Friday, July 31, 2009

6979: Medals And Metals.


TGIF with a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• President Barack Obama will award the Presidential Medal of Freedom to 16 people he called “agents of change,” including Harvey Milk, Jack Kemp, Sidney Poitier and Desmond Tutu. “These outstanding men and women represent an incredible diversity of backgrounds,” said Obama. “Yet they share one overarching trait: Each has been an agent of change. Each saw an imperfect world and set about improving it, often overcoming great obstacles along the way. Their relentless devotion to breaking down barriers and lifting up their fellow citizens sets a standard to which we all should strive.” Hey, have any advertising people ever received the honor—or are they resigned to settle for an ADCOLOR® Award?

• Alaska Natives filed a lawsuit to stop drilling and exploration for a copper and gold mine above a wild salmon sanctuary, charging the action would violate the state’s Constitution by letting things move forward without full environmental review. Wonder if former Governor Sarah “Drill, Baby, Drill” Palin even knows what Alaska Natives are.

6978: You Don’t Know Jack Johnson.


From The New York Daily News…

House OKs pardon for first black boxing champ Jack Johnson

By Richard Sisk
Daily News Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON - Heavyweight Jack Johnson, the first black boxing champ, deserves a presidential pardon, the House unanimously concluded Wednesday.

A resolution urging a pardon by President Obama cleared the House after previously being passed by the Senate last month.

Rep. Pete King (R-L.I.), chief sponsor of the bill along with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), called Johnson “a trailblazer and a legend.”

King urged swift consideration by Obama of a pardon for Johnson, who was killed in a car crash in 1946.

In 1913, Johnson was convicted of violating the Mann Act against “transporting women across state lines for immoral purposes.” The woman, who later became his second wife, was white. Johnson fled to France and served a year in jail on his return to the U.S. in 1920.

Johnson’s third wife, Irene Pineau, said at his death: “I loved him because of his courage. He faced the world unafraid. There wasn’t anybody or anything he feared.”

6977: Diversity Is Priceless… Or Pricy?


Hey, your credit card understands diversity—at over 18 percent interest rates.

Thursday, July 30, 2009

6976: Boston Cop Acted Racistly.


From The New York Daily News…

Boston cop Justin Barrett suspended for calling Henry Louis Gates a ‘jungle monkey’

By Corky Siemaszko, Daily News Staff Writer

A Boston cop insisted he was not a racist as he apologized for calling Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates a “banana-eating jungle monkey” in a mass e-mail.

“I did not mean to offend anyone,” Officer Justin Barrett told WCVB-TV. “The words were being used to characterize behavior, not describe anyone.”

Barrett admitted it was a “poor choice of words.”

“I didn’t mean it in a racist way,” he added. “I treat everyone with dignity and respect.”

Boston Mayor Tom Menino said he doesn’t buy Barrett’s explanation and wants the officer, who has already been suspended, fired.

“He’s gone,” Menino said. “G-o-n-e. I don’t care, it’s like cancer. You don’t keep those cancers around.”

Barrett, 36, who is also a captain in the National Guard, said he will fight to keep his job. He said he was “just venting” about the July 16 arrest of Gates by a white Cambridge cop that became a national discussion about race when President Obama said the officers acted “stupidly.”

“People are making it about race,” Barrett said. “It is not about race.”

But it may be about whether Barrett has any sense.

Barrett got into hot water after he fired off the note to his buddies in the Guard — and, inexplicably, The Boston Globe.

In the email, Barrett called the Globe story “jungle monkey gibberish” and wrote that Gates’ “first priority should be to get off the phone and comply with police.”

“For if I was the officer he verbally assaulted like a … jungle monkey, I would have sprayed him in the face with OC deserving of his belligerent non-compliance,” Barrett wrote.

OC is pepper spray.

Barrett went on to question Gates’ credentials, called him a “God damned fool,” and twice challenged the paper to “ax” him what he thinks.

“I am not a racist, but I am prejudice [sic] towards people who are stupid and pretend to stand up and preach for something they claim is freedom,” Barrett wrote.

6975: A Culture Of Absurdity.


What the hell are the minorities in the back row doing?

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

6974: Budweiser True Storyboard.


Inspired by Beer Summit featuring Obama, Biden, Gates and Crowley.

6973: Whasssssup?


From The Chicago Sun-Times…

6972: Nobody’s Home At Homeland Security.


Nice to know that when you’re counting on Homeland Security, the employees have gone fishing.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

6971: Work Like A Dog For Big Money.


Given all the criticism of FEMA being a bureaucratic and inefficient mess, is it wise to admit training dogs costs up to $10,000? Also, why does all that money go to the White dog?

6970: Daily Dumps.


Toilet humor in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Former Senator Larry Craig has opened a consulting firm focusing on energy issues. Client meetings will take place in airport toilet stalls.

• Michael Vick has been conditionally reinstated to the NFL, and might be allowed to play again by the sixth game of the regular season. Signing up the quarterback could turn into a real dogfight.

• Verizon announced plans to dump 8,000 landline workers. Can you fire me now? Good.

6969: Drinking And Jiving.


From The Chicago Sun-Times…

After the brews, let’s start teaching

By Jesse Jackson

President Obama has stated that the arrest of Harvard Professor Henry Louis “Skip” Gates in his home provides a “teachable moment” about racial profiling, and the “relations between police officers and minority communities.”

The president’s remarks—that the police “acted stupidly”—sparked a backlash that the White House has tried to defuse by inviting arresting officer Sgt. James Crowley and Gates to sit down over a beer at the White House. The meeting, slated to take place in the next few days, will no doubt result in consensus that we should all get along, and how hard it is to do so given conflicting histories and perspectives.

This will defuse the furor, but it won’t provide much of a lesson for the teachable moment. Racial profiling isn’t a matter that is unique to Gates and Crowley. The reality is, as the president suggested, despite the great progress this nation has made on racial discrimination—as attested by the president’s own election—we are still a long way from a post-racial society.

African Americans across the country understood Gates’ anger at being challenged in his home. Racial profiling remains a widespread reality. DWB—driving while black—is still more likely to get you stopped in areas across the country. Young African Americans are more likely to be searched if stopped, more likely to be charged, more likely to be arrested if charged, more likely to do time than be fined if convicted. In schools across the country, African-American boys and girls are more likely to be disciplined and more likely to be suspended for the same behaviors as their white classmates.

This isn’t a secret. We have passed laws and set up agencies to remedy these practices. Police and fire departments in many urban areas have made significant efforts to overcome them. Progress has been made as police forces have become more integrated, but we still have a long way to go.

Moreover, as the president stated in his speech earlier this month to the NAACP, “The most difficult barriers include structural inequalities that our nation’s legacy of discrimination has left behind; inequalities still plaguing too many communities and too often the object of national neglect.”

African Americans are more likely to go to poor and crowded schools; more likely to be unemployed, more likely to lack health insurance, more likely to be targeted by predatory lenders. These structural inequalities, as the president noted, require public action and initiative to change.

So while it would be a good thing for Gates and Crowley to apologize one to another and shake hands, that won’t fulfill the “teachable moment.” It wouldn’t have been sufficient if the bus driver in Montgomery had apologized to Rosa Parks, and Ms. Parks had apologized for refusing to obey his order to go to the back of the bus. That would not have addressed the basic question of access to public accommodations. It’s the policy that must be addressed, not just the personal interaction.

Attorney General Eric Holder has stated that this is a “nation of cowards” when it comes to discussing race. It is particularly hard for an African-American president who wants sensibly to establish that he is the president of all Americans.

But the Gates arrest—and the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Ricci case, overturning New Haven’s decision to throw out a test that had a discriminatory effect, that may toll the death knell to affirmative action—do provide teachable moments. It is time to teach. We need a White House Conference on Structural Inequality and Racial Profiling.

We’ve acknowledged that racial discrimination is bad and passed laws and programs to remedy it. But as Dr. King taught us, that is not enough. We have to fund the programs and enforce the laws. So let’s detail the reality of the practices and structural inequalities that the president mentioned, evaluate the programs and laws that exist to remedy them, fund and enforce the law, and set up goals and timetables to measure our progress.

6968: ANA’s Funniest Home Video.


ANA President and Chief Executive Officer Bob Liodice stars in a bizarre video to discuss industry diversity. Don’t expect this mess to go viral like Chocolate Rain.

First, one would think the Association of National Advertisers might consult with, say, an advertising agency before executing a video production. This thing resembles an America’s Funniest Home Videos reject.

Liodice essentially admits to the rampant exclusivity by stating, “…there are no specific facts or staffing data that we can confidently rely upon, but all you have to do is look with your eyes and observe that we are not a diverse industry.”

Next, Liodice joins the many Madison Avenue honchos who recognize the industry’s historic failure to create change by declaring, “The reality is, is that we really need to do more.” The reality is, no other profession on Earth so consistently repeats such a lame line in order to deflect attention from the collective leadership’s lack of responsibility.

Finally, Liodice unveils the latest brainstorm, which involves delegating diversity to the ADCOLOR® Industry Coalition. The ANA bigwig urges folks to become ADCOLOR® members—cha-ching!—and help generate more publicity and attention to the alleged accomplishments bringing inclusive harmony. Liodice contradicts his earlier admission by saying the hype is intended “…to demonstrate, in fact, there is far more progress than may meet the eye.”

Um, you don’t have to look with your eyes and observe the real deal here. Simply use your nose to sniff the bullshit.

Monday, July 27, 2009

6967: Michael Jackson—A Diversity Pioneer…?


If Jacko doesn’t win the ADCOLOR® Legend Award, the contest is a total sham.




Hey, the award icon even looks like a scene from a Michael Jackson music video.

6966: Obesity And Obscenity.


Hating Monday with a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• A new study showed obesity and weight-related medical issues cost the U.S. about $147 billion in 2008. “If you really want to rein in health-care dollars, you have to get people dieting, exercising and living a healthier lifestyle,” said an expert from the study. “Otherwise somebody is going to be paying for treating these weight-related illnesses, either the government or employers.” Somebody ought to charge Mickey D’s. Although the fast feeder is probably responding to the news by updating its iconic signs to read, “Over 147 Billion Served.”

• Not surprisingly, the Henry Louis Gates, Jr. affair has inspired racist comments at The Root. Some of the remarks have been removed, but others will remain for public display. “For the most part, as long as the comments are not threats of violence, and the most vicious, nasty, racist comments, we leave them up,” said an editor for the site. Maybe they should bring in a special editorial board comprised of Michael Richards and Dog The Bounty Hunter.

6965: Racial Profiling On Madison Avenue.


All the drama surrounding the Henry Louis Gates, Jr. affair makes one think about the racial profiling that happens in the advertising industry.

On Madison Avenue, Blacks are routinely pulled over and presumed to be:

Security Guards
Mailroom Workers
Receptionists
Custodians
Cafeteria Cooks
Elevator Attendants
Chief Diversity Officers
Visitors From The Multicultural “Partner” Agency
Diversity Advisory Committee Members
Inner-City Outreach Program Interns
NAACP Officials
Rabble-Rousers
MC Hammer

And if an incident like the Henry Louis Gates, Jr. affair ever took place, the 4As President would probably invite the opposing parties to Madison Avenue for beer malt liquor.

6964: Culturally Competent College.


Kinda dig this phrase from Oakton Community College: Cultural Competence. It’s a safe bet that few if any Madison Avenue executives are Oakton graduates.

Sunday, July 26, 2009

6963: Translating Ad Age’s Hispanic Fact Pack.


Read the Ad Age story below. Then check out the MultiCultClassics commentary immediately following.

As Lines Continue to Blur, Some of Today’s Top Hispanic Shops Aren’t Hispanic After All

Ad Age’s Hispanic Fact Pack Ranks Agencies and Uncovers Latino Trends


By Laurel Wentz

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Agencies are trampling the traditional boundaries between general-market and multicultural accounts to win business in a tough economy. Enough, in fact, that seven of the shops in Ad Age’s ranking of the top 50 U.S. Hispanic agencies this year aren’t primarily Latino shops.

The changes are coming swiftly enough that four of the seven agencies this year are new to the ranking, which appears in Ad Age’s sixth-annual Hispanic Fact Pack, published today. Five non-Hispanic agencies that appeared on last year’s list have dropped off.

Independent GlobalHue, originally an African-American shop, now gets 50% of its revenue from a GlobalHue Latino unit that recently restructured with a number of high-level Hispanic execs. It now ranks as the fourth-biggest Hispanic shop, up from No. 7 last year.

In one anomaly in the U.S. Hispanic market, full-service Hispanic agencies with hefty media departments—which have all but disappeared from the largest general-market agencies—are competing with big media agencies that are trying to capture their clients’ multicultural business by growing and packaging their own expertise in units such as Omnicom Group’s OMD Latino and WPP’s Mindshare Multicultural.

Just two years ago, WPP’s Mediaedge:cia opened a unit called MEC Bravo, based in Mediaedge’s New York office and run by the media agency’s former CEO in Argentina, Gonzalo Del Fa. MEC Bravo is now tied for third-largest Hispanic media shop, according to Ad Age’s Hispanic Fact Pack ranking. Last year two Hispanic creative agencies, Omnicom-backed LatinWorks and independent Republica, started their own media departments, a move that has helped LatinWorks grow its business with clients such as Pizza Hut.

The new normal

Blurring the lines between who handles what business isn’t new. Interpublic Group of Cos.’ McCann Erickson, for instance, has such a lock on MasterCard’s “Priceless” ad franchise that the agency produces Spanish-language work, too. But it’s increasingly the new normal. When Volkswagen’s U.S. Hispanic agency, Creative on Demand, does a Spanish-language ad for Volkswagen of America, it usually does an English-language one, too. And at Omnicom-owned Hispanic shop Alma DDB, Chief Creative Officer Luis Miguel Messianu troubleshoots for biggest client McDonald’s Corp. as far away as Romania, as well as handling Hispanic, urban and general market assignments in the U.S.

Hispanics themselves often live in two worlds, going back and forth between English and Spanish, even as demographic patterns are being reversed. In today’s America, 61% of Hispanic adults were born outside the U.S.—but 88% of Hispanic children were born in this country.

Marketers short on time and money appreciate go-anywhere agencies. In a microcosm of the U.S. market, small agency Walton Isaacson handles African-American work for Toyota’s Lexus, has pitched in on general-market projects and recently hired Rochelle Newman-Carrasco as chief Hispanic strategist after Lexus inquired about Hispanic capabilities. This summer the agency organized Lexus events in two cities that were planned as general-market events for affluent attendees drawn from dealers’ mailing lists. As it turned out, the general market was mainly African-Americans in Atlanta and Hispanics in Miami.

Some agencies are positioning themselves as being more about cultural convergence than ethnic labels. Project 2050, a small New York shop that says it helps marketers reach diverse consumers, just hired as chief creative Bobbito Garcia, described as “a curator of underground culture.” CEO Phil Colon compares the move to the agency’s 2005 hiring of then-underground street artist Shepard Fairey as founding creative director. Mr. Fairey went on to create the iconic Obama image plastered everywhere during the last presidential campaign.

¡Ay, caramba! The Taco Bell Chihuahua must be spinning in its grave. As different cultures often see the same events in different ways, here’s the MultiCultClassics point-of-view on the scenarios presented by Ad Age.

Uno. Ad Age wrote, “Agencies are trampling the traditional boundaries between general-market and multicultural accounts to win business in a tough economy.” It’s probably more accurate to say that Whites are remapping the borders, raiding the undiscovered country of Latino marketing in search of mucho dinero. GlobalHue is the oddball, yet its uniqueness is mostly based on the shop’s original goal of servicing all the top minority segments. To write that GlobalHue was “originally an African-American shop” is a bit strange too, as many clients employ the place as their African-American shop. The agency is likely considered to be in every major racial/ethnic category except general market.

Dos. Full-service Hispanic agencies battling with big media agencies is not an “anomaly.” It’s business as usual—another example of Whites seeking to dominate the game.

Tres. “The new normal” is a polite term for neo-racism in the industry. As always, the White agencies are allowed to handle any business available, while the minority shops are systematically shut out from vying for general market work. The examples of Latinos leading on projects are extreme cases, paling in comparison to the cross-cultural steals executed by White counterparts. Blurring the lines? Blurring the truth is a better phrase.

Cautro. The Age Age story inspires a new term you won’t find in the Hispanic Fact Pack: Greengos—Gringos seeking Latinos’ green.

6962: Overreaction Of The Week.


The New York Post story below inspired the brief MultiCultClassics perspective immediately following…

A Jihad on Bruno

By David Brown

Sacha Baron Cohen has stepped up his security after being threatened by a terrorist organization that is angered at its portrayal in the film “Bruno.”

The al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, a coalition of Palestinian militias in the West Bank, said it was “very upset” that it was featured in the movie, starring Baron Cohen’s homosexual fashionista alter ego.

Baron Cohen’s Austrian character ridicules the terrorist group when he attempts to get himself kidnapped during a meeting with Ayman Abu Aita, who is identified in the film as the leader of the Martyrs’ Brigades.

The British comic is taking the threat seriously and has improved security arrangements for himself and his family in preparation for violent reprisals.

The Martyrs’ Brigades has issued a statement to a Jerusalem-based journalist including a veiled threat against Baron Cohen, 37.

“We reserve the right to respond in the way we find suitable against this man,” it said. “The movie was part of a conspiracy against the al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades.”

The group condemned the use of the interview.

“According to what we checked, there was no meeting about the real context of the film,” the statement said. “This was a dirty use of our brother, Ayman, and we don’t accept that the al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades is part of the film.”

The group is responsible for dozens of suicide bombings and shootings, and has been designated as a terrorist organization by the United States.

Baron Cohen’s Austrian character is shown telling Abu Aita: “I want to be famous. I want the best guys in the business to kidnap me. Al Qaeda is so 2001.” Before Abu Aita can respond, Bruno suggests that he remove his moustache, explaining: “Because your King Osama looks like a kind of dirty wizard or homeless Santa.”

Abu Aita claims that he was tricked into appearing in the film and has insisted that he is no longer involved in the Martyrs’ Brigades. He has threatened to sue Baron Cohen.

“This man, I think he is not a man,” Abu Aita said. “He is not saying the truth about me. He lied.”

Abu Aita’s lawyer, Hatem Abu Ahmad, has said that he is preparing a legal action against Baron Cohen and Universal Studios alleging that the terrorist reference could get his client in trouble with the Israelis and that the gay association could get him killed by Palestinians.

Abu Ahmad said: “This joke is very dangerous. We are not in the United States, we are not in Europe, we are in the Middle East, and the world operates differently here.” The Times of London

Cambridge University graduate Sacha Baron Cohen apparently didn’t spend any time learning about folks like Salman Rushdie. Otherwise, Baron Cohen might have realized it’s not too smart to joke around with people driven by strong spiritual and religious beliefs—especially when they’ve been known to react violently over such slights.

At one point, Baron Cohen and Universal Pictures had invited GLAAD representatives to preview and comment on the film—and the comedian and studio ultimately ignored every suggestion offered. Maybe they should have held private screenings with the Martyrs’ Brigades too.

Universal Pictures displayed monumental arrogance when first stating, “While any work that dares to address relevant cultural sensitivities might be misinterpreted by some or offend others, we believe the overwhelming majority of the audience will understand and appreciate the film’s inarguably positive intentions, which we’ve seen demonstrated whenever we have shown it.” Hey, the underwhelming minority misinterpretations and offenses need to be addressed after all.

It’s also ironic that in Baron Cohen’s previous film, Borat, the title character showed absolute terror when confronting Jews. Might Baron Cohen find himself in a real-life scenario of paranoia and fear?

Most people probably believe the Martyrs’ Brigades are overreacting. And let’s hope the threats don’t lead to actual trouble. At the same time, it’s disturbing to see how far the offended have to go to get the attention of the offenders.

6961: The New Elite.


From The New York Times…

Meet the New Elite, Not Like the Old

By Helene Cooper

WASHINGTON — They are the children of 1969 — the year that America’s most prestigious universities began aggressively recruiting blacks and Latinos to their nearly all-white campuses.

No longer would Harvard, Yale, Princeton and Columbia be the domain of the privileged. Instead, in response to the national soul-searching prompted by the civil rights movement, America’s premier colleges would try to become more representative of the population as a whole.

Forty years later, America is being led, to a striking extent, by a new elite, a cohort of the best and the brightest whose advancement was formed, at least in part, by affirmative action policies. From Barack and Michelle Obama (Columbia, Princeton, Harvard) to Eric Holder (Columbia) to Sonia Sotomayor (Princeton, Yale) to Valerie Jarrett (Michigan, Stanford), the country is now seeing, in full flower, the fruition of this wooing of minorities to institutions that for much of the nation’s history have groomed America’s leaders.

And yet the consequences of that change remain unresolved, as became clear on Friday, when Mr. Obama grappled a second time with the arrest of the Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. in his own home.

The incident, the president said, offered the potential to soothe longstanding distrust between minorities and police officers. But it also laid bare another reality, that the children of 1969, even those who now occupy niches at the top of society, regard their status as complicated, ambiguous and vulnerable.

“Whether I were black or white, I think that me commenting on this and hopefully contributing to constructive — as opposed to negative — understandings about the issue, is part of my portfolio,” Mr. Obama said.

It was a reminder that Mr. Obama, in addition to being the most powerful American, is also the fulfillment of the ideals embraced by Ivy League minority recruiters in 1969. Mr. Gates entered Yale that year, as one of 96 black freshmen. Today that number seems small. But there had been only six black students just three years before.

Mr. Gates belonged to the first affirmative action wave at top universities — a wave that continued into the 1970s and the 1980s. I was one of its beneficiaries. A black 17-year-old from Monrovia, Liberia, I was one of some 200 black freshmen at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1983.

My first roommate was a white student from Seagrove, N.C., whose SAT scores and grade-point average were higher than mine. Privately, I consoled myself that I had qualifications that she didn’t: I could name the capital of every country in Africa; countries she had never heard of. I knew where the Zambezi River emptied into the Indian Ocean. None of that had been on the SAT.

But every now and then I feared I was faking it, that my white classmates had something I didn’t. There were things they seemed to know instinctively, that I had to look up. I remember getting laughed at during a game of Pictionary when I couldn’t come up with the word for a giant bird landing on a lawn with a baby in its mouth.

My feelings of inadequacy were not unusual, said David L. Evans, the Saturn/Apollo electrical engineer hired by Harvard in 1969 to help lead its affirmative action program. When Mr. Evans visited public high schools in Arkansas in search of promising black students, he was met with skepticism. “Even people who didn’t have any mean-spiritedness would say to the students, ‘You going to be up there with the Kennedys?’ ” he recalled. “ ‘How do you think you can make it there?’ ”

There was anxiety, too, among the originators of race-based affirmative action programs. “The idealistic version of why these universities embraced racial affirmative action is that they said, ‘Hey, we’re in the business of training elites, it would be better for America if there were a diverse elite,’ ” said Nicholas Lemann, dean of Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism and author of “The Big Test,” a history of the SAT and the rise of America’s meritocracy. To its architects, the minority recruitment was the next phase for universities that for years had paved the way for whites, particularly the offspring of upper-class alumni, Mr. Lemann said.

“The cynical version of why they did this is they said, ‘We can’t control this country, it’s becoming too diverse, we need to socialize the brighter minorities and make them more like us.’ ”

In many ways, being molded into people “more like us” gave the children of 1969 an advantage denied most of their white counterparts. They learned to navigate within a second world. They also absorbed some of its ideas and values. And they paved the way for the next generation.

“We had to go through this phase of larger integration for Barack Obama to be possible,” Mr. Gates said in an interview a few days after his arrest. “It would have been impossible for Barack Obama to go from a historic black school to become president, at this time. The whole point is that a broad swath of America had to be able to identify with him.”

It also enabled Mr. Obama to run “the most race-blind campaign” of any black presidential candidate, said Gwen Ifill, the PBS news reporter whose book “The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama” examines the rise of African-Americans in politics.

Perhaps. But the children of 1969 dwell in a complex world. They retain an ethnic identity that includes its own complement of cultural, historical and psychological issues and considerations. This emerged at Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation hearings. And it emerged again last week, when Mr. Obama joked in the White House East Room that if he ran afoul of the police, “I’d get shot.” In saying this, he seemed to draw on the fears of black men across the United States, including those within the new power elite.

What Mr. Obama seemed to be demonstrating was what Mr. Lemann of Columbia calls a “double consciousness” that allows the children of 1969 to flow more easily between the world which their skin color bequeathed them and the world which their college degree opened up for them.

It’s the same double consciousness I acquired at U.N.C., though I didn’t think about it that way as a student. Sure, my white friends were learning a little more about black (and African) culture from me. But I was absorbing much more from them, since they surrounded me in such great number. At the time it seemed I had the advantage; I would leave college having gotten much more from my interactions with my white friends than they could possibly have gotten from me. And the principal thing I learned was how to make them feel at ease around me.

Except, of course, on those occasions when one can’t. Life outside the university doesn’t duplicate the conditions of university life.

“I can’t wear my Harvard gown everywhere I go,” Professor Gates said. “We — all of us in the crossover generation — have multiple identities, and being black trumps all of those other identities.”

On Friday Mr. Obama said he hoped Mr. Gates’s incident might become a “teachable moment.” It is a daunting task for the children of 1969: finding out whether the double consciousness they honed in the Ivy League can actually get this country to listen — and react — to race in a different way.

Helene Cooper, a White House correspondent for The Times, is the author of “The House at Sugar Beach: In Search of a Lost African Childhood.”

Saturday, July 25, 2009

6960: Relating To Racial Profiling.


From The Chicago Tribune…

Black males’ fear of racial profiling very real, regardless of class

Several African American professionals find professor Henry Louis Gates Jr.’s recent encounter with police all too easy to relate to. Their lingering question is when to speak up.

By Richard Fausset and P.J. Huffstutter

Reporting from Atlanta and Fort Wayne, Ind.

Like Henry Louis Gates Jr., they are professionals, men of status and achievement who have excelled in a nation that once shunned black men.

And for many of them, their only shock—upon learning of the celebrated scholar’s recent run-in with police—was the moment of recognition.

They know too well the pivotal moment Gates faced at his Massachusetts home. It was that moment of suspicion when confronted by police, the moment one wonders, in a flash of panic, anger or confusion: Maybe I am being treated this way because I’m black.

Next comes the pivotal question: Do I protest or just take it?

Kwame Dunston says he has made the calculated choice to take it—repeatedly. The public school administrator says he has been pulled over more than 20 times in the last decade, but has rarely been issued a ticket. What factor other than race, he wondered, would account for all of those stops?

“It’s more important for me to make it home than to fight for a cause I’m not going to win,” he said.

Dunston, 36, a New York resident who was in Atlanta this week, pointed to the interior of his 2006 Toyota Camry. It was showroom-clean. He doesn’t want police to think he has something to hide.

“My job,” Dunston said, “is to make sure they don’t have any question about what’s inside the car.”

Such anxiety, deeply rooted in the African American experience, has endured into the era of the first black president.

For many black men, the feeling of remaining inherently suspect never goes away, no matter their wealth and status and the efforts by police forces to avoid abuses in profiling.

Lawrence Otis Graham, author of a book on affluent African Americans, said wealthy blacks may, in fact, be subjected to more racial profiling than others.

In upscale white neighborhoods, they sometimes stand out. In fancy restaurants, they’re sometimes mistaken for help. “We become almost numbed by the constant presumptions,” said Graham.

New attention

Those issues came crashing back into the spotlight with the arrest of Gates, a 58-year-old Harvard University professor, on July 16.

Early that afternoon, Cambridge police showed up at Gates’ home, responding to a tip on a possible break-in. Gates was inside the house, after reportedly forcing open a stuck door.

According to his police report, Sgt. James Crowley asked Gates to step outside to talk, and Gates began screaming, accusing Crowley of being a “racist police officer.”

Gates was arrested on suspicion of disorderly conduct, a charge later dropped. A number of people—most prominently, President Obama—rushed to his defense.

But Lorenzo Wyche, 32, is among those who wonder whether Gates picked the right time to take a stand. Wyche, a black restaurateur and Atlanta resident, said that his generation may not be as quick to ascribe nefarious motives to police as Gates’ generation. “I didn’t grow up with dogs chasing me down,” he said.

And yet Wyche is also gripped at times by the gnawing suspicion that his black skin makes him a target. He was recently driving in midtown Atlanta. In front of him, an attractive white woman walked across the road, catching his eye. Behind him, a white policeman turned on his lights and pulled Wyche over.

But there would be no fireworks. The officer warned Wyche about an expired tag on his Porsche, and drove away.

“So that was my moment,” Wyche said, with a laugh. “Did he run my tag just because I stared at this white girl?”

Wyche figures he will never know whether he was profiled. He prefers this mystery to the possible more serious outcomes. At the same time, the difficulty in proving profiling has created problems for police. Last year, members of the Los Angeles Police Department’s civilian oversight panel were incredulous when department officials announced that not one of more than 300 racial profiling complaints was found to have merit.

A Times review of department documents later showed that no claims of profiling—more than 1,200—had been upheld in at least six years. (Racial profiling isn’t confined to black men; women and other groups can be targeted as well.)

But LAPD Chief William J. Bratton dismissed criticism, saying that profiling allegations hinge on what the officer was thinking, and therefore are nearly impossible to prove. “How,” he said, “do you get inside someone’s mind?”

For some black men, the solution is to try to avoid the possibility of confrontation altogether. Graham, the author, lives with his family on a large spread in the mostly white suburb of Westchester, N.Y. When the house alarm goes off, his wife goes to the front gate to meet police. He fears that if he goes instead, they will mistake him for an intruder.

Vibert White, a University of Central Florida history professor, recalled driving along an Indiana highway and spotting a line of cars pulled to the side of the road. All of the drivers were black men. So White, too, pulled over, figuring that was expected of black men.

An officer walked up and asked him why he had stopped.

“I told him that I’d seen the line of cars and just reacted,” said White, 51. “He told me, ‘Sir, you can go on with your business.’ I realized how deeply ingrained this lesson had become—of not causing a ruckus, of just playing the game, of doing what you needed to do in order to live your life.”

Years earlier, he said, he had challenged a traffic stop and ended up in handcuffs.

In Detroit, Tony Spearman-Leach, 42, chief communications officer of the Charles H. Wright Museum of African American History, said he gets tailed by police three or four times a year. He gets pulled over, on average, once a year, but has never received a ticket.

He keeps his replies clear, respectful and short. Each time the officer walks up to his black 1991 Volvo S70 sedan, his mind weighs the same questions.

“I know it’s because I’m black, and I’m driving the most conservative car you can get your hands on,” Spearman-Leach said. “But you have to weigh what to do. If I fight, am I going to escalate the matter? Is this a battle worth fighting?”

Fighting it

Leach’s answer has always been no. But before the Gates incident, other black voices had been encouraging people to say yes.

In January, Baratunde Thurston, a contributor to the influential blog Jack & Jill Politics (which bills itself as a voice of the “black bourgeoisie”) argued that with a black president entering office, it was important to speak up about such issues, rather than bury the lingering problems of race.

In the past, speaking up has sometimes brought real change. In 1992, Robert L. Wilkins, a Washington attorney, refused a Maryland trooper’s attempt to search his rental car with a drug dog. His federal lawsuit forced the state to enact a new training regimen for troopers, and to end race-based blanket drug sweeps.

But fighting back does not always yield such results.

In 1997, Aaron Campbell argued with sheriff’s deputies in Orange County, Fla., after he was pulled over for a suspected lane-change violation. He was pepper-sprayed and thrown in a police car. Campbell happened to be a major in the Miami-Dade Police Department.

“I think that if I was a white major on the turnpike, and was stopped unlawfully, they would have said, ‘Hey, major, go on about your business,’ “ Campbell said.

Campbell was found guilty of resisting arrest. The sheriff’s deputies said race had nothing to do with it. Campbell’s federal civil suit went nowhere.

Times staff writers Kate Linthicum and Joel Rubin contributed to this report.

6959: E. Lynn Harris (1955-2009).


From The Associated Press…

Author E. Lynn Harris dies at age 54

The Associated Press

Long before the secret world of closeted black gay men came to light in America, bestselling author E. Lynn Harris introduced a generation of black women to the phenomenon known as the “down low.”

Harris endeared such characters to readers who were otherwise unfamiliar with them, using themes and backdrops familiar to urban professionals, conditioned by their upbringings, their church leaders or their friends to condemn and criticize homosexuality in the African-American community. A proud Razorback cheerleader at the University of Arkansas who struggled with his own sexuality before becoming a pioneer of gay black fiction, Harris died Thursday at age 54 while promoting his latest book in Los Angeles.

Publicist Laura Gilmore said Harris died Thursday night after being stricken at the Peninsula Hotel in Beverly Hills, and a cause of death had not been determined. She said Harris, who lived in Atlanta, fell ill on a train to Los Angeles a few days ago and blacked out for a few minutes, but seemed fine after that.

An improbable and inspirational success story, Harris worked for a decade as an IBM executive before taking up writing, selling the novel Invisible Life from his car as he visited salons and beauty parlors around Atlanta. He had unprecedented success for an openly gay black author and his strength as a romance writer led some to call him the “male Terry McMillan.”

In 15 years, Harris became the genre’s most successful author, penning 11 titles, ten of them New York Times bestsellers. More than four million of his books are in print.

McMillan had just spoken to Harris about a week ago, to tell him she would pay tribute to him in her upcoming book by having a character read one of his titles, And This Too Shall Pass.

“He was thrilled,” McMillan said. “I loved his spirit and generosity. I loved that he found his own niche in the world of fiction, and I’m grateful to have known him. This just breaks my heart.”

He went on to mainstream success with works such as the novel Love of My Own and the memoir What Becomes of the Brokenhearted.

Harris’ storytelling fell into several categories, including gay and lesbian fiction, African American fiction and urban fiction. But he found success in showing readers a new side of African American life: the secret world of professional, bisexual black men living as heterosexuals.

His readers, many of them young black, professional women of dating age, were fascinated and shocked to learn that the men in their lives could be attracted to other men. Harris’ vivid storytelling — at least somewhat grounded in his reality and of others whom he knew — pulled back the curtain for some and held up the mirror for others.

“He was a pioneering voice within the black LGBT community, but also resonated with mainstream communities, regardless of race and sexual orientation,” said Herndon Davis, a gay advocate and a diversity media consultant in Los Angeles. “Harris painted with eloquent prose and revealing accuracy the lives of African American men and the many complicated struggles they faced reconciling their sexuality and spirituality while rising above societal taboos within the black community.”

For years, he was alone in exposing the “down low,” but the phenomenon exploded into mainstream culture in 2004, a decade after Invisible Life. That year, J.L. King’s On the Down Low: A Journey Into the Lives of Straight Black Men Who Sleep With Men hit bookstores and the author appeared on Oprah Winfrey’s TV show.

Harris’ 1994 debut, Invisible Life, was a coming-of-age story that dealt with the then-taboo topic.

“If you were African American and you were gay, you kept your mouth shut and you went on and did what everybody else did,” Harris said in an interview last year. “You had girlfriends, you lived a life that your parents had dreamed for you.”

Harris was born in Flint, Mich., in 1955 and raised in Little Rock He attended the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville where he was the school’s first black yearbook editor, the first black male Razorbacks cheerleader and president of Alpha Phi Alpha fraternity. He graduated with honors with a degree in journalism.

Harris worked in corporate America for 13 years at IBM, Hewlett-Packard and At&T before quitting a career in sales to become an author. He was not living as an openly gay man when Invisible Life was published, and could not acknowledge the parallels between himself and the book.

“People would often ask, ‘Is this book about you?’ I didn’t want to talk about that,” he said. “I wasn’t comfortable talking about it. I would say that this is a work of fiction.”

Harris said that the courage readers got from the book empowered him to be honest about himself. He continued to tell stories dealing with similar issues, to tell black middle class readers about people they knew, but who were living secret lives.

Tilia Parks read Invisible Life as a 16-year-old and was moved by the struggle of someone so close to her own age.

“I loved the truthfulness of it,” said Parks, now 26, of Atlanta. “I’d never heard that point of view, of a guy finding himself and his sexuality at such a young age.”

Parks had looked forward to the next plot twist for the book’s main character, Raymond Tyler, who reappeared in subsequent titles has not been in Harris’ more recent works. With Harris’ death, Parks is saddened that his story may be gone.

“Loyal readers were looking for that,” Parks said. “I’m so sad. I was waiting for him to come back around and start talking about Raymond.”

Friday, July 24, 2009

6958: Holes In The Hardee’s Argument.


The New York Daily News story below warrants the brief MultiCultClassics perspective immediately following…

Hardee’s ad rejected for asking reviewers to choose between “A-holes” and “B-holes”

By Christine Roberts, Daily News Writer

Taste-tasting between “A-holes” and “B-holes” is appetizing, right? Hardee’s thinks so.

The fast-food chain has developed commercials—featuring its new Biscuit Holes—that ask consumers to choose between regular donut holes, labeled A-holes and the company’s own version, labeled “B-holes.”

The advertisements have drawn outrage from a North Carolina company, Boddie-Noell Enterprises, which owns almost 350 Hardee’s restaurants, the News & Observer reports.

Boddie-Noell chairman, Ben Mayo Boddie, has vowed to stop running the ads in any market that the company controls. Boddie has also asked Hardee’s parent company, CKE Restaurants of California, to follow his lead.

This is not the first time that Hardee’s has used risquĆ© advertisements to appeal to its consumers. Hardee’s has previously released ads with celebrities, such as socialite Paris Hilton and “Top Chef” host Padma Lakshmi, seductively eating the company’s burgers.

CKE spokeswoman Jenna Petroff said that although the company does not plan to drop the ads, it will only run them in specific markets after 9 p.m. She said that Hardee’s advertisements are aimed at a “target audience of young, hungry guys.”

“We do not aim to exclude or offend any other group with our efforts, but merely to appeal and amuse a very specific audience,” Petroff said.

Um, based on her comments at the end of this story, CKE spokeswoman Jenna Petroff is an unqualified A-hole and B-hole.

First, if the commercial is offending your own owner-operators, you’ve got a corporate cultural problem. Like it or not, the people running your shitty restaurants represent the brand as much as the advertising—and maybe even more than the advertising.

Second, if the ad is targeting “young, hungry guys,” why does it depict a full range of hole reviewers?

Finally, Petroff displays a high degree of ignorance and arrogance by declaring, “We do not aim to exclude or offend any other group with our efforts, but merely to appeal and amuse a very specific audience.” Yo, beeotch, if you’re running a spot on network television, you cannot avoid having other groups see the message. To brush off the probability that your offensive garbage is invading other people’s space demonstrates some serious insensitivity. The next time Hardee’s must make a public response, company officials better tell Petroff to shut her pie hole.

6957: Bruno = Borat = Bigot = Boring.


Don’t expect MultiCultClassics to catch the latest Sacha Baron Cohen movie, Bruno, anytime soon.

Nothing personal, really. The film will undoubtedly draw its fans, as well as many who will find it hilarious. Whatever.

MultiCultClassics opts to avoid the movie for a few reasons.

1. Wasn’t overly impressed by Borat. And Bruno appears to be the same premise in a different freak costume. Should the public look for the next Sacha Baron Cohen extravaganza to star a Special Olympian…?

2. Can’t believe anything in the flick will be as funny as the statements by Universal Pictures. The studio insists that Bruno is a satire that “uses provocative comedy to powerfully shed light on the absurdity of many kinds of intolerance and ignorance, including homophobia.”

“While any work that dares to address relevant cultural sensitivities might be misinterpreted by some or offend others, we believe the overwhelming majority of the audience will understand and appreciate the film’s inarguably positive intentions, which we’ve seen demonstrated whenever we have shown it.”

Right. Bruno is inspiring endless thought-provoking dialogues on intolerance among moviegoers. And the belief that “the audience will understand and appreciate the film’s inarguably positive intentions” was probably “demonstrated” by box office receipts. This Hollywood hype reads as if PR hacks lifted excerpts originally written for last year’s critically-acclaimed Milk. Somebody needs to shed light on the absurdity of ignorance at Universal Pictures.

3. Just ain’t buying the notion that Sacha Baron Cohen is a comic genius with keen cultural insights and sensitivity. The man’s career is not based on highlighting cultures, but rather, hijacking cultures.

4. Would prefer to waste $10 on G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

6956: Police Chief Diversity Officer…?


The Associated Press story below appeared at NPR.org. Look for this cop to land a job on Madison Avenue as a Chief Diversity Officer. Or minimally win a position on the Omnicom or Ogilvy & Mather diversity advisory committees.

Officer Who Arrested Gates Teaches Diversity Class

AP — The white police sergeant criticized by President Barack Obama for arresting black scholar Henry Louis Gates Jr. in his Massachusetts home is a police academy expert on cultural diversity.

Cambridge Sgt. James Crowley has taught a class on diversity for five years at the Lowell Police Academy after being hand-picked for the job by former police Commissioner Ronny Watson, who is black, said Academy Director Thomas Fleming.

“I have nothing but the highest respect for him as a police officer. He is very professional and he is a good role model for the young recruits in the police academy,” Fleming said on Thursday.

The course, called “Racial Profiling,” teaches about different cultures that officers could encounter in their community “and how you don’t want to single people out because of their ethnic background or the culture they come from,” Fleming said.

Obama said the Cambridge officers “acted stupidly” in arresting Gates last week when they responded to his house after a woman reported a suspected break-in.

Crowley, 42, has maintained he did nothing wrong and has refused to apologize, as Gates has demanded.

Crowley responded to Gates’ home near Harvard University last week to investigate a report of a burglary and demanded Gates show him identification. Police say Gates at first refused, flew into a rage and accused the officer of racism.

Gates was charged with disorderly conduct. The charge was dropped Tuesday.

Gates’ supporters maintain his arrest was a case of racial profiling. Officers were called to the home by a woman who said she saw “two black males with backpacks” trying to break in the front door. Gates has said he arrived home from an overseas trip and the door was jammed.

Obama was asked about the arrest of Gates, who is a friend, at the end of a nationally televised news conference on health care Wednesday night.

“I think it’s fair to say, No. 1, any of us would be pretty angry,” Obama said. “No. 2, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home. And No. 3, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident — is that there is a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately, and that’s just a fact.”

In radio interviews Thursday morning, Crowley maintained he followed procedure.

“I support the president of the United States 110 percent. I think he was way off base wading into a local issue without knowing all the facts as he himself stated before he made that comment,” Crowley told WBZ-AM. “I guess a friend of mine would support my position, too.”

Crowley did not immediately respond to messages left Thursday by the AP. The Cambridge police department scheduled a news conference for later Thursday.

Gates has said he was “outraged” by the arrest. He said the white officer walked into his home without his permission and arrested him only as the professor followed him to the porch, repeatedly demanding the sergeant’s name and badge number because he was unhappy over his treatment.

“This isn’t about me; this is about the vulnerability of black men in America,” Gates said.

He said the incident made him realize how vulnerable poor people and minorities are “to capricious forces like a rogue policeman, and this man clearly was a rogue policeman.”

The president said federal officials need to continue working with local law enforcement “to improve policing techniques so that we’re eliminating potential bias.”

Fellow officers, black and white, say Crowley is well-liked and respected on the force. Crowley was a campus police officer at Brandeis University in July 1993 when he administered CPR trying to save the life of former Boston Celtics player Reggie Lewis. Lewis, who was black, collapsed and died during an off-season workout.

Gov. Deval Patrick, who is black, said he was troubled and upset about the incident.

Cambridge Mayor Denise Simmons, who also is black, has said she spoke with Gates and apologized on behalf of the city, and a statement from the city called the July 16 incident “regrettable and unfortunate.”

The mayor refused Thursday to comment on the president’s remarks.

Police supporters charge that Gates, director of Harvard’s W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research, was responsible for his own arrest by overreacting.

Black students and professors at Harvard have complained for years about racial profiling by Cambridge and campus police. Harvard commissioned an independent committee last year to examine the university’s race relations after campus police confronted a young black man who was using tools to remove a bike lock. The man worked at Harvard and owned the bike.

6955: Acting Stupidly.


Dumbing down the news in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• President Barack Obama weighed in on the arrest of Henry Louis Gates, Jr. by remarking, “I think it’s fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry. Number two, that the Cambridge [Mass.] police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home.” Hey, it’s unlikely the cops are Harvard graduates.

• A subscriber to the now-defunct Vibe Magazine has filed a class-action lawsuit, charging the publication with failing to notify or refund money to subscribers. The suit complains, “This conduct includes … continuing to sell subscriptions to Vibe Magazine to consumers without disclosing that the company was on the brink of ceasing its operations.” In lieu of a refund, maybe they could offer free Black porn videos and obscene ringers from the magazine’s last remaining advertisers.

• Kool Moe Dee is making news as part of a group of performers backing new legislation that would require radio stations to cough up performance royalties. Let’s hope the artists fare better than Vibe subscribers.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

6954: Taco Bell Chihuahua (1994-2009).


First Michael Jackson, now this.

6953: The Case For Female Minority Lawyers.


From The Chicago Sun-Times…

Female minority lawyers don’t stay at U.S. firms

Report | 75% bail within 5 years due to barriers

By Francine Knowles

A study has found that more than 75 percent of female minority attorneys at U.S. law firms will leave their jobs within five years due to continuing barriers to advancement. The finding is by the women’s research group Catalyst, which notes the barriers bring with them big costs.

“Those who leave often report experiencing institutional discrimination and unwanted and or unfair critical attention, which combine to create an exclusionary and challenging workplace,” the report said.

When a lawyer leaves a firm, the cost to the employer is equal to or greater than that person’s annual salary and benefits, Catalyst said, citing a previous study it did.

The report looked at the workplace experiences of minority women, compared with those of men of color and white women and men. Challenges unique to women of color include limited growth opportunities and a greater sense of “outsider status,” racial and gender stereotyping and more feelings of sexism in the workplace compared with white women; lack of access to high-profile client assignments and important client engagements, and missed opportunities for candid feedback, the report said.

The findings come as firms focus on associate satisfaction and retention and address diversity issues while facing a client base and talent pool composed of more women and minorities, Catalyst said.

The report found stark differences between groups of minority women in their perceptions of workplace culture and diversity.

Black women were more likely to believe diversity programs don’t address workplace biases and feel that partners and other supervising attorneys get insufficient training on how to work effectively with diverse cultures. They also cited a lack of access to challenging work assignments.

The report, whose sponsors included Sidley & Austin, said that to attract and retain women of color firms need to:

• Include senior leaders as active players in building and establishing inclusive workplaces.

• Raise awareness on the varying needs of different minority groups.

• Create opportunities for dialogue between firm leadership and female minority attorneys.

• Educate all attorneys, especially partners and other supervising attorneys on how to recognize bias and stereotyping of women of color.

• Monitor and track the career development of minority women and hold leaders accountable for their advancement.

Image Source

6952: Catch The Fearless Fish Out Of Water.


The Fearless Fish Out Of Water: How To Succeed When You’re The Only One Like You by Robin Fisher Roffer is a tough book to categorize because, well, it’s the only one like it.

On one fin, The Fearless Fish Out Of Water is a survival guide for 21st century creative people. Fisher Roffer opens by declaring, “Being different is good.” She inspires you to honor your authentic self—challenging you to avoid conservatism and conformity, opting instead to deliver unique, breakthrough thinking while embracing change.

Fisher Roffer makes repeated references to tapping your Higher Power, which seems to draw from classic 12-step programs. Fortunately, the author acknowledges our warp-speed world and ADD-style existences, presenting only 7 steps for success over roughly 200 easy-to-read pages. Each chapter is filled with character profiles of cutting-edge professionals, how-to advice and provocative exercises.

The spotlighted executives give The Fearless Fish Out Of Water a biographical hook. Fisher Roffer’s personal revelations add an autobiographical slant. By studying the spiritual journeys of others, readers are ultimately ignited to blaze their own trails.

Whether intentional or not, The Fearless Fish Out Of Water is actually a neo-diversity manual for today. The author recognizes, respects and reveres race, ethnicity, culture, gender, generation and all the other qualities that create healthy communities. In the end, Fisher Roffer supports inclusive environments where a broad range of perspectives, opinions and ideas are encouraged to flourish.

You can learn more via the publisher, by visiting the author’s website and reading an online excerpt. But to truly appreciate everything the book offers, make like a fearless fish and dive into it.

6951: Commander-In-Choo-Choo.


If Amtrak decorated their trains like this, business would skyrocket.

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

6950: The Greediest Generation.


From The Chicago Tribune…

Saddling the next generation with massive debt

By Dennis Byrne

The Boomers are the worst generation.

Certainly, they would never call themselves that. As the title of a 2007 book written by a Baby Boomer brazenly proclaims, they’re “The Greater Generation.” I suppose the Boomer author can be excused for his excess of self-satisfaction, because Boomers are so loaded with smugness that it’s oozing out their ears.

But surely someone who writes a book about them in another 40 or 50 years—Tom Brokaw wrote his book “The Greatest Generation” decades after that generation’s self-sacrifice preserved our freedom—will brand them as perhaps the most selfish generation in American history. That author would accurately nail them for their greedy, miserable selves because he and hundreds of millions of others will be living in the cesspool of debt that they leave behind.

Every time you take a breath, President Barack Obama (he’s on television more frequently than the weather forecast) is pushing through another costly program, rescue, bailout, giveaway—whatever you want to call it—that we can’t afford to pay for ourselves. So, in a magical example of time travel, he—we, I should say—will deliver the bill to the future, with nary a thought of how the future will pay for it.

No need here for a tedious recounting of the huge, impossible debt that we’re passing off; it has been outlined enough, but the figures seem to scare few. Our official national debt, the one you hear occasionally debated in Congress, is a sliver under $12 trillion. Sounds like a lot? Then get this: Our true national debt, when you include every cent of benefits promised to seniors, Baby Boomers and other entitled beneficiaries, amounts to nearly $62 trillion, according to the Northbrook-based Institute for Truth in Accounting. That’s $202,000 for every man, woman and child in America. Our gift to future generations is the shaft. We could talk about how paying the interest on the national debt we now have is one of the largest items in the federal budget, already draining billions from all those education, welfare and other programs so dear to the progressive agenda. But future interest payments will gobble up so many of our resources that we won’t be able to afford new cars, homes and the rest of the consumer cravings that fuel our economy. Our economy will be in shambles.

But wait, that $62 trillion doesn’t even include the other trillions for the sugarplums dancing in Obama’s head. The additional $1 trillion for health-insurance “reform.” An additional trillion or so for the third stimulus package. What else, we can only imagine.

When they write about how the Boomers are the worst generation, my guess is the target won’t be aimed at Obama so much. After all, he’s just the frontman; wind him up and off he goes to another press conference, speech or town hall meeting to tell us how we’re headed for hell if we don’t do what he says. No one can spend that much time doing public relations and devote the amount of time needed to study the consequences of everything that he wants to stuff down our throats. No, someone else is his brain and that’s his own version of Karl Rove—White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Emanuel’s cynical proclamation—“you never want a serious crisis to go to waste”—unveils the essence of this administration: its (read: Emanuel’s) lust for power. The unborn be damned. This recession is not the worst since the Great Depression, as the administration and its media acolytes keep propagandizing. It’s not even the worst since the one we survived in the early 1980s without the kind of insane spending we’re doing now.

Truth is, we’ve become so frightened of bad things happening to us that we’ll do anything, no matter how reckless, to avoid just the perception of risk. Our fear of discomfort or sacrifice is contemptible beyond description.

The Greatest Generation gave their lives so that we might enjoy our liberties and prosperity. We show our appreciation by imprisoning future Americans in a dungeon of debt from which they may never recover. Nowhere in the Obama/Emanuel blueprint is there even the slightest suggestion of how future generations will survive this mess. Not that they care, but, more important, there simply may not be a way to lift the burden. Mark this generation down as the most cowardly and irresponsible in America’s history. Mark it down as the Shameless Generation.

Dennis Byrne is a Chicago-area writer and consultant. He blogs at ChicagoNow.com

6949: Fifteen Ways…


6948: Gates Counterpoint.


From The New York Daily News…

Henry Louis Gates should skip the racial histrionics: Instead, teach kids to cooperate with cops

By Michael Meyers, Special to NYDailyNews.com

The most famous black professor at Harvard lives in a very safe neighborhood because, in part, residents look out for and report suspicious activities, and because cops respond quickly to reports of possible break-ins. Yet that’s not how Henry Louis Gates Jr., director of the W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research at Harvard University, took it when cops showed up at his door after a neighbor reported two black men (Gates and his driver) seemingly pushing into a vacant residence, which turned out to be Gates’ home.

He was arrested for disorderly conduct, and the rest is now histrionic history. (The charges have since been dropped, but the incident is not going away.)

Gates was returning from a trip to China, and he couldn’t get in through a jammed front door, so he apparently went around the back, shut off an alarm and worked with his driver to get the door open.

In any neighborhood — especially one of the safest in America — that kind of behavior would be cause for suspicion and a call to the cops, no matter the color of the guys “breaking” in.

But when police showed up, the “he said, he said” has Gates indignant and, according to the cop, refusing to present himself and his ID, then complying and at some point getting loud - with Gates saying, according to the police report, “Why, because I’m a black man in America?”

Had I been the cop, I would have probably gotten suspended for saying to Gates: “No, stupid, because I need you to step outside so that I may do my job. I need to know that you are who you say you are.”

The cop’s job is not the most famous black professor at Harvard’s concern. Yet Gates’ automatic reflex was racial — that of a victim rather than a property lessee. The man with all the brains did not have the common sense of the average citizen who appreciates good and effective police work.

Calling the cops when one sees suspicious activities underway is exactly what good neighbors do. It is what a woman who works nearby did — and all indications are she acted in good faith. When cops follow up on such a report by asking suspicious persons who’ve seemingly gained entry to a vacant house to present ID, they are doing their jobs.

Nevertheless, Gates and the race industry spokesmen who’ve rushed to his defense have leaped to the fast conclusion that this was an incident of racial profiling — and that one of America’s most famed black academics was a victim of police misconduct. Choice reaction by the Rev. Al Sharpton: “I’ve heard of driving while black, and I’ve heard of shopping while black. But I’ve never heard of living in a home while black.”

Give me a break. Why isn’t it enough that the charges of disorderly conduct have been dropped against Gates? The question answers itself: The race activists need to posture that the nation has to pause and contemplate and endure yet another round of guilt around their “truth” and constant observation of racism by cops. “See,” they exclaim, “in postracial America, the black man with a Ph.D. can’t get into his own home without causing suspicion and getting arrested.”

The real truth is that Gates did not get arrested for being black or even for being suspicious or for breaking into his own home. He was arrested for disorderly conduct — for failing to do what civil rights activists and race experts always advise innocent black men, and all others who come into contact with the police, to do: cooperate.

It makes sense to repeat this message now, especially for the benefit of young black men. If the police confront you, don’t go demanding badge numbers and reading the cops the riot act. Be courteous and calm. Explain yourself and, if asked, present ID.

If there has been a constitutional violation of some kind by the cops, that can be taken care of once the police have left you alone, moving on — let’s hope — to investigate other suspicious behavior.

Meyers is executive director of the New York Civil Rights Coalition.

6947: Minorities Made Their Votes Count.


From The New York Times…

2008 Surge in Black Voters Nearly Erased Racial Gap

By Sam Roberts

In last year’s presidential election, younger blacks voted in greater proportions than whites for the first time and black women turned out at a higher rate than any other racial, ethnic and gender group, a census analysis released Monday confirmed.

As a result, in the election that produced the nation’s first black president, the historic gap between black and white voter participation rates over all virtually evaporated.

The Census Bureau’s survey also found striking contrasts in why people said they did not vote. More than three times as many whites as blacks said they did not like the candidates or campaign issues.

Over all, 18 percent of nonvoters said they were too busy, 15 percent said they were prevented because of an illness or disability and 13 percent each said they were not interested or did not like the candidates or issues.

Total turnout in 2008 was about the same as it was in 2004, about 64 percent of voting age citizens.

But with Barack Obama on the ballot, the makeup of the 131 million who voted last year was markedly different. While the number of non-Hispanic white voters remained roughly the same, 2 million more blacks, 2 million more Latinos and 600,000 more Asians turned out. Compared with 2004, the voting rate for black, Asian and Hispanic voters increased by about four percentage points. The rate for whites declined by one percentage point.

As a result, according to an analysis by William H. Frey, a demographer with the Brookings Institution, whites declined to 76 percent of all voters in 2008, from 79 percent in 2004.

Turnout varied widely by state, from a high of 75 percent in Minnesota to 52 percent in Utah.

In a number of states, including Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, Ohio and South Carolina, turnout among blacks surpassed 70 percent.

In 2004, according to the census, barely 60 percent of eligible blacks voted. In 2008, nearly 65 percent did (as did 66 percent of white voting-age citizens).

But one of the biggest changes was the gap between black and white participation. In 2004, the rate of black voter registration was 10 percentage points below that of whites. Last year, it narrowed to four percentage points.

Of the 206 million citizens 18 and older, 71 percent were registered to vote. Among those who were registered, 90 percent voted in 2008.

Thom File, a voting analyst with the Census Bureau, said the turnout among blacks ages 18 to 24 increased 8 percent from 2004, to 55 percent. That helped drive the overall turnout in that group to 49 percent, still lower than among older eligible voters.

Among voters 18 to 24 and 25 to 44, blacks voted at a higher rate than whites in 2008.

Like an analysis earlier this year by the Pew Research Center, the latest findings were drawn from census surveys and interviews.

“In 2008 we obviously had a historic candidacy,” said Paul Taylor, executive vice president of the Pew center. “That’s certainly a plausible explanation for the spike in African-American turnout. The question was, Would other minorities vote for this minority? Not only did he get a big vote, but he got a big turnout.”

6946: Minty Fresh Multicultural Marketing.


Quick, guess which ad targets Whites and which one targets Blacks.

Monday, July 20, 2009

6945: Chief Idea Officer Offers Really Bad Idea.


The column below originally appeared at AdAge.com. Scan it quickly and read the MultiCultClassics perspective immediately following…

Clients, Let Agencies Be Part of the Hiring Process

Getting Your Shop More Involved Can Help You Win Customers


By Brian Brooker

Attract and retain customers. That’s what advertising agencies get paid to do. But since the economy took a tumble, everything changed. Today, clients should be asking more of their agencies. The key to getting more output is letting your ad agency play a bigger role in all aspects of the organization that impact the customer experience.

Let’s start with your employees.

If you want to ensure your ad agency attracts and retains customers, it starts with the front line—those people with whom your customers come in contact daily. In an instant, your employees can turn off new customers or turn away loyal ones. Allow your ad agency to be involved in every aspect of the hiring process, from targeting and acquiring new employees, nurturing them to maximize retention, and even determining when they are no longer a fit through ongoing customer evaluation.

The people you hire are your brand ambassadors. It’s critically important that they know and reflect your brand and give your customers the ultimate brand experience. Your ad agency can indoctrinate them by developing a brand kit that communicates point of difference, brand voice as well as advertising materials. They can also aid in training your employees in every facet of store experience, from customer greeting to customer check-out.

And that’s just scratching the surface. The better your employee base, the better product and service you can offer your customers. For one of our clients, we put on an internal competition that rewarded the best employees based on their ability to provide the optimal experience. The competition, which is as fun as the brand, takes place across the country. The best of the best are recognized at the annual sales convention. The employees feel a sense of pride and purpose that translates into satisfied customers.

Now, on to the customer experience.

The more your agency becomes immersed in aspects of your business beyond marketing and advertising, the more they can help you. Widen their scope. The agency should be involved in managing every contact point, from the time your customer leaves his car, sits at his laptop and turns on his cellphone, all the way to the consumption of the experience/product/service. Yes, you hired your agency to deliver a marketing plan. But consider: If you are a retail brand, why not involve your agency in designing the faƧade of the store, the floor plan, the product display, the furniture, the lighting and the music? It’s at the store level that the brand promise becomes real. Your ad agency can build that bridge from communications to store experience.

You can navigate a tough economy by leaving no stone unturned and by not trying to do it all by yourself. Your ad agency will welcome a chance to get immersed in marketing minutiae. It may not be as glamorous as producing a Super Bowl spot, but if they are trusted partners, they are well aware that it’s the details that count.

Why should you include them? Because your ad agency knows your customers and they know your brand. Include them because they know what your customers want and how they think. Include them because they can help you complete the sales loop in a way that keeps your customers coming back.

About The Author
Brian Brooker is chief idea officer of Barkley, Kansas City, Mo. Clients include Sonic Drive-In and Build-A-Bear Workshop.

Um, is the author of this column aware that the advertising industry is renowned for doing an abysmal job when it comes to hiring—and Madison Avenue is likely facing a class-action lawsuit for institutionalized discrimination in recruiting and retention practices?

Or better yet, forget the bias and racism infesting our business. Let’s consider the corrupt leadership, outdated business models, inability to change with the times, illegal billing and other instances of criminal bookkeeping.

This column—while perhaps typed with the best of intentions—demonstrates quite clearly the ignorance and arrogance crippling our industry. Allowing Mad Men to influence clients’ employment decisions is like inviting Minutemen to Cinco de Mayo celebrations.

Should advertisers let advertising agencies be involved in the hiring process? Hell, ad executives can barely handle the advertising process.

6944: Diversity On Trial…?


From The Chicago Tribune…

Diversity a touchy topic at Sotomayor hearings

What Sen. Jeff Sessions calls an ‘honest discussion’ on race, some observers say is an attack on ethnic pride.

By James Oliphant and David G. Savage

Two months ago, Sonia Sotomayor’s Latino heritage was viewed as an overwhelming asset. And though history will be made if she becomes the Supreme Court’s newest justice, there wasn’t much talk about that during three days of grueling testimony last week. For some, her confirmation hearings left a bitter taste.

“This is a great first, but we are not being allowed to celebrate it in the way we are allowed to celebrate Thurgood Marshall as the first African American on the court,” said Laura Gomez, a University of New Mexico law professor.

That’s because Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee attempted to shine a negative light on Sotomayor’s earlier statements about what she as a Latina could bring to judging and on her connections with a Latino advocacy group. In wave after wave of questions, they suggested that statements by the New York federal appellate judge indicated an inability to remain impartial on the bench.

Sotomayor had given them ammunition: speeches in which she said she hoped that “a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male.”

By the end of the week, however, she had forcefully rejected that notion—along with the idea that her diverse background meant she would judge with “empathy,” a quality President Obama had said was important for a high court justice.

She also denied being involved in abortion-rights lawsuits filed by the Puerto Rican advocacy group whose board she served on for 12 years.

Even though Sotomayor is almost certain to be confirmed, some Republicans considered their bid to root out what they saw as potential prejudices as a kind of victory.

“We had a more honest discussion of some of the complexities and sensitivities of the race question in this hearing than in the 12 years I have been in the Senate,” said Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the ranking Republican on the committee, whose own bid for a federal judgeship was blocked because of racially insensitive remarks he had made in the past.

Sotomayor’s supporters, however, viewed the questioning another way.

“It was extremely disappointing and a walk backward from the point of diversity,” said Sherrilyn Ifill, a law professor at the University of Maryland. “This was not a productive conversation. It was unfortunate posturing by the Republicans.

“This was an all-white judiciary committee asking condescending questions. And it was an unequal power situation. She was not in a position to honestly engage with them, because she needed their votes.”

What last week’s public exercise illustrated was the nature of questions of race and identity in America: Ethnic pride to some is identity politics to others.

Read the full story here.

6943: Not Very Comcastic.


Nothing kills sincerity like contrived stock photography.

Sunday, July 19, 2009

6942: U Can’t Touch This, Madison Avenue.


Madison Avenue executives perpetuate the industry’s exclusivity by insisting there is a lack of qualified Black talent. Yet in this column from Adweek.com, MC Hammer—yes, MC Hammer—demonstrates more digital savvy than most advertising agency honchos. Go figure.

It’s Twitter Time

By MC Hammer

Social Media is quickly becoming a vital tool for brands, especially those driven by a celebrity. The use of social media outlets effectively shortens the distance between the content that is created and produced for a brand and the consumer like no other medium.

The same is true with celebrities, artists and entertainers like me who are now closer to fans than we’ve ever really been before.

While new social media platforms seem to pop up every day, I’m strongly behind Twitter, a micro-blogging tool that has become a game changer for me. The platform offers celebrity brands the means to build and develop relationships in an intimate and personal way. The friendly and efficient interface links to video and audio and integrates with various other social media outlets with ease. That means my brand can live on a wide variety of platforms where fans might find me.

The short, 140-character tweets give brands the power to quickly bond with consumers, point them to projects or products that they can interact with without interpretation or personal interjections messing up the communication flow.

Additionally, Twitter gives power to the users by allowing them to track the brands and celebrities they choose, whether or not they follow back. Twitter followers tend to be a loyal and engaged audience who are more likely to continue to spread the brand’s buzz when they feel they are part of it.

I was an early adopter of Twitter and currently have more than a million followers. I have used my Twitter feed to discuss events in my personal and professional life, to encourage various behaviors, causes and initiatives that I get behind (i.e., “Respect Women Wednesday” and “DJ Appreciation Day”). Additionally, unlike many celebrities and brands, I follow many of my followers back, encouraging one-on-one dialogue. I follow more than 26,000 people, which I think is pretty atypical of a celebrity or brand account.

My love of social media is being integrated in a big way into my A&E reality series Hammertime. We are displaying my tweets on screen so viewers can see how I interact with the platform, and my Twitter account is a major feature on the official Hammertime Web site — www.aetv.com/hammertime — which also includes videos, some of my wife’s recipes, a fun online board game, a widget and plenty of other digital bells and whistles.

Digital media has become such a strong part of my life that it was a given to put Twitter to work on the series. In fact, I am working closely with the network to use social media to bring attention beyond the show itself to promotional efforts around it, like a recently posted YouTube video that features 60 people dancing, dressed up in “Hammer pants,” during a recent flash-mob stunt at a Sunset Blvd. store. That little clip went viral and is nearing 2 million views.

According to Guy Slattery, senior vp of marketing for A&E, who I talked to for this column, the watercooler has been virtually replaced by social media. “Word of mouth all starts online these days, and for a new television series to succeed, it needs to become part of that conversation,” he told me. “For Hammertime, we had the Hammer pants, the Hammer dance and MC Hammer the Twitter feed. We knew that if our campaign was done right, people would be buzzing about the show before it even hit the air.”

Amen.

Understand that the value in marketing and promotion dollars that a brand with substantial followers brings to the plate is immense. Brands and celebrities can benefit from utilizing the platform in the days leading up to an opening weekend, a premiere or release date by connecting fans with links, trailers, contests, video and photo content, and each other, just like we did for Hammertime.

Brand marketing, promotion and distribution via 140 characters…a digital triple threat!

Threat in the negative sense is the fear of the unknown. But while social media may be seen as a daunting and unknown to some, the most savvy businesses, brands and celebrities are adopting the platform to establish a one-on-one dialog with their consumers and fans. Those who aren’t will surely be riding the “fail whale” in the near future.

Don’t forget to check out my series Hammertime and follow me at www.twitter.com/MCHammer

I’m a tweet away.

MC Hammer stars in the weekly reality series Hammertime on A&E.

6941: Overreaction Of The Week.


Did they have to put the Black glasses on the watermelon?

Saturday, July 18, 2009

6940: Hot Dogs And Wienies.


Reckless jiving in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• The Oscar Mayer Wienermobile crashed into a Wisconsin home. No one was injured, and the driver claimed she was trying to turn the vehicle around and accidentally lurched forward. Sounds like a bunch of baloney.

• The Illinois House wound up passing a resolution to honor the late Michael Jackson, although many of the lawmakers insist they didn’t even realize what they were voting on. If they’re not paying attention and passing Jacko resolutions, what else might these morons be approving?

• The Bay State Banner, Boston’s only Black-owned newspaper, is accepting a $200,000 bailout loan from the mayor to stay in business. The paper probably can also get financial support from the Illinois House, provided the measure is packaged with Jacko resolutions.

• A Seattle Starbucks will add booze to its menu, offering glasses of beer and wine. Can’t imagine what they’ll charge for a grande Pabst. And will the workers be called barmaidistas?

6939: Some Ethnic Publications Are Surviving.


From The Washington Post…

A Passion for the Printed Word Across Language and Culture

As Mainstream Publications Falter, Those Catering to Ethnic Groups Hang On

By Tara Bahrampour, Washington Post Staff Writer

Even as print media across the country shut down, an Indian entrepreneur in Virginia is planning a glitzy party next month to launch his glossy monthly magazine. Modeled after Washington Life, Washington Masala will cater to highly educated, affluent South Asians in the area.

“It’s a very niche market,” Rick Khosla said, sitting at a Starbucks in Capitol Hill this week with galleys of the 96-page inaugural issue. “That market has always been overlooked.”

Although much of the $100,000 for the first issue came from Khosla’s pocket, he expects the magazine to become self-sustaining within three months.

Is his a quixotic undertaking in an era of financial meltdowns, or is a publication catering to a specific ethnic group better positioned to survive the stormy economy?

It’s a little of both. Across the country, thousands of newspapers, magazines, and television and radio stations target specific immigrant groups. Many publish in languages other than English, and they address events in the homeland as well as acculturation issues that mainstream media organizations do not cover.

They have a hungry audience. A poll this spring by San Francisco-based New America Media shows that despite the economic downturn, consumption of ethnic media is growing. About 150 outlets operate in the Washington region.

“In some ways, it is both the best of times and the worst of times,” said Sandip Roy, an editor at New American Media, an association representing 2,000 ethnic news organizations. “They are definitely not immune to the pressure on media going on all over the place … but in terms of audience, the interest has never been higher.”

Ethnic media outlets have two big advantages, said Sandy Close, the association’s executive director. “They know their audience, and they know how to operate on a shoestring, so when the roof caves in, they know how to tighten their belts.”

But shoestrings can fray.

Dereje Desta, editor and publisher of Zethiopia, a seven-year-old newspaper targeting the Ethiopian community in the United States and especially the District, had been planning to increase production from once to twice a month. But since the recession, even monthly production is difficult to sustain. The paper, which publishes in English and Amharic, has shrunk, recently closed its U Street office and moved into Desta’s Fairfax County home.

The problem is not reader interest, he said, but advertising, which the paper relies on for 80 percent of its revenue. Ad revenue is down 60 percent this year.

“It’s very, very hard because all the restaurants, their income, all these things are hurt by the economy,” Desta said. “I’m worried if I can actually continue.”

Some ethnic news outlets are switching to online publication only, Desta said. “But the problem is you can’t make money on the Web site. The advertisers prefer the newspaper.”

The Korea Daily, with a daily circulation of 15,000 in the Washington area, has started printing on smaller paper, cut the number of pages and recently laid off some employees after ad revenue dropped 30 to 40 percent.

“Mostly the ads were from real estate and mortgage businesses,” but they are faltering, said Sungkyoon Park, editor of the Annandale-based paper.

Although interest is high among the 200,000 or so Korean-Americans in the Washington-Baltimore area, he said, one daily recently cut service to twice a week, and “no new media is starting in the Korean-American community.”

Khosla’s magazine will include news about Bollywood as well as profiles of successful local South Asians and tips on getting into local universities. Roy said such a publication could fill a hole in the South Asian market. “That kind of glossy magazine has not existed for the longest time,” he said. “People have wondered about this.”

Older South Asians in the United States rely heavily on ethnic papers and television for their news, said Deepa Iyer, executive director of Washington-based South Asian Americans Leading Together, a national organization that advocates for issues affecting South Asian communities.

Iyer, who has not seen a copy of Washington Masala, said she isn’t sure young, professional South Asians will be interested in such a publication.

“For people who are more affluent and educated, in their 20s and 30s, professionals, I wouldn’t say those people would tend to use ethnic media as their source of news,” she said.

Khosla, 41, owns an IT company and has no publishing experience but has visited plants in the United States and abroad to see how it is done. “You have to start somewhere, no? So I started.”

The magazine will have a 20,000 print run and sell for $4.95 after the first three free issues. Khosla’s business model is unusual on several fronts: Although most magazines like his rely heavily on advertising, he expects half his revenue to come from ads and half from newsstand sales. Also, unlike with many ethnic media outlets, most of his advertisers are national businesses, such as Charlie Palmer Steak, Sheraton hotels and Air India, which, he said, he charges “a quarter of the cost in The Washingtonian.”

With designers and some writers based in India, Washington Masala also has lower production costs. Writers in India are paid $13 an article; the highest rate paid to U.S.-based writers is $30. Khosla wrote some of the articles for the first issue.

That kind of personal involvement might give ethnic media an advantage in tough times, said Roy, the New America Media editor. “A lot of them really believe in what they’re doing. It’s not just a business opportunity.”

Desta, for example, said he is making almost no money right now. He hasn’t calculated exactly how much he’s spending, he said, “because if I’m going to face that figure, I’m going to quit.”

For Khosla, who is planning future Masalas in other major U.S. cities, the business seems secondary to the passion.

“I’m so sizzled with this thing I came up with,” he said. Looking over the design for the cover, he said: “You know what masala is, right? It’s like spice. So it’s the spice of life.”

6938: Moore Commentary On O&M & NAACP.


Almost missed this gem. Sanford Moore commented at The Big Tent in response to the O&M-NAACP story.

On the day after Bill Thompson, the NYC Comptroller, sent letters to 46 Corporate CEOs and their Boards demanding that they move to end the discriminatory policies of their ad agencies toward minority broadcasters and toward minority employees/executives, this “happening” occurs. If the issues were not so crucial, the initiatives announced by Ogilvy and the behavior of Rev. Sharpton would be laughable...instead of being obscene. Does Rev. Sharpton have to “grin & skin,” anoint John Seifert “brother” to get a paltry $10k for the NAACP, which should refuse such a tainted and niggardly contribution? Let us not forget that Ogilvy, when it was the prime contractor on the Office of Anti-Drug Policy, only saw fit to allocate some .017% of the $120m in media dollars to Black media while Blacks represent the vast majority of offenders imprisoned for drug offenses. Ogilvy’s record on Black employment transcends discrimination...it is criminal. Its media buying policies have helped create a “separate and unequal” media reality for minority broadcasters. Finally, Rev. Sharpton’s callous behavior while visiting the “big house” is inexcusable and unforgivable. Methinks it is time for Rev. Sharpton to stop taking donations from the “Mad Men in the Grey Flannel Sheets” who marginalize his people and the radio stations his show is on.

Sanford Moore

Friday, July 17, 2009

6937: All-Time Highs.


Flying through the news in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• On Thursday, President Barack Obama was part of another historical first—an all-female Marine Corps crew served on the helicopter that flew the president to Andrews Air Force Base. Former President Bill Clinton is probably jealous.

• The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 36 percent of Blacks are overweight, which is significantly higher than the figures for Latinos (29 percent) and Whites (24 percent). This is not really new news, and the probable reasons behind the numbers include less access to medical care, exercise facilities and healthier food. State Farm and Dr. Ian Smith have been offering a totally free solution worth checking out: The 50 Million Pound Challenge.

Thursday, July 16, 2009

6936: Obama Addresses NAACP.


From The Hill…

Obama emphasizes education in NAACP speech

By Sam Youngman

NEW YORK CITY – President Obama responded to African American unemployment concerns by encouraging the black community to form a new mindset about education.

In a speech honoring the 100th anniversary of the NAACP, the president faulted the economic crisis, a broken health care system and the nation’s energy policy for many of the societal ills facing the black community, but he urged African-Americans to take responsibility for their success.

Cheered repeatedly throughout his speech, Obama listed the steps his administration is taking to fix some of the problems hurting the African-American community and America as a whole, but he warned that would not be enough.

“Still, even if we do it all, the African-American community will fall behind in the United States and the United States will fall behind in the world unless we do a far better job than we have been doing of educating our sons and daughters,” Obama said.

The president warned the supportive crowd that “government programs alone won’t get our children to the Promised Land.”

In the days before Obama’s speech, many members of the civil rights group said they were looking for details on how the first black president would reduce unemployment rates for African-Americans.

In response, the president spent a great deal of his remarks pushing the need to close the education achievement gap, and he challenged black parents and neighbors to do more to help their children learn and achieve.

“We need a new mindset, a new set of attitudes – because one of the most durable and destructive legacies of discrimination is the way that we have internalized a sense of limitation; how so many in our community have come to expect so little of ourselves,” Obama said.

He added: “They might think they’ve got a pretty good jump shot or a pretty good flow, but our kids can’t all aspire to be the next LeBron or Lil Wayne. I want them aspiring to be scientists and engineers, doctors and teachers, not just ballers and rappers. I want them aspiring to be a Supreme Court Justice. I want them aspiring to be president of the United States.”

Obama talked about the need to fix and improve America’s schools because he said “the state of our schools is not an African-American problem; it’s an American problem.”

The president’s speech, loaded with historical references and his signature inspirational passages, did lack some of the detail some NAACP officials said they wanted to hear from the president.

Regardless, the crowd was enthusiastic and overwhelmingly supportive throughout Obama’s remarks. The hero’s welcome Obama received prompted him to say “it’s just good to be among friends.”

He also spoke movingly of the Civil Rights leaders he credited with allowing him to be president.

“Because of them I stand here tonight, on the shoulders of giants,” Obama said. “And I’m here to say thank you to those proud leaders and thank you to the NAACP.”

The president began the day with a rally for New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine’s (D) reelection and will end it with a fundraiser in Manhattan for the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

6935: Draftfcb Keeping It Real… Awful.


Based on this bullshit, add Wiggers to the list of audiences Draftfcb has offended.

6934: Tall Tales.


Towering tidbits in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Chicago landmark Sears Tower has officially changed its name to Willis Tower. Somebody call Gary Coleman to holler, “Whatchu talkin’ ‘bout, Willis Tower?”

• General Motors’ bankruptcy filing includes allowing the automaker to dump sponsorship deals, including its 70-year presence on Times Square. Funny, don’t ever recall seeing GM ads on Times Square. Guess that demonstrates another of GM’s bad marketing moves.

• The NYPD graduated its most diverse rookie class ever, with 58 percent of the recruits being members of minority groups. These guys make New York advertising agencies look criminal.

• Lawmakers in Washington, D.C., are opposing the proposed building of a new Walmart on land where noteworthy Civil War battles took place. Guess they don’t want to outshine the historic skirmishes with contemporary wars over sales items in the underwear department.

6933: O&M Makes KKK Look OK.


Before deciding the post title is too harsh, scan through the Ad Age story below and read the MultiCultClassics perspective immediately following…

Ogilvy Hosts Event to Honor NAACP’s Centennial

Sharpton in High Spirits in Agency’s Rooftop Garden

By Ken Wheaton

Ogilvy & Mather opened up the rooftop garden on its new Manhattan office for a reception in honor of the NAACP’s 100th anniversary. It was the inaugural event at a striking space on Manhattan’s far West Side (one which has a great view of World Wide Plaza, the company’s previous home).

It’s no secret that the agency world isn’t exactly a paragon of diversity and inclusiveness. Or, as Ogilvy North American Chairman John Seifert put it during opening remarks at the reception, the industry is “not exactly leading the way.” Indeed, the NAACP is part of Cyrus Mehri’s Madison Avenue Project. Seifert rattled off a number of Ogilvy initiatives to remedy the situation, including the formation of a diversity advisory board, which includes Kevin Liles, president of Warner Music; Rachel Nordlinger, who works with the Rev. Al Sharpton; and Jay Hersonson, of CUNY. But, he admitted, the agency is “not blind to the fact that there is so much more to do to recognize our ambitions.”

Then again, Al Sharpton seemed a big fan of the agency. Taking the stage after a performance by Kathy Sledge (formerly of Sister Sledge), Sharpton was in good spirits, waving off any credit for progress in the arena. “All I did was intervene and change the weather,” he joked, referring to predictions of rain that had threatened the outdoor event. “When you plan your next event, you know who to call.”

While Sharpton has had plenty of sharp words for the industry, he praised Ogilvy’s efforts and held the company up as a model of sorts—even calling Seifert “Brother John.” Keep in mind that Sharpton helped to file a class action suit on behalf of minority agencies a few years ago. That suit was announced at the first meeting of his National Action Network, which included a panel called the Madison Avenue Initiative (not to be confused with the current Madison Ave. Project).

Sharpton pointed out that Ogilvy has supported both NAN and the Madison Avenue Initiative.

He went on to warn against tribalism between different minority groups in their quest for better representation. He also made the case that supporting diversity efforts is good for business.

“What looks like charity really accrues back to your [business] interest.”

After Sharpton’s praise of the agency, one guest noted that it pays to cut checks for the reverend’s favorite causes.

But the only check cut last night was for the NAACP. Seifert, on behalf of Ogilvy, handed the New York chapter of the organization a check for $10,000. He also announced a high school summer internship program with the NAACP of New York.

Not sure where to start with this one.

Um, how many O&M staffers even know what NAACP means? (Hint: The N does not stand for Negro.)

Wonder if the O&M party planners realize Madison Avenue will soon celebrate its centennial—100 years of promoting cultural exclusivity.

O&M also announced the formation of a diversity advisory board, chock-full of colored celebrities. Hey, Omnicom already tried that maneuver. Why the hell are the big agencies ripping off each other’s failed concepts?

Next, O&M coughed up $10,000 for the NAACP, while the Center for Advertising Excellence at Howard University’s John H. Johnson School of Communications—the effort specifically designed to address the industry’s diversity problems—scrambles to find funding. Nice.

“Brother John” admitted the agency is “not blind to the fact that there is so much more to do to recognize our ambitions.” Amazing that he didn’t say they were colorblind.

Yet Seifert’s statement really drives home the neo-racism on Madison Avenue. It’s outrageous that executives feel comfortable continually spewing proclamations like:

“It’s pathetic. There’s a lot more we can do.”

“We’ve done a pretty poor job on diversity as an industry and we’ve got to do better.”

“We suck at [diversity].”

At least the KKK is clear and honest about its positions. On Madison Avenue, it’s OK—and seemingly admirable—to recognize a great need for change, then do absolutely nothing substantial about it. Except introduce segregated award shows or internship programs for inner-city kids.

It was reported that folks at the new O&M headquarters installed white noise machines to deal with the emptiness of the space. At the garden rooftop soiree, the White noise was in full force.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

6932: Color Photography Problems.


Here’s an Associated Press story, along with an image from MultiCultClassics’ Tagging Diversity Ads series.

Kodak agrees to settle lawsuit claiming discrimination against black employees

By Associated Press

ROCHESTER, N.Y. (AP) — Eastman Kodak Co. has agreed to pay $21.4 million to settle legal action brought by black workers who claim the photography products maker discriminated against them.

The deal was given preliminary approval by a federal judge last month. It would have the Rochester company pay amounts ranging from $1,000 to $75,000 to more than 3,000 past and current workers.

Kodak is admitting no wrongdoing and says it agreed to the settlement to avoid further litigation.

The proposed settlement would end both a 2004 lawsuit brought by a group called Employees Committed for Justice and a similar suit filed by other black workers in 2007.

A final approval hearing is scheduled for Sept. 15 in federal court in Rochester.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

6931: Swear It’s True.


Cursing the news in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• A new study shows using curse words can help relieve or lessen physical pain. “Swearing has been around for centuries and is an almost universal human linguistic phenomenon,” said one of the study authors. “It taps into emotional brain centers and appears to arise in the right brain, whereas most language production occurs in the left cerebral hemisphere of the brain.” Plus, it helps relieve the pain of a shitty job.

• Worker discrimination claims against New York City have increased tenfold over the past eight years, costing taxpayers millions of dollars. 67 claims were filed in 2008, up from 56 in 2007 and only six in 2002. Holy fucking shit! Ah, that feels better.

6930: Minority Broadcaster Bailout?


From The New York Daily News…


Minority broadcasters to Treasury Secretary Geithner: We need a bailout, too

By David Hinckley, Daily News Staff Writer

A dozen of the country’s largest minority broadcasters warn they’ll be “extinct” if they don’t get some federal bailout dollars — or at least a helping hand with bank loans.

In a letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, dated Sunday, the broadcasters say a credit crunch from “plummeting ad revenue” and other factors has led to an “unprecedented crisis.”

The letter does not address the sticky topic of whether government should provide financial assistance to media, but does warn that a loss of these stations could “roll back decades of work by the federal government to encourage more minority voices.”

The letter asks for either the direct aid provided to the auto and financial services industry, or government pressure on banks to free up money for loans.

Signers of the letter include Pierre Sutton, chairman of Inner City Broadcasting Co., which owns radio stations WBLS and WLIB. Inner City was founded by former Manhattan Borough President Percy Sutton, Pierre’s father.

It also was signed by Sydney Small, owner of WWRL, and by Raul Alarcon, president of Spanish Broadcasting Systems. His company owns New York’s two largest Spanish radio stations, WSKQ and WPAT-FM.

WSKQ, which a few years ago was the city’s No. 1 station, says revenues have plummeted 40% or more in the last year. WBLS says its revenues are down by more than half, compared with an industrywide average of 20% to 30%.

Treasury Department spokeswoman Meg Reilly did not return calls asking when and if the request would be considered.

6929: Built By Mad Men.



The new Wieden + Kennedy campaign for Levi’s ignited blogosphere chattering, particularly for the execution above that was tagged with historical and political commentary. MultiCultClassics is a little late to the party, but wanted to submit the entry below, inspired by the words of W+K co-founder Dan Wieden.

Click on the image to enlarge.

Monday, July 13, 2009

6928: Bruno—The Gay Review.


From The Chicago Tribune…

No offense, ‘Bruno’ is funny

By Rex W. Huppke

National gay rights groups have said Sacha Baron Cohen’s new movie, “Bruno,” is offensive to gays and reinforces over-the-top stereotypes held by certain straight people.

I know five gay guys who would disagree.

Rather than watch from the sidelines, on opening night I immersed myself in the “Bruno” controversy by rounding up a diverse group of gay men to join me at the movie.

As the credits rolled and the laughter subsided, Rick Garcia, public policy director of the gay rights group Equality Illinois, noted that national groups protesting “Bruno” may need to get a sense of humor. If anyone should be concerned about the movie, he said, it’s straight people. “Is there some kind of heterosexual defamation league?” said Garcia, 48. “Because they’re the ones that looked bad, not the queer people. I think we looked great.”

Using the same guerrilla satire tactics he employed in the blockbuster film “Borat,” Baron Cohen puts his gay Austrian character, Bruno, into a series of wildly awkward situations intended to expose homophobia. It’s effective, but the point of concern for many—and for me—was whether the film was overly offensive in the process.

Along with Garcia, there was Danny Kopelson, 51, communications director for the Center on Halsted, a community center for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people. Arnie Cuarenta, 42, joined in. He’s general manager of the Chicago Gay Men’s Chorus.

I also invited Tim Sniffen, 37, a member of The Second City comedy troupe, and Andy Shaw, 24, a graphic designer.

With the popcorn-fueled focus group together and the movie about to start, I briefly wondered if this was a bad idea.

I’m a straight man who, on a mature day, has the sense of humor of a teenager. The odds of me laughing at something inappropriate were high, and it seemed that an ill-timed guffaw could easily brand me an insensitive goon. That didn’t happen. I laughed in almost perfect sync with my five guests, howling at the “Gayby” shirt Bruno placed on his adopted child and at the preposterous gay sex scene that launched the movie.

“I actually really liked it,” Kopelson said afterward. “I was prepared not to, but I think the controversy was much to do about nothing.”

It was across-the-board agreement—no one was offended by Baron Cohen’s faux gay antics. And part of the reason for that was confidence that few Americans would ever believe “Bruno” truly represents any element of gay life.

“The gay stuff he does in the movie is so extreme, nobody is going to think that’s what gay people really do,” said Sniffen, the comedian. “If people go to this movie looking for evidence of a certain gay lifestyle, then this might pretty well cement it. But if that’s what they’re looking for, they’re lost causes.”

As frivolous as debate over a comedy might seem, “Bruno” does surface at an interesting time for the GLBT community. A string of states have recently legalized same-sex marriages, while debate continues to rage in California over Proposition 8, which banned such marriages.

Many activists believe the country may be nearing a tipping point in favor of gay marriage. Yet opponents remain entrenched, the Obama administration has been reluctant to address the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy and acceptance of gays remains tenuous in swaths of the country.

Still, throughout the weekend, straight and gay Americans made “Bruno” the No. 1 movie, doling out millions to watch a straight man act farcically gay. “I think people understand gay people so much better now,” Shaw said. “They can see this and realize how ‘out there’ it is.”

“All the gay stuff isn’t as big a deal,” Cuarenta added. “I think it was more troubling to see the reactions going on around him, and if that’s what people see as offensive, that means we’re making progress.”

Though it’s hard to mine great social significance from a movie that mocks Ron Paul, swingers and G-strings with equal aplomb, my panel concurred that the world is somehow a better place with “Bruno” in it.

6927: “…Being Black Is Where My Heart Is.”


From The Chicago Tribune…

Appreciating differences gave Kraft Foods executive perspective

Mary Beth West, chief marketing officer, wants to get the best out of everybody

By Ann Therese Palmer, Special to the Tribune

In high school, Mary Beth West said she spent “lots of time figuring out who I was. It involved picking a race that would define me.”

Adopted by an upstate New York white couple, West describes herself as “three-quarters black and one-quarter Polish, light-skinned, with white brothers and white sisters.”

Joining her high school’s Black Student Association, of which she eventually was elected president, “helped me find my way,” she said.

“I discovered being black is where my heart is.”

West, 46, now chief marketing officer at Northfield-based Kraft Foods, said she discovered throughout her career that “being different is an incredible asset.”

“It’s made me the type of leader who tries to make people feel comfortable, understand their story, where they’re coming from, what they’re dealing with and how to get the best out of them,” she said.

“It makes me sensitive to people who look and act different. It gives me a perspective on diversity and the power diversity can bring to the workplace, to innovation and, ultimately, to grow businesses. The more different perspectives in the room, the better endpoint you’ll get to—richer, deeper, more compelling.”

-- -- --

Q. Managing an effective team involves more than racial diversity. It involves working with people of varying abilities. Where did you acquire that skill?

A. There were five kids in our family. Four of us were adopted. My sister has a borderline IQ. One of my brothers spent five years in 20 foster homes. We had different capability levels.

My mom taught me how to get the best out of everyone. She made each of us feel as special and accomplished as the rest. That idea, that people can be as successful as they can at their capacity level, wasn’t prevalent back then. That was a real leadership gift from my mom.

Q. What’s the most effective way you provide leadership at work?

A. A long time ago somebody told me, “Don’t give people the answer.” As a leader, the challenge is to guide and provide inspiration and insight. Let your team discover their own answers. For one thing, you could be wrong. Also, that’s the only way they’ll learn for themselves.

Q. What are you doing more of than when you started?

A. As a brand manager, my job was making recommendations based on a lot of data analysis.

Today, my days are spent influencing, inspiring and enabling my team to get Kraft Foods marketing worldwide to optimum levels. It involves much more emphasis on strategic thinking.

Q. How do you manage yourself?

A. Every five years, I deliberately take time to ask myself, “Are you doing the right thing? Do you love what you’re doing?” Doing what I do is a deliberate decision.

I used to work out every day for an hour. Now I’m lucky if I squeeze in two hours weekly. I’ve got three children, ranging from 16 months to 6 years. Something’s got to give.

My husband, Hiry, a small-business consultant, is my reality check.

When I got this job, I said to him, “Can you believe I’m the chief marketing officer of a $42 billion company?”

He replied, “Just remember, when you come home, you’re a summer intern.”

When I walk in the front door, I’m a wife and mom, responsible for getting dinner. That’s who I am. I love it.

6926: An Inconvenient Truth.


Despite being concerned with cleanliness and connected to Al Gore—the man wrongly accused of saying he invented the Internet—this organization pollutes the Web with garbage.

6925: Don’t Blame P&G For Shittier Mad Ave.


The story below appeared at Advertising Age. Scan it quickly and read the MultiCultClassics perspective immediately following…

P&G’s Production Move Makes Industry a Worse Place

Marketers Won’t Gain Efficiencies by Strangling Creativity

By Teressa Iezzi

So P&G is now going to choose with which production companies its agencies can work in the U.S. From a select group of production shops chosen by its roster of agencies, P&G will demand detailed financial information and discounted long-term production costs. The marketing giant is looking to reduce the number of production vendors it uses to 30 (from over 100) and set production rates for the next two years, at least. Production companies that agree to P&G’s terms will be given “preferred vendor” status but not guaranteed any work.

Sounds great. What happens now?

1. Production companies get squeezed, again. We can all agree that creativity can flourish under pressure, be it the temporal, financial or peer variety, and that a lot of great ideas have been executed for next to nothing. But production companies are consistently asked to do what is realistically big-budget-level work for not much beyond the reel/career boost the resultant campaign bestows on the director involved. Given that P&G so rarely backs reel-boosting work, participating production companies can’t count on banking even prestige.

2. Creativity suffers. The still-moist notion that it’s possible to do interesting things for huge, unglamorous marketers is put out of its misery. The best creatives do whatever they can to not work on P&G. Here’s the part where I sound naĆÆve, thinking that every marketer wants to actually do what you would call “creative work.” Of course not all of them (perhaps not many of them) do. But this is a company that’s eagerly claimed the mantle of creative marketer, one that accepted marketer-of-the-year honors at Cannes, billed as the industry’s premier celebration of brand creativity. But creativity isn’t just about communications, it’s about process too. P&G might not be the best advertiser, but it has demonstrated innovation in certain areas (product design). Rethinking its production processes would have been a great opportunity to apply some creativity—as the Association of Independent Commercial Producers has suggested, perhaps tying production costs to guaranteed shoot days or payment terms. But the proposal doesn’t seem to encompass anything creative or anything that encourages creativity.

3. P&G creates the appearance of creating significant efficiencies.

4. P&G gains no such efficiencies. See No. 1. Production companies already do a lot of work for less than fair market value. As one agency producer puts it, “It doesn’t matter what the budget is; there’s always a way to find a way to do something. I don’t think these rates are going to be that great, or beyond what we could get on a given day. It won’t give them the results they want—and it’ll set up this tension in the industry about people wanting P&G rates.”

5. The best talent gets yet another reason to leave the industry. And the talent that might have, once upon a time, considered entering advertising gets another reason to look elsewhere for a creative career. In the wake of this country’s financial crisis, many are looking to a new, small-business-driven innovation boom. With Wall Street a little off its game, other fields stand to benefit from an influx of new brains. Precedents like this encourage those brains to bypass advertising and marketing, where, not only do you not own the great ideas you create, but where you’re now under orders as to with whom and on what basis you can collaborate. Buh-bye, innovators and creative geniuses.

6. Another of the final drops of joy left in the industry evaporates. We’re all painfully aware of the choices that most businesses have been forced to make in the last year. But here’s to P&G for making the industry just that little bit shittier just because it can.

Teressa Iezzi is the editor of Creativity magazine and Creativity-Online.com

Um, can’t help but think Teressa Iezzi typed this bullshit after having lunch with a whining BDA creative director—probably at a fancy New York restaurant.

There are lots of questions here. The first one being why the hell the editor believes she is qualified to pontificate on matters at all.

That aside, Iezzi should rest assured that P&G is not launching Armageddon on Madison Avenue. Indeed, the actions are likely a response to the advertising industry’s bloated and corrupt practices.

This is hardly a new initiative. Over the years, P&G has routinely introduced mandates designed to generate efficiencies. So has nearly every big advertiser.

Perhaps these measures would not be necessary if advertising agency dinosaurs didn’t consistently insist on hiring A-level directors for lame talking-head commercials—while staying at 5-star hotels and maxing per diems like corporate CEOs on crack.

Why the outrage, Ms. Iezzi? Let’s be honest. Advertising agencies are just as guilty when it comes to being in bed with “preferred vendors,” accepting favored rates, gifts and kickbacks in exchange for repeat assignments.

Additionally, P&G is not very revolutionary. That is, the “preferred vendors” list will almost certainly be comprised of production houses that have already successfully serviced the mega-client. In other words, the advertising agencies’ pet production pals will not be eliminated from the festivities. However, they may unable to continue spoiling agency peeps with gourmet dinners, theater tickets and other pampering excursions.

Not surprisingly, completely ignored in Iezzi’s rant are any references to minority advertising agencies—maybe because the esteemed editor of Creativity magazine and Creativity-Online.com has never visited non-White shops…?

Otherwise, Iezzi might know that P&G and nearly every other major advertiser has issued orders like these to minority shops for generations.

Minority shops are expected (i.e., forced) to use minority production houses and vendors, mostly in order to satisfy the advertisers’ minority supplier goals versus choosing the best person for the job. Or the minorities are required to tag onto White agencies’ productions, where they inevitably assume a literal minority status.

Minority shops are expected to execute their concepts for significantly less money than White agencies, which translates to reduced resources and results. If White agencies were asked to perform under similar conditions, the majority of them would go out of business.

Minority shops are expected to serve as “consultants” to White agencies, reviewing White agencies’ concepts for projects that should rightly belong to minority shops. P&G is a prime culprit for this nonsense.

Minority shops are expected to deliver in ways that make White agencies’ potentially joyless existence feel like paradise.

The difference is, minority shops don’t have the luxury of recruiting reporters to air their childish grievances.

The Ad Age editor ends by declaring, “But here’s to P&G for making the industry just that little bit shittier just because it can.”

Ms. Iezzi, take a closer look at the Mad Men you’re sleeping with. Their hands are covered with the feces contributing to the industry’s shittiness.

Sunday, July 12, 2009

6924: New Low Standards In Journalism.


This actual craigslist ad seeks writers to provide art criticism for Newcity, a Chicago free weekly newspaper. The extraordinarily lengthy classified warrants the following artistic critique:

You guys are cheap bastards. Kinda sleazy too.

Newcity proclaims, “From the beginning, we’ve been a publication with a special appreciation for, and relationship with, writers and artists.” Yet you’re offering up to $25 for a review—and you bury the admission that payment can be expected within a year of publication.

Hope you find a few starving art critics.


Write art criticism for Newcity
Reply to: gigs-39dyq-1266543004@craigslist.org
Date: 2009-07-12, 5:30PM CDT

Chicago's Newcity magazine is looking for contributors to its art section. We publish weekly exhibition reviews on shows at museums, galleries, and alternative spaces, and profiles on local artists, curators, dealers, and art world luminaries. Contributors will be invited to submit pitches for all Chicago area scenes and all artistic media, and an assignment list will also be distributed. Knowledge of Chicago's artistic climate is helpful, and a willingness to attend art shows outside of your comfort zone is required.

Expect to write 1 pithy and concise review weekly (250-300 words, $10), and 1 profile (350-400 words, $25) every 1-2 months. Other opportunities to write feature-length articles and blurbs in special issues could become available.

Newcity's art section covers more ground than any other publication in Chicago. Your reviews and articles will be published online (http://art.newcity.com/) and in print.

To apply, send a writing sample and resume.

More information about Newcity:

From the beginning, we’ve been a publication with a special appreciation for, and relationship with, writers and artists. The list of Newcity contributors and alumni who’ve influenced and shaped American culture, with words, with images or both, is lengthy and one we’re proud of and constantly seeking to extend. Twenty-plus years in, we’ve evolved into an enterprise equally at home online and in print, but our core values remain unchanged: We believe that what we create, through the combined words and images of our individual contributors, is not only a chronicler and critic of the arts, but has the potential to be a work of art in itself, and to that end we constantly strive. We’re the last of our kind in Chicago still locally owned, and we take that unique role as a responsibility to be the absolutely very best that our city has to offer.

We want scoops, but we don’t want them written in the style of a daily newspaper or a lifestyle web site that breathlessly regurgitates PR copy. We want voice, criticism and perspective, but we don’t want opinion. While we prefer articles about things no one else has addressed, we also look for stories about things everyone else has covered, as long as we get it in a singular style or from an unconventional perspective. When others use a microscope, we prefer a telescope; and vice versa.

Assignments: New contributors to Newcity rarely work “on assignment,” meaning that we are neither committed to publish nor pay a kill fee even if we respond with interest to your query or manuscript.

Editing philosophy: We consider Newcity a writer’s publication. Please do not hesitate to raise questions or concerns with any member of our editorial staff.

Payment: The “new economy” has not been nice to us, or to our ability to pay creators. Contributors to our web sites are currently doing so on a volunteer basis in nearly all cases. This is not our preferred state of affairs, and as the economics of our world improves, we will look for ways to change. We still pay for stories we run in print, albeit modestly and at a time lag that is equally absurd, about a year after publication currently.

6923: Legally Insured Blond.


So easy a dumb blond can do it.

6922: The NAACP Centennial.


From The New York Daily News…

President Obama, new NAACP president Benjamin Jealous star at centennial

A hearty Big Apple welcome to visiting delegates of the nation’s best-known civil rights organization, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, which today kicks off an annual convention marking the group's 100th anniversary.

The celebration is a homecoming for a group that first convened in Manhattan, as well as a relaunch under the leadership of new President Benjamin Todd Jealous, a 35-year-old Rhodes scholar who fairly crackled with energy and ideas in a meeting with the Daily News Editorial Board.

It was from a headquarters here that the NAACP waged audacious legal and political battles that hastened the demise of formal racial segregation. During the darkest days of struggle, the group would hang a grim flag outside its Fifth Ave. offices after every lynch-mob murder.

Hardly could the activists of yore have imagined that their successors would be addressed by a black President, as will happen when Barack Obama appears at the conclusion of the festivities.

Today, the NAACP’s appeals to the nation’s conscience about the state of black America are more nuanced because the starkest injustices have given way to subtler issues of race and complex issues of poverty.

As the country’s social fabric has improved, bringing greater opportunity and better lives to many, the NAACP has struggled to define its mission. It also has suffered scandals and management shakeups.

Now, Jealous is shaping an agenda that, he hopes, will address the persistent ills that afflict too many blacks — in the process, serving also to lift the fortunes of others in poverty.

He plans to marry traditional protests and lawsuits with modern political tactics, using online social networks and a new cell-phone based rapid-response system to accomplish what his predecessors did via door-to-door canvassing. More importantly, he recognizes that many social problems have less to do with race than with economic inequality.

We wish him success in reestablishing the NAACP as a powerful voice for fairness and an advocate for those most in need of help in a nation that can always use more of both.

Saturday, July 11, 2009

6921: Bill Clinton, Frat Boy.


From FOX News…

Black Fraternity Inducts Bill Clinton as Honorary Member

National fraternity Phi Beta Sigma welcomed Bill Clinton as an honorary member Friday, making him the first and only U.S. president to be inducted into a historically black fraternity.

From AP

NEW ORLEANS -- A historically black fraternity has voted to induct former President Bill Clinton as an honorary member.

Phi Beta Sigma President Paul Griffin Jr. said Friday that Clinton is the first U.S. president to be inducted into a historically black fraternity.

The fraternity voted Tuesday for Clinton's induction at its 95th Anniversary Conclave in New Orleans, La.

Stevie Wonder, Al Roker, the Rev. Al Sharpton and jazz musician Ramsey Lewis are also honorary members of Phi Beta Sigma.

The fraternity was founded in 1914 at Howard University in Washington, D.C. It has more than 150,000 alumni and college members in about 500 chapters throughout the U.S., Caribbean, Africa and Asia.

6920: Offending The Masses.


Insensitivity training in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) declared Sacha Baron Cohen’s new Bruno movie perpetuates negative stereotypes and “decreases the public’s comfort with gay people.” Universal Pictures insists the flick is a satire that “uses provocative comedy to powerfully shed light on the absurdity of many kinds of intolerance and ignorance, including homophobia.” Omnicom sees absolutely nothing wrong with the movie.

• Burger King made news a few times in the past days. An ad that ran in Spain featuring a Hindu goddess sitting upon a burger managed to offend Hindus. Then Burger King officials sought to persuade U.S. franchisees to adopt a value menu item by promising to tone down the advertising. Recent research showed the fast feeder’s cutting-edge campaigns haven’t translated to increased sales, but that doesn’t seem to dissuade them from pushing the envelope. Expect to see a Bruno Burger soon.

• House Speaker Nancy Pelosi nixed a proposal for Congress to vote on honoring the late Michael Jackson. “What I have said to my colleagues over the years … is that there is opportunity on the floor of the House to express their sympathy or their praise any time that they wish,” said Pelosi. “A resolution, I think, would open up to contrary views that are not necessary at this time.” The response is not surprising, as the government also never considered offering Jacko much-needed bailout money.

6919: GEICO Gecko’s No Gringo.


Wonder if the Gecko raps when targeting Black consumers.

Friday, July 10, 2009

6918: Digging Through History.


From The Chicago Sun-Times…

Exclusive: Emmett Till’s casket left to waste at Burr Oak

Cemetery debacle grows worse with discovery of coffin of civil rights icon

By Mary Mitchell, Sun-Times Columnist

Broken. Rusted. Battered. The image of a glass-covered casket with the body of Emmett Till was shown around the world in the 1950s. But on Thursday, as hundreds of African Americans searched frantically for the graves of love ones, the battered casket of Till was rusting in the back of a shack at Burr Oak Cemetery in Alsip.

The casket was surrounded by garbage and discarded headstones strewn about like litter.

“When we opened it up trying to find what we have, a family of possums ran out,” said Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart.

Cemetery workers had been cooperative and informed law enforcement officials that it was indeed Till’s original casket.

“It sure looks like all of the photos I have ever seen,” Dart said. “This is absolutely horrible.”

In June 2005, Till’s body was exhumed during an investigation of his death. As is customary, he was not reburied in the same casket.

The original casket was supposed to be part of a planned memorial for Till at Burr Oak Cemetery, but the donations for that memorial were allegedly pocketed by a woman who has been charged in this ghoulish scheme.

Till, 14, was kidnapped and murdered after he whistled at a white woman in 1955 in Mississippi. The lynching of the Chicago youth helped spark the civil rights movement. A picture of his severely mutilated face was shown around the world.

His original casket is symbolic of the condition of the battered condition of the cemetery.

Officers raided the cemetery at 4400 W. 127th St. in Alsip on Wednesday morning.

Four people, including Carolyn Towns—the woman who was supposed to set up the Till memorial—were charged with one count of dismemberment of a human body.

The other charged employees were Keith Nicks, 45; Terrence Nicks, 39, and Maurice Dailey, 59.

Throughout the day, Cook County sheriff’s deputies ferried anxious family members to grave sites in buses ordinarily used to take inmates to Cook County Jail.

The landscape in some sections of the cemetery was dotted with orange utility flags that some people mistakenly thought indicated desecrated graves.

But beyond the grassy areas at Burr Oak, hidden by a wall of high weeds and buried under mounds of dirt, is the nightmare that all of these African Americans were praying they were spared.

The Cook County sheriff’s office now estimates that about 300 bodies were dumped in the rear of Burr Oak, in an area that is about the size of three football fields.

Knowing what was out there was a heavy burden etched in the faces of the people who were waiting for answers.

Carolyn Singleton of Chicago sat in a folding chair outside of the cemetery’s office building, where people were lined up seeking information about plot locations.

She had arrived at Burr Oak at 11 a.m. It was about 3 p.m., and she was still clutching No. 379.

Singleton told me she was looking for the grave sites of seven family members: her grandmother, two aunts, two uncles, a cousin, and her fiance’s mother.

“This is like having a funeral all over again,” she said. “My fiance’s family is calling from out of town trying to get information. All this is giving me a headache.”

I have to give Dart credit for the way he has handled this unprecedented catastrophe.
Although the cemetery’s owners said they would attend a news conference at the cemetery, they failed to show. With most of the employees under arrest, the Cook County Sheriff ‘s Department is essentially running the cemetery.

Sheriff’s deputies drove worried families back and forth to sections of the cemetery to look for plots.

Armed detectives took information from distraught people who either could not find their loved one’s grave site or discovered something was amiss.

Other employees with the Cook County sheriff’s office passed out cold bottled water and even emptied garbage containers.

Although the process for locating plots was indeed slow, people were unbelievably patient, and sheriff’s deputies were sensitive.

The Rev. Steve Jones, a chaplain for the sheriff’s office and president of the Baptist Pastors Conference, was one of the people driving distressed survivors to grave sites.

Jones was thankful that Dart advised the clergy about the disaster before going public. He believes that decision helped bring an element of dignity to a situation that could have been chaotic.

“It wouldn’t have been fair to exclude funeral homes or fair to pastors, not to be prepared for a catastrophe of this magnitude,” Jones said.

“The fact is every black person in Chicago has a tie to this cemetery. When they took us to the crime scene, I walked over bones,” he said.

“This whole thing makes the bereavement experience fresh. To even think your loved one’s remains might not be in place… it really breaks my heart.”

6917: Ebony And Ivory Funerals.


From The Chicago Tribune…

The black funeral of Michael Jackson

Though he may have transcended or “escaped” blackness in life, Michael Jackson was rendered fully black in death. And that says much more about us than about him.

By Melissa Harris-Lacewell

Funerals tell us more about the living than the dead. It’s why anthropologists often begin with rituals of death as an entry point for understanding societies and cultures.

I remember watching the funeral of Princess Diana. It was a perfectly British event: the poignant, silent march of her children, the bells tolling at Westminster Abbey, the red coat pallbearers. But I remember being taken aback as the car carrying Princess Diana’s casket drove through the streets of London. I was surprised because at that moment the mourners began to applaud.

They’d stood for hours lining the streets and as the casket passed they needed to grieve collectively and publicly. Stiff-upper-lip British culture does not have a mechanism for such public grieving. There is no piercing death wail, no garment rending, no ceremonial dance. So, instead, the British applauded. That applause revealed the missing place in English life for public mourning.

The death and remembrance of Michael Jackson has been an interesting window into American culture, its relentless cable news cycle, and the overwhelming but false sense of intimacy our celebrity culture engenders. But for me it was the peek into African-American culture that was most intriguing.

Within a week of Jackson’s death I watched the avatars on my Twitter feed turn from Iran-solidarity green to iconic photographs of Michael Jackson. But the photos were exclusively of “black” Michael Jackson: some from his childhood, some from the “Off The Wall” era, and many from the “Thriller” era. Few of my African-American tweeps were visually remembering the Michael Jackson of the past decade with diminished features and whitened skin.

Memorializing Jackson included selective collective memory that allowed African-Americans to see him as belonging especially, if not exclusively, to black folks.

Some African-Americans were incensed by the misogynist, racially stereotypical BET Awards that gave the first public tribute to Jackson. Many have been critical of BET as a cable network for more than a decade, and the tribute to Jackson renewed those criticisms. The contrast of Michael Jackson with Soulja Boy felt particularly stark, regressive and embarrassing.

Memorializing Michael Jackson renewed critical conversation about the direction of black music.

Jackson’s passing inspired memorials that reflected local cultures. My favorite was the “second line” in New Orleans, those who follow the brass band just to enjoy the music. But it was the massive funeral in Los Angeles on Tuesday that was most revealing. Jackson was an international music icon and his memorial was covered on mainstream media. But it was black tradition most fully on display Tuesday.

African-American death rituals have long been celebratory as well as mournful. As a marginal people whose collective identity is rooted in struggle, death is celebrated as a release from pain, inequality and torment. As a deeply religious people, death is celebrated as an opportunity for reunion with God. As a people who were often denied dignity in life, the dignity of a proper “home-going” is a critically important sign of respect. Along with these celebratory aspects of funerals, death rituals among African-Americans are marked by loud, deep displays of emotion and public grieving that mark the sense of loss experienced by the whole community.

All of these aspects of black life were on display Tuesday. And it tells us more about us than about Michael Jackson. Jackson’s radical surgical choices largely eliminated his black phenotype. Jackson’s romantic choices did not include black women. His wealth and eccentricities set him apart from most black people. In the final years of his life, his music was much more popular in European and Asian countries than among black American listeners. But in death, black folks embraced Jackson.

Memorializing Jackson reminds me that death still is a segregated business in America. Funeral homes still anchor black neighborhoods and are a central path of black entrepreneurship. Though he may have transcended or “escaped” blackness in life, Jackson was rendered fully black in death. And that says much more about us than about him.

Melissa Harris-Lacewell, an associate professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University, is completing her latest book, “Sister Citizen: A Text for Colored Girls Who’ve Considered Politics When Being Strong Isn’t Enough.”

Thursday, July 09, 2009

6916: Picture Imperfect.


Developing news in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Ritz Camera warned of possible liquidation, saying it does not have enough cash to survive the summer. You mean those commercials with honcho David Ritz and Carmen Electra didn’t ignite sales?

• The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that over 26 percent of Americans are obese. Somewhere, Ronald McDonald is proclaiming, “Mission Accomplished.”

• J.C. Penney same-store sales for June fell 8.2 percent. Target same-store sales for June fell 6.2 percent. Free sales-inducing ideas: Stock more plus-sized garments and execute promotional tie-ins with Mickey D’s.

• Turns out former D.C. Mayor Marion Barry was busted for stalking his girlfriend, shortly after the two had a spat. Hey, if Barry joined Twitter, would women be upset to learn he was following them?

6915: Hasta La Vista, Univisión…?


From The Miami Herald…

Univisión struggles to overcome recession

By Meg James
Los Angeles Times Service

LOS ANGELES—When Spanish-language broadcasting giant Univisión Communications was sold for $13.7 billion three years ago, the highly leveraged deal was, in the words of one veteran banker, “priced for perfection.”

Given the $10 billion in debt the buyers were assuming, the slightest hiccup in the company’s financial performance would have a cascading negative effect.

The buyers, a consortium of investors including entertainment mogul Haim Saban, were counting on several factors to justify the steep purchase price: the nation’s exploding Hispanic population and the popularity of Spanish-language programming, coupled with the promise of robust advertising growth. They expected to hold the assets for a few years, then sell at a tidy profit.

But it’s not a perfect world.

In the two years since the buyout, the U.S. economy has collapsed, dragging down advertising to media companies. Adding to the economic distress, Univisión has been mired in a costly legal battle with its primary programming partner.

The big payday for Univisión’s owners, which include well-heeled private equity companies, seems far less certain. Instead of riding a high wave to easy profits, Univisión executives have been working furiously to dig the company out of its hole.

WROTE DOWN ASSETS
During the past year, the broadcaster has written down assets by $5.3 billion, and some industry insiders now believe the nation’s largest Spanish-language media company is worth closer to $9 billion—slightly less than what it owes.

In recent months, Univisión has been putting out fires on multiple fronts to shore up its finances and to protect its programming pipeline.

In January, it settled a nagging lawsuit brought by its longtime programming partner, Grupo Televisa of Mexico, which had threatened to strip Univisión of its most popular and profitable shows. The resolution guaranteed Univisión the right to broadcast Televisa’s hugely popular soap operas, including Cuidado con el Angel (Be Careful With the Angel), through 2017.

Two weeks ago, Univisión bought breathing room by refinancing $500 million in debt, pushing back the due date by three years to 2014. The extension means that Univisión no longer has to worry about burning through its cash within the next two years.

CABLE FEES
And during the past few months, Univisión achieved one of its highest priorities—getting cable and satellite TV operators to pay the company to carry its programming. The agreements with Time Warner Cable, DirecTV, AT&T and others should bring Univisión $175 million in 2009, and as much as $350 million annually by 2014.

The cable-subscriber fees help Univisión diversify its revenue and, for now, make up for the decline in ad revenue.

Univisión’s chief financial officer, Andrew Hobson, said the company’s actions during the past six months had put it on a stronger footing and should allow it to weather other economic storms.

“Our balance sheet is now bulletproof for even the most draconian scenarios,” Hobson said. “We don’t feel that we have covenant risks or liquidity risks for at least another five years.”

Still, credit-rating agencies worry that Univisión could default on loans that total $9.7 billion.

“This clears the runway a little bit for them, but we still have concerns about their liquidity and their ability to make their debt-amortization payments,” said Standard & Poor’s credit analyst Michael Altberg, who acknowledged that Univisión had bolstered its position.

“Before their credit amendment, they didn’t have that much of a cushion.”

Barclays Capital debt analyst Andrew Finkelstein said Univisión executives did “exactly what they needed to do for now.”

INCREASING REVENUES
But Univisión’s challenge in the next few years, he said, will be to increase revenue—a difficult task during an economic recession.

Univisión’s predicament is not unusual for a company sold in a leveraged buyout at the top of the market.

In 2006, Univisión’s then-controlling shareholder, billionaire A. Jerrold Perenchio, orchestrated a bidding war for the company.

The Spanish-language broadcaster had been showing dramatic growth, along with the Hispanic population. Univisión’s upside seemed unlimited.

6914: Room For Change.


From The New York Times. Hey, maybe Madison Avenue executives should be forced to room—or at least share cubicles—with minorities.

Interracial Roommates Can Reduce Prejudice

By Tamar Lewin

As a freshman at Ohio State University, and the only black student on his floor, Sam Boakye was determined to get good grades — in part to make sure his white roommate had no basis for negative racial views.

“If you’re surrounded by whites, you have something to prove,” said Mr. Boakye, now a rising senior who was born in Ghana. “You’re pushed to do better, to challenge the stereotype that black people are not that smart.”

Several recent studies, at Ohio State and elsewhere, have found that having a roommate of a different race can reduce prejudice, diversify friendships and even boost black students’ academic performance. But, the research found, such relationships are more stressful and more likely to break up than same-race pairings.

As universities have grown more diverse, and interracial roommate assignments are more common, social scientists have looked to them as natural field experiments that can provide insights on race relations.

“From a scientific standpoint, when these roommates are paired, you have a natural experiment going on, in an area that’s very difficult to test empirically,” said Thomas E. Trail, a graduate student in psychology at Princeton University who has studied interracial roommates. “You couldn’t very well set up an experiment assigning people to spend several months living with someone of a different race.”

Russell H. Fazio, an Ohio State psychology professor who has studied interracial roommates there and at Indiana University, discovered an intriguing academic effect. In a study analyzing data on thousands of Ohio State freshmen who lived in dorms, he found that black freshmen who came to college with high standardized test scores earned better grades if they had a white roommate — even if the roommate’s test scores were low. The roommate’s race had no effect on the grades of white students or low-scoring black students. Perhaps, the study speculated, having a white roommate helps academically prepared black students adjust to a predominantly white university.

That same study found that randomly assigned interracial roommates at Ohio State broke up before the end of the quarter about twice as often as same-race roommates.

Because interracial roommate relationships are often problematic, Dr. Fazio said, many students would like to move out, but university housing policies may make it hard to leave.

“At Indiana University, where housing was not so tight, more interracial roommates split up,” he said. “Here at Ohio State, where there was a housing crunch, they were told to work it out. The most interesting thing we found was that if the relationship managed to continue for just 10 weeks, we could see an improvement in racial attitudes.”

Read the full story here.

6913: Game Over.


This ad is a fusion of lousy copywriting and bad art direction.

Wednesday, July 08, 2009

6912: Slice Of Life.


Safe to say the Creative Minds comprising this survey were not exclusively advertising people. Otherwise, the yes slice would be considerably thinner.

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

6911: ¡Ay Carcrashamba!


This ad is about as subtle as a head-on collision.

6910: Mookie Today.


The New York Daily News commemorates the 20th anniversary of Spike Lee’s Do The Right Thing with a series of photos showing the stars then and now.

6909: The Minority Money Game.


From USA TODAY…

For many minorities, saving isn’t so easy

By Sandra Block and Laura Petrecca, USA TODAY

Many Americans fear they’ll outlive their savings, but African Americans and Hispanics face an even greater risk of spending the end of their lives in poverty.

Members of those two groups are less likely than white and Asian workers to participate in their employers’ 401(k) plans, and when they do contribute, they save less, according to a study scheduled for release today by Ariel Education Initiative and Hewitt Associates.

African Americans and Hispanics also are much more likely to take money out of their 401(k) plans for emergencies, which could further stunt long-term savings growth. And they are less likely to invest in stocks in favor of low-risk investments and real estate, increasing the risk that their savings won’t keep pace with inflation, retirement specialists say.

The survey, which analyzed data from nearly 3 million employees at the end of 2007, found significant differences in retirement savings even among higher-income employees. White workers who made $120,000 or more had an average balance of $223,408 in their 401(k) plans, vs. $154,902 for African Americans in the same salary range.

Monica Flamand, 33, a fraud analyst in Chicago who is Hispanic, has a 401(k) plan through her job but has saved only about $6,000 in five years. Her husband doesn’t have a 401(k) plan, she says. She worries that Social Security won’t be there for her when she retires.

“We don’t save,” she says. “We should. We could, if we really wanted to, save at least 3% of our paycheck, which is probably what we should talk about doing.”

Last year’s bear market wiped out 27% of the typical worker’s 401(k) plan, according to Fidelity Investments, forcing millions of Americans to save more, delay retirement or both. Many Americans have increased their savings rate in recent months, even as many employers have reduced or eliminated matches to 401(k) plans. But the Ariel/Hewitt study indicates that African Americans and Hispanics will have to save at a significantly faster pace than others to have a chance at a comfortable retirement.

Read the full story here.

6908: Comfort Inn’s Uncomfortable Gestures.


What’s with all the staged hand gestures?

Monday, July 06, 2009

6907: Legally And Morally Bankrupt.


Hating Mondays with a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• General Motors was granted permission by a federal bankruptcy judge to sell the bulk of its assets to a new entity. Somebody better ask for a CARFAX® report.

• Rep. Peter King of New York declared the late Michael Jackson was a “pervert” and wondered why Americans are “glorifying” a “low-life” while ignoring real heroes like firefighters, cops and teachers. Ex-New York Governor Eliot Spitzer will probably step in to tell King to tone it down already.

• Colin Powell criticized his fellow Republicans for their attacks on Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor. Powell believes Sotomayor should not be condemned for ruling against White firefighters in a reverse discrimination case. He added, “What we can’t continue to have is to have somebody like a Judge Sotomayor … called a racist.” Rush Limbaugh will likely respond by calling Powell a racist.

6906: MBA In Bullshit.


Build your brand online —with a Master’s Degree in Internet Marketing. The hype states, “The Internet Marketing Master’s Degree provides an in-depth exploration of Internet-specific marketing methodologies, Internet law, and interactive advertising design principles, as well as teaching the best ways to utilize social media networks and search engine optimization. Through it all, you’ll gain the necessary tools to create a viable marketing and strategic plan for selling products, developing and cultivating a brand, and for protecting a company’s reputation within the Internet community.”

Um, why is a college offering a Master’s Degree promising expertise in areas that the entire industry has not yet figured out?

6905: Multibingual.


Has anyone actually used Bing™ for anything?

The brand’s commercials are completely unintelligible. One would be hard-pressed to explain what the fuck Bing™ even is after viewing the spots. Ironically, the best way to find answers about Bing™ requires a Google™ search.

The recent PR surrounding Bing™ seems to confirm the problem. It’s as if the stories are forced on the media to generate fake hype. And tying to Twitter smacks of desperation.

Bing™ needs to do a search—for a new advertising agency. Of course, if Bing™ executives tried Bing™ to conduct the quest, they’d probably wind up with a bad decision like, say, Draftfcb.

Then Draftfcb would employ its cutting-edge—albeit culturally clueless—consumer insight expertise to appeal to diverse audiences. And the end result might include copy and imagery such as this:






Sunday, July 05, 2009

6904: Bad Role-Playing & Bad Role Models.


Antisocial media and behavior in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• CNET News reported that social media entities like Facebook, MySpace and Twitter are raking in serious loot with Mafia-inspired games. Seems folks just can’t get enough mobster role-playing, carrying out crimes including stealing and killing rivals. It’s amazing that Draftfcb has not emerged as a major player in the action.

• Former Washington Mayor Marion Barry was arrested and charged with stalking a woman. If only this guy would confine his criminal activities to online role-playing.

Saturday, July 04, 2009

6903: Closing Notes On The Fourth Of July.


Perhaps society has grown so accustomed to things like Twitter and TMZ—with the instant delivery of news and short bursts of mindless content—that we fail to appreciate and savor the true historic moments.

On July 4, 2009, Serena and Venus Williams staged another groundbreaking event by dueling at Centre Court, with the younger sister picking up her third Wimbledon title.

And as Harry Webber pointed out, advertisers and media failed to recognize “the importance of celebrating the first Fourth of July since the birth of our nation—the very first—when we could tell our children, ‘Yes. You can grow up to be President.’ And know it to be true, deep down in your heart.”

6902: How Harlem Celebrates Independence Day.


From The New York Times…

Harlem Journal
The Good Old Red, White and Barbecue

By Christine Haughney

Limited space has long forced New Yorkers to celebrate Fourth of July rituals differently. As the rest of the country has backyard barbecues and pool parties, city dwellers cook lunches in tiny kitchens and carry them up to rooftops, or, if they can get a spot, they spread blankets in the parks.

In Harlem, Dorothy Davis celebrates with a front-stoop cookout.

Ms. Davis, 54, a full-time baby sitter with an encyclopedic knowledge of the comings and goings of her West 119th Street block, starts shopping weeks ahead for a communal feast. In a decade of yearly cookouts on the sidewalk in front of her building, Ms. Davis — known to neighbors as Dot or Auntie — has come to feed at least 50 relatives and neighbors.

“I don’t mind sharing my blessings,” she said, sitting in her living room near a tall stack of take-home containers. “I’m a people person.”

Part of the reason her cookout is so popular is her reputation for generous portions. Anthony Burrell, an Alvin Ailey dancer whose 3-year-old daughter, Sifare, is under Ms. Davis’s care, described the dinners she cooks for him on Friday nights.

“You could feed the whole block off one plate,” he said, recalling fried white fish, rice, collard greens and macaroni and cheese.

For her family, Ms. Davis’s efforts have made the Fourth of July into one of the biggest holidays her family celebrates, but the observance has taken on added significance since her Aunt Lillian, who loved the holiday, died two years ago.

This year, about 30 relatives drove in from Texas, Virginia, Rhode Island and South Carolina. Weeks in advance, Ms. Davis invited her building superintendent, a neighboring landlord and retired police officers from the local precinct.

“The neighbors come; she doesn’t have to invite them,” said one of her aunts, Lena Perryman, who stops by the cookout each year, even though she dislikes crowds. “She doesn’t turn anybody away.”

Ms. Davis, who says she has been cooking since she was 10, usually prepares collard greens, green beans, barbecue chicken, potato and macaroni salads. (She did not have time to bake this year, but she hinted that there might be a Costco cake for an uncle whose birthday is coming up.)

In an effort to cut costs, she is serving lemonade instead of cans of soda — though at some point, Ms. Davis may retreat to her apartment for her favorite Cognac.

The way Ms. Davis sees it, food is not just a source of sustenance. When guests are well fed, she said, there is “no fussing.”

“Usually at a cookout, there’s somebody who wants to fight,” she said. “We never had no arguments.”

In the weeks leading up to the cookout, Ms. Davis tries to squeeze in shopping around baby-sitting for eight children. Last weekend, she headed to two Western Beef stores in the Bronx to buy $400 of ribs, chicken and hamburgers, which she stored in a deep freezer in a bedroom. By Monday, she had already decided to set up the grill in a vacant lot next to her building. She was still sorting out what kind of pork to use in the collard greens.

On Thursday, she headed back to Western Beef to pick up hamburgers. As she shucked corn and soaked chicken, her sister Deborah picked up plates, and her daughter, Dequasha, headed to a party shop to make a deposit for 30 balloons.

By Friday, her entire family had started to pitch in with last-minute shopping and preparations. A goddaughter, Denise, was expected to arrive from Providence, R.I., to make the fruit salad. Aunts, brothers, daughters and nieces helped with peeling potatoes, spicing chicken and preparing ribs.

Her friend Tina is bringing a macaroni salad. One aunt who does not like to cook will bring a tossed salad. Setup is to begin as early as 6:30 on Saturday.

By late afternoon, her brother Marshall will start to grill. She will seat her relatives and neighbors on a half-dozen tables set up on the sidewalk. As the aroma of grilled chicken and ribs wafts down 119th Street, neighbors will start to appear.

In the end, she makes sure that no leftovers come home with her. One year she cooked so much, she had to hand out trays of food to relatives, neighbors — even strangers — to get rid of it all. While she estimates the cookout will cost $600, she does not keep track. Her concern is that people leave well fed.

“I spend, and I cry the next day when I’m broke,” she jokes. “It’s always better to have enough than not enough.”

6901: How Slaves “Celebrated” Independence Day.


From The Chicago Sun-Times…

Slaves denied even the chance to celebrate Fourth of July

By Anne Pastore

In America today, both black and white citizens gather to celebrate the Fourth of July, but that has not always been the case. Blacks in the antebellum North were sometimes pressured to stay away from celebrations, while in the South no one thought to include them. In his book Celebrating the Fourth: Independence Day and the Rites of Nationalism in the Early Republic, Len Travers reports that in the overwhelmingly black South “no one was about to allow crowds of blacks to march anywhere.”

In the plantation country surrounding Charleston, S.C., in 1800, for example, the African-American population was 84 percent. As a minority, the whites never allowed slaves to celebrate the Fourth of July, Travers says, and they themselves “celebrated, as it were, while glancing over their shoulders. White Charlestonians could never quite dispel their fears of what their enslaved servants might do while their masters celebrated liberty.”

They had reason to be wary. Charleston suffered a devastating bout of fires, often at the homes of slaveholders, not a few of which occurred while the owners were out observing the Fourth. As fears spread, laws were passed forbidding gatherings of more than seven blacks. The use of fireworks, cigars and anything capable of starting a fire was outlawed.

Edward Hooker, a white visitor to South Carolina, found the Fourth of July experience unsettling: “The tables were served by negro slaves under the superintendence of the managers. What an incongruity! An Independence dinner for freedmen and slaves to wait on them. I couldn’t keep the thought out my mind, the whole time I was there feasting.” This “incongruity,” however, was not apparent to the party-goers, or to most white southerners.

As Travers writes, “Independence Day was for Americans only, and as far as white Charlestonians were concerned, blacks simply did not qualify.”

In northern cities, blacks were allowed to gather on the Fourth, Travers says, but when a hostile group of black youths took to the streets of Philadelphia on that day in 1804, whites retaliated the next year by forcing them out of the town square.

In his book Forging Freedom: The Formation of Philadelphia’s Black Community, 1720-1840, Gary B. Nash says that in the years following this incident the exclusion of blacks from Independence Day celebrations became customary. “Black citizens could enter the public space in front of Independence Hall only at their peril.”

As a result of their exclusion from Independence Day celebrations, African Americans in the North began to create their own holidays. In The Roots of African-American Identity: Memory and History in Antebellum Free Communities, Elizabeth Rauh Bethel says one of the first opportunities for a celebration came on Jan. 1, 1808, when the United States formally abolished the slave trade. This was also the day in 1804 when Toussaint L’Ouverture declared Haitian Independence, a date that would be commemorated by American blacks well into the 1820s.

On March 5, 1858—one year to the day after the Dred Scott decision—Boston’s African-American community began the Commemorative Festival, which marked the anniversary of the death of Crispus Attucks in the Boston Massacre as well as the Supreme Court ruling.

In the years before the Civil War, African Americans’ attitudes toward Independence Day were perhaps best expressed by Frederick Douglass in his 1852 speech named after its most famous line, “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?”

Douglass asked the crowd why they had invited him, a black man, to speak on this occasion celebrating freedom in a country where his people were not free.

“Your high independence only reveals the immeasurable distance between us,” he said. “This Fourth of July is yours, not mine. You may rejoice, I must mourn.”

Anne Pastore is a writer for History News Network.

6900: Nielsen Rerun.


Nielsen is getting lots of play out of a single lame layout. Insert minorities here.

Friday, July 03, 2009

6899: Freemasonry At Last!


From The New York Times…

Black Member Tests Message of Masons in Georgia Lodges

By Shaila Dewan and Robbie Brown

ATLANTA — The members of the Gate City Lodge No. 2 would like it known that Freemasonry, a centuries-old fraternal organization founded on the principles of the Enlightenment, is not racist.

But some of their fellow Masons here in Georgia are spoiling the message.

In June, the Worshipful Master, or leader, of the Gate City Lodge was served with complaints from two other lodges, whose Worshipful Masters were upset that Gate City had admitted a “nonwhite man” to its ranks.

Although the rules of Freemasonry do not say that members must be white, and there are numerous Hispanics, Asians and other ethnicities represented in lodges across the state, the Grand Master of Georgia decreed that the complaints would be heard in a Masonic trial that could have resulted in expulsion of a lodge or members of it. In response, Gate City (the name is an old nickname for Atlanta) filed a lawsuit in state court seeking an injunction to prevent its charter from being revoked.

The “nonwhite man” whose presence had caused such a fuss is Victor Marshall, a shy, 26-year-old African-American Army reservist who has been eagerly studying the secret catechisms of the Masons for almost a year. Mr. Marshall, who has the Army rank of specialist, said he was attracted to the Masons because of the group’s spirit of volunteerism.

“I’ve been interested in the Freemasons for a very long time,” he said in an interview. “It took me a while to find my place and get up the courage to try and join.”

Mr. Marshall investigated historically black Masonic lodges, which are part of an entirely separate organization known as Prince Hall Masonry, but said he felt most at home at the Gate City Lodge, a predominantly white Masonic group where officers attend in tuxedos and regular members wear suits and ties. Recent Gate City programs have included talks by Hindu priests, a Mozart recital (the composer was a Mason) and a visit from an Auschwitz survivor.

After petitioning to join, Mr. Marshall moved up through the ranks, becoming a Master Mason, giving him the right to visit other lodges.

Mr. Marshall was actually the second black member of Gate City, said David Llewellyn, a member and lawyer who is representing the lodge. But he was the first to attract notice, when he and Masons from across the state attended the 275th anniversary of a lodge in Savannah.

“There were ill-informed brethren who were surprised that there was an African-American brother,” Mr. Llewellyn said, “and some of them were very upset.”

Read the full story here.

6898: Horny On The Fourth Of July.


Celebrate Independence Day with a new dependent, sugar daddies.

6897: Classic Bullshit From Coke…?


An anonymous comment left at the post on Coca-Cola Assistant VP of African-American Marketing Yolanda White inspired this follow-up perspective. The comment included declaring, “Ms. White is Black and even she is culturally clueless.”

It’s not fair to presume Ms. White is culturally clueless, and it’s quite probable that she isn’t. MultiCultClassics’ original remarks were never intended to question Ms. White’s cultural credentials.

At the same time, Ms. White did make a lot of bizarre statements. She said, “Three years ago, we began to see new evidence of growing population, growing buying and growing power in income. We also saw significant [interest] in emerging categories, which made this consumer segment that much more viable for us as a company. So we really began to rebuild our strategic focus and realign our organizational capabilities to go after this consumer more holistically.”

For how many fucking decades must research be presented to prove the Black consumer market has money and is a viable audience? Surely Ms. White isn’t implying the segment mysteriously vanished for a few years, suddenly becoming poor and unworthy of Coke’s interest.

Additionally, every “insight” Ms. White presented on Black consumers was originally delivered to Coke by advertising agencies like Burrell and FUSE—as long ago as the 1970s.

The revelation that “a plethora of other agencies” handles Black-targeted assignments is particularly disturbing.

First, it continues the corporate crimes of allowing White agencies to win minority billings while non-White agencies are never permitted to even pitch for mass market spoils.

Second, it contributes to the perpetuation of exclusivity and discrimination in the industry. The White agencies admit they are doing a lousy job of embracing diversity. As previously mentioned, the head of Coke’s lead agency—Dan Wieden of Wieden + Kennedy—proclaimed things are “fucked up.” The Coca-Cola Company officially brags about its commitment to supplier diversity. Yet it awards work to agencies that appear adverse to diversity, while its minority shops must beg for scraps. This deliberate bullshit is driving minority shops out of business, further compounding the global problem.

MultiCultClassics hopes Ms. White’s answers were rooted in supporting and promoting the Black consumer market—as well as representing her bosses. Again, it’s not fair to call the woman culturally clueless. But if Ms. White really believes her own words, one has to wonder if she’s just plain clueless.

Thursday, July 02, 2009

6896: Rising Rates And Weights.


Examining the figures in a MultiCultClassics Monologue…

• Bosses cut 467,000 jobs in June, raising the unemployment rate to 9.5 percent. Does that figure include all the celebrities that have dropped dead in recent weeks?

• Mickey D’s is stimulating the economy with it new Angus Burger, debuting nationwide today. “Customers are looking for great tasting burgers at a value that only McDonald’s can offer,” said a McDonald’s spokeswoman. “These premium burgers are a tremendous value compared to similar fast-casual and midscale offers.” Fast-casual? Are there fast-formal restaurants out there?

• Obesity rates are rising like unemployment, with 23 states reporting citizens are heavier now versus last year. Two-thirds of U.S. adults are obese or overweight. And probably thrilled to hear about Mickey D’s new Angus Burger.

6895: Fayette Pinkney (1948-2009).


From The New York Times…

Fayette Pinkney, Soulful Singer With the Three Degrees, Dies at 61

By William Grimes

Fayette Pinkney, an original member of the Three Degrees who lent her strong, soulful voice to the 1970s hits “When Will I See You Again?” and “T.S.O.P. (The Sound of Philadelphia),” the theme song of the television show “Soul Train,” died Saturday in Lansdale, Pa. She was 61.

The death was confirmed by Abington Health Lansdale Hospital. The cause was acute respiratory failure, The Philadelphia Inquirer reported.

The Three Degrees formed in the early 1960s when Ms. Pinkney, who was still going to Overbrook High School in Philadelphia, joined with Shirley Porter and Linda Turner under the management of Richard Barrett, the record producer behind the Chantels and Little Anthony and the Imperials.

For more than a decade, Ms. Pinkney was the one constant in a group whose members came and went. She sang on the group’s first single, “Gee Baby (I’m Sorry),” on its 1970 hit “Maybe” and on the hits for Philadelphia International Records in the 1970s that helped the define the Philadelphia sound.

In a statement, Kenneth Gamble and Leon Huff, the label’s founders, called the Three Degrees “our Philly sound version of Motown’s Supremes, but bigger and stronger and melodic.”

The group’s first two singles for Philadelphia International, “Dirty Ol’ Man” and “I Didn’t Know,” were modest successes, but “T.S.O.P.,” a mostly instrumental piece featuring the studio band MFSB, reached No. 1 on both the R&B and pop charts in 1974. “When Will I See You Again?,” which sold more than two million records, reached No. 2 on the pop charts that year.

Their close-harmony singing made the Three Degrees a popular nightclub act. The group performed with Engelbert Humperdinck at the Riviera Hotel in Las Vegas; a performance at the Copacabana in Manhattan ended up in the 1975 film “The French Connection.”

After leaving the Three Degrees and recording a solo album, “One Degree,” in 1979, Ms. Pinkney studied psychology at Temple University and earned a master’s in human services at Lincoln University in Pennsylvania in 1985. She began working as an administrative assistant for the Medical College of Pennsylvania and rose to become an education coordinator there. She later counseled incoming patients at United Behavioral Health in Philadelphia.

She is survived by a brother, Nathaniel.

Ms. Pinkney continued to sing. “I travel with a unique group called the Intermezzo Choir Ministry,” she told the Web site thethreedegrees.com. “Yes, I do still love people and I love to make them smile.”

Wednesday, July 01, 2009

6894: White Talk.


The story below appeared at AdAge.com. Scan it quickly, then read the brief MultiCultClassics comments immediately following…

How Coke Is Targeting Black Consumers
Q&A With Yolanda White, Assistant VP of African-American Marketing

By Natalie Zmuda

Coca-Cola re-established a dedicated African-American marketing group in 2006. The beverage giant has spent the past few years testing programs and conducting market research. And in the first half of this year, those efforts have come to fruition, with four new campaigns for the Dasani and Coca-Cola brands.

“Three years ago, we began to see new evidence of growing population, growing buying and growing power in income,” said Yolanda White, assistant VP of African-American marketing. “We also saw significant [interest] in emerging categories, which made this consumer segment that much more viable for us as a company. So we really began to rebuild our strategic focus and realign our organizational capabilities to go after this consumer more holistically.”

Ms. White’s dedicated group of five people—three additional employees are shared with the Hispanic-marketing division—has a seemingly herculean task, working across the company’s numerous billion-dollar brands. But Ms. White says the arrangement has its advantages. The group has a deep understanding of the demographic and is able to measure the total impact of African-American marketing efforts. Here, Ms. White also talks more about that, the impact President Barack Obama is having and why general-market agencies are ceasing to exist.

Ad Age: The four campaigns you’ve done so far this year focus on moms and teens. Why?

Ms. White: Among African-American consumers, African-American moms are the gatekeeper to the household. We over-index in single-family households, and so reaching Mom is critical. Teens really are the future of America, and African-American teens, in particular, have proven to be trendsetters in the U.S. Their ability to shape culture is really critical.

Ad Age: What sorts of results are you seeing from those campaigns?
Ms. White: We’re really focused on building loyalty and building share. And our numbers are showing that we’re doing both. We are the beverage leader among African-American consumers. And if you look at how we’re performing vs. our competition, we are outperforming them on both volume and value. We’re seeing our equity numbers grow. One of the things that’s not as measurable but is really important is we’re also seeing really strong organic integration of our brands in relevant African-American spaces.

Ad Age: What trends do you see in the African-American market?
Ms. White: All consumers right now are experiencing some struggles and strife. We are seeing some of that accelerating with the African-American consumer, in terms of the way that they have to manage time and how they have to manage their family, given that they’re maintaining more jobs and balancing at home issues. …The Obama effect is another trend we’re seeing in the marketplace. That’s helping African-Americans feel more in tune with Americans and more a part of American society. Another general trend that we are seeing is the fact that multicultural consumers are sharing more of their culture with the total population.

Ad Age: What agencies do you work with?
Ms. White: We work with several agencies. There’s no dedicated agency, due to the complexity of managing multiple brands. We have African-American agencies, but we also have a plethora of other agencies that work on the business.

Ad Age: Do you think general-market shops can adequately speak to this demographic?
Ms. White: What is interesting is that, if you look at society today, there really is no general market. The market is really multicultural. It’s really important for all agencies to have a pulse on the total population as it exists and on what’s happening. If they don’t, it really prohibits the agency’s ability to be at the forefront of pop culture and to tap into relevant trends, which could have an impact on the long-term growth of a company.

Ad Age: Do you feel that African-American or multicultural shops bring something unique to the table?
Ms. White: Absolutely; we use them. All of our agencies bring something unique.

Ad Age: Are marketers taking the lead in encouraging agencies to diversify?
Ms. White: Diversity as a whole is important for the Coca-Cola Co. And as a company we’re in full support of where the advertising-industry efforts are moving, in order to increase their diversity.

Ms. White said: “We work with several agencies. There’s no dedicated agency, due to the complexity of managing multiple brands. We have African-American agencies, but we also have a plethora of other agencies that work on the business.” Um, Coke saw fit to re-establish “a dedicated African-American marketing group,” yet doesn’t see the need for a dedicated agency. Okey-doke. And does “a plethora of other agencies” working on Black-targeted assignments mean Coke is yet another major corporation handing minority projects to White shops?

Some ground-breaking insights from Ms. White:

“Teens really are the future of America, and African-American teens, in particular, have proven to be trendsetters in the U.S. Their ability to shape culture is really critical.” Um, this has been common knowledge since at least 1971.

“Another general trend that we are seeing is the fact that multicultural consumers are sharing more of their culture with the total population.” Um, ditto. And some folks insist the sharing has not been voluntary.

Ms. White said: “Diversity as a whole is important for the Coca-Cola Co. And as a company we’re in full support of where the advertising-industry efforts are moving, in order to increase their diversity.” Um, better check with the head of Coke’s leading White shop, Dan Wieden of Wieden + Kennedy. He said the industry’s diversity record is fucked up.

6893: Talent Seeker Wanted. No Talent Required.


This actual craigslist ad might explain the quality of creative work coming from Draftfcb. The place is seeking a Recruiting Manager to identify, court and sign up wunderkinds for The Agency of the Future. The prerequisites? A whopping 4-5 years as a “professional,” and at least two years in the HR department. Plus, recruiting experience is not mandatory. The ideal candidate “[d]evelops a pipeline of star talent for future needs.” Sounds more like a pipe dream.

Draftfcb Chicago — Recruiting Manager
Reply to: job-ccekn-1248956828@craigslist.org
Date: 2009-07-01, 1:41PM CDT

The Talent Hound. The Attentive Listener. The Problem-Solver.

The Draftfcb Recruiting Manager
Partnering with hiring managers and human resources generalists to define staffing needs, the Draftfcb Recruiting Manager creates effective strategies for hiring high-quality talent. Responsible for the entire recruiting cycle — from sourcing candidates to making offers — this person must have the persistence and patience to find the needle in the haystack.

The Personality
• Enjoys the challenge of managing competing demands in a high-pressure environment
• Knows the value of creativity, flexibility, and a sense of humor when problem-solving
• Possesses excellent project management. Strong communication skills a must.
• Has the ability to anticipate needs before they arise and acts accordingly
• Shows solid judgment when handling sensitive and confidential information
• Is capable of weathering long lines, flight delays and lost luggage from time to time

The Position
• Must have 4-5 years of professional experience
• Minimum 2 years in HR, preferably Recruiting
• Works with teams to identify both short- and long-term staffing needs
• Sources and interviews all candidates presented to hiring teams
• Contributes ideas toward the continued improvement of our recruiting process including creative and cost-effective sourcing strategies, interview procedures, candidate assessment tools, and branding materials
• Develops a pipeline of star talent for future needs
• Builds and maintains excellent relations with hiring teams and candidates

6892: Another One Bites The Dust.


Do you know me? I’m moonwalking with Jacko right now.”