Tuesday, September 13, 2016

13351: Emmy Award For Exclusivity.

Adweek reported The Ad Council and White advertising agency R/GA won an Emmy for the Love Has No Labels campaign. Ironically, the Emmys were recognized for the diversity of nominees this year. Are the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences and the International Academy of Television Arts & Sciences ignorant to the obscene hypocrisy involved with the promotion of love and inclusion coming from an exclusively White advertising industry where diversity is a dream deferred, diverted, delegated and denied? The Ad Council President and CEO Lisa Sherman gushed, “We are so grateful to everyone who has watched and shared the PSA, and taken our message of love and inclusion to heart.” Um, take a look in the mirror—as well as in the hallways of R/GA. Meanwhile, R/GA Vice Chairman and Global Chief Creative Officer Nick Law declared, “…[O]ur greatest hope is that this commercial contributes to a more thoughtful and accepting America.” Hey, why not start with a more thoughtful and accepting advertising industry?

The Ad Council and R/GA’s ‘Love Has No Labels’ Wins the Emmy for Best Commercial

First Emmy win for a PSA

By Tim Nudd

Count Emmy Award voters among the slew of people nationwide who’ve been charmed and captivated by The Ad Council’s famous, viral “Love Has No Labels” diversity and inclusion PSA campaign, created by R/GA.

As Adweek predicted when the nominees were announced, the spot, filmed on Valentine’s Day in 2015, won the Emmy Award for Outstanding Commercial at the Creative Arts Emmys on Saturday at the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles. It’s the first such win by a PSA in Emmy history.

The ad features an X-ray screen with human skeletons seen dancing, hugging and kissing. Eventually the humans themselves walk in front of the screen. Each reveal shows a loving couple who represent different religions, races, disabilities and so on, demonstrating that “love has no labels.”

The video beat four brand spots to take the coveted prize—Gatorade’s “Dear Peyton” by TBWA\Chiat\Day; Snickers’ “Marilyn” by BBDO; Honda’s “Paper” by RPA; and Google’s “Year In Search 2015” by 72andSunny.

“We are thrilled to be recognized by the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences with this award and want to thank our extraordinary brand and media partners who have helped make the campaign such a success,” said Lisa Sherman, president and CEO of the Ad Council. “We are so grateful to everyone who has watched and shared the PSA, and taken our message of love and inclusion to heart.”

“It’s satisfying when the work that you believe in so passionately is watched and shared by so many people,” added Nick Law, vice chairman and global chief creative officer of R/GA. “But our greatest hope is that this commercial contributes to a more thoughtful and accepting America.”

The campaign has been supported by brand partners including Bank of America, Coca-Cola, Google, PepsiCo, P&G, Unilever, State Farm, Wells Fargo and others, and by an advisory board of nonprofit partners, including The Perception Institute, the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League.

The spot has been viewed over 160 million times, making it the second most viewed social and community activism video of all time, according to the Ad Council.

Monday, September 12, 2016

13350: Toyota Drives Stereotypes.

A MultiCultClassics visitor pointed toward this Toyota commercial accelerating cultural cluelessness. In the spot, parents drop off their White kids for extracurricular practice sessions at upscale facilities including a horse riding academy, swimming pool and baseball field—however, the Black kid is dropped off at a gritty boxing gym by his “bro” versus Moms or Pops. Twitter comments have noted the stereotypes. Not sure which White advertising agency is responsible for this latest example of Total Toyota total bullshit. Hey, at least the Black kid wasn’t driven to the slave plantation.

13349: True Lies & Gender Equality.

Quick comment regarding diverted diversity dame Cindy Gallop, who responded to criticism from former Saatchi & Saatchi Chairman Kevin Roberts by insisting, “… [C]ontrary to his remarks directed at me, nobody anywhere is paying me anything to do the work I do in this area.” Okay, but The 3% Conference’s fall soiree—where Gallop will deliver speeches—is charging attendees up to $1399 per ticket. If Gallop isn’t collecting cash for her culturally clueless contributions, she’s an idiot. If she is getting paid, well, it demonstrates progress in showing that female advertising executives lie as well as their male peers.

Sunday, September 11, 2016

13348: Change Is Bad.

What would you change here? Um, the art direction and copywriting. Logo sucks too.

13347: Delayed WTF 34: IPG DNA BS.

MultiCultClassics is often occupied with real work. As a result, a handful of events occur without the expected blog commentary. This limited series—Delayed WTF—seeks to make belated amends for the absence of malice.

Business Insider published an interview with IPG CEO Michael Roth at Advertising Week Europe, which included the following excerpt:

BI: One of the other big over-arching advertising topics that has certainly had a few high-profile cases this year has been diversity in the industry.

IPG has been no exception with what happened at Campbell Ewald (IPG fired the agency’s CEO and a staffer who sent a racist email to colleagues inviting them to take part in a “Ghetto Day”) the ongoing JWT discrimination suit (in which the agency’s now former CEO is accused of making racist and sexist slurs — allegations he denies.) What are holding groups like yourselves doing to ensure there are less of these cases happening?

MR: When I first joined the industry I felt as though diversity and inclusion was not properly reflected in the industry, so 10 years ago we embarked on diversity and inclusion being a core part of the DNA at IPG.

It’s now to a point where our agency heads are held accountable for improvements on diversity and inclusion. When I mean accountable, I mean it affects their bonuses. And we have in fact enforced that to a point where, since we embarked on this program, we have had an improvement of over 50% of manager-level people representative of inclusion and diversity goals over the past 10 years. There is more work to come but I think we’ve made it our DNA.

The other part of it is that we have a zero-tolerance for it. As reflected in the Campbell Ewald [incident.] The second I heard about this, we took action. Not only with respect to the individual who wrote that email, which was offensive, but the individual who was responsible for him, and I took action on them. There was no hesitancy on my part, as opposed to some others.

And, frankly, I was very proud of the fact that I received both internally and externally a lot of comments appreciating how swiftly we acted in that case and our people were very much appreciative of it because they knew it was part of our core.

BI: What is it about the advertising industry that is different to other sectors when it comes to diversity issues?

MR: When I challenge individuals they say there are not enough candidates that are interested in the field, and so on.

Intuitively, that does not make sense. I don’t accept that as an answer when we go over this. We have to do a better job of reaching out and, in essence, selling the career path that we offer. It’s a great career path.

We are in the marketing and communication business. How can we not represent the consumer?

And, by the way, on the gender side, 80% of all purchasing decisions are made by females. So if we don’t have a fair representation just on the female side, we are missing the boat.

But as far as people of color … the same is true. Hispanic is one of the largest growing populations in the world. How can we not be representative of that in terms of the talent? And our clients are demanding this.

So Roth believes a decade of smokescreens has resulted in diversity and inclusion becoming a part of the IPG DNA? Okay, let’s review the progressive proof:

• Four words: Campbell Ewald Ghetto Days.

• IPG behemoth Draftfcb—now FCB—vowed to eliminate the term “diversity and inclusion” from the corporate lexicon by 2014. Now the words are a “core part the DNA at IPG.” Sorry, but IPG is rotten to the core.

• IPG faced a $50 million race-discrimination lawsuit.

• IPG faced an age discrimination lawsuit.

• IPG agencies consistently create culturally clueless crap.

• Deutsch, an IPG White advertising agency, dumped its Diversity Director, who claimed she was told the shop “was no longer going to invest in diversity.”

• IPG brags about dubious diversity awards and its fuzzy commitment and experience with progress.

• IPG publishes gobbledygook claiming to be recognized for leadership in diversity and inclusion—in an industry where everyone admits the dearth of diversity and inclusion is fucked up. It’s like boasting that you’re the smartest Stooge.

And the list goes on.

Saturday, September 10, 2016

13346: So Bad, You’ll Blush.

This blush campaign comes from glow in Berlin, who explained the concept as follows:

Germany took more than 1 Million refugees in 2015 — mostly from Muslim countries. Is it a threat to female equality and women’s liberation? blush is offering the “blush Course Integration.”

Um, need a culturally competent interpreter to decipher the thinking behind glow’s rationale. Are the Berliners seeking to help Muslim refugees assimilate to Eurocentric culture with sexist imagery? Gee, that’s mighty White of them. And speaking of mighty White, check out the glow team—they’re positively glowing with exclusivity.

13345: Alleged Bullshit From JWT & WPP.

Advertising Age reported on the court case involving allegedly former JWT Worldwide Chairman and CEO Gustavo Martinez and allegedly former JWT Communications Chief Erin Johnson—allegedly former because Martinez is currently handling WPP projects and Johnson is being asked by JWT to return to work. The 3% Conference and Cindy Gallop are allegedly thrilled, as it gives them fodder to appear relevant. Plus, the scenario allows Sir Martin Sorrell and Maurice Lévy—who are allegedly concerned about diverted diversity—to continue squabbling like, well, little girls. And everyone can keep celebrating the advertising industry’s alleged progress with eliminating exclusivity.

WPP, Erin Johnson Attorneys Meet in Court

By Lindsay Stein

The lawsuit filed by former JWT communications chief Erin Johnson against the agency and its former Chairman-CEO Gustavo Martinez is grinding on. In a court hearing today, Judge Paul Oetken approved a move by Ms. Johnson’s attorneys to add Title VII discrimination and retaliation claims to the suit, filed in New York in March over alleged racist and sexist comments by Mr. Martinez.

Ms. Johnson’s law team from Vladeck, Raskin & Clark filed a letter to Judge Oetken on Aug. 25, requesting a conference “to discuss defendants’ refusal to stipulate to plaintiff’s filing a Second Amended Complaint…” according to the document.

The defendants’ lawyers accused Ms. Johnson of trying “to avoid the scrutiny of the EEOC (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission)” with the Second Amended Complaint for Title VII, the document states. One of Ms. Johnson’s lawyers, Anne Vladeck, said on Friday that going through the EEOC could take years and the team wanted to go to court “as soon as possible” due to the alleged sex, rape and anti-semitic comments the plaintiff was facing.

During the procedural hearing at Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse in New York City, the defendants’ legal team said it’s “demonstratively untrue” that Ms. Johnson has still been harassed because she asked to go on leave 10 days before the lawsuit was filed. The lawyers added that Ms. Johnson remains on company payroll and JWT has requested for her to come back, but she has refused.

Ms. Johnson’s legal team told Ad Age that JWT has “totally not” asked for her to return to work. Ms. Johnson and Mr. Gustavo were not in the courtroom on Friday morning.

Upon allowing the Second Amended Complaint, Judge Oetken is giving the defense two weeks to write a 10-page response, followed by two weeks for the plaintiffs to pen a response. After that, the defense will have one additional week to make another response to the decision.

In the amended complaint, filed Aug. 30, the section under “Gender Discrimination: Title VII” states that “corporate defendants discriminated against plaintiff in terms and conditions on the basis of her gender, including inter alia, by creating a hostile work environment because of her gender, in violation of Title VII.”

It adds that the defendants “acted with malice and reckless indifference to plaintiff’s rights under Title VI,” and due to the alleged discrimination, the plaintiff “has suffered and will continue to suffer irreparable injury, emotional distress, and other compensable damages unless and until this Court grants relief.”

In June, Ms. Johnson’s lawyers opposed WPP and JWT’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The motion to dismiss, filed May 20, said: “It is clear that Plaintiff has twisted the facts and distorted the context to contrive gender-based hostile work environment and retaliation claims.”

Ms. Johnson’s legal team’s June filing stated in response: “Although defendants, and their counsel, are fully familiar with the law governing motions to dismiss, they urge the Court to make factual findings—such as jokes about rape, and comments about African-Americans being ‘strange characters’ with a penchant to steal and act inappropriately, are not ‘offensive’ as a matter of law.”

Friday, September 09, 2016

13344: Progress 1000 100% Bullshit.

Campaign reported the London Evening Standard’s Progress 1000 included BBH Co-Founder Sir John Hegarty, Havas Media Group UK & Ireland CEO Paul Frampton and MediaCom UK CEO Karen Blackett. In the cases of Hegarty and Frampton, progress clearly doesn’t refer to diversity.

Hegarty, Hornby and Blackett recognised in Evening Standard’s Progress 1,000

By Gurjit Degun

John Hegarty, co-founder of Bartle Bogle Hegarty, Johnny Hornby, founder of The & Partnership, and Karen Blackett, chairwoman at MediaCom UK, are some of the agency and media executives to make it into the London Evening Standard’s Progress 1,000.

The trio have been listed as “brand builders” alongside Nick Theakstone, UK chief executive at Group M, Amanda Morrissey, UK chief executive at Publicis Groupe Media, Tracy De Groose, UK chief executive at Dentsu Aegis Network, Paul Frampton, chief executive at Havas Media Group UK & Ireland, and Philippa Brown, chief executive at Omnicom Media Group UK.

Media owners Jeremy Darroch, group chief executive at Sky, David Abraham, chief executive at Channel 4, and Rebekah Brooks, chief executive at News UK, were also recognised in the newsmakers list.

They were alongside Lord Hall, director-general at the BBC, Evgeny Lebedev, proprietor of the London Evening Standard and The Independent, Viscount Rothermere, chairman at the Daily Mail and General Trust, and Kelly Merryman, vice president for content partnerships at YouTube.

Last year’s list included Camilla Harrisson, chief executive and partner at Anomaly London, Cilla Snowball, group chief executive and chairwoman at Abbott Mead Vickers BBDO, and James Murphy, chief executive at Adam & Eve/DDB.

13343: The Gap Brand.

This Loctite commercial says, “Gap problem? No problem.” Um, got a problem with this bullshit, including the “We Be Flexin’” copy.

13342: C’MON WHITE MAN! Episode 48.

(MultiCultClassics credits ESPN’s C’MON MAN! for sparking this semi-regular blog series.)

Campaign published the latest lame and lazy thinking from Havas Media Group UK & Ireland CEO Paul Frampton, who declared the need to put millennials in charge. Last February, Frampton implored everyone to embrace diverted diversity and put White women in charge. Count on seeing his next call to actions demanding that companies put White boomers, LGBT, White disabled veterans, White foreigners and Caucasian house pets in charge. And maybe eventually, Frampton will suggest putting racial and ethnic minorities in charge—for roles including reception, administrative assistance, security, janitorial maintenance, mailroom delivery and Chief Diversity Officer. It all begs the question: Who the hell put Frampton in charge?

C’MON WHITE MAN!

Put millennials in charge to challenge media’s legacy thinking

It is time for media leaders to better serve millennials....

By Paul Frampton

Vice Media’s Shane Smith, speaking in Edinburgh last month, accused the TV industry of “retreating instead of innovating”.

He proclaimed “change has never been so important”. Smith put Vice’s success down to pivoting its content strategy to better serve its millennial audience, moving from “hipster’s bible” to a more meaningful focus on “the environment, women’s and LGBT issues”. Critically, he was quoted as saying “the audience demanded it”.

Matt Rennie, managing director of Box TV, shares Smith’s view. “Young millennials are so quick, so up on everything, we have to sprint to catch up or we’ll lose them,” Rennie said.

This got me thinking. As another crop of younger millennials get ready to head off to university this month, what lessons are they teaching us about how to best serve them? And how well is our industry serving millennials as an audience?

How many brands have acknowledged this shift and subsequently reimagined their strategy for engaging this powerful 16 million-strong community?

The younger end of millennials (18-24s) are often “unfairly portrayed as a vacuous, selfie-obsessed generation of lazy Pokémon players” (Jack Parsons, 22-year-old CEO of Your Feed) when in fact, they over-index on appetite to drive social change.

They see technology as an enabler with 86% of millennials believing technology will create new jobs.

Millennials seek democratic organisations that prioritise purpose over profit and offer them the mobility and flexibility to grow. They are well known to favour experiences over ownership, hence the rise of digital platforms.

How many of today’s brands, media or otherwise, have adapted accordingly?

Digital and social media are their lifeblood and mobile the default access point for news and content. Linear TV viewing among 16- to 34-year-olds is steadily dropping whilst over-the-top providers are slowly growing.

Audio-visual (AV) content remains hugely important to millennials but is increasingly consumed via devices and on-demand.

Vice’s successful US Viceland TV launch demonstrates it is as much about commissioning the right content as well as thinking cross platform. Vice is satisfying the millennial appetite for programming by focusing on issues they care about, stealing audiences from the likes of Viacom, owner of MTV.

The stark decline in print is another casualty. Seventy-three per cent of 18-34s cite social media as their main source of news. Beyond news, the heyday of lifestyle brands like Loaded has been blown out of the water by digital brands like The Lad Bible, which boasts 35 million global social subscribers. It’s no coincidence that the founders are both under 25.

Young millennials expect content to be tailored and frictionless. Of course, longer form content still matters, but short, snackable mobile content is their daily diet.

The majority of TV broadcasters and publishers still commission for TV or paper first. Whether publishing or broadcast, mobile and video first is the model of the future.

Our industry is fortunate enough to be populated in the main by millennials, many with creative, entrepreneurial brains. I, for one, would like to see more of them challenging those running legacy media houses that are blinkered to this revolution.

The organisations that are unprepared “to sprint to catch up” risk being left on the blocks.

Paul Frampton is chief executive of Havas Media Group UK & Ireland

Thursday, September 08, 2016

13341: Airing Cultural Cluelessness.

Advertising Age and Adweek aired stories of cultural cluelessness from Air China and Airbnb. There must be something in the air.

Air China airdropped an in-flight magazine that offered the following travel advice:

“London is generally a safe place to travel, though precautions are needed when entering areas mainly populated by Indians, Pakistanis and black people.”

Adland has apparently taken the tip to heart, based on the lack of Blacks employed in the local White advertising agencies.

Airbnb admitted to bias ‘n bigotry, and will now require hosts seeking to rent space to agree with the following statement:

We believe that no matter who you are, where you are from, or where you travel, you should be able to belong in the Airbnb community. By joining this community, you commit to treat all fellow members of this community, regardless of race, religion, national origin, disability, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation or age, with respect, and without judgment or bias.

Don’t expect Madison Avenue members to sign a similar proclamation to belong in the advertising community.

Airing one’s discriminatory laundry is a common occurrence these days.

13340: Y&R LG BS.

This LG campaign from Y&R in Brazil is extraordinarily heinous, sexist and… Hey, wait a minute—isn’t Gustavo Martinez working on projects in South America?

Wednesday, September 07, 2016

13339: Delayed WTF 33: 3% At 0%?

MultiCultClassics is often occupied with real work. As a result, a handful of events occur without the expected blog commentary. This limited series—Delayed WTF—seeks to make belated amends for the absence of malice.

A MultiCultClassics visitor recently asked, “In New York, a city that’s over 27% Hispanic/Latin@, how did the 3% Conference manage to put together an NYC Conference that features 0% Latin@s?”

Hey, the speaker roster also has a low number of female creative directors, the allegedly underrepresented group that is supposed to be the organization’s primary focus. The 3% Conference has always advocated for diverted diversity—jumping on the White women bandwagon—versus showing any interest in true diversity. Plus, the girl gang will probably count the Manhattan Center waitstaff and custodial crew as evidence of cultural inclusion.

13338: GMC = General Motors Cluelessness.

Adweek reported General Motors launched a review for its GMC brand, currently being serviced by Leo Burnett and DigitasLBi. Based on GM’s record, it’s a safe bet there will be no diversity or diverted diversity requirements presented to the White advertising agencies competing for the business. In fact, IPG should offer an “Agency of the Future” featuring Campbell Ewald led by Gustavo Martinez, Alexei Orlov and Neil French.

General Motors Launches a Creative Agency Review for GMC Brand

Incumbents Leo Burnett and DigitasLBi will defend the business

By Patrick Coffee

America’s largest automaker has launched a creative agency review for one of its core brands as part of an extended effort to secure its position in both domestic and international markets.

In April, sources speculated that a blind RFP making its way around the agency world amounted to an outreach on behalf of General Motors Company, which was rumored to be launching reviews for its GMC and Buick brands.

Today, a company spokesperson confirmed that the GMC creative advertising business is indeed in review; however, these recent developments do not concern the Buick brand. Both accounts are currently with Publicis Groupe’s Leo Burnett and DigitasLBi, which have longstanding relationships with the larger General Motors Company.

“Expanding the relevance of GMC brand and positioning it for continued success are key priorities,” the spokesperson wrote. “To support this effort, GMC is inviting multiple agencies to participate in a RFP to develop advertising strategies for the brand.”

GM declined to provide more information on the agencies involved in the RFP, but noted that incumbents Leo Burnett and Digitas will be invited to defend the business. Multiple sources tell Adweek that the client notified the two agencies last week, just after McDonald’s announced that it would be ending its relationship with Publicis Groupe in order to consolidate its advertising business with Omnicom.

This news comes almost three months after Publicis announced that the Detroit offices of those two agencies would join forces to form “united partnership” Engage M-1, which takes its name from the Motor City’s central roadway. A Publicis spokesperson told Adweek at the time that the two offices would retain their separate offices and brands while combining forces to serve the client.

Leo Burnett has worked with General Motors in some form for more than 45 years, and GM was one of the Digitas agency’s flagship clients. The former agency won lead creative duties for Buick and GMC in 2007 without a review as the client moved its business away from McCann and Lowe.

This is not the only recent change to GM’s agency roster: In early 2015, the company sent its Chevy Silverado brand to Commonwealth//McCann, a unit formed in 2012 to handle the global Chevrolet advertising business. Earlier this summer, the larger GM organization also picked Kovert Creative and Weber Shandwick to handle public relations for Cadillac and Chevrolet, respectively, with The Detroit News reporting that an RFP for PR duties on Buick and GMC was expected “by the end of the year.” Dentsu Aegis’ Carat remains GM’s media agency of record after winning the $3 billion account in a 2012 review.

General Motors Company LLC, which formed as a product of the General Motors Corporation’s 2009 bankruptcy restructuring, remains one of America’s largest advertisers. According to Kantar Media, the company spent $269 million on measured media promoting its GMC brand in 2015; that total does not include spending for its other roster brands such as Buick, Cadillac and Chevrolet.

Spokespeople for Leo Burnett and DigitasLBi deferred to the client for comment on the news.

13337: Eye Don’t Get It.

Has Brazil ever produced a decent ad?

13336: C’MON WHITE MAN! Episode 47.

(MultiCultClassics credits ESPN’s C’MON MAN! for sparking this semi-regular blog series.)

The Advertising Age story about HP Chief Marketing and Communications Officer Antonio Lucio mandating diverted diversity for his White advertising agencies featured the following excerpt:

BBDO Worldwide President and CEO Andrew Robertson expressed his commitment to the idea saying, “the pursuit of gender equality is something Antonio and I have discussed a lot over the years, and not just because of business. I have two daughters and he has five. He knows about BBDO’s commitment to double the number of female senior creative leaders we have in one year and obviously supports it. His initiative to formalize an action plan on his business is something we welcome.”

Sorry, but Robertson is a culturally clueless liar and fucking moron.

First of all, Robertson is supposed to be focused on true diversity versus promoting White women, as his agency and Omnicom promised to address the chronic exclusivity 10 years ago. To date, BBDO’s greatest accomplishments in the area involve smokescreens like a Diversity Development Advisory Committee, a comic book and sending Chief Creative Officer David Lubars to Here Are All The Black People events. The actual results of these half-assed efforts are unknown, as Omnicom refuses to share its EEO-1 data. For Robertson to position himself and BBDO as genuinely concerned and committed to progress demonstrates dishonesty, hypocrisy and idiocy of the highest order.

C’MON WHITE MAN!

Tuesday, September 06, 2016

13335: Campaign Chronicles Covert Cluelessness.

Campaign published the obligatory report/editorial on clients like General Mills and HP pressuring White advertising agencies to embrace diversity and diverted diversity. Apparently, some of the White advertising agencies proudly proclaimed they’re already satisfying the diverted diversity requirements, as there is hardly a dearth of White women in the field. But when probed on the requests for more people of color, the response is chirping crickets. Fortunately for the diversity delinquents, HP is parsing progress into phases, with racial and ethnic minorities being asked to step to the back of the White women bandwagon. And the fact that General Mills allowed the chronically culturally clueless Deutsch to participate in its pitch indicates the foodmaker may relax the requirements. Of course, the self-absorbed cheerleaders in this sorry spectacle include Kat Gordon and PepsiCo Global Beverage Group President Brad Jakeman—who has yet to deliver any measurable mandates to his own White advertising agencies. Meanwhile, minority shops continue to lose crumbs as White shops displaying racism win new business.

At last, brands tell agencies to diversify, and advocates cheer

By Ilyse Liffreing

HP and General Mills say they will require agencies to meet diversity goals, signaling a shift in client involvement.

A lack of diversity has been plaguing ad agencies for years, and clients are no longer staying quiet about it. Two major advertisers are now demanding that agencies take immediate action, or risk losing their business.

Last Thursday, HP CMO Antonio Lucio sent a letter to HP’s five ad and PR agencies insisting that they improve the diversity of their workforces within the next 12 months, as first reported by The Wall Street Journal. Lucio’s letter called for agencies to increase the number of women and minorities in creative and strategy roles, with 50% of their workforce to be made up of women, to match HP’s own advertising department makeup.

“Including women and people of color in key roles is not only a values issue, but a significant business imperative,” Lucio said in the letter. Women buy 53% of personal computers and 45% of printers, Lucio told the Journal. HP’s three ad agencies, which includes Omnicom’s BBDO, Fred & Farid and Dentsu’s Gyro, have 30 days to submit a plan or face a possible rejection.

General Mills is also insisting on more diversity. Last week, the food giant announced that agencies competing for its creative business have to have a staff of at least 50% women and at least 20% of color, according to AdAge.

Karen Kahn, HP’s CCO, said the company is leaving the request open-ended, so agencies can decide how they will increase diversity themselves. But if an agency can’t change, Kahn said HP would stop working with it.

“We can’t control agencies, but [with] the kind of budgets we have in marketing and PR, we can influence with the spend we have,” Kahn told Campaign US sister publication PRWeek. “The best way we can have impact is to change ourselves and work with our agencies to change.” Kahn also noted that diversity is a “bigger issue” in the “creative world” than in PR.

Last week, conversations with HP’s agencies revealed that two of them already meet HP’s goals for female leadership. Women represent 50% of both Gyro’s and Fred & Farid’s senior teams, the agencies said on Friday.

“HP’s initiative is critical, timely and necessary,” said Christoph Becker, Gyro’s CEO and CCO, in an email. “Gyro, since day one, has embraced diversity on all fronts. We will continue to work to insure that our culture is as diverse as possible.”

“We admire and share his can-do, fix-it attitude, because we too are dissatisfied,” said Fred & Farid CEOs and founders Fred Raillard and Farid Mokart, in an email. “We started FRED & FARID because we couldn’t stand the old establishment and their reluctance to evolve. Diversity is part of our source code: we are ourselves from mixed backgrounds and we’ve promoted many women in key leadership roles.”

BBDO, on the other hand, is still working to meet HP’s expectations. “The pursuit of gender equality is something Antonio and I have discussed a lot over the years—and not just because of business. I have two daughters and he has five,” Andrew Robertson, BBDO’s CEO said in a statement. “He knows about BBDO’s commitment to double the number of female senior creative leaders we have in one year and obviously supports it. His initiative to formalize an action plan on his business is something we welcome.”

Nancy Hill, president and CEO of the 4A’s, praised both companies for taking a stand on an issue she’s long been vocal about. “I applaud both General Mills and HP. I’m very happy to see this happening. (Hopefully, they are doing the same thing themselves internally),” she said in an email.

“Diversity has been proven again and again to be good for business,” she continued. “Obviously, they both know this and have asked their agencies to reflect the diversity of the consumers they are selling to.”

Kat Gordon, founder of the 3% Conference, was in a celebratory mood following the announcements. “’Hallelujah!’ she wrote in an email. “This is exactly where the diversity conversation needs to be headed.”

The HP directive should not come as a total surprise, noted Gordon. In 2013, HP CEO Meg Whitman is said to have expressed outrage during an agency review after four shops in a row presented all-male leadership teams. “What is it about the advertising industry? Don’t you have any women leaders?” she said, according to people in the pitch.

Jonathan Mildenhall, CMO of Airbnb, who had expressed his approval online Friday, said in an email that it was “time for the client community to accelerate this issue not only the debate but also the action,” and praised his principal agencies, Starcom Worldwide and TBWA\CHIAT\DAY for putting women in leadership positions on Airbnb’s account.

“For me, my next focus is people of color,” he added. “Imagine the difference we could make if all clients mandated just one person of color to work on every client facing team. Just that single act would transform the industry forever for better.”

Brad Jakeman, president of global beverage group at Pepsico, also expressed his enthusiasm online.

Not everyone applauded the moves. On the r/Advertising subReddit, some users commenting on the General Mills story expressed disappointment that the industry was resorting to quotas.

“I hate quotas. As a creative of colour, I would find it soul-destroying to know that I had been hired not because the ECD thought my book was the best, but because he had a number to meet,” said one user.

That said, “agencies (and especially creative departments) have a diversity problem,” the commenter acknowledged, and something had to be done.

“So, while I’m not 100% sold on the execution, I like that the client is making diversity a financial issue for agencies, because we can make all the Gold Winning Like-A-Girl ads we want, but as Bill Bernbach once said “A principle is nothing until it costs you money,” the user wrote.

For months the agency business has been rocked by lawsuits and allegations against top executives for discriminating against women and minorities. In March, former CEO Gustavo Martinez, of WPP’s J. Walter Thompson, stepped down amid a harassment lawsuit. In June, RAPP CEO Alexei Orlov resigned after a lawsuit claimed he had shown discriminatory behavior against women and people of color. And at the end of July, Kevin Roberts resigned as Saatchi & Saatchi’s chairman and head coach at Publicis Groupe after the comments he made about women lacking ambition.

Though several brand marketers had expressed disgust over the comments and allegations in recent months, clients had largely remained silent till now. For example, aside from Macy’s handing its 2016 holiday campaign to Figliulo & Partners, JWT lost not a single client during the Martinez scandal, according to several WPP sources.

“Those paying the bill—clients—know what their customers look like and see the value of having diversity within their agency partners,” said Gordon. “The talent is there and agencies have historically done a poor job of tapping into it at the most senior levels. I’m excited to see the way messaging and consumer engagement will shift thanks to the involvement of more diverse perspectives.”

Despite already meeting HP’s new gender requirement, Raillard and Mokart said they planned to push their diversity initiatives further.

“Half of our global steering committee is now women, but we’ll not stop there: we want women to thrive at every levels of the company, and we want to coach the younger ones to climb faster,” they said.

13334: Obama’s Transformation.

Wow, the pressures of the presidency have taken their toll on Barack Obama—he’s been turned into an old White man.

13333: HP’s Privileged Pontification.

Advertising Age interviewed HP Chief Marketing and Communications Officer Antonio Lucio, covering the diverted diversity call to action for the White advertising agencies employed by his company. The discussion featured key comments worth scrutinizing.

Lucio explained the motivation behind his mandate via the following:

[HP is] about reinventing marketing and to do this we actually have to have a better representation of our customer base. You are learning about this now, but we’ve been working on this in our company for the last 12 months.

Wow, an entire year of wooing White women is impressive, especially when considering HP’s lead White advertising agency, BBDO, promised to address diversity 10 years ago—and has nothing of value to show for the efforts. Of course, that didn’t stop HP from hiring the diversity deficient dummies.

The following exchange is particularly disturbing:

Ad Age: How are you working toward more internal diversity with people of color?

Mr. Lucio: The single biggest opportunity around the world is female, so we decided to focus on that first. Within the U.S. and some countries we need to increase our representation of people of color and that will be our next phase.

Wow, Lucio might have delivered the smoothest dodge on true diversity to date. Too bad his statement isn’t really accurate. While women might outnumber men globally, people of color outnumber White people by a much higher margin. It could easily be argued that people of color represent the bigger opportunity around the world. To assign non-Whites to “our next phase” is ridiculous—especially for a corporation allegedly committed to diversity and inclusion.

The Lucio interview closed with the following statement:

It is right for our culture, it is right for society and right for my family as I am the father of five daughters.

Yes, and Lucio’s five daughters have a greater chance of landing jobs in the advertising industry than any person of color—even those non-Whites who are more qualified. Having personal incentives for embracing diversity is fine. But leaders like Lucio must remember their professional responsibilities too. Prioritizing initiatives with phases has resulted in minorities being phased out of the picture. Patronizing pontification about what is right for culture, society and family sounds culturally clueless when the historical actions and inactions have violated the rights of fellow citizens.

Q&A: HP’s Antonio Lucio on Why Diversity Matters

Tech CMO Explains His Call to Action for Agencies

By Adrianne Pasquarelli

After years of talk but very little progress, it seems marketers and agencies are finally taking solid steps toward diversity. Consider what happened with the space of a week: First, General Mills told Ad Age it is requiring the creative departments at the agencies participating in its review to be staffed by at least 50% women and 20% people of color.

Then, HP Chief Marketing Officer Antonio Lucio sent a memo to HP’s five advertising and marketing agency partners—Gyro, BBDO, Fred & Farid, FleishmanHillard, and Porter Novelli—asking for a commitment “to radically improve the percentage of women and people of color in leadership roles” in their organizations.

Mr. Lucio, who said HP is creating a scorecard to track its own efforts, expects agencies to deliver formal plans within 30 days and make good on such plans within 12 months, the memo read. Below, in an interview with Ad Age, he explains the reasoning behind his effort.

Ad Age: Why did you decide to send out this challenge to your agency partners?

Mr. Lucio: It is the right thing to do from a business standpoint, flat and simple. We are about reinventing marketing and to do this we actually have to have a better representation of our customer base. You are learning about this now, but we’ve been working on this in our company for the last 12 months.

Ad Age: HP is creating a scorecard to measure its own efforts. How does the company stack up so far?

Mr. Lucio: We believe that if we have a team of people representative of the client we service we are going to be able to be more successful. When you analyze our business, you see over 50% of the personal [computer] system side is driven by women; on the print [printer] side, 45% of the business is driven by women. You start with that premise, then begin to look at yourself—do we have the right team, the composition to be able to have the point of view of the clients we service? The answer at the time was no.

We are very well represented in terms of total female population—we have about 1,000 marketers around the world—55% of those are women. When you go into the manager level, the female composition is 43%--it’s higher than most companies, but not where it needs to be. Then my biggest problem was the top leadership marketing positions. I have 10 that report to me. At the time we started I only had two that were female—20%. To transform your marketing organization, it needs to start at the top level.

Ad Age: You now have women in 50% of your top marketing positions. How did that happen?

Mr. Lucio: You do not start with 10 empty chairs and then say ‘I’m going to have the best five guys and the best female executives and just hire them.’ You have people in place and you need to create change. We first analyzed the business strategy, then the capabilities we needed. We had to create capacity to put the right people in place. It took us 12 months to be able to identify the internal and external talent. I’ve been bothered by certain commentaries on Twitter where people question this, saying we focus too much on gender and diversity issues, what about capability? Capability is a given in all of this and the women I have working for me are the best, they just happen to be female.

Ad Age: How are you working toward more internal diversity with people of color?

Mr. Lucio: The single biggest opportunity around the world is female, so we decided to focus on that first. Within the U.S. and some countries we need to increase our representation of people of color and that will be our next phase.

Ad Age: How has the reaction been from the memo recipients?

Mr. Lucio: The reaction has been great. Sometimes our industry gets a bad rap, but my conversations were incredibly positive. They were excited and committed to respond to this memo the right way. People like BBDO were already making progress in this particular area.

Ad Age: Will agencies need to fulfill specific diversity quotas?

Mr. Lucio: They need to provide us a very detailed and specific plan to be delivered within 30 days. They know what I was able to achieve internally, which was 50%, so we are guiding them toward that reaction and giving them 12 months to implement it, which is how long it took me to achieve it.

Ad Age: Have you found that having less sameness and more variety can foster a company’s success?

Mr. Lucio: You have to come to one of my meetings—the level of conversations, the richness of diverse points of view—it just makes it more fun. It makes it a more argumentative meeting, but that’s how innovation and breakthrough ideas come along.

Ad Age: Do you think other marketers will implement similar requirements—we’ve already seen it with General Mills, for example?

Mr. Lucio: I hope so, but I own my own destiny; I am responsible for what I can impact. The first thing we did was put our house in order, the second thing was invite those partners we have to do the same. It is right for our culture, it is right for society and right for my family as I am the father of five daughters.

Monday, September 05, 2016

13332: Happy Labor Day, White People!

Advertising Age reported on a CareerBuilder study showing employment for marketing managers and market research analysts is on the rise, which means White people will continue to enjoy exclusive work privileges in adland. CareerBuilder identified technology and globalization as causing the boost in marketing jobs, and it’s a safe bet that nepotism and cronyism will accelerate the dearth of diversity. The Ad Age story featured a headline that declared, “Happy Labor Day! You’re In High Demand.” There should have been a qualifying subhead that read, “Unless You’re Not White.” Happy Labor Day indeed.

Happy Labor Day! You’re In High Demand

CareerBuilder Says Marketing Jobs Soar, Citing Tech and Globalization

By Jack Neff

There’s good news for marketers heading into Labor Day: They’re in demand and even on trend, according to CareerBuilder in its annual study.

An analysis by the job-search site finds marketing managers and market research analysts among the jobs employers are advertising and filling the most.

What’s driving the growth? CareerBuilder credits technology and globalization for the rise in marketing employment—which are two things many in the industry view as creating job losses broadly.

The data is collected and interpreted by CareerBuilder’s labor-market analysis firm Emsi based on data from 100 national and local employment resources, not just CareerBuilder’s online job posts.

Marketing managers are among the biggest beneficiaries of technology advancement, according to CareerBuilder, with their ranks having swelled by around 10% or 19,000 jobs to nearly 209,000 from 2012 to 2016.

According to CareerBuilder: “Technology has made advertising become more intuitive and effective based on ability to track and interpret online behavior.” It’s a statement that, while seemingly positive and innocuous, may come as a shock to an industry involved in nearly constant soul searching and hand wringing about how technology is disrupting its future.

Meanwhile, market-research analysts are benefiting from the globalization trend, according to CareerBuilder. Their ranks swelled even faster, up 15% or by nearly 68,000 jobs to 532,000 from 2012 to 2016. The firm attributes that to companies “looking to gain a greater understanding of the international market they’re targeting.”

Some of them may also be studying whether technology really has made advertising more intuitive and effective, or even why marketers are so worried even though their ranks are growing at a healthy clip.

While growth in the marketing fields was good, it wasn’t the best. Among job categories growing faster were software developers (up 17%) and wind turbine technicians (up 37%). Somebody’s got to create all the software the marketers use and keep the power on to run it.

13331: Telling Lies About Diversity.

Campaign published a pathetic perspective from Grace Blue Joint CEO Claire Telling, who suggested the drive for diversity should be a slow ride. First of all, Grace Blue is a global executive search firm specializing in securing candidates for communications, media and creative industries at senior management levels, which totally explains Telling’s asinine opinion. That is, Grace Blue is directly responsible for perpetuating the worldwide exclusivity in the advertising and marketing fields. Additionally, Telling’s professional background features working for White advertising agencies including DMB&B, BBDO, BBH and TBWA\Chiat, so she’s completely familiar with maintaining the predominately Caucasian status quo.

Telling opened by cautioning companies to avoid rash responses with “Band-Aid” hires. It’s ironic that she’d use such a metaphor, when a true diversity champion—Harry Webber—created the iconic “I Am Stuck on Band-Aid” campaign. But it’s more outrageous that a self-proclaimed top recruiter would think companies might respond rashly via hiring initiatives that should have already been moving forward for many decades.

The prudent solution, according to Telling, is to create a 10-year plan for inclusion. Again, Telling seems oblivious to the fact that certain U.S. companies promised to address the dearth of diversity 10 years ago. Technically, White advertising agencies have been spewing false promises since the Mad Men era. Recommending a long-term plan underscores the long-term lies. Hell, Telling makes the Leo Burnett prediction that equality in adland won’t happen until 2079 feel downright prophetic—and actually optimistic.

Telling insisted there’s a “dearth of diverse talent at the senior levels”—however, she failed to accept accountability for the alleged deficit. As a veteran of White advertising agencies and a current executive recruiter, Telling is an active member of the exclusionary White majority. Of course, Telling is completely ignorant regarding the available diverse talent at the senior levels. Qualified candidates of color are ready for anyone open-minded enough to seek them out. Unfortunately, the talent remains invisible to idiots like Telling.

Telling revealed, “Many agencies come to Grace Blue asking for diverse talent to fill senior roles, but they’re often using diversity as code for ‘women’ and not necessarily for diversity across ethnicity and age.” Great. There’s another blatant admission that White advertising agencies and recruiters are conspiring to promote White women under the guise of fostering inclusion.

Telling called on the entire industry to demonstrate bravery and honesty in facing the challenges of progress. Hey, based on viewing the Grace Blue leadership, she ought to start the revolution in her own hallways. Too bad Telling and her culturally clueless cronies represent the cowardly dishonesty that has kept diversity a dream deferred, delegated, diverted and denied.

To tackle the diversity issue, plan 10 years ahead

By Claire Telling

The matter is urgent, but rushing to diversify will only backfire, says the CEO of Grace Blue

The conversations around the diversity problem in our industry are not only inescapable — they’re now undeniable.

And nothing highlights that better than the fallout from recent high-profile missteps at agencies, which included issues around gender, ethnicity, and age. The conversations are valuable; as we turn up the temperature on these discussions, they’ll hopefully spur more industry players to take a harder look at their own operations and diversity efforts.

But a potentially negative side effect to publicly confronting the issue may cause some leaders to address diversity with haste and lack of strategy, assuming that they can put a Band-Aid on the problem with one or two visible hires.

But Band-Aids fall off. People leave. And short-term fixes aren’t systemic changes.

To make meaningful progress that’s not only smart for our businesses but also culturally significant, we have to start treating our efforts like a marathon. That means making both short and long-term decisions to put us in the best place we can be 10 years from now. There are several reasons for this, many of which I’ve encountered in my role consulting the industry on talent and its business impact.

Firstly, there’s a dearth of diverse talent at the senior level. And focusing attention only at the junior level ultimately won’t work.

Many agencies are making substantial efforts to drive diverse recruitment at the junior level, but retaining that talent is problematic. Diverse junior talent simply lacks the leaders to look up to, making it hard for them to see themselves in that place later on in their careers. Several agency CEOs have opened up to me about their well-intentioned efforts to attract a diverse audience of recent grads, but then many of those hires leave quickly for this reason. It’s frustrating for all concerned.

Continuing to recruit heavily at the junior level is important, but agencies must give even more immediate attention to hiring at a senior level.

Studies prove a diverse work culture helps generate dynamic ideas that drive growth — and part of that idea generation comes from diverse leaders at the top fostering the next generation of fresh thinkers.

We know it can be difficult to find diverse senior people. If this is the case, and you feel the need to look outside our industry, there are other sectors to consider. In particular, look at ex-military; their leadership, teamwork and problem-solving skills have been finely-tuned; Or, look at leaders who come from the client-side or management consultants.

Championing bravery is important — and we have work to do on that front. That’s part of the reason why there isn’t enough diverse talent at the senior level yet. Many agencies come to Grace Blue asking for diverse talent to fill senior roles, but they’re often using diversity as code for “women” and not necessarily for diversity across ethnicity and age.

This is not because agency leadership is shortsighted; rather, it’s indicative of widespread discomfort in talking about complex issues of race, sexual orientation, gender and age discrimination, to name a few.

We have to acknowledge where we’re falling short. We have to own what we lack. And the onus shouldn’t be on the Chief Diversity Officers — everyone from the CCO to the Head of Accounts should be leading frank discussions across departments. These leaders must open up about their own internal struggles; if they’re putting initiatives in place to combat the problem, they should share the success stories. And if they’ve hired capable, diverse candidates only to see them leave after a short time, they need to understand why. Only then will we begin to see more organizations take off the kid gloves and have honest conversations.

We need to create a culture of sharing. Much is written about creating an agency culture that is founded on inclusion, not exclusion. But how can we build that culture if we don’t understand the talent that’s living in it?

This is not a movement that starts just at the top, it has to happen at all peer levels. Even if it exposes certain biases, leaders need to create an open forum that fosters conversation on all sides that is personal and real.

The goal is to make honesty the norm — whether it’s opening up about small day-to-day challenges, or talking about specific instances of discrimination. Or simply encourage people to challenge management and ask for more responsibilities and promotions.

We have to stop treating diversity like a problem. Instead, it’s one of the biggest opportunities in our industry. It will make agency cultures and our product better and more representative of the world in which we’re living.

My recommendation? Develop a brave, long-term strategy that addresses diversity in all of its forms, and make all your leaders responsible starting now. Progress might happen faster than you think.

Sunday, September 04, 2016

13330: Miami Ad School’s Diverted Diversity.

This patronizing pap from Miami Ad School in India is messed up on so many levels. First, it appears that the students are being taught to embrace diverted diversity versus true diversity, which is downright criminal. Plus, it’s obscenely ironic that the White women being defended in the video will land advertising agency jobs more easily than the student creators—at least in the U.K. and U.S. Second, why are students in India working on projects for American products with imagery like the New York City Marathon? Are the students being told that White advertising is the gold standard? Third, it’s pathetic for folks from India to be lecturing on gender equality when the country struggles with skin-tone bias, domestic violence and rape. Oh, and the overwhelming majority of the idiots responsible for the Always video are men.

Saturday, September 03, 2016

13329: HP Diverted Diversity BS.

Adweek reported HP Chief Marketing and Communications Officer Antonio Lucio is demanding that his White advertising agencies embrace diverted diversity within a year—with proposals for action plans due within 30 days. “We are more likely to create solutions that amaze our customers if our workforce represents the communities we serve,” wrote Lucio. “As a global company, we need to take a broad view of diversity, as increased representation will take different forms in different countries. We have decided to start by addressing women.” Huh? When Lucio declared the need to take a broad view of diversity, he really meant broad. People of color can continue to wait in line behind White women at Madison Avenue—and at HP too, based on peeking at the Executive Team. Hell, even the only Nigro in the group is a White man. The HP tagline reads, “Keep reinventing.” Sorry, but Lucio isn’t reinventing anything; rather, he’s repeating, regurgitating and recycling everything that ultimately represses true diversity.

HP Calls on All of Its Agencies to Improve Leadership Diversity Within a Year

BBDO, Gyro and others have 30 days to submit proposals

By Katie Richards

HP chief marketing and communications officer Antonio Lucio has called on all of its agencies to put forward a proposal outlining how each agency will improve on the number of women and people of color within their creative departments.

In the letter, dated Aug. 30, Lucio notes that he has already spoken with each of HP’s agency partners and briefed them on what’s to come. Within the next 30 days, each agency must submit a formal plan outlining how it will improve diversity numbers. The expectation is that within 12 months each agency will have accomplished the goals put forth in those plans.

“Including women and people of color in key roles is not only a values issue, but a significant business imperative,” Lucio writes.

“We are more likely to create solutions that amaze our customers if our workforce represents the communities we serve. As a global company, we need to take a broad view of diversity, as increased representation will take different forms in different countries. We have decided to start by addressing women,” he added.

HP will also be participating in this larger effort to add more women and people of color to its staff by creating scorecards that will help the brand measure its own diversity numbers throughout the organization. “We are far from perfect, and I know there will be challenges, but I am committed to immediate, global, impact, rigorously measuring our performance and being transparent about the gaps to overcome. I am asking the same of each of you,” Lucio said.

The move from HP comes just a few days after General Mills chief marketing officer Ann Simonds announced that any agency working with a General Mills brands must prove that their creative department is comprised of at least 50 percent women and 20 percent people of color.

Unlike General Mills, HP did not disclose any particular percentage that it is hoping for within its advertising partners. Rather, the letter is a call to action for each agency to make a change, and actually begin to make that change rather than simply talking about it.

“We owe this to ourselves, to each other and to future generations. By making the important and necessary changes today, together we can bend the arc of history in favor of inclusion and opportunity. Now comes the proof of our commitment,” he added.

HP currently works with agencies including BBDO, FleishmanHillard, Gyro, Fred & Farid and Porter Novelli. BBDO worldwide president and CEO Andrew Robertson expressed his commitment to the idea saying, “the pursuit of gender equality is something Antonio and I have discussed a lot over the years, and not just because of business. I have two daughters and he has five. He knows about BBDO’s commitment to double the number of female senior creative leaders we have in one year and obviously supports it. His initiative to formalize an action plan on his business is something we welcome.”

Take a look at the full call to action [above].

Friday, September 02, 2016

13328: Is Wendy Clark A McHypocrite?

Advertising Age and Business Insider added to the Mickey D’s PR hype, with DDB Worldwide President and CEO of North America Wendy Clark babbling about McBabel—the wondrous-yet-undefined “Agency of the Future” handcrafted to save the Golden Arches.

“…We worked Mother’s Day. We worked Father’s Day,” bragged/whined Clark about the pitch that won the business. “Almost all of the team missed Cannes. So many vacations were postponed.” Yes, it’s nice to know McBabel will be a Mom-unfriendly and Dad-unfriendly sweatshop. That should go over well with any typical Millennials—as well as any lazy Boomers—ultimately employed by the firm. As for missing out on the highly exclusive jaunt to the French Riviera, oh, the humanity!

Mickey D’s “is one of the most democratic and inclusive brands in the world,” gushed Clark. “McDonald’s is for everybody. It’s not exclusionary. It has a broad expanse around the world, availability, value, affordability—you have the ability to have good food at a reasonable price around the corner from you. The brand doesn’t distinguish and hold itself just for small groups. That’s something I love about the brand. They are very clear on what their brand is, and it’s a wonderful thing to have a brand that has that legacy.”

Okey-doke. It will be interesting to see whether or not the restless diversity champion—along with John Wren, Omnicom’s resident Pioneer of Diversity—make good on their vows when erecting McBabel. If the “Agency of the Future” is indeed being built from scratch, it should be easy to incorporate futuristic hiring practices to ensure the staff reflects the democratic and inclusive Mickey D’s audience. Why, it’s the perfect opportunity to bake digital, data and diversity into the core of the company. It’s also the perfect opportunity for Clark and Wren to demonstrate they’re not lying, hypocritical dinosaurs. The next 120 days will reveal the truth.

Thursday, September 01, 2016

13327: Quotas & Quotes.

AgencySpy posted on the General Mills account review—which features diversity requirements for the competing White advertising agencies—with a headline reading, “General Mills Insists That Its Future Agencies Meet Specific Diversity Quotas.” The tone of the headline and the integration of the term “quotas” was enough to inspire over 75 comments to date. It’s a collection of cultural cluelessness, vividly exposing the ignorance killing inclusion.

Given the drive for diversity that has accelerated over the past decade, White advertising agencies should be capable of meeting General Mills’ mandates—and the agencies should be fully aware of the makeup of their staffs. Indeed, the holding companies are keeping records, although there is a continued refusal to publicly disclose the data. Most White advertising agencies have even made open commitments to diversity and inclusion. The figures sought by the cereal maker do not exceed the goals of the average White shop. So what’s the problem with General Mills’ request?

General Mills isn’t the only client to ask to see the diversity of its advertising agencies. Multicultural shops are routinely scrutinized like this. Clients judge these crumb-collecting companies by their “authenticity”—which is a polite way to say the staffs at such agencies are expected to be majority minority. Plus, minority ownership is an important expectation of the scheme. These shops are typically required to show their diversity supplier figures too, and are often mandated to use minority vendors. And of course, the work produced by multicultural shops must be blatantly targeted, often to the point of being stereotypical.

In short, it’s about time clients scrutinized the diversity of all its partners. And it’s well beyond time for White advertising agencies to deliver on diversity. Why would anyone want to team up with a company that doesn’t keep its promises?