Sunday, August 24, 2014

12010: Comic Culturally Clueless Clowns.

It’s so sad to see the Ferguson incident bringing out the culturally clueless in entertainment and media.

Former Hercules star Kevin Sorbo posted a Herculean asinine Facebook rant:

“Ferguson riots have very little to do with the shooting of the young man. … It is an excuse to be the losers these animals truly are. … It is a tipping point to frustration built up over years of not trying, but blaming everyone else, The Man, for their failures. It’s always someone else’s fault when you give up. … [The event is a] reminder to the African Americans (I always thought we just Americans. Oh, well.) that their President the voted in has only made things worse for them, not better.”

Um, shouldn’t this idiot be competing with Lou Ferrigno to appear at comic book conventions?

Meanwhile, FOX News host Andrea Tantaros called U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder a “race-baiter,” insisting that he runs the Department of Justice “like the Black Panthers would.” Um, would this dimwit even know a Black Panther from the Black Panther? She ought to be joining Sorbo at comic book conventions, perhaps playing the role of Xena.

Next, FOX News host Jeanine Pirro—aka Judge Jeanine—booted two Black lawyers off her program after they charged her with “distracting” from slain teen Michael Brown’s death by getting wrapped up over minor details in witness accounts. Here’s yet another potential comic book convention attraction: stage a wrestling match between Judge Jeanine and Judge Judy—refereed by Judge Dredd.

12009: Jackie Robinson West Bested.

From The Chicago Tribune…

Jackie Robinson West falls 8-4 in Little League final

By Paul Skrbina

SOUTH WILLIAMSPORT, Pa. -- Jackie Robinson West was looking to make history its story Sunday when it faced Seoul, South Korea for the Little League World Series championship.

But the team from Chicago's South Side fell short in an 8-4 defeat in front of an announced crowd of 28,671 at Lamade Stadium, which is nestled in the mountains of the Little League capital of the world.

No all-African-American team ever has won the world title. Former Cub Lloyd McClendon and his 1971 Gary, Ind., team finished second to a team from Taiwan, falling 12-3. In 1980, Gary Sheffield and Derek Bell led a team from Tampa to second, losing 4-3 to Taiwan. Bell returned with Tampa in 1981, a 4-2 loss to another team from Taiwan.

Jackie Robinson did its best to become the first in the sixth inning, when it scored three runs to chants of “USA, USA.”

“We’ve always had questions of baseball in the intercity and how to get more African-American kids playing baseball,” said Phillies first baseman Ryan Howard earlier this week, before JRW met a team from Philadelphia in a United States semifinal. “I think this proves it’s working.”

Seoul, South Korea was working Sunday, too.

The Asia-Pacific region champs scored single runs in the first, third and fourth innings before a four-run sixth inning, punctuated by Hae Chan Choi’s home run and a two-run single from Jin Woo Jeon, made it 8-1.

Jae Yeong Hwang doubled in Dong Wan Sin to open the scoring in the first. Choi scored in the third on a fielder’s choice and Jun Ha Yoo singled home Ji Ho Park in the fourth. Sin added a home run to left in the fifth to make it 4-1.

Jackie Robinson West pulled within 2-1 after DJ Butler and Ed Howard led off the inning with the team’s first hits. Butler scored on a shot to shortstop that resulted in a fielder’s choice.

Seoul National (5-0) won its Little League-record third title. It defeated Japan 12-3 in the international final Saturday. Jackie Robinson West (5-2) won four elimination games to the final. It defeated the West regional champion from Las Vegas 7-5 Saturday in the United States final.

12008: Jackie Robinson West Is U.S. Best.

From The Chicago Tribune…

Jackie Robinson West wins U.S. championship at Little League World Series

By Paul Skrbina

SOUTH WILLIAMSPORT, Pa. — Happy berth day, Jackie Robinson West.

On Saturday afternoon, under a gray Pennsylvania sky, 13 boys from the South Side of Chicago earned a spot in the Little League World Series championship game. Jackie Robinson West sweated out a 7-5 victory in the United States final against Nevada, a team that defeated Jackie Robinson by 11 runs six days earlier.

Jackie Robinson West is the first team from Chicago since North Roseland in 1967 to qualify for the championship and the fourth finalist from Illinois, which doesn’t own a title.

As one emailer wrote, simply: Now it’s soul vs. Seoul.

Jackie Robinson West will face Asia-Pacific champion Seoul, South Korea, a 12-3 winner over Japan in the international final, at 2 p.m. Sunday on ABC-7.

“I don’t like losing,” Jackie Robinson’s Trey Hondras said. “It’s like a girl dumping you and going to your best friend. It really hurt.

“Getting revenge is like getting a better girl and showing her off to your best friend.”

Four batters into Saturday’s game, Jackie Robinson was showing off its bats.

That was all it took for the Great Lakes Region champions to surpass the offensive output — two runs and two hits — they had during a 13-2 loss to Las Vegas on Aug. 17.

That put Jackie Robinson (5-1) in the losers’ bracket — and on a mission.

“They were cocky, so we wanted to play them again,” said Darion Radcliff, who had an RBI and walked twice.

Added Ed Howard, who earned the save for Josh Houston: “Before the game in our dorm we had a talk about how we wanted to get revenge against them.”

Jackie Robinson wasted little time exacting it.

Hondras’ two-run home run to right field highlighted a three-run first. Hondras was at it again in the second, when his single to left scored Cameron Bufford to give Jackie Robinson a 4-3 lead.

“I wasn’t really trying to hit the home run, I just wanted to make contact to get Pierce (Jones) home,” Hondras said. “I just got lucky. Well, not lucky. But I hit the ball over the fence.”

Hondras didn’t just show off with his bat. He wisely started a 3-4-1 double play in the second inning that went Hondras to Marquis Jackson to Houston.

Jackie Robinson West answered with three runs in the fifth, when Houston singled home Jackson. Radcliff (walk) and Brandon Green (fielder’s choice) also scored in the inning.

Things looked eerily familiar to Jackie Robinson at the start, though. Last time it was three consecutive walks to the top of Las Vegas’ order in the first that led to a Brad Stone grand slam and an early hole for the Chicagoans. This time the first three hitters singled before Drew Laspaluto cleared the bases with a two-out double.

Stone was at it again Saturday for Vegas, hitting a two-run home run on an 0-2 count with two outs in the fifth to give his team a 5-4 lead.

Houston, who is 4-0 at the Little League World Series, pounded the ground in frustration.

“After that home run I got scared, I got very scared,” Houston said. “I knew at some point something good would happen.”

So it did.

“It’s still unreal,” Jackie Robinson manager Darold Butler said. “I’m still going through the game in my mind, how exciting it was, how intense it was.”

Much more intense than Butler’s Saturday night plans.

“My celebration is going to be sleep,” he said. “To be honest, I don’t even know what time (Sunday’s) game is. I’m going to do my research, but at the same time I love our style of baseball.”

Jackie Robinson came back from two five-run deficits to win the Great Lakes Regional against Indiana just to get to South Williamsport. After losing to Las Vegas, West won four win-or-go-home games to advance.

“It was one of those games that could have gone either way,” Butler said.

Once again, it went Jackie Robinson West’s way.

“They hate to lose. That’s it. They’re horrible losers,” Butler said. “They don’t show it, but they hate it.”

12007: BS From PR.

Campaign published an inane perspective from Andrew McGuinness, an advertising agency wonk who quit to run a PR firm. McGuinness insists that his move is not a dramatic shift, contending that “today’s category-defying creative work” is coming from all sources. “Ideas are ideas, however you categorise them,” declares the author. In short, McGuinness believes great concepts and campaigns can come from traditional advertising agencies, digital agencies, direct marketing agencies, etc.—and PR agencies too! Leave it to a PR guy to push propaganda proclaiming everyone is equal in the quest for the big idea. Too bad McGuinness’ argument completely falls apart upon viewing the website of the place employing him. From a digital angle, it’s an experiential nightmare. In terms of design, it’s ugly. On an advertising and self-promotional tip, it totally sucks. Hell, it doesn’t even manage to sell public relations. The commoditization of the industry certainly makes it easy to think agencies are alike. But commoditization does not translate to capabilities. And there are plenty of examples to prove PR firms have no business hyping services outside of public relations. However, McGuinness and his mates are identical to the typical advertising agency in at least one way: a thorough lack of diversity, as evidenced by the Freuds directors profiles.

Advertising, PR and our obsession with definitions

Andrew McGuinness has quit advertising and is now running a public relations agency. But, he insists, today’s category-defying creative work is beginning to make such labels redundant.

By Andrew McGuinness

For at least a decade, advertising has been trying to escape its own legacy. From the latest big TV commercial and the “agency reel” being a point of pride, agencies have fallen over themselves to say (and, in many cases, prove) they are about more than the 30-second TV ad. Indeed, the ability to execute brilliant TV ads — which, for almost 50 years, was at the heart of an ad agency offering — has become less a reason for pride and more a perceived weakness. The industry will sneer at other, highly successful businesses, saying “they’re still just a TV agency”, while clients frequently cite the disproportionate emphasis placed on TV within agencies as a matter of frustration.

And they’re right. Many ad agencies (and all the very best ones) have adapted to create broader ideas, which can be executed across a variety of platforms. This is reflected in the ideas we celebrate as an industry: in 1999, Guinness “surfer” was universally applauded, but now winning ideas tend to be broader. Dove’s “real beauty” work and “dumb ways to die” for Metro trains are examples of this.

This change is long overdue. Going back to the 60s, Fairfax Cone said: “Advertising’s what you do when you can’t go see somebody. That’s all it is.” This is a definition I’ve always found reassuringly simple and directional. We love to make things complex for ourselves, but the truth is that the majority of the time we have an issue or message we want people to engage with and, at its simplest, our task is to find the most effective means of achieving that goal.

Encouraged by the way clients budget, plus the demand to categorise ideas for awards and even the structure of our trade press, we love to put things into neat boxes: that’s an ad idea, that’s a sales promotion, that’s PR. However, the ideas that excite me most are increasingly those that evade definition. Was “the best job in the world” for Queensland Tourism an inspired advertising idea or a stunning piece of PR? Who cares? It’s a cracking idea of which I wish I’d been part.

It’s for this reason that I love the Cannes Titanium award, which celebrates ideas that defy channel- or discipline-based definitions. From the Nike+ FuelBand to the Barack Obama campaign, “real beauty sketches” to Microsoft Bing’s “decode”, these are ideas that have a fame that extends well beyond the boundaries of our industry.

The quest to become a broader-based communications agency isn’t something that is exclusive to the world of advertising. “Best job…” was produced by Nitro, an agency whose origin was digital; Creative Artists Agency, an agency that itself defies definition, created the stunning Chipotle work; and Red Bull continues to develop ideas that defy convention… and gravity. This new breed of idea can come from, and is coming from, organisations of all backgrounds.

Which brings me to why I was asked to write this article. “Why have you decided to leave advertising to join a PR agency?” The truth is I simply don’t see it like that. Yes, Freuds is a superb PR agency that, over the past 29 years, has built a phenomenal re­putation within the industry — something it will continue to protect and develop. But, alongside that work, it has also created many “Titanium” ideas: “do us a flavour”, created with Abbott Mead Vickers BBDO for Walkers; more than 20 years of collaborating with Richard Curtis on Red Nose Day (something next year we’re hoping to take to the US); and working with Bono on the development of the (Red) brand, a partnership he credited when awarded the LionHeart award in Cannes.

Like all the world’s very best agencies, Freuds combines expertise in a very specific, specialist area with the ability to create and execute ideas that defy categorisation. The chance to work with an incredibly talented and dynamic group of people to help define its next decade, combined with the opportunity to continue the phenomenal growth of Seven Dials, is a rare one indeed. So I don’t mind whether I’m called a PR man or an adman. Ideas are ideas, however you categorise them. 



Andrew McGuinness is the chief executive of Freuds, founder of BMB and chairman of Seven Dials

12006: U.K. Shops Whine Over Pay.

Campaign reported U.K. advertising agencies are whining about clients instituting extended payment terms—yet a measly 5 percent have refused to accept the new deals. It’s a safe bet the rejecters were not AORs for major clients such as Glaxo¬SmithKline and Mondelez International. Similar to their U.S. peers, U.K. ad shops don’t have the guts to earnestly protest pay arrangements. Plus, the advertising Brits are probably just as guilty as the advertising Yanks of already extending payments to vendors and freelancers—as well as dragging their feet on issues like diversity. Imagine if clients were to send payments based on the agency’s diversity record. For example, agencies (not even confident the plural form of the word is appropriate here) displaying deliberate and proactive inclusivity would receive restitution for services within two weeks, while the shops showing systematic exclusivity would have to wait much longer to collect on invoices. Would that type of arrangement lead to change?

Agency unrest at payment terms

By Maisie McCabe

Almost two-thirds of agency executives say they are unhappy with clients’ requests for extended payment terms — but only 5 per cent have refused to accept them, according to a new study.

Kingston Smith W1, the marketing services and media accountants, asked more than 100 managing directors and financial directors about their experience of advertisers wanting to extend the length of time they take to pay their agencies. Of the agency executives surveyed, 91 per cent said they had been asked by a client to extend their payment terms and 65 per cent said they were unhappy with payment-term extensions and associated supplier finance schemes.

Although the majority (64 per cent) had tried to negotiate with clients who had asked them to extend their payment terms, just over a fifth (22 per cent) accepted the new terms.

Over the past two years, conglomerates such as Glaxo¬SmithKline and Mondelez International have extended the length of time they take to pay suppliers. GSK increased its payment terms to 90 days, while Mondelez moved to 120 days.

Paul Bainsfair, the director-general of the IPA, said: “In all agencies, cash flow is critical. If their clients don’t pay on time, then the agencies often have no alternative but to hold off paying their suppliers. These are often the highly talented people who, in our case, help make UK advertising among the best in the world.

“These small suppliers need their money like most people need their monthly salary. When they don’t get paid, the human cost can be devastating.”

The UK government is planning to consult on the issue of payment terms later this year.

Saturday, August 23, 2014

12005: Sexist Spider-Woman…?

From The New York Daily News…

Illustrator’s ‘Spider-Woman #1’ cover features heroine in overtly sexual pose, critics say

The alternate cover by Italian erotica artist Milo Manara will be an option for customers beginning Nov. 19. Some have blasted it as sexist and in poor taste, while other comic fans aren’t offended.

By Ethan Sacks

The curves on this Marvel character make no spidey sense.

An Italian erotica illustrator has spun a tangled web of controversy after drawing an alternative cover for an upcoming Spider-Woman comic that shows the character in a pose that would make Miley Cyrus blush.

Critics have blasted the cover of “Spider-Woman #1” as overly sexual, sexist and in poor taste. But some fans aren’t offended by the image, showing the heroine with her derriere in the air.

It looks more like a Nicki Minaj album cover than the front of a comic.

“I was surprised to see it because of how well Marvel had been doing recently,” says Jill Pantozzi, managing editor of TheMarySue.com, a pop culture news site. “For a variant cover to pop up which is very offensive to many women and men, there seems to be a disconnect there.”

The variant cover, drawn by Milo Manara, will be an option for customers beginning Nov. 19.

Dani Ward, manager of Staten Island’s JHU Comic Books, finds the cover unsurprising in an industry that has catered mainly to adolescent males since long before the character was first created in 1977.

“Not many regular comic readers are offended by this,” she says. “They get more offended if someone draws lips on the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.”

Still, it’s a particularly surprising KAPOW! for female readers given Marvel’s recent track record. The publisher has been praised for adding a number of new titles centered around female characters for a growing segment of its readership.

The company announced a woman would be taking over the hammer as the new Thor, the character played by Chris Hemsworth in the Marvel movies. Other new Marvel titles have focused on veteran heroines Black Widow, She-Hulk, Captain Marvel and Elektra.

Marvel has also introduced a series around a new Ms. Marvel character, whose alter ego is a Muslim-American teenage girl from Jersey City.

Marvel executive editor Tom Brevoort answered a fan’s question on the sexy spider via his blog.

“I think that the people who are upset about that cover have a point, at least in how the image relates to them,” Brevoort wrote.

He added that Manara’s Spider-Woman art seems “far less exploitative to me than other Manara pieces we’ve run in previous months and years.”

Breevort said “the character is covered head-to-toe, and is crouched in a spider-like pose.”

“But all that said, it’s the right of every reader not to like something,” he added.

12004: Afropunks Assemble!

The New York Times published Afropunks, Come as You Are by Whitney Richardson, featuring portrait photography by Phil Knott.

The Afropunk Festival will be held this weekend at Commodore Barry Park in Brooklyn. Ms. Richardson will be taking portraits of people wearing Afro hairstyles while attending the event.

Friday, August 22, 2014

12003: Kmart’s Gangsta Granny.

Here we go again. Shop Like A Boss from Kmart continues the contrived, culturally clueless clichés while seemingly striving to establish the retailer as the urban and hip hop brand—via the efforts of a White advertising agency, of course.

Thursday, August 21, 2014

12002: Milking Cross-Cultural Crap.

The New York Times advertising columnist Stuart Elliott reported on a new campaign for the California Milk Processor Board that demonstrates cross-cultural marketing—yet ultimately displays cultural cluelessness. It’s a total market approach that’s total bullshit. Or cow shit, since the commercials are trying to sell milk.

BTW, the commercials suck, which hardly helps promote the cross-cultural/total market propaganda. The only thing tying the spots into a campaign is the injection of the iconic “got milk?” tagline. The individual executions—“Champion” and “Brave”—are contrived, clichéd and crappy. Seriously, these could be the worst installments in a collection that has featured breakthrough ideas for many years. If this stuff is indeed representative of cross-cultural thinking, one could easily argue in support of sticking with segregation. That is, let the Whites and minorities continue to toil in their respective advertising agency silos.

What’s most bewildering is that the two shops responsible for the commercials—Goodby Silverstein & Partners and Grupo Gallegos—typically do award-winning work. Did the cross-cultural collaboration lead to committeeism? Or could it be that deliberately catering to all markets waters down the milk?

California Milk Processor Board Executive Director Stephen James explained, “This is the first time our agencies have worked as a cohesive team on creative strategy, creative execution and media planning. … It’s happening now as a result of a coming together of trends, in California especially, that seem to be getting more and more pronounced. … Terms like ‘the Hispanic market’ and ‘the general market’ seem so quaint at this point because you’re seeing such a cross-pollination of media, language, food, culture, you name it. … We’re looking at Californians as they evolve into one market.” Wow, James has obviously been drinking something much stronger than milk. If the Hispanic market and the general market seem so quaint, why does James continue to employ separate shops? Why was collaboration necessary? Couldn’t one agency have handled the total market solo? Hell, a roomful of monkeys could have outperformed GS&P and Grupo Gallegos on this initiative.

According to the NY Times story, Jeff Goodby “was the lead creative director for the campaign, overseeing creative employees of his agency and Grupo Gallegos.” Um, when did Goodby become qualified to lead such an endeavor? Handing him the reins is like asking Donald Sterling to emcee the ADCOLOR® Awards. Goodby’s role underscores how the cross-cultural/total market trend is essentially a thinly veiled attempt to give complete control to the White agencies. It’s not progressive; rather, it’s absolutely regressive, as well as repressive, oppressive and depressive. Besides, Goodby failed to establish harmony in a White coalition, so believing he could run a multicultural affair showed utter ignorance and insanity.

Goodby stated that in the “Champion” spot, the Black mother, Black girl and Black decathlete were cast so they could “easily be Caribbean Hispanic.” Huh?! Anyone who has ever produced work for Caribbean audiences knows Goodby’s culturally clueless contentions are laughably incorrect. The man deserves a sixth appearance in the C’MON WHITE MAN! series.

“We flew [Grupo Gallegos] teams up [to San Francisco] and vice versa,” Goodby said, “to work together in the same room on the ads.” Why? Grupo Gallegos has historically hatched spots that nabbed Cannes Lions, as has GS&P. This team-up resulted in awfulness that stinks worse than grossly sour milk.

To wrap up, somebody owes Pepper Miller an apology—and kudos for being downright prophetic.

Selling Milk to All Audiences, With a Unified Campaign

By Stuart Elliott

THE California Milk Processor Board, like many marketers, has one agency creating campaigns for the general market and another creating campaigns for ethnic audiences, in this instance Spanish-speaking consumers. Now, in a shift indicative of a movement on Madison Avenue known as cross-cultural marketing or a “total market” approach, the board asked its two agencies to collaborate on a campaign encouraging all Californians, regardless of ethnicity or the language they speak, to buy and drink more milk.

The campaign is to begin on Wednesday with two television commercials, each with soundtracks in English and Spanish; plans call for the spots to be followed by radio ads, digital ads and social media content. The ads are the result of the teaming of the board’s general market agency — Goodby, Silverstein & Partners in San Francisco, part of the Omnicom Group — and the Hispanic agency Grupo Gallegos in Huntington Beach, Calif.

The board has worked since 1993 with Goodby, Silverstein, which created the familiar “Got milk?” slogan that the board licensed for national dairy marketing efforts from 1995 until earlier this year. Ads from Grupo Gallegos, the board’s Hispanic agency since 2005, carry the theme “Toma leche,” or “Drink milk.”

“This is the first time our agencies have worked as a cohesive team on creative strategy, creative execution and media planning,” said Stephen James, executive director of the board in San Clemente, Calif. “It’s happening now as a result of a coming together of trends, in California especially, that seem to be getting more and more pronounced.”

“Terms like ‘the Hispanic market’ and ‘the general market’ seem so quaint at this point because you’re seeing such a cross-pollination of media, language, food, culture, you name it,” he added. “We’re looking at Californians as they evolve into one market.”

That expresses a philosophy of those who advocate the total-market approach: As the American population becomes more diverse, they prefer to focus on the similarities among consumers rather than the differences.

“Total market is where things are headed,” said Michael Fernandez, chief executive of Factory 360, an agency in New York not involved in the milk campaign. “You’re marketing in a ‘Modern Family’ world, not an ‘Ozzie and Harriet’ world.”

The commonality celebrated in the campaign, Mr. James said, is that “the most important job” for the target of the ads — parents who buy milk, particularly mothers — “is making sure their children have a healthy future: a universally powerful force that transcends culture and language and ethnicity.”

In one commercial, a bedraggled woman speaks to a girl in a shopping cart in the milk aisle of a supermarket. “I’m you, from the future,” the woman tells the girl, who replies disappointedly, “You’re me?” The woman says: “I know. Drink this.” As the girl drinks milk, the woman exclaims, “It’s working, keep drinking,” races out of the supermarket and transforms into a champion decathlete. “We did it,” the woman shouts to the younger version of herself back in the store, where the girl’s mother is frantically filling the cart with milk.

The mother, the girl and the decathlete, who are black, were cast so they could “easily be Caribbean Hispanic,” said Jeff Goodby, the co-chairman of Goodby, Silverstein. He was the lead creative director for the campaign, overseeing creative employees of his agency and Grupo Gallegos.

“We flew their teams up” to San Francisco “and vice versa,” Mr. Goodby said, “to work together in the same room on the ads.”

The other commercial also plays with the passage of time. It begins with a firefighter of no discernible ethnicity pouring himself a glass of milk as a mother is heard talking to her young son, who is scared of the dark. “Let’s think about some people who make you feel brave,” she says, and when the boy replies, “Firemen,” the firefighter is shown rescuing a boy from a house fire and reuniting him with his mother. The commercial ends with the on-screen words “What you say with a glass of milk lasts forever.”

A lot of the “soulful, emotional tone” of the commercials “came from working with the guys at Grupo Gallegos,” Mr. Goodby said.

The lead strategic director for the campaign was Andrew Delbridge, chief strategy and engagement officer of Grupo Gallegos; he oversaw employees of his agency and Goodby, Silverstein.

“For milk, what we and Goodby had done was to take parallel paths toward the same goal,” said John Gallegos, president and chief executive of Grupo Gallegos. “This is about today’s market, and tomorrow’s, recognizing that in California we’re on the front edge of what’s happening in the rest of the country.”

“There’s a fine line” in adopting cross-cultural marketing, Mr. Gallegos said, in that “if you try to say too much to everybody, you wind up saying nothing.” Still, “our philosophy has always been that it’s one marketplace,” he added. “You have to go forward with one collective voice.”

To that end, Mr. Gallegos is making Marty Orzio the agency’s chief creative officer; Mr. Orzio, who had been serving on an interim basis, was chief creative officer of general market agencies like Energy BBDO and Gotham.

“You’ve got to put the best talent on client assignments,” Mr. Gallegos said, “talent that understands the U.S. as a whole.”

The budget for the campaign is around what the milk board typically spends, a bit more than $10 million on an annualized basis. Plans call for the ads to run through January, Mr. James said, “and then we’ll see what the results are” before deciding whether to ask the two agencies to collaborate again.

12001: Land Rover Riddle.

What is this Land Rover ad from Greece communicating? It’s Greek to us.

From Ads of the World.

12000: Sprint Reloads Again.

Advertising Age reported Sprint is trying to resuscitate itself once again with a new CEO, new sales promotion and new rate plan—which will hopefully lead to a new advertising agency and new campaign to replace the asinine Frobinson framily. In a pathetically lame video, new Sprint CEO Marcelo Claure read from a note card and declared, “We’re Sprint…and with this promotion…and with this new rate plan…we’re back in the game.” Sounds like a clear admission that the ultra-weird clan is a highly dysfunctional framily. Sprint the company—with a Japanese owner and Bolivian immigrant CEO running Midwestern troops—also appears to be a highly diverse-yet-dysfunctional family. Unfortunately, a fresh promotion and rate plan will not turn things around for the company. It’s the classic Challenger Brand scenario; that is, the category is led by two competitors (in this case, Verizon and AT&T) and everyone else must establish a distinctive niche. T-Mobile, for example, became the low-price choice. Sprint has not had a unique position attractive to consumers for many years. The advertising has been pretty ugly too.

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

11999: C’MON WHITE MAN! Episode 36.

(MultiCultClassics credits ESPN’s C’MON MAN! for sparking this semi-regular blog series.)

Adweek reported Rooster CCO Gavin McInnes was asked to take a leave of absence after publishing a nasty perspective on transphobia. In most other U.S. industries, McInnes would have been fired—and that his employers didn’t show the intelligence to do so is another poor reflection on the cultural cluelessness in the advertising business. Granted, Rooster boasts being unlike typical ad agencies; however, what the place produces for clients definitely falls under the category of advertising.

McInnes was not exactly a big name in the field before this episode, so it’s tough to judge the man’s character and reputation. In addition to the transphobic post, he provided clueless commentary on the recent Anthony Cumia incident. Plus, he’s a FOX News commentator, which pretty much brands him as an ignorant, narcissistic asshole. But being an ignorant, narcissistic asshole is not grounds for termination—otherwise, Madison Avenue would experience a mass dismissal of epic proportion.

No, McInnes ought to be canned for a much simpler reason: his highly public opinions arguably create a hostile work environment. Imagine how a transgender or Black employee might feel having to report to a douchebag like McInnes. Hell, his FOX News rant on spring break might make women uncomfortable to be managed by him. McInnes symbolizes all the negative stereotypes of the discriminatory White men dominating the ad game. The stuff he does is just not cool. McInnes is to Madison Avenue what Donald Sterling was to the NBA—and he deserves a similar fate.

So this is directed at McInnes and the leaders of Rooster (most of whom appear to be of the Caucasian persuasion):

C’MON WHITE MAN!

::

Rooster CCO Gavin McInnes Asked to Take Leave of Absence

Following transphobic Thought Catalog essay, boycott

By Kristina Monllos

Gavin McInnes, chief creative officer of Rooster in New York, has been asked to take an indefinite leave of absence following the publication of a transphobic essay.

Published earlier this week on Thought Catalog, “Transphobia is Perfectly Natural” has at publication received 2,082 comments. It has also sparked a “Boycott Rooster” movement, with Tumblr and Twitter accounts asking followers to let Rooster clients—Vans, Red Bull, Fox Sports and others—know they will not support companies that work with McInnes.

“Gavin’s views are his own and do not represent those of the company or its members,” said a Rooster representative. “We are extremely disappointed with his actions and have asked that he take a leave of absence while we determine the most appropriate course of action.”

McInnes co-founded Rooster in 2010 as an agency that would make ads for people who hate ads. He has appeared in the shop’s work for Vans, most recently as the man who explains how to do absolutely everything.

Prior to that, he co-founded Vice Magazine. McInnes has made controversial comments publicly before, with essays on Thought Catalog and contributions to Fox News. Though, due to the tone of his work, some are unsure if it is meant to be taken seriously.

McInnes could not be reached for comment.

11998: Swift Cultural Cluelessness.

USA TODAY reported Taylor Swift’s new music video under fire for racism. In the video, Swift alternates integrating with lily-white ballerinas and an urban hip hop crew. Somebody ask Kanye West to weigh in pronto.

11997: WPP = Wealthy Puny Person.

Campaign reported WPP Overlord Sir Martin Sorrell earns 780 times more than the average WPP employee. This should surprise no one. In fact, Sorrell probably reels in 78,000 times more than the average minority WPP employee. It’s also a safe bet that Sir Marty is 78 million times more culturally clueless than the average WPP employee.

Martin Sorrell earns 780 times more than average WPP employee

By James Swift

Sir Martin Sorrell, WPP’s founder and chief executive, earns nearly 780 times more than his average employee, according to a think tank report.

Sorrell earned almost £30 million last year, which is roughly 780 times more than his average worker, who gets £38,000. It is the second highest pay differential of any FTSE 100 company and was questioned by WPP shareholders at the company’s annual general meeting.

The statistic was part of a report released today by the High Pay Centre, which is a non-party think tank that monitors pay gaps.

According to the report, FTSE 100 executives are now paid around 143 times more than their average employee. In 1998, FTSE 100 chief executives were paid only 47 times more than their average employee.

According to the latest study, the largest pay gap was at Randgold Resources, where the chief executive, Mark Bristow, earned £4.4 million compared with the average worker’s £2,968 salary. Many of Randgold Resources’ employees are miners in Africa, but the FTSE 100 company is registered in Jersey.

The clothing retailer, Next, had the third highest pay gap, with a multiple of 459, though this figure does not take into account that the company’s chief executive, Lord Simon Wolfson, donated his multimillion pound bonus to his staff.

The statistics were created using figures from the companies’ own annual reports and refer to the company-wide pay differential, as opposed to just comparing UK workers with their chief executives.

According to the High Pay Centre, the average FTSE 100 chief executive earned 174 times more than the average UK worker in 2013.

A spokesman for WPP commented that Sorrell’s pay included money earned as part of a five-year incentive scheme that is dependent upon the performance of the company and requires shares to be pledged into the scheme.

Around £22.7 million of Sorrell’s £29.8 total remuneration package was paid out of the long-term incentive scheme. Between 2009 and 2013, WPP was the seventh best performing FTSE 100 company and earned shareholders a 241 per cent return.

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

11996: Wukchumni Words.

From The New York Times…

‘Who Speaks Wukchumni?’

Throughout the United States, many Native American languages are struggling to survive. According to Unesco, more than 130 of these languages are currently at risk, with 74 languages considered “critically endangered.” These languages preserve priceless cultural heritage, and some hold unexpected value — nuances in these languages convey unparalleled knowledge of the natural world. Many of these at-risk languages are found in my home state of California. Now for some, only a few fluent speakers remain.

This Op-Doc tells the story of Marie Wilcox, the last fluent speaker of the Wukchumni language, and the dictionary she has created. I met her through the Advocates for Indigenous California Language Survival, an organization that encourages the revival of languages like Wukchumni. Through training and mentorship, it has supported Ms. Wilcox’s work for several years. Ms. Wilcox’s tribe, the Wukchumni, is not recognized by the federal government. It is part of the broader Yokuts tribal group native to Central California. Before European contact, as many as 50,000 Yokuts lived in the region, but those numbers have steadily diminished. Today, it is estimated that less than 200 Wukchumni remain.

Like most Native Americans, the Wukchumni did not write their language until recently. Although several linguists documented the grammar of the Wukchumni language in the 20th century, Ms. Wilcox’s dictionary is the longest work of its kind. Ms. Wilcox has also recorded an oral version of the dictionary, including traditional Wukchumni stories like the “How We Got Our Hands” parable featured in the film. The pronunciation of the language, including intricate accents, will be preserved, which will assist future learners of the language.

For Ms. Wilcox, the Wukchumni language has become her life. She spent more than seven years working on the dictionary and she continues to refine and update the text. Through her hard work and dedication, she has created a document that will support the revitalization of the Wukchumni language for decades to come. And Ms. Wilcox isn’t slowing down. Along with her daughter Jennifer Malone she travels to conferences throughout California and meets other tribes who also struggle with language loss.

Although Wukchumni is now being taught to tribe members at a local career center, the language still struggles to gain traction and move beyond a rudimentary level. Few seem able to dedicate the time needed to learn Wukchumni and become fluent speakers. Without additional resources and interest, I fear the language, in any meaningful form, may soon exist only in Ms. Wilcox’s dictionary.

Monday, August 18, 2014

11995: Memo To Edelman—STFU.

The New York Times reported on the recent fuck-ups from PR shithole Edelman. The story—written by the typically polite advertising columnist Stuart Elliott—was hardly flattering. Makes one wonder who the hell is handling PR for the alleged public relations experts. Maybe Edelman should create a multimedia campaign to promote itself—like what bp did to counter the hate ignited by the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Or even like the propaganda Edelman shat out during the Rupert Murdoch scandal. Then again, maybe not. The problem is, the Edelman wonks in the NY Times story came off as if they were trying to be contrite; however, they didn’t sound sincere. Even worse, they didn’t appear to realize the full depth of their own ignorance. Edelman executives should be instructed to assume a fetal position under their desks and keep their fucking mouths shut—plus, please step away from the keyboard and stop publishing blog posts!

Edelman P.R. Firm Acts to Correct Faux Pas

By Stuart Elliott

A GIANT public relations agency that has been under fire for a couple of gaffes in the last couple of weeks says it is taking steps to try to make sure such blunders do not recur — the kinds of steps it would recommend to clients in the same predicaments.

“What the leadership team decided,” Ben Boyd, president for practices, sectors and offerings at Edelman in New York, said in an interview on Friday, is that “we will treat ourselves like we treat a client.”

“Lesson learned,” he added.

“Just because you advise clients on the complexities of today’s world, that doesn’t mean they’re easier to manage,” Mr. Boyd said, adding that “it would have been smart” to have had in place at Edelman some of the internal protocols and processes that the agency’s 5,000 employees suggest that clients adopt.

Edelman, the largest independent public relations firm in the world by revenue, found itself having to re-examine its procedures after two episodes that generated unwelcome media attention. The first involved the agency’s response to a survey of large public relations agencies, conducted by The Guardian and an organization called the Climate Investigations Center, about representing clients that deny climate change. The second incident, less fraught than the first, was centered on a blog post suggesting that the suicide of Robin Williams represented “an opportunity” for a national conversation about depression.

The Guardian, in an article on Aug. 4, reported that Edelman, unlike many of its competitors, “did not explicitly rule out taking on climate deniers as clients,” and included a sentence that read, “An initial response to C.I.C. from Edelman inadvertently included an internal email which said: ‘I don’t believe we are obligated in any way to respond. There are only wrong answers for this guy.’” The article was illustrated with what was described as a screen grab of the conversation inside Edelman showing that the email had been written by Mark Hass, who was at the time United States president and chief executive of Edelman. He left the agency last month.

The Guardian published a follow-up article on Aug. 7 reporting on a subsequent statement on the Edelman website in which the agency said it “fully recognizes the reality of and science behind climate change” and does not “accept client assignments that aim to deny climate change.”

Two related articles by Brian Merchant were on the Motherboard channel of Vice, one on Aug. 5 castigating Edelman and one on Tuesday about a telephone call from Richard Edelman, president and chief executive of Edelman, to Mr. Merchant, during which, Mr. Merchant wrote, Mr. Edelman told him that Edelman had “fired” Mr. Hass “in part because of that stupid note he wrote” and describing Mr. Hass as “the ham-head who filled out the questionnaire to be a little, uh, slick.” (Earlier, in a blog post, Mr. Edelman said that the agency “did a poor job of filling out” the questionnaire.)

That, in turn, brought online articles questioning Edelman from publications like O’Dwyer’s and PR Week because, when it was reported in April that Mr. Hass would leave the agency, his departure was described by Edelman as his stepping down rather than as a dismissal. “It wasn’t the best interview I’ve ever seen,” said Steve Barrett, editor in chief of PR Week, referring to Mr. Edelman’s conversation with Mr. Merchant. “It certainly wouldn’t be in line with the media training they give their clients.”

In an email statement on Friday, Mr. Edelman, who took issue with the first Motherboard article in his blog post, wrote this about the second article: “In a recent interview my intention was to simply clarify Edelman does not accept client assignments that deny climate change. I regret several of the remarks I made beyond that.” Mr. Hass could not be reached for comment.

“I don’t feel sorry for Edelman for mishandling” the questionnaire, said Kert Davies, executive director of the Climate Investigations Center in Washington, because inquiries about climate-change policies “have been posed multiple times for 20 years” to other companies in fields like energy, transportation and consumer products.

Although how Edelman handled the matter was “a bit of shooting one’s own feet,” Mr. Davies said, and cast shadows “on a firm that handles crisis communications” for others, “I’m not gloating.” He said, however, that he remained skeptical about Edelman’s eschewing of climate denial when the agency works for clients like the American Petroleum Institute. Mr. Barrett of PR Week estimated that 10 to 15 percent of “the business in the P.R. industry comes from energy companies.”

As for the blog post after Mr. Williams’s death, Mr. Barrett said he believed it “was written in good faith,” adding, “Personally, I don’t think it was a crass attempt to cash in on a tragedy.” The post described “a very careful line” that mental health professionals and people with depression “need to walk so as to not seem exploitive of a terrible situation” and added, in parentheses, “We too are balancing that line with this post.”

Mr. Boyd of Edelman said, “We should have been more thoughtful about the headline” — it read, “Carpe Diem,” quoting a line from the Williams film “Dead Poets Society” — “and about the timing of the post.”

The agency apologized in a post on its Twitter account. “We talk to clients about being nimble, about being engaged in real time,” Mr. Boyd said, but there ought to be “checks and balances in place” to address problems as they arise or prevent them from intensifying.

“We’ve already asked a team” inside Edelman “to look at issues, reputation management issues, that we as a firm have,” he added, and that examination will be “global in nature and across all our areas.”

11994: Mariachi Marathon Miffs.

From The Los Angeles Times…

Promoter of Mariachi 5K run in Boyle Heights faces backlash over theme

By Esmeralda Bermudez

The mariachi of Boyle Heights mostly live by a golden rule: No event is a bad event.

They play for funerals and quinceañeras, foreclosures and sex change celebrations.

But Sunday’s Mariachi 5K — where some runners undoubtedly will show up in mariachi garb, big sombreros and colorful serapes — is another matter.

Neighbors initially hoped that the run, which is slated to begin and end at historic Mariachi Plaza, could serve to promote Boyle Heights and bring in new business. But now the organizer is facing a backlash from those who think the theme makes a mockery of mariachi. Opponents are threatening to shut down the race.

Along 1st Street, everyone seems to have an opinion — especially the mariachi.

“We wear our suits with pride. They represent a culture, a nation,” said Arturo Ramirez, president of the Los Angeles United Mariachis Organization. “No one should ever come here and ridicule us in the streets.”

Ramirez’s group represents a number of mariachi who hustle daily for work at the plaza, striving to give them a voice and elevate their image. He’s concerned that plaza mariachi were not hired to play at the event, and thinks the race organizer is looking only to make money off of their tradition.

Promoter Carlos Gaspar says the trouble he’s facing has little do with his theme.

The former middle school teacher, who lives in Downey, has organized similar races (called Tacos and Beer) in Long Beach. Those events, he said, went smoothly and drew as many as 2,000 runners.

“Here, it’s all politics,” Gaspar said. “A few people … have gotten together to show that only people with power can hold events in this city.”

Gaspar said he decided to visit Boyle Heights at the suggestion of a friend. He saw Mariachi Plaza and was inspired.

“I’m from Jalisco, where mariachi come from,” Gaspar said. “I checked with my mom and my relatives. They all thought the theme was a good idea.”

He began applying for permits at the start of the summer, and said business owners signed on in support after he explained the mariachi theme.

Gaspar launched a Facebook page and created a colorful flier featuring cartoon guitars and trumpets running with sombreros and mustaches in the streets of Boyle Heights.

Registration for the race ranges from $35 to $50.

When people complained about a proposal to open a beer garden, he said, he canceled it. He also canceled a costume contest.

He said he didn’t hire plaza mariachi because he was able to get outside musicians for a much lower price.

A week before the event, Gaspar said, only 180 participants have registered. Several of his permits are still pending.

“I’ve spent so much time dealing with these issues, I haven’t had time to promote,” said Gaspar, adding that the race is costing him close to $20,000.

Out in the Mariachi Plaza one recent morning, Ramirez went around with a clipboard, collecting signatures to have the event canceled. That petition, along with another from business owners, will be submitted to Los Angeles City Council member Jose Huizar.

The council member’s office has expressed concern over the theme and plans to follow up with city agencies in charge of issuing race permits.

“We have to adhere to people’s opinions, and as it stands, this event does not have community support,” spokesman Rick Coca said.

On 1st Street, some businesses and mariachi said they would like to see the event take place.

Teodoro Cuevas, 74, thinks his fellow musicians are being too sensitive and too possessive of the plaza, which is a public space.

“These guys are always complaining about something,” the base player said. “This is a fun event and it’s free publicity for us. We should be grateful.”

A few steps away at La Casa del Mariachi, Jorge Tello, the mariachi’s tailor for more than 30 years, is trying to stay neutral.

He said he had no problem allowing Gaspar to place race fliers in his shop, and he doesn’t see how such an event could hurt his business.

But as a mariachi tailor — who often scolds local musicians if they look the least bit disheveled — his only hope is that the runners won’t get too out of control with their outfits.

“To a certain point,” he said, “the mariachi suit must always be respected.”

Sunday, August 17, 2014

11993: World’s Most Hated Dad.

Does anyone who watches this Cheerios video not want to punch Dad in the face? Repeatedly? The Tribal Worldwide creative team responsible for this shit deserves to get bitch-slapped too. Why do clients continue to let digital agencies produce videos?

11992: The Twix Timing Is Off.

This Twix Bites commercial tries to explain why the product wasn’t introduced in the 1980s; however, the historical accuracy seems a bit off. Sure, whiteboards have been around for a while, but it wasn’t until the 1990s that they became commonplace in the office. Likewise, while the Reebok Pump was officially introduced in 1989, the shoe really grew in popularity in the 1990s. Not sure about the character’s use of “tight” in terms of authenticity. And it’s highly unlikely a dude with that hairstyle would be in a corporate environment.