
Advertising
Age reported on a 4-year survey whose 2023 results
showed 53% of consumers think corporations should not get involved in political
or cultural concerns, versus almost 30% saying corporations should take a stand
on issues. The figures indicated an increase of about 10 percent versus the
survey’s 2019 results.
Ad Age also noted the
following:
“Support
for corporate activism grew among younger consumers in the wake of the 2020
killing of George Floyd, and sentiments have stayed that way … Among
millennials and Gen Z, 41% say corporations should use their influence to
impact political and corporate issues, up from 27% in 2019. Support among Gen X
and baby boomers is also growing but remains well below 50%—just 17% of boomers
are supportive, with support among Gen X is at 23%.”
The
data poses questions that could apply to Adland. That is, how would consumers
react upon learning that most corporations are partnering with White
advertising agencies where diversity is a dream delegated, deferred, diverted, dodged, and denied? Might consumers demand
that corporations use their influence to impact change in the exclusive
industry?
It’s
clear that commitment to racial and ethnic diversity has dwindled in recent years
at White advertising agencies and corporations. Yet consumer dedication remains
steady.
MadMen character Don Draper once quipped, “If you don’t like
what is being said, then change the conversation.” Hey, if you don’t like the
lack of diversity in Adland, perhaps it’s time to invite consumers to join the
conversation.
Brand activism—over half of consumers not interested
in hearing companies’ political and social stances
Brands
might be better off supporting their employees rather than making public
statements, Morning Consult finds
By Erika Wheless
A
majority of Americans say brands should not take stands on social, corporate,
or cultural issues—but a desire for companies to speak out is rising,
especially among younger generations, according to a new report from Morning
Consult. And some issues are more polarizing than others: General statements
about diversity in the workforce have widespread support, but there is less support for
backing LGBTQ+ rights, especially among older Americans.
The
report is based on a survey of roughly 20,000 U.S. adults between
August 2019 and Sept. 2023. In 2023, the survey found that 53% of
respondents said corporations should not get involved in political or cultural
issues, while almost 30% said corporations should take a stand. In 2019, 61% of
respondents said corporations should not get involved while 19 percent said
they should take a stand, according to the survey. (The remaining respondents
said they don’t care or don’t know.)
Support
for corporate activism grew among younger consumers in the wake of the 2020
killing of George Floyd, and sentiments have stayed that way, according to
Joanna Piacenza, head of industry intelligence at Morning Consult. Among
millennials and Gen Z, 41% say corporations should use their influence to
impact political and corporate issues, up from 27% in 2019. Support among Gen X
and baby boomers is also growing but remains well below 50%—just 17% of boomers
are supportive, with support among Gen X is at 23%.
For
marketers speaking to a broad audience, this presents a damned if you do,
damned if you don’t scenario. But the report also outlines what issues
consumers care about the most: often what’s happening internally at a company.
It’s
what’s on the inside that counts
Across
generations, how a company treats its employees and customers is a paramount
issue. The report found that roughly 9 in 10 Americans said that it’s important
that companies they buy from take care of their employees, have products
readily available, and always do what’s best for customers, even in challenging
times.
The
data showed that internal company actions resonated with customers more than
external advocacy —71% of consumers said they viewed a company as more
favorable if they paid their employees well; 69% said they viewed a company as
more favorable if a company was known to be a place where employees liked to
work; 66% liked if the company paid men and women equally; 65% liked if it made
goods in America; and 60% cared if the company supported the U.S. military.
“There
is a ‘keeping your own house in order’ feel that consumers have toward brands,”
Piacenza said. “Brands should be doing more to show their benefits or highlight
why their employees are happy. Treating workers well is its own form of good
advertising because then you aren’t risking an angry employee going viral about
you online.”
The
actions with the least impact on a brand’s favorability included supporting the
Me Too movement, advocating for gay rights, supporting the Black Lives Matter
movement, advocating for transgender rights and advocating for stricter
abortion policies.
External
issues
If
brands are going to issue public statements, there are five issues that
consumers feel that brands are able to speak about: support for the police,
diversity in the workforce, climate change and the environment, women’s rights
and gender equality and voting rights. Race and racism in America was the
sixth-most popular topic, with 67% of U.S. adults saying that brands are able
to speak about it. But this was a topic that had the greatest difference
between the general population and Gen Z, with 73% of Gen Zers saying that
corporations should issue public statements around race, compared to 56% of the
general population.
Among
the issues consumers want to hear about the least from brands is access to
abortion and contraception, though that topic resonated with nearly 60% of
millennials who want brands to speak out, compared with just 45% of the general
population. Online censorship, LGBTQ+ rights, transgender rights and
efforts to ban books were also among the issues consumers want to hear about
the least from brands.
Bud
Light and Target are
among the brands that faced backlash this year among some consumers for LGBTQ+-related
marketing campaigns and products.
Issues
that U.S. consumers agree corporations should be taking a stance on include
threats against U.S. democracy, the protection of government institutions,
women’s rights, climate change and diversity and inclusion in the workplace,
according to the report.
Piacenza
notes that company statements around certain issues have to be specific,
including how they phrase their stance. “We have women’s rights high up as an
acceptable issue for brands to make public statements about, but abortion
access is lower,” she said. “So if you are a more female-focused brand or a
brand with a majority-female customer base, and you want to make a statement
about the Dobb’s decision, you should phrase it as a women’s rights issue, not
access to abortion.”
Why the
divide
Majorities
of Gen Z adults, millennials and Democrats said “a lot” or “some” corporate
brands are in touch with the average American, compared with less than half of
Gen Xers, boomers and Republicans who said the same. It’s another sign that
younger and more liberal Americans see corporations drifting toward their own
viewpoint, while older and more conservative Americans feel increasingly
isolated from brands.
“If you
believe that a brand aligns with your values and they take a stand, you’re more
open to hearing from them,” Piacenza said. “But on the other hand, if you feel
that you aren’t aligned, you don’t want to hear from them as much.”
A
misalignment in values led to Bud Light’s woes, which began last April when
conservatives complained about transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney posting about a custom can bearing her
image, eventually leading to a steep sales decline. Morning Consult’s report found that roughly one in five
Americans said they have boycotted a company over the past year for political
reasons. Younger, college-educated, high-earning consumers, baby boomers, and
Republican men are the most likely groups to boycott brands for political
reasons.
“This
really comes down to knowing your audience,” Piacenza said. “If you are unsure
about taking a stance, keep your head down and go about your business.”