip Morris is disputing the recent study that showed nicotine levels in cigarettes have risen 10 percent in the last six years. The tobacco company claims the data it provided for the study recorded fluctuations in nicotine levels, but no steady increase. However, they don’t deny the steady and measurable increase in the company’s lies to the public.

Essay 1058


Looking for a Few Good Minorities with MultiCultClassics…

Tired of working for The Man? Make a switch to The Michelin Man.

Monday, September 11, 2006

Essay 1057


Everybody’s got an opinion. Here’s a new collection responding to recent AdAge articles. Plus, Hadji Williams delivers spirited rants at knockthehustleblog.typepad.com. Click on the essay title above to view his perspectives.

Four initial reactions to the AdAge article presented in Essay 1056…

> ad agencies should reflect the demographic of the marketplace. in other words, they should be a microcosm of the marketplace. that’s when interesting ideas and a dynamic creative environment is given further impetus and the agency truly represents the pulse of popular culture from which it draws/reflects its ideas. — Scarborough, ON

> Omnicom is the only brave one here. Signing is the easy thing to do but will only lead to inappropriate hiring and promotions. Instead, Omnicom invested their money into everyone’s future. That donation will not only brighten the future of those students but all the agencies will benefit from an enlarged pool of qualified minority candidates. Agencies don’t care about skin color -- they care about expanding their business. They would have been more successful by now if they’d had good candidates available. This isn’t anyone’s fault, but Omnicom actually took action while everyone else is simply giving lip service. — Dallas, TX

> If signing the Human Rights Commission diversity agreement represents nothing more than an opportunity to “shunt this potentially embarrassing issue to the background,” as Matthew Creamer and Lisa Sanders seem to suggest, shame on our industry. As the leading publication of American advertising, ADVERTISING AGE should be mindful of the signals such language sends. Unless, of course, your publication takes the position that advertising’s stunning lack of diversity is merely an embarrassment, rather than an injustice. Valerie Graves Chief Creative Officer Vigilante New York City — New York, NY

> The whole “issue” is ridiculous! Any agency, no matter how big or small, as a private company operating in a free market should have the solemn right to select and hire its employees based on TALENT, SKILLS and QUALIFICATION, and NOT on skin color! Actually, the commission request is much more racist in its core — as it will mean that, for example, a white Copywriter or Creative Director with better portfolio or more appropriate experience should be neglected in favor of a black candidate, just because of the “minority quota”... Such quota would be understandable for government and city jobs, but for the private sector? How about Wall Street then? How about Silicon Valley? And how about the percentage of black students in Ivy League colleges? And do you ever wonder how many white vs. black candidates apply for each top agency position? Of course, when 90% and more ARE white, the end result would be obvious... Milko Stoyanov Chicago — Chicago, IL

More comments posted in response to the article presented in Essay 1036 (initial comments presented in Essay 1042)…

> I didn't know that getting a job at one of New York’s best advertising agencies was a “Human Right”. With competition as keen as it is, no company can afford to reject talented people. This is especially true in the ad business. If discrimination has occurred, then hire a lawyer and file suit. Otherwise, this appears to be more of an inquisition than an investigation. If the “Human Rights Commission” wants to play hardball, as they appear to be willing to do, then Madison Ave should remind the Mayor that NYC isn’t the only place where space can be rented to ply our trade. — Kansas City, MO

> I’m a young, educated black professional seeking to switch gears into the creative side of the advertising industry, so I won’t go into where my sympathies rest with all this. I’ve been following AdAge’s solid coverage for months, as well as the typical predictable provocative reactions such as those of the esteemed poster from Windham, ME above. Assuming nothing but a truly sincere, legitimate belief that no amount of intervention is warranted, would be effective, nor proximate to the actual offending parties, please tell me this, my brother: how much interaction do you have at every level with every person involved on each account? Would the cologne/body odor, jewelry, clothing, hair coloring, height/weight, shoes, tattoos earned in service to community and country vs. those created for aesthetic value -- get scrutinized by you, for everyone, men and women, old and young alike, on the agency and client side? And who would do that review for you? Are you breaking the law if you refuse to hire a person or agency with a minority of people that don’t fit the image you wish to project? Yes, if you are stupid enough to admit it publicly. Is that bad business for you in the long run? Yes, it is if you can admit to yourself personally. It’s not simply about diversity and quotas, it’s about the value of perspective and talent, and mettle everyone brings to their work -- not how much metal they have in their face. As a side note, I hear Omnicom is going to do $2.5 million over five years for a diversity proposal of some sorts and to create a marketing program at Medgar Evers College. It was announced at the annual Congressional Black Caucus summit at Washington, DC. Ironic because Omnicom is the holding company of DDB behind the Bud Light “Steve and Zagar” campaign celebrating a white guy and a “stereotypical cultured savage” (implied Yanomamo); as well as TBWAChiatDay behind the Starburst spot with a white guy pretending to be Jamaican. Still think a more informed diverse perspective in a more informed diverse America isn’t warranted? — Washington, DC

Essay 1056


From AdAge.com…

----------------------------------------

Omnicom Flies Solo on Diversity Hiring Issue

Holding Company Splits with Rivals, Could Still Face NYC Public Hearings

By Matthew Creamer and Lisa Sanders

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- A landmark agreement to improve diversity on Madison Avenue could shunt the potentially embarrassing issue into the background for everyone but the industry’s largest player -- Omnicom Group.

Of the 16 agencies originally subpoenaed by the New York City Human Rights Commission, four are owned by Omnicom: DDB, BBDO, PHD and Merkley & Partners.

Conspicuously absent
Omnicom, the No. 1 holding company, was conspicuously absent from a series of agreements -- first reported by AdAge.com -- that agency holding companies made with the New York City Human Rights Commission to ramp up initiatives to hire more minority executives. Rather than sign on with WPP Group, Interpublic Group of Cos. and Publicis Groupe, Omnicom went its own way, pledging more than $2 million for diversity initiatives, including the establishment of an advertising, media and marketing curriculum at the historically black Medgar Evers College.

No good deed, of course, goes unpunished. Despite offering more concrete plans than anyone else, Omnicom still faces the specter of public hearings that are scheduled to coincide with Advertising Week this month. Underwhelming racial statistics for two of its largest units were trotted out in a front-page New York Times article Sept. 8. And the commission invoked the name of one of Omnicom’s largest clients, PepsiCo, in describing how it arrived at the new procedures.

The pacts
Of the 16 agencies originally subpoenaed, four are owned by Omnicom: DDB, BBDO, PHD and Merkley & Partners. (Arnold, owned by Havas, has not yet signed but is expected to.) Omnicom, according to executives familiar with the situation, was reluctant to agree to terms that involved monitoring its progress. An Omnicom spokeswoman declined to comment.

Eleven agencies signed pacts to improve minority hiring, pledging to diversify by setting goals for the hiring, promotion and retention of minority talent. The agencies did not agree to quotas, but instead will set their own hiring goals and report their progress to the commission. Failure to meet the objectives will require the agencies hire outside consultants, but it won’t result in financial penalties.

Detailed work-force report
“The agencies have agreed to tell us whether they’re living up to the goals they’ve set and to give us a detailed report on how their work force is comprised” said Avery Mehlman, deputy commissioner of the HRC’s law-enforcement bureau.

While Omnicom isn’t off the hook as far as the commission’s hearings go, it is in the good graces of another outspoken advocate for diversity: New York City Councilman Larry Seabrook, who brokered the deal.

“We went to Omnicom and we kicked ass,” said Mr. Seabrook, speaking at the annual legislative meeting of the Congressional Black Caucus in Washington on Sept. 7. “But they came to the table. Omnicom put their money where their mouth is.”

Continuing threat of public hearings
Mr. Seabrook said he intends to hold his own Advertising Week hearings that could include agencies or their clients if the agencies don't also reach a settlement with him.

Mr. Mehlman said the agreements were modeled on diversity programs used by corporations such as Pepsi. For instance, agency CEOs will have their compensation tied to progress on the diversity goals. Patricia Gatling, chairwoman of the commission, said at the caucus, “Approximately 2% of the individuals who create in us a desire to buy at the 16 agencies we examined are black,” adding, “Here we are in 2006 -- also a half century after the civil-rights movement began -- and we have still been unable to break and excel in this industry.”

She said that while 22% of the 8,000 employees of 16 agencies it examined earned over $100,000, only 2.5% of those were African-American.

Ira Teinowitz contributed to this report.

Essay 1055


Looking for a Few Good Minorities with MultiCultClassics…

The U.S. Department of Justice takes a pretty aggressive approach with recruitment. The scene is reminiscent of INS agents storming the Miami home to seize Elian Gonzalez back in 2000.

Essay 1054


Truthiness and less in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• A new study revealed members of Congress tell the entire truth about 25 percent of the time when debating major legislation in the House and Senate. Rather, elected officials spout half-truths, misleading exaggerations or outright lies when pontificating on the country’s business. One political scientist behind the study said, “We don’t pretend to know whether they are lying, are ignorant, or misperceive the facts and informed opinion on an issue.” That sounds like a polite fib.

• Ford Motor Company may decide to cut 6,000 more jobs than originally predicted, as its board meets this week to continue planning the company turnaround. Hey, somebody’s gotta pay for the new CEO’s $18.5 million signing incentives (see Essay 1045).

Essay 1053


Looking for a Few Good Minorities with MultiCultClassics…

Pitney Bowes claims to celebrate diversity in its recruiting efforts. But the sci-fi image appears to be distinctively Caucasian. Plus, it calls to mind the Borg from Star Trek: The Next Generation — “You will be assimilated.”

Sunday, September 10, 2006

Essay 1052


From Adweek.com…

-------------------------------------------------------------

Omnicom Pays $2.5 Mil. to Foster Diversity

By Wendy Melillo

WASHINGTON Omnicom Group has agreed to pay $2.5 million over five years to promote diversity at advertising agencies and establish a marketing program at Medgar Evers College, according to New York City Council member Larry Seabrook.

An Omnicom representative confirmed that the holding company had made a proposal.

Seabrook disclosed the deal here today at the annual legislative meeting of the Congressional Black Caucus, during a session on “Truth in Advertising: How You Are Affected by the Practices of Ad Agencies and Their Clients.” Rep. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, D-Mich., hosted that session.

The issue of a lack of diversity among ad agency executives has gained prominence since the New York City Human Rights Commission sent subpoenas in June to the heads of 16 New York-based shops, including leaders at DDB, Saatchi & Saatchi and Ogilvy & Mather, among others.

Seabrook, who is chairman of the New York City Council’s Committee on Civil Rights, has also said he will hold hearings on the issue and include testimony from agency and client executives.

Human Rights Commission Chair Patricia Gatling, who also spoke at the session, would not confirm if a settlement had been reached with any of the agencies.

She said one of the driving forces behind the commission’s decision to pursue an investigation of the agencies was the fact that “the number of African-Americans in the advertising industry, particularly in the upper echelons (i.e. creative, professional or managerial titles) weren’t much better than they were in the 1960’s” when her office conducted a similar investigation.

“In a city where African-Americans make up one quarter of the population, with billions of dollars in purchase power, the lack of representation in the advertising industry is completely unacceptable,” Gatling said. “In citing management diversity, one agency went so far as to identify the African-American chief of security and director of janitorial services as company managers. While these positions are certainly important to the daily functioning of the agency and the individuals did make a substantial salary, they are not the molders of public opinion.”

Gatling said only 2 percent of the people who “create in us a desire to buy” at the 16 agencies are black. Of the 8,000 employees who work at the 16 shops, about 22 percent make more than $100,000, and only 2.5 percent of those staffers are black. Gatling said the commission is pressing the agencies for settlements.

Adonis Hoffman, svp and counsel for the Washington office of the American Association of Advertising Agencies, said shops are often caught in the middle. “Advertising agencies act on behalf of clients,” Hoffman said. “Advertisers tell us where to go and how high to jump. I am not trying to shift the buck. Agencies have a big problem in terms of employment.”

Seabrook said he plans to continue pressuring the advertising industry for change. “To quote Martin Luther King, we are too nice to people who are too nasty to us,” he said.

Essay 1051


Don’t mean to blow things out of proportion, but the obesity epidemic is rooted in corporations’ hunger for profit.


The Dunkin’ Donuts Website features this mantra:

How everyday people get things done, every day.

What are the keys to getting things done? A can-do attitude, of course. And a quick stop at Dunkin’ Donuts. Whether you need a delicious cup of coffee, a quick snack on the go, or an icy cold beverage, Dunkin’ Donuts helps you tackle any task at hand.

Mom and dads. Students and senior citizens. Blue collar, white collar, and every collar inbetween. Dunkin’ Donuts is how everyday people get things done, every day.


Taco Bell invents The Fourth Meal — the new meal between dinner and breakfast — to hype its late-night hours. The ultimate result: The Fourth Chin.


Mickey D’s counters its new salad items with the Snack Wrap, a fried chicken strip doused with lettuce, cheddar jack cheese and ranch sauce — all crammed in a soft flour tortilla. Plus, the House of Ronald continues to drag its feet on replacing the trans fat-laden cooking oil used for French fries, despite a court mandate. Did Mayor McCheese grant them a pardon?


KFC claims to address customers’ desire for portability by launching Famous Bowls, a cornucopia of crap dumped into a plastic bin. Perhaps the fast feeder was actually satisfying customers’ desire for portliness.


Sara Lee introduces the latest campaign for its sugary stuff with the tagline, “The Joy of Eating.” Focus groups probably preferred it over, “Binge Until Your Butt Blows.” Nobody doesn’t like Sara Lee. Except Jenny Craig, Richard Simmons and a host of others.


At this rate, Subway’s Jared may start a successful venture selling his old pants to a literally growing American audience.

Essay 1050


Looking for a Few Good Minorities with MultiCultClassics…

Don’t mean to knock this ad, but the photograph is just plain bizarre.

Essay 1049


Bad Boys in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• The producer who owns 71 hours of footage starring O.J. Simpson has offered it to the father of murder victim Ron Goldman in exchange for the right to Fred Goldman’s share of the $33.5 million wrongful-death trial judgment. The elder Goldman is allegedly considering the deal. Sources estimate the footage is worth about $4 million. Or considerably less if placed for sale on eBay.

• Cops who arrested 50 Cent in Manhattan (see Essay 1045) claim the rapper was a model prisoner. “He seemed more embarrassed about being [at the police station house] than anything else,” said one source. “…He cooperated fully and answered all the questions. …There was no attitude at all.” Wait until Fiddy releases the inevitable rap detailing the event.

Essay 1048


Looking for a Few Good Minorities with MultiCultClassics…

The Army is bragging its recruitment efforts have significantly improved over 2005. The Pentagon even announced on Friday that the Army met its enlistment goal for August, attributing the success to innovative salesmanship by more recruiters and incentives like bonuses of up to $40,000. Does the Rambo-style attitude of this print ad reflect the new hype tactics?

Essay 1047


From The Los Angeles Times…

----------------------------------------------------------

By Steve Lopez

And What Do You Mean by Hot?

I’m confused. As the grandson of people from Malaga on one side, Naples and Sicily on the other, I always thought it was Spaniards and Italians who were supposed to be hotblooded. I definitely grew up with a lot of people yelling at one another.

Then I see where Gov. Easy Column had to apologize for saying it’s the Puerto Ricans and Cubans who are the really fiery ones because they’ve got black blood mixed with Latino, which makes for sangria that’s muy spicy.

“Anyone out there that feels offended by these comments, I just want to say I’m sorry,” Arnold Schwarzenegger said Friday in Santa Monica, with Assemblywoman Bonnie Garcia (R-Cathedral City) by his side. “The fact is that if I would hear this kind of comments in my house, by my kids, I would be upset….”

By his kids? They’re not the problem, Arnold, but you and your chief of staff might need to be sent to your rooms without supper. I’ll get to her in a minute.

I was a little surprised Schwarzenegger didn’t make the apology on “Oprah,” with Maria at his side, but it might have been tough to explain his theories on the science of racial cross-pollination.

As for Garcia, she did not look like a woman who felt insulted by the governor’s symposium on ethnicity, which he delivered during a recorded high-powered meeting last spring in Sacramento. Garcia said she had an inside joke with the governor about being a “hotblooded Latina,” and this is likely to be good news for her El Centro and Cathedral City district.

It’s only a matter of time, I’m betting, before we see massive state investment out there, and I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a new Puerto Rican (or Cuban) museum before the end of the year.

Newsmakers in this state never disappoint, do they? The same week that Arnold makes the nightly news, Paris Hilton gets pulled over in Hollywood on suspicion of drunk driving and says she was cruising for an In-N-Out Burger because she “had not ate all day.”

Not too smooth, but throw her in with Mel Gibson and Schwarzenegger in the celebrity faux pas derby and she’s the one who comes off like the sophisticate.

But getting back to Arnold, am I the only one who wondered whether the governor meant something other than hot-blooded, as in temperamental? Is it possible he simply meant hot? He is who he is, after all.

“I mean, they are all very hot,” he said at one point in the recording.

Hard to say exactly what he might have had in mind. Let’s go to the transcript.

“Bonnie Garcia is great,” Chief of Staff Susan Kennedy says at one point, and Kennedy, let’s keep in mind, is supposed to be the brains of the operation. “She’s a ball-buster. She’s great. Is she Puerto Rican?”

“She seems to me like Cuban,” the governor responds.

“She’s not Mexican,” Kennedy says.

“No,” Arnold says.

“But she said something, and I thought, I thought she was Puerto Rican,” Kennedy says.

“She maybe is Puerto Rican or the same thing as Cuban,” the governor says.

I hate to break up the summit, but let’s pause here for a second.

Do Arnold and Kennedy, whose appointment raised eyebrows in both the anti-gay and anti-Democrat crowds, often sit around talking about saucy cross-breeds?

If so, I’m kicking myself. Not long ago I had a one-hour cigar chat with the governor, and we spent most of the time talking about campaign finance reform. Am I that dull? And what were we smoking, anyway, Cubans or Puerto Ricans?

Come to think of it, what does the governor mean by “the same thing as Cuban?” You are or you aren’t, unless I’m missing something. I mean, Lucy wasn’t married to a Caribbean. Ricky was a Cuban, and no matter what else you think of him, he probably offended more real Cubans than Schwarzenegger.

And why is Schwarzenegger on the hook but not Kennedy, who seems to be an expert on Mexicans? I didn’t see any evidence that she objected when Arnold said, “I mean, they are all very hot. They have the, you know, part of the black blood in them and part of the Latino blood in them that together makes it.”

This is quite an interesting peek behind the curtain in Sacramento, wouldn’t you say?

And whatever you think of him, you’ve got to give Schwarzenegger points for the way he handled the apology. He wasted no time, stepped right up, faced the cameras and said that when he read his own comments in the paper, they made him cringe.

If only Bill Clinton had been that smart.

Poor Phil Angelides, the Democratic challenger. He can’t get traction on anything. Just after he put out a statement saying Arnold had embarrassed the whole state, there was Arnold on TV with Garcia standing by her man like a proud Mexican, Cuban, Puerto Rican.

Look, I can’t remember what the heck she is. But she’s definitely hot.

Saturday, September 09, 2006

Essay 1046


From The Chicago Reader…

-------------------------------------------------------

Girls With Grills

Zoe Weisman and Natasha Newman-Thomas are seniors at the School of the Art Institute.

What made you want to get a grill?

ZOE: I always wanted braces. I never had them and I think they’re really hot.

How much did those cost?

NATASHA: Between $400 and $500. My mom has wanted gold teeth her whole life but feels she’s past the point where it would be OK for her to have them, so she said she would pay half because I was living out her dream.

Where did you get them, and what are they made of?

ZOE: Mine is really ghetto. It’s from Da Hot Zone in Logan Square. It’s white gold with diamonds molded to my teeth. You boil the wax, put the grill in, bite down, keep it like that for a while until it hardens, and there you go.

NATASHA: I got mine at a custom jeweler in Oakland about two years ago. It’s fake, not copper but something like that. I molded it with wax. They make a mold of your mouth like they would at the dentist, then they keep it on record in case you want to get more. Then you choose the design that you want—you can get really elaborate stuff, or not.

ZOE: There are some that cost $20,000.

NATASHA: They can also etch photos into them—

ZOE: And do names—

NATASHA: And words. I would kind of like to have some like that.

ZOE: I’m saving up for fangs. That’s what I really want. Donald Fagen fangs.

NATASHA: We both love Steely Dan. Maybe I’ll get tops that say WALTER BECKER and you can get bottoms that say DONNY FAGEN!

Donald Fagen doesn’t have fangs!

ZOE: He just looks like a vampire.

What kind of reaction do you get when you wear them?

NATASHA: One time I left mine at a Steak n Shake and when I drove back to get it all the employees sang the song “Grillz” to me. This baby and I have gone through a lot together. I’ve lost it and dug through like eight bags of trash for it.

ZOE: I was at the barber shop recently getting braids and some guy was looking at my grill and not saying anything. I was like, “What?” And he said, “I’m not mad, it’s cute.”

—Liz Armstrong

Essay 1045


Sorry statements in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger apologized for remarks he made in reference to Assemblywoman Bonnie Garcia (both pictured above). During a conversation with staffers, Schwarzenegger said, “She maybe is Puerto Rican or the same thing as Cuban. I mean, they are all very hot. … They have the, you know, part of the black blood in them and part of the Latino blood in them that together makes it.” Garcia responded by saying, “I am not mad that he recognizes that I am passionate about the issues. … and I am not mad that he allows me to tell him exactly what I think, and what’s on the mind of people in my community. So again, there is no need to apologize.” Garcia, elected in 2002, is the first Latina woman to represent the 80th Assembly District; plus, she’s the sole Latina Republican in the State Legislature. Hey, she’s pretty hot for a Republican.

• 50 Cent was arrested for traffic violations in Manhattan, while fans cheered the rapper and booed the cops. The charges included making an unsafe lane change, driving with an expired permit and driving without insurance. Maybe insurance companies need to offer special policies for rappers — with extra rates for speeding, police encounters and gunfire damage.

• New Ford Motor Company CEO Alan Mulally will reportedly receive a base salary of $2 million, with a signing bonus of $7.5 million and $11 million to offset forfeited money and stock options from former employer Boeing. Looks like he won’t have to worry about paying his auto insurance premiums.

• The Federal Reserve presented a study that showed minorities were denied home loans at a higher rate than Whites in 2005. Denial rates for Blacks were at 27.5 percent, followed by Native Americans at 22.4 percent, Hispanics at 21.3 percent, Native Hawaiians at 19.6 percent and Asians at 15.8 percent. Whites faced denials at 12.2 percent. “I do not believe this problem is caused solely by racial or ethnic prejudice, but it also cannot be argued that these factors do not contribute to the problem,” said U.S. Rep. Barney Frank. “It is unacceptable for a nation committed to ending racial and ethnic disparity in financial services to allow this to continue.” Talk about being in denial.

Essay 1044





Do all Black women look alike? It seems that way in some recent general market advertising. Medium complexions. Lean figures. Long hair. The standards even apply when the Black women are cartoons.

Essay 1043


From The Associated Press…

----------------------------------------

Spanish Fashion Show Rejects Skinny Models

By DANIEL WOOLLS, AP

MADRID, Spain — Spain’s top fashion show has turned away a slew of models on grounds they are too skinny — an unprecedented swipe at body images blamed for encouraging eating disorders among young people.

Organizers of the pageant, known as the Pasarela Cibeles, used a mathematical formula to calculate the models’ body mass index — a measure of their weight in relation to their height — and 30 percent of the women flunked, said the Association of Fashion Designers of Spain.

The association said Friday it wanted models at the show running from Sept. 18-22 to project “an image of beauty and health” and shun a gaunt, emaciated look.

The decision was made as part of a voluntary agreement with the Madrid regional government, said Jesus del Pozo, a designer who is part of the association, said Thursday.

Last year’s show, also called Madrid Fashion Week, drew protests from medical associations and women’s advocacy groups because some of the models were positively bone-thin.

This time the Madrid regional government decided to intervene and pressure organizers to hire fuller-figured women as role models for young girls obsessed with being thin and prone to starving themselves into sickness, said Concha Guerra, deputy finance minister of the regional administration.

Fashion shows, Guerra said, “are mirrors for many young women.”

Del Pozo said this was the first time skinny models have been snubbed at a major international fashion show.

Ryan Brown, director of marketing and public relations in North America for the Elite modeling agency in New York City, agreed. “It is very unprecedented,” said Brown, who has nothing to do with the Spanish show.

He welcomed the decision saying “I think it is great to promote health.”

Madrid’s show, which features mainly Spanish designers, is not as prestigious as catwalks in Paris or Milan but “it is not at the bottom of the pile,” he said.

The impact of rejecting skinny women would have been greater at those other glitzier venues. Still, he said, “I am sure the industry is taking note.”

The body mass index is a tool for doctors who study obesity. It is calculated by dividing weight in pounds by height in inches squared, and multiplying that total by 703.

If the resulting number is between 18.5 and 24.9, the person’s weight is normal. Below 18.5 they are underweight. In the case of the Madrid show, organizers rejected women with indices under 18.

Brown of the Elite agency said fashion shows reflect the tastes of clothing designers, who for now prefer the Kate Moss look as opposed to the curvier dimensions of models such as Cindy Crawford in years past.

“They don’t want voluptuous girls any more,” he said. “It would be nice if fashion got back to that.”

Friday, September 08, 2006

Essay 1042


Initial opinions posted at AdAge.com in response to the story referenced in Essay 1036…

> Commitments and investments in this area are good for business, the industry, and our culture. Nevertheless, why not have hearings? Why not open up and face the complexity of issues and challenges, accept realities, and plan more comprehensive solutions? Why won’t hearings be good for everyone? They are long overdue. — NEW YORK, NY

> I understand that many people feel as if the NY commission is wrongfully targeting certain agencies, but as an educated, articulate minority working in advertising, I can tell you that it is very hard to find an agency that can look past the stereotypes that exist for minorities. I applied to quite a few agencies after I graduated, and I only got phone calls from a couple of agencies — and I graduated Magna Cum Laude from the Advertising/Communications program at Florida International University. At many agencies, it seems as if the number of minorities can be counted on one hand. I think the commission is just trying to create equal opportunity for all those people out there who are equally qualified to work in the Advertising industry. What’s so wrong about that? — Ft. Lauderdale, FL

> Another government program to keep racism and bigotry prominent. And, of course, the “diversity” issue is further reaching: Why must an agency or client hire help with lifestyles not consistent with their beliefs or the character of their company? Am I breaking the law if I refuse to hire a person or agency with people with metal hanging all over their face because that person or entity is in the minority; even though that’s not part of the image I wish to project? People like John Kerry make one man’s freedom another man’s tyranny so that he can justify his existence in Congress. Public hearings? Sounds more like the Salem witch trials. — Windham, ME

Essay 1041


File these notes under “Stereotypical Dumb Blondes.”

Jessica Simpson tells Jay Leno she believes diet soft drinks cause cellulite. Wonder what she thinks the offerings at Pizza Hut (a Pepsi partner) will do to your figure. Plus, she’s heavily involved with Pepsi Smash™ promotional activities. Meanwhile, Paris Hilton reveals she was speeding to grab a bite at In-N-Out Burger, despite her on-air whoring for Carl’s Jr.

Essay 1040


Boycotts will be boycotts in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Anheuser-Busch is under fire for its Bud Light campaign depicting Zagar and Steve, a character resembling a Yanomamo tribesman and his standard White guy roommate. The comedy comes from Zagar’s primitive behavior playing against a modern, urban setting. However, Native Americans are not amused, and threats of boycotts are underway. Some have even referred to Zagar as the new “Stepin’ Fetchit” stereotype.

“I am in agreement of the number of the Indigenous leaders that have contacted me on this issue,” said the program director of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility. “This is a gross misuse of Indigenous images, issues and culture. It is just completely offensive. It needs to be stopped.”

Another critic wrote, “This campaign is a throwback to the days when Americans portrayed Indians as pure savages: unable to speak English, uninterested in peace and harmony, intent only on killing and ravaging. It’s no better than a 19th century minstrel show that depicted Negro behavior as stupid and stereotypical. George Washington once labeled Indians ‘beasts of prey’ and this endeavor does the same.”

An Anheuser-Busch spokesperson stated, “We have the greatest respect for people of all nationalities and ethnic origins. We have been advised that some in the Indigenous community take issue with this fictional character — which was never our intention — and we are in discussions with the program director at the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility about concerns that have been raised. We hope to resolve this quickly and amicably.”

They’ll probably offer cases of Bud Light.

• Wal-Mart announced plans to retool its stores with offerings designed to target six distinct consumer groups, including Blacks, Hispanics and affluent shoppers. No word yet if any revamped departments will appeal to Bud Light’s Zagar.

Essay 1039


Couldn’t Tide depict a more aspirational vocation than a floor mopper?

Essay 1038


From The New York Times…

-------------------------------------------------------

City Ad Firms Agree to Hire More Black Managers

By DIANE CARDWELL and STUART ELLIOTT

Finding that just 2 percent of the upper echelon of the advertising industry is black, New York City officials said yesterday that they had reached agreements with several of the nation’s biggest ad firms forcing them to bring more black managers into this crucial sector of the city’s economy.

The city’s Human Rights Commission found that hiring of black workers had barely improved since an inquiry found similar problems 40 years ago. Of 8,000 employees working for 16 agencies the commission examined, Patricia L. Gatling, chairwoman of the commission, said about 22 percent make more than $100,000 a year, and only 2.5 percent of those are black.

Faced with the findings, nearly a dozen agencies, including those owned by the Interpublic Group of Companies and the WPP Group, have promised to set numerical goals for increasing black representation on their creative and managerial staffs and to report on their progress each year.

Under the agreements, the agencies have agreed to submit to three years of monitoring by the city, under which the companies will report hiring, promotion and retention figures to the commission each year. If they do not meet their goals, they will hire an outside consultant to help them do so, among other measures.

At the same time the companies have agreed to set up diversity boards and to link progress on the issue to their managers’ compensation.

The commission has the authority to fine companies up to $250,000 or to sue them, but officials said that they believed the threat of pressure from agency clients like Pepsi and Citigroup was a more effective stick in bringing corporate leaders to the negotiating table.

“In a city where African-Americans make up one-quarter of the population, with billions of dollars in purchase power, the lack of representation in the advertising industry is completely unacceptable,” Ms. Gatling said at a meeting of the Congressional Black Caucus in Washington yesterday. “There are plenty of secretaries and clerks, but very few African-Americans have risen much higher.”

A former advertising executive first brought the problem to the attention of the commission, which decided to focus on black workers as officials discovered that they were more severely underrepresented than other groups, Ms. Gatling said.

The city’s ad industry has long had a huge economic and symbolic role in New York, accounting for 46,000 jobs in the city. The industry is a crucial part of the media nexus — from TV networks to glossy magazines to Web design firms — that help make New York City the nation’s business capital. And the industry’s failure to hire and promote minorities has put it at odds with its clients as they try to reach an increasingly polyglot consumer marketplace.

By signing the agreements, which also require that agencies establish recruiting and internship programs through universities with large minority student populations, the agency executives can avoid the embarrassing prospect of testifying at public hearings scheduled for Sept. 25, at the start of the industry’s annual gathering, Advertising Week. So far, of the 16 agencies subpoenaed to testify by the commission, only the agencies of the Omnicom Group have declined to work on an agreement, officials said.

The commission’s analysis, which looked at salary levels as well as job titles, indicated that although the major ad firms have black workers, they are largely absent from the most senior or creative levels. Of 476 employees at DDB’s New York office, commission officials said, 51 are black. But of 159 employees making $100,000 or more, only 2 are black. Neither is among the 29 employees earning $200,000 to $300,000 or the 22 employees earning more than $300,000.

A similar pattern exists across the industry, commission officials said. At BBDO, of 1,077 New York office employees, 104 are black. In the group making $100,000 or more, 6 employees are black; among the 140 who earn $100,000 to $200,000, there are only 5. Not one of the 89 employees who earn $200,000 to $300,000 is black, and among the 59 earning above $300,000, there is but one black employee.

At Merkley & Partners, 10 of 207 employees are black. None earn more than $100,000.

Through the years, the advertising industry has tried to make efforts to increase the diversity of its work force, in many instances spurred by agency clients: marketers want the staff members of the agencies to reflect the increasing diversity of the American consumer, so they can better aim their pitches at a multicultural shopper.

One senior executive at a top agency said there had been previous investigations by the commission or its predecessors in 1968 and 1978, which led to reports being issued but nothing more. He spoke only when granted anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the agreement before it was formally announced.

“This represents a concrete step in the right direction,” the senior executive said, because until now “no agreement has ever been signed by any agency on this issue.” Whatever efforts have been made before have been voluntary and informal, the senior executive said.

“The industry generally has recruiting issues,” the senior executive said, adding: “Let’s be honest. Minorities are targeted broadly by everyone: Wall Street, Fortune 100 companies. Your top minority students have lots of opportunities outside advertising.”

Interpublic, which owns agencies like Draft and Gotham, said the decision by four of its agencies to sign agreements with the city commission demonstrated how the firms “will continue to make achieving an increasingly diverse work force and transparency on this issue major corporate priorities,” said Philippe Krakowsky, an executive vice president at Interpublic.

One company not party to the deal is Omnicom, which owns agencies like BBDO, DDB and Merkley. But Omnicom says it is pursuing its own strategy for diversifying its work force, making an arrangement with the City Council that does not involve setting specific hiring goals.

The company has promised to spend, for instance, at least $2.35 million to finance a diversity development program that will include an institute at Medgar Evers College from which the company will hire graduates. And it has pledged to recruit at historically black colleges around the country. The City Council has agreed to put up matching funds of $1 million for the institute.

Thursday, September 07, 2006

Essay 1037


Both of these ads appeared in the latest issue of BusinessWeek — which is a pretty amazing thang already, given the typical lack of ad diversity in such publications. But what’s with chopping up Black folks?

Essay 1036


From Adage.com…

--------------------------------------------

Several Agencies Sign Agreements to Forestall Diversity Hearings
Industry Execs Could Avoid Testifying During Advertising Week

By Matthew Creamer

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Several ad agencies under scrutiny for their lackluster diversity-hiring practices have pledged to ramp up their minority recruiting, signing agreements designed to forestall potentially embarrassing public hearings planned for later this month.

Aggressive pursuit
Multiple executives familiar with agreements reached with the New York City Human Rights Commission said they don’t entail quotas, fines or any especially stiff oversight, though the commission is expected to review the matter after some time. Agencies owned by WPP Group, parent of Ogilvy & Mather and Grey, are said to have already signed, and Interpublic Group of Cos., Publicis Groupe and Omnicom Group are all at varying stages of negotiations with the commission, which has been aggressively pursuing the issue.

15 agencies
Each one of the 15 agencies initially subpoenaed by the commission is expected to sign on to the agreements, the executives said.

The pacts, these executives said, will take the agencies’ executives off the hook for hearings set to coincide with Advertising Week in New York, the annual industry celebration that begins Sept. 25. “By reaching an understanding, the idea is they’d no longer be called to testify,” said one.

Commission comment
A representative for the commission denied that any resolution has been reached. “I don’t know where you’re hearing it from, but you’re hearing it from me that [we’re] moving forward with the hearings on [Sept.] 25,” said Betsy Herzog, a spokeswoman for the New York Human Rights City Commission.

The agencies all referred calls to the commission or declined to comment.

Complaints about the ad industry’s historical lack of diversity has long besmirched the industry, despite the fact that most agencies have put in place programs designed to help them foster more diverse workplaces. Short of taking legal action, it was never clear exactly what the commission could achieve in terms of pushing the agencies on the diversity issue, though by scheduling the hearings during Advertising Week -- a bit of PR moxie worthy of Madison Ave. -- it promised to move the issue onto a larger stage.

Attention From Washington
The issue is likely to be addressed at a forum on minority advertising at the Congressional Black Caucus’ annual meeting in Washington on Thursday. The discussion features Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.; U.S. Rep. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, D-Mich.; and some top New York City officials involved in the dispute.

Mr. Kerry, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Small Business Committee, has been especially concerned that the government isn’t adequately supporting minority agencies and minority media in the government’s own media buying.

Willow Duttge and Ira Teinowitz contributed to this report.

Essay 1035


The guy in this ad is probably praying for guidance in paying off his credit card debt.

Essay 1034


The latest issue of Adweek features an essay by Marian Salzman, executive vice president and director of strategic content at JWT in New York (pictured above). Salzman fancies herself a futurist who’s plugged into cutting-edge culture, and her Website claims she “identified such trends as wiggers.”

The piece is titled, “Spilt Champagne: Is bling history or are urban culture leaders still tastemakers?” Unfortunately, viewing the story online requires a subscription, but don’t fret if you can’t access it. You’re not missing much.

It’s always interesting when Madison Avenue lifers boast having street cred.

Salzman opens by announcing, “The playas in the club are no longer raising glasses of Cristal, at least not the playas at Jay-Z’s upscale 40/40.” She then proceeds to detail the recent conflict between the hip-hop mogul and Cristal. Salzman writes, “If it’s not exactly the East Coast-West Coast rap music beef that spilled blood years ago, Jay-Z’s falling out with Cristal shows how far urban culture has come from its inception as the angry protest of ghetto youth.” Guess rap and hip-hop are now completely synonymous with “urban culture.”

Salzman continues to school Adweek readers. “Now, the highest strata of urban culture is occupied by multi-millionaire music producers and recording artists whose conspicuous consumption have written brands like Bentley, Burberry and Courvoisier into the pop culture lexicon. Cross that community, Jay-Z seems to be saying, and you can just as easily be rubbed out.” Don’t recall Jay-Z ever threatening to rub out anyone.

Then Salzman reveals, “A major survey by JWT confirms what I’ve been saying for 15 years: CMOs who want a handle on young consumers from all walks of life must understand what’s taking hold dozens of stories below their penthouse offices, on the streets of the cities where they lunch.” Well, it’s safe to guess few CMOs do lunch in the ‘hood. But it’s encouraging to note Salzman has spent the last 15 years trying to sell notions that most Black advertising agencies have hyped for over 30 years.

Thank goodness Salzman’s here to drop gems like, “Young urban style is clearly a mainstay for a solid minority, but more significantly, it is a major influence for a big majority of young people.” Quick, somebody tell Diddy!

Salzman (w)raps it up by predicting, “Booty shaking and bling may always be in style, but we think hip-hop’s future is in the music with a message: the young Parisian Arabs who have something to say about racism, the Mexican youth who rap about poverty, the Middle Eastern teens who seek to protest war. We think artists who turn away from mass-marketed music will begin using their skills to raise consciousness and make a difference. They may yet make Grandmaster Flash proud.” You go, girl.



Special Bonus! Not sure about the reproduction quality, but here’s a copy of the complete Adweek essay.

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

Essay 1033


This is what happens when healthcare advertising agencies try to be creative.

Essay 1032


From TVWeek.com…

---------------------------------------

‘Survivor’ Stirs Up Supremacists
Web Posters Embrace Show’s Racial Split

By James Hibberd

CBS’s plan to racially segregate the tribes for the 13th season of “Survivor” has white-supremacist Web bulletin boards buzzing, prompting concern from the Southern Poverty Law Center civil rights group.

“It has lit up the white-supremacist world,” said Mark Potok, director of the Intelligence Report at the SPLC. “It’s been a fairly remarkable reaction. [The format] plays into the hands of many people in this country who have racist feelings.”

The upcoming season of the 6-year-old CBS reality show has contestants separated by race into four groups: The African-American Tribe, the White Tribe, the Hispanic Tribe and the Asian-American Tribe. The tribes will stay segregated for about half the season.

Since the format was announced two weeks ago, the plan has been widely criticized as a racially inflammatory ratings stunt. Show creator Mark Burnett has said the format was a response to criticism that the reality program didn’t include enough minorities.

People posting messages on white supremacist Web sites such as Stormfront.org and Vanguardnewsnetwork.com, are greeting the “Survivor” format with a mix of hope and suspicion: Some hail the idea as a way to foster racial pride among whites, but others fear Hollywood will portray whites unfavorably.

“This is a great idea,” wrote poster “Drafli Hakon” on Stormfront, which claims 120,000 members. “This will get all those millions of couch potatoes who watch the show [rooting] for their own. Win, lose or draw, millions of whites will start to remember that they ARE part of a tribe. If the Whites win, they will feel pride. If they lose, they will feel resentment towards those who won. It’s win-win for us.”

Another poster, “Krom,” agreed. “This is great and should be really interesting!” the poster wrote. “One benefit I see is that people will really see racial differences are real PLUS they will be able to root for their own people; a sense of racial solidarity. Good luck to the white team!”

Much of the reaction is tempered by fearful certainty that the show will portray whites in a negative light.

“The show will choose the weakest and most indecisive whites to be on the island, and the opposite for the other races (except the asians, maybe),” wrote one poster, “Kragen.” “The show will also be carefully edited to fit their agenda … to make people think whites are nothing without non-whites.”

CBS declined to comment about the message boards. Mr. Burnett could not be reached for comment by press time.

Mr. Burnett has denied the show will inspire racism and has called critics “less than open-minded.”

Mr. Potok, whose nonprofit group investigates racist organizations, said segregating players is an unhelpful way to address diversity issues. “I’m not sure if creating a mini-race war on TV is much of a solution to an affirmative-action problem,” he said. “To some people, this is a chance to get up and cheer for your race. And that’s not helpful at a time when race relations are doing poorly in America.”

One poster on Stormfront noted that the new “Survivor” format might “double or triple [CBS's] ratings.” To which another member hopefully replied: “It might double or triple Stormfront’s ratings.”

Stephanie Robbins contributed to this report.

Essay 1031


Ford wants us to think the quest for vehicles that run on alternative fuels is somehow inspired by warm-and-fuzzy motives. Is Ford doing it for the Black kids — or just desperately seeking to get in the black?

Essay 1030


Business as unusual in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• In a not-so-bold move, William Clay Ford Jr. stepped down as CEO and President of Ford Motor Company, handing the roles to Alan Mulally, a top executive of Boeing. Ford retains his title of Chairman and Master of His Universe. And technically, since he gave up his salary in a symbolic gesture last May, the new appointment will obviously cost the struggling automaker more money. Chairman Ford proclaimed, “Our team needs a steady hand from somebody who’s been through turnarounds and knows what it takes and can say, ‘You’re on the right path, stick with it, it’s going to work,’ or ‘This isn’t the way to go, let’s refocus and go somewhere else.’” Spoken like a true and decisive leader. Ironically, the matchmaker behind Mulally’s appointment was Richard Gephardt, a man who’s failed to turn around the country or land the presidency after numerous attempts.

• There will be about 10,500 fewer folks inside Intel, as the chipmaker announced plans to reduce its staff by 10 percent. “They have to go back to their roots, go back to what they know how to do, which is microprocessors for notebooks, desktops and servers,” said one analyst. Let’s hope going back doesn’t involve reviving the obnoxious commercials starring the Blue Man Group.

• The father of Ron Goldman is seeking to get the rights to O.J. Simpson’s name, image and likeness — in an attempt to collect on the $33.5 million judgment awarded in a 1997 wrongful-death suit. “He personally has never paid a dime on the judgment to anyone,” said Fred Goldman. “He has made it very clear over the years that he has no intention of doing so.” Can’t imagine O.J.’s name, image or likeness could amount to $33.50, let alone $33.5 million.

• The digital divide continues, as a new study shows Internet usage gaps between White and minority kids. 67 percent of White kids use the Internet, while the figures for Black and Hispanic students are about 50 percent. “This creates incredible barriers for minorities,” said a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and an analyst on how communications influence civil rights. Not using the Internet “narrows their ability to even think about the kind of work they can be doing. … It doesn’t prepare them for a world in which they’re going to be expected to know how to do these things.” Imagine all the kids being deprived of experiencing MultiCultClassics.

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

Essay 1029


At last, there’s a multicultural management technique to help you train those immigrant employees to wash their hands after using the restroom.

Essay 1028


A recent episode of “Mind of Mencia” presented a sketch titled, “The Stereotype Olympics.” Contestants of different ethnicities competed in politically-incorrect challenges that included looting televisions and eating watermelons. In typical Carlos Mencia fashion, the event was crude, obscene and hilarious.

Which calls to mind the CBS “Survivor” fiasco, with the reality program’s intention to segregate players by race. Criticism has been fast and furious, with organized protests and advertisers abandoning sponsorships (although the advertisers insist their decisions were not based on the show’s provocative format).


But maybe the “Survivor” deal isn’t so crazy. After all, one could argue that race has always been present in arenas of competition. On abstract and literal levels, the true Olympic Games have many race-based components. Few American professional sports succeed in dodging issues of race. Things are even more intense with international sporting duels — see World Cup Soccer for plenty of examples. Race repeatedly surfaces in political elections. Hell, the race factor even comes up during every installment of “American Idol.”

It’s interesting to note that “Survivor” has traditionally referred to its teams as tribes. Let’s be honest. People tend to be clannish, congregating with their own kind. Yes, we all try to get along on professional and societal planes. But the country — and perhaps the entire planet — leans towards tribalism. “Survivor” isn’t resorting to desperate attempts at boosting ratings. This upcoming season is the natural and inevitable progression.


The only true controversy involves Jeff Probst, the current host of “Survivor.” Probst may not be qualified to oversee the new dynamics of segregated tribes. Perhaps Carlos Mencia or Dave Chappelle should be considered as replacements. Either comic is better suited to mediate the potential conflicts — plus provide some sorely needed entertainment value.

Essay 1027


Greyhound takes very different approaches when targeting Hispanics and Blacks. Hard to decide which ad is the bigger dog.

Essay 1026


Growing concerns in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• A new study showed pudgy toddlers tend to grow up to become pudgy teens. “These findings underscore the need to maintain a healthy weight beginning in early childhood. Contrary to popular belief, young children who are overweight or obese typically won’t lose the extra weight simply as a result of getting older,” said a doctor involved with the study. Hey, let’s refer to the issue as The Happy Meal Syndrome.

• USA Today reported that most Americans don’t realize the actual amount of calories in supersized portions at fast-food restaurants. “One of the big dangers of fast-food lunches is that we not only mindlessly overeat, but we mindlessly underestimate how much we've eaten,” said the lead author of a recent study on the topic. “The more we eat, the less we think we eat. … Nobody is immune from doing this, from the lightest person to the heaviest person.” However, the end results have people looking more like Mo’Nique versus Nicole Richie.

• A Minnesota company has hatched an idea to help students pay for textbooks: load the titles with advertising. By integrating ads, students may enjoy free textbooks. Would you like fries with that physics lesson?

Essay 1025


For Bridgestone, switching from Black to Hispanic messaging is as easy as changing a tire.

Essay 1024


AdAge.com states the obvious regarding Taco Bell’s inability to connect with Hispanics. The ad above certainly tells the story — would anyone be attracted to food that looks like that?

----------------------------------------------

Taco Bell Grapples With Its Hispanic Conundrum
Chain Struggles to Attract Latino Demographic; Analysts Claim the Problem is the Product

By Kate MacArthur

CHICAGO (AdAge.com) -- Taco Bell’s fast-food version of Mexican food isn’t playing very well with Hispanics, who contributed just a half-percent to the company’s same-store-sales gain of 7% in 2005, despite making up 20% of Taco Bell’s core 18-to-34-year-old target market. Now, as the definition of the average American increasingly includes Spanish-speaking consumers, the Yum Brands chain plans to boost its Spanish-language marketing.

Ads or product?
But experts aren’t sure whether Taco Bell’s problem is the advertising -- or the product.

With same-store sales declining for two consecutive months after a 43-month streak of gains, the fast-feeder shared with analysts its plans to prevent a full-out sales swoon. Among them, Taco Bell is considering adding carnitas, a braised pork dish, to the menu and doing more Spanish-language advertising. Management said Taco Bell’s English-language TV ads tended to underdeliver to Hispanic consumers, according to John Ivankoe, a JPMorgan Chase restaurant analyst who attended the chain's investor meeting.

‘Not really Mexican’
“It’s not really Mexican food or food that unacculturated Hispanics know from their home country,” said Everett Hernandez, senior VP-general manager, diversity for market-research firm Synovate. “It’s a new offering to them.”

Taco Bell tends to rely on food-oriented advertising and uses the same positioning regardless of language.

“Food looks like food whether you’re Spanish-dominant or Anglo-Saxon,” said Debbie Myers, VP-media services for Taco Bell. Because its tagline “Think Outside the Bun,” designed to lure consumers from their burger routines, doesn’t translate well into Spanish, the chain uses “No solo de pan vive el hombre” (“man does not live by bread alone”) in Spanish-language ads.

Taco Bell Hispanic ads
Taco Bell does ads for 10 different marketing periods throughout the year, with a Hispanic version for each, Ms. Myers said. The “food-heavy” spots are adapted from general-market footage, and the company also did two live-action original Hispanic spots last year with its Hispanic agency, Dieste Harmel & Partners, Dallas, a Taco Bell spokesman said.

A Dieste executive declined to comment, saying it is too early to discuss the work.

Sonya Suarez-Hammond, director-multicultural marketing insights at Yankelovich, recommends using both Spanish and English to reach Hispanics. “If you think about extended family where you have grandparents, uncles, in-laws and cousins living in one home, there are varying levels of acculturation and language proficiencies,” she said. “Oftentimes marketers have to get past the question of: Is it English or Spanish? It’s really both. We’re seeing the important thing is marketers have to reach out to Hispanic consumers in a culturally relevant way.”

For instance, mealtime is more important to Hispanic families and creates a different opportunity from general-market consumers hooked on dashboard dining.

That opens up a host of operational issues, from point-of-sale materials to dining-room cleanliness.

‘Their issue is authenticity’
“If they want to broaden their Hispanic market … their issue is authenticity, and they have a lot of years of not being perceived as authentic to break through,” said Carl Kravetz, chairman-chief strategic officer of Cruz/Kravetz: Ideas, Los Angeles, which handles advertising for fast-casual chain El Pollo Loco.

He also questioned whether adding more traditional Mexican food would help the situation.

“If they say they deliver good Mexican food to [Hispanics] they won’t be believed. If they say they have good, filling, cheap American food, they may have a chance.”

Essay 1023


Looks like the same creative team was responsible for both of these ads. Or maybe there’s a template or formula for creating really bad liquor ads targeting Blacks.

Essay 1022


From The New York Post…

-------------------------------------

YOU ARE WORKING HARDER & YOU ARE GETTING PAID LESS

By John Crudele

AMERICANS shouldn’t celebrate Labor Day just once a year. They should do it twice or maybe even three times — that’s how many jobs it now takes to maintain the standard of living they had in the early 1970s.

Yesterday was the 123rd anniversary of Labor Day as a national holiday. And now that people are going back to their post-summer, workaday routines, I thought it would be a good time for a reality check.

Politicians will try to make jobs an issue in the congressional election in two months. I’m not going there: The current financial state of the American household has more to do with the costs of homes, education and health care over decades, as well as the pricey amenities of life we’ve all come to love, than it does with political parties.

And we are paying for all that stuff with declining incomes.

Here’s a figure that I find stunning.

When I was in college in 1972 (and paying about $3,000 a year total for an expensive private school), the average American had an average weekly paycheck of $334.60.

Today, the figure is just $277.96 after it’s adjusted for inflation. And that is down about 90 cents a week from August of 2005.

Don’t believe me? Look it up on the U.S. Department of Labor’s Web site — www.bls.gov.

The tables go back to 1964, when average earnings were consistently over $300 a week.

If you look around, you’ll see that Americans are obviously surviving and even thriving. But they are doing it by taking on additional jobs, or by having more than one adult in each household working.

And that gets me to the current state of the job market, which can be best described as confusing.

Last Friday, the Labor Department announced that a modest 128,000 new jobs had been created in August. That figure was slightly higher than the 125,000 new jobs that Wall Street had been expecting, but the number was made a bit better when the government restated the previous two months upward by 18,000 new jobs.

(After I wrote a couple weeks ago that the employment number might be stronger than expected, some on Wall Street boosted their expectations to 130,000 new jobs.)

The fantasy Make Us Rich hedge fund that Bill King and I have conjured up made a measly profit of about $125,000 on Friday when we covered our short position after bond futures initially sank on the slightly better than expected employment figure.

But the jobs number was benign enough to allow stocks their typical rally on the first day of the month. And the Make Us Rich fund is using that as an opportunity to increase our bet that stocks will ultimately have a bad September.

So we are shorting another 500 contracts on the S&P index — adding to our anti-market bet. (see www.nypost.com for details.) Over the past month the Make Us Rich fund is up a mythical $5 million — about the price of a house I’d like to buy in Beverly Hills.